pgsql.hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: code coverage patch

Subject: Re: code coverage patch
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:00:21 +0300
Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers


Korry Douglas wrote:
1) Use bison's -o option to put the output file in the right place directly,
if we are dealing with bison (and don't bother to support code coverage
analysis with other yaccs), or

2) Run a pattern replacement across the grammar output files as their are
renamed.

Why not use the %output directive in the grammar file instead; that way you don't need to add any special flags to the Makefile.

I think only bison supports that directive.

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy