pgsql.hackers (date)

pgsql.hackers (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

July 31, 2008

Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Tom Lane, 17:23
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Alvaro Herrera, 17:08
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Alvaro Herrera, 16:43
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Robert Lor, 16:21
Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys, David Fetter, 16:06
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Kris Jurka, 15:45
Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys, Tom Lane, 15:10
Re: Creating Universal OSX binaries, Tom Lane, 14:39
Creating Universal OSX binaries, Bruce Momjian, 14:28
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, David Fetter, 14:23
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Alvaro Herrera, 14:20
Re: Plans for 8.4, "Henry B. Hotz", 14:14
Re: Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys, David Fetter, 14:02
compilig libpq with borland 5.5, "claudio lezcano", 13:52
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 13:42
Fixing DISTINCT ON for duplicate keys, Tom Lane, 13:38
Re: pg_regress inputdir, Alvaro Herrera, 13:25
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, "Hitoshi Harada", 13:13
Re: pg_regress inputdir, Alvaro Herrera, 13:13
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, David Fetter, 12:34
Re: Dumping datconfig, Magnus Hagander, 11:09
Re: Plans for 8.4, Magnus Hagander, 10:58
Dumping datconfig, Magnus Hagander, 10:54
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, "Hitoshi Harada", 10:00
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Andrew Sullivan, 04:39
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Dimitri Fontaine, 03:49
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 03:07
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, David Fetter, 02:53
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, "Hitoshi Harada", 01:46
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, David Fetter, 01:33
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, "Hitoshi Harada", 01:12
opportunity for time on large itanium system, "Mark Wong", 00:08

July 30, 2008

Re: Plans for 8.4, Tom Lane, 22:59
Re: Plans for 8.4, Stephen Frost, 22:48
Re: Plans for 8.4, "Henry B. Hotz", 22:15
Re: Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS, Tom Lane, 19:27
Re: printing raw parse tree, Tom Lane, 19:11
Re: printing raw parse tree, Tatsuo Ishii, 18:57
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Tom Lane, 18:13
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Alvaro Herrera, 18:07
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Gregory Stark, 18:01
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Tom Lane, 17:29
Re: Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Gregory Stark, 17:19
Re: Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS, daveg, 16:38
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 16:11
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 16:10
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 15:58
Should creating a new base type require superuser status?, Tom Lane, 15:50
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 14:27
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 14:26
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 14:09
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "Kevin Grittner", 13:55
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 13:42
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 13:34
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, "Pavel Stehule", 11:17
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "Ryan Bradetich", 11:11
Re: printing raw parse tree, Tom Lane, 10:56
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 10:50
Re: pg_regress inputdir, Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway, 10:47
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Hannu Krosing, 10:30
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 10:25
Re: pg_regress inputdir, Alvaro Herrera, 10:14
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Gregory Stark, 06:08
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 06:05
Re: pg_regress inputdir, Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway, 04:35
printing raw parse tree, Tatsuo Ishii, 04:29
Re: about postgres-r setup., leiyonghua, 04:26
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging, Markus Wanner, 04:07
Re: about postgres-r setup., Markus Wanner, 03:56
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 03:49
Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 03:45
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "Ryan Bradetich", 03:24
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, "Pavel Stehule", 02:40
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Hannu Krosing, 02:19
http://www.net4manpower.com looking for web developer, batista, 01:34
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, "Pavel Stehule", 01:29
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Robert Lor, 00:34
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, David Fetter, 00:21

July 29, 2008

modifying views, "Robert Haas", 22:12
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 19:53
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 19:45
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 19:22
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 18:35
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2, Jan Urbański, 18:17
Re: about postgres-r setup., Markus Wanner, 18:14
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 18:06
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 17:33
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 17:15
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 17:00
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 16:24
Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types, Tom Lane, 16:12
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, David Fetter, 15:24
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Zdenek Kotala, 15:19
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Tom Lane, 15:15
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Zdenek Kotala, 15:12
Type Categories for User-Defined Types, "David E. Wheeler", 14:53
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 14:41
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, "Robert Haas", 14:21
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 14:03
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 14:01
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Andrew Dunstan, 13:23
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Hannu Krosing, 13:10
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Greg Smith, 13:03
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 12:59
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, "Asko Oja", 12:48
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Tom Lane, 12:46
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Hannu Krosing, 12:27
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Tom Lane, 12:24
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 12:09
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 11:58
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Gregory Stark, 11:48
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, Tom Lane, 11:08
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Tom Lane, 10:56
Re: pg_regress inputdir, Alvaro Herrera, 10:43
Location of ident code, Magnus Hagander, 10:41
Re: Relicensed and downloadable (Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?), "Stephen R. van den Berg", 10:03
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Zdenek Kotala, 09:26
pg_regress inputdir, Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway, 09:16
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, Stephen Frost, 09:11
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, Stephen Frost, 09:03
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, "Robert Haas", 08:31
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, Peter Eisentraut, 08:25
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2], KaiGai Kohei, 08:24
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Peter Eisentraut, 08:21
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 07:24
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, Stephen Frost, 07:08
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, "Asko Oja", 06:56
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Gregory Stark, 06:56
Relicensed and downloadable (Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?), "Stephen R. van den Berg", 06:55
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, "Asko Oja", 06:52
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 06:12
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Peter Eisentraut, 04:41
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, Peter Eisentraut, 04:03
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2, "Heikki Linnakangas", 04:01
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Peter Eisentraut, 03:58
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Peter Eisentraut, 03:53
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search, Jan Urbański, 03:27
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search, "Heikki Linnakangas", 03:23
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, "Pavel Stehule", 02:42
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, tomas, 02:05
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Robert Lor, 01:23

July 28, 2008

Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 21:31
Re: window function v03 against HEAD, David Fetter, 21:24
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 20:49
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Gierth, 20:13
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Tom Lane, 20:06
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Robert Lor, 19:54
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Robert Lor, 19:39
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tom Lane, 19:18
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Robert Lor, 19:17
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Tom Lane, 19:13
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Dunstan, 19:09
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tom Lane, 19:04
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Gregory Stark, 18:54
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 18:48
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Martijn van Oosterhout, 18:24
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Dawid Kuroczko", 18:16
Re: CVS Head psql bug?, "Guillaume Smet", 18:12
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Gierth, 17:39
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Decibel!, 17:29
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 17:04
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Martijn van Oosterhout, 16:40
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Gregory Stark, 16:30
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Francisco Figueiredo Jr.", 16:22
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Andrew Dunstan, 16:05
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 15:49
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Andrew Dunstan, 15:42
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Gierth, 15:35
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 15:29
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tom Lane, 15:15
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Gierth, 14:57
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tom Lane, 14:49
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Andrew Garner", 14:36
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 14:29
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "A.M.", 14:24
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Dave Cramer, 13:54
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Gierth, 13:39
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 13:27
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tom Lane, 13:06
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Joshua D. Drake", 13:00
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Marko Kreen", 12:48
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 12:45
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tom Lane, 12:44
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Gregory Stark, 12:33
Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:19
dblink security, "Marko Kreen", 12:16
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Andrew Dunstan, 12:01
Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode, Greg Smith, 11:59
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?, "Hiroshi Saito", 11:57
Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm, Tom Lane, 11:56
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?, "Marko Kreen", 11:51
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?, "Hiroshi Saito", 11:31
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Gierth, 11:20
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Asko Oja", 11:11
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tom Lane, 10:56
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Tom Lane, 10:16
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Zdenek Kotala, 10:13
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Gierth, 10:06
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, "Robert Haas", 09:32
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?, "Marko Kreen", 09:03
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?, "Marko Kreen", 08:41
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Dave Cramer, 07:53
Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows, Magnus Hagander, 07:49
gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2, Jan Urbański, 07:34
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Zdenek Kotala, 07:32
about postgres-r setup., leiyonghua, 06:41
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Zdenek Kotala, 06:27
window function v03 against HEAD, "H.Harada", 06:25
Re: Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ?, Bjorn Munch, 06:00
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 04:35
Re: patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, Zdenek Kotala, 04:17
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tatsuo Ishii, 03:29
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, "Pavel Stehule", 02:55

July 27, 2008

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump additional options for performance, daveg, 21:32
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 15:00
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tatsuo Ishii, 04:47

July 26, 2008

Re: Regd: TODO Item : Have EXPLAIN ANALYZE issue NOTICE messages ..., "Ramya Chandrasekar", 23:45
Re: Search for version-numbered tclsh?, Andrew Dunstan, 23:03
Search for version-numbered tclsh?, Tom Lane, 20:28
Re: Auto-explain patch, Tom Lane, 19:44
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Tom Lane, 19:09
patch: Add a separate TRUNCATE permission, "Robert Haas", 17:44
Re: [HACKERS] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Andrew Gierth, 16:05
Re: pg_dump(all) library, Andrew Dunstan, 13:44
Re: Executor question, Tom Lane, 13:20
Re: pg_dump(all) library, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:59
Re: pg_dump(all) library, Tom Lane, 12:46
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Kenneth Marshall, 12:06
Executor question, Andrew Gierth, 11:19
Re: pg_dump(all) library, Stephen Frost, 11:13
pg_dump(all) library, David Fetter, 11:09
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Andrew Dunstan, 10:50
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Simon Riggs, 10:22
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Andrew Dunstan, 09:08
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Simon Riggs, 08:28
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Andrew Dunstan, 07:47
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Gregory Stark, 06:29
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Simon Riggs, 05:35
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Simon Riggs, 05:09
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Simon Riggs, 05:08
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Markus Wanner, 04:17
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Tom Lane, 01:38
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Ron Mayer, 01:27
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Tom Lane, 00:03

July 25, 2008

Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Ryan Bradetich", 23:50
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Ryan Bradetich", 23:41
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Alvaro Herrera, 22:36
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Tom Lane, 20:44
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Alvaro Herrera, 20:37
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, daveg, 20:33
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Tom Lane, 20:26
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Alvaro Herrera, 20:15
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, "Joshua D. Drake", 19:35
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, "Jonah H. Harris", 19:31
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Gregory Stark, 18:17
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Gregory Stark, 18:10
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 16:33
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Dann Corbit", 16:29
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Andrew Dunstan, 16:28
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Ron Mayer, 16:18
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Dann Corbit", 16:14
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Andrew Dunstan, 16:11
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Dann Corbit", 16:06
Re: Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ?, "Dann Corbit", 15:56
Re: Additional psql requirements, Tom Lane, 15:54
Re: Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ?, Tom Lane, 15:51
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, "Joshua D. Drake", 15:38
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Tom Lane, 15:32
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Simon Riggs, 15:26
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, "Manoel Henrique", 15:05
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Simon Riggs, 14:33
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?, "Hiroshi Saito", 13:57
Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Tom Lane, 13:31
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 13:26
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?, Andrew Dunstan, 13:25
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Alvaro Herrera, 13:24
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Kevin Grittner", 13:20
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Simon Riggs, 13:09
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Alvaro Herrera, 12:44
Re: Column level privileges was:(Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences), "Jaime Casanova", 12:30
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Gregory Stark, 12:28
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?, "Hiroshi Saito", 12:25
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Alvaro Herrera, 11:42
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Ryan Bradetich", 11:25
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Ryan Bradetich", 11:23
Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump, Simon Riggs, 11:19
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Alvaro Herrera, 10:42
[patch] gsoc, improving hash index v2, "Xiao Meng", 10:26
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Joshua D. Drake", 10:03
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Peter Eisentraut, 08:14
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Gregory Stark, 06:57
Re: Column level privileges was:(Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences), Stephen Frost, 05:51
Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 04:57
Re: Additional psql requirements, Simon Riggs, 04:57
Whence cometh the data in src/test/regress/data/streets.data ?, Bjorn Munch, 04:50
Re: Additional psql requirements, "Dave Page", 04:40
Re: Additional psql requirements, "Pavel Stehule", 04:36
Re: Additional psql requirements, "Dave Page", 04:31
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Zdenek Kotala, 04:09
Re: Additional psql requirements, "Pavel Stehule", 03:57
Re: Additional psql requirements, daveg, 03:52
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Teodor Sigaev, 03:48
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Zdenek Kotala, 03:45
Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE, Simon Riggs, 03:40
Re: pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers, Simon Riggs, 03:24
Re: Additional psql requirements, Simon Riggs, 03:16
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Asko Oja", 02:37
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Ryan Bradetich", 01:46
Column level privileges was:(Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences), "Jaime Casanova", 01:38
Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support., Tom Lane, 01:10
[RFC] Unsigned integer support., "Ryan Bradetich", 00:20
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Josh Tolley", 00:17

July 24, 2008

Re: Additional psql requirements, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 21:00
Re: pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers, Stephen Frost, 20:46
Re: pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers, Andrew Dunstan, 19:33
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 19:19
pg_dump vs data-only dumps vs --disable-triggers, Tom Lane, 19:11
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Robert Haas", 17:56
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 16:37
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 16:30
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Hannu Krosing, 15:31
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Teodor Sigaev, 15:24
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 14:29
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Teodor Sigaev, 14:25
So, what's the "base dn" in an LDAP URL again?, Tom Lane, 14:19
Re: [DOCS] [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax, "Joshua D. Drake", 14:02
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 13:20
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, Tom Lane, 13:09
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 13:01
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, "Jaime Casanova", 12:17
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Theo Schlossnagle, 12:15
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:06
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Hannu Krosing, 12:01
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Teodor Sigaev, 11:53
Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE, Tom Lane, 11:41
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Hannu Krosing, 11:38
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03, Zdenek Kotala, 11:11
Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE, Simon Riggs, 11:11
Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE, Tom Lane, 10:30
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Hannu Krosing, 10:25
Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows, "Hiroshi Saito", 10:03
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, "Jonah H. Harris", 09:53
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, Simon Riggs, 09:06
Re: Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE, Simon Riggs, 08:33
Uncopied parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 06:09
Additional psql requirements, Simon Riggs, 05:52
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Marko Kreen", 05:20
Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows, Martin Zaun, 04:30
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, Jeroen Vermeulen, 03:53
Re: PostgreSQL extensions packaging, Dimitri Fontaine, 03:51
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Peter Eisentraut, 03:45
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging, Markus Wanner, 03:44
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Peter Eisentraut, 03:43
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Martijn van Oosterhout, 02:32
Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows, Tom Lane, 02:05
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, Tom Lane, 01:49

July 23, 2008

Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows, Andrew Dunstan, 23:16
issues/experience with building postgres on Windows, Martin Zaun, 22:07
Re: PostgreSQL extensions packaging, "Tom Dunstan", 21:32
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723, Tatsuo Ishii, 21:19
Re: PostgreSQL extensions packaging, "Tom Dunstan", 19:40
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, "Dann Corbit", 18:50
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 17:26
PostgreSQL extensions packaging, Dimitri Fontaine, 17:08
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging, Tom Lane, 16:51
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, "Manoel Henrique", 16:47
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Alvaro Herrera, 16:44
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Oleg Bartunov, 16:28
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging, Markus Wanner, 16:26
Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, "Dann Corbit", 16:23
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Tom Lane, 16:20
Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization, "Manoel Henrique", 16:16
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 16:08
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Dimitri Fontaine, 15:01
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Zdenek Kotala, 15:01
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Zdenek Kotala, 14:57
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Zdenek Kotala, 14:55
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Marko Kreen", 13:54
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging, Markus Wanner, 13:36
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Matthew T. O'Connor", 13:33
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Peter Eisentraut, 13:08
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 12:38
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, "Sushant Sinha", 12:17
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 12:05
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Peter Eisentraut, 12:02
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Kenneth Marshall, 11:56
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 11:46
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Tom Lane, 11:43
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Tom Lane, 11:19
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Zdenek Kotala, 11:13
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 11:05
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging, Tom Lane, 11:01
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, "Marko Kreen", 10:59
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Tom Lane, 10:50
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Peter Eisentraut, 10:43
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Tom Lane, 10:36
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Peter Eisentraut, 10:14
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Teodor Sigaev, 09:39
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Oleg Bartunov, 07:44
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Teodor Sigaev, 07:36
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging, Markus Wanner, 06:31
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 05:56
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 05:48
Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging, Alexey Klyukin, 05:41
Postgres-R: internal messaging, Markus Wanner, 03:17
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Simon Riggs, 03:07
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Markus Wanner, 02:08
Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization, Markus Wanner, 01:42
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Joshua D. Drake", 00:47
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 00:01

July 22, 2008

Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Joshua D. Drake", 23:47
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Dann Corbit", 23:36
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 23:29
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 23:26
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Xiao Meng", 22:57
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Xiao Meng", 22:57
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Jens-Wolfhard Schicke, 20:49
Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization, Decibel!, 19:09
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Simon Riggs, 19:08
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, "Marko Kreen", 18:39
Re: Plans for 8.4, Simon Riggs, 18:18
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Simon Riggs, 18:15
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Joshua D. Drake", 18:02
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 17:54
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Joshua D. Drake", 17:44
Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization, Markus Wanner, 17:43
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 17:36
Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Markus Wanner, 17:35
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 17:24
Re: Plans for 8.4, Markus Wanner, 17:08
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Josh Berkus, 17:06
Re: Plans for 8.4, Tom Lane, 16:54
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, "David E. Wheeler", 16:54
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Tom Lane, 16:49
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 16:33
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Simon Riggs, 15:51
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 15:01
Transaction-controlled robustness for replication, Simon Riggs, 14:56
Re: phrase search, Teodor Sigaev, 14:42
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Shane Ambler, 14:34
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Teodor Sigaev, 14:24
Re: Plans for 8.4, Simon Riggs, 14:23
Re: Plans for 8.4, Simon Riggs, 14:13
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Simon Riggs, 14:00
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 13:50
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Tom Lane, 13:35
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Tom Lane, 13:26
Re: Plans for 8.4, "David E. Wheeler", 13:23
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Teodor Sigaev, 13:22
Slony-I playing with system catalog, chris, 13:16
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Alvaro Herrera, 13:15
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Zdenek Kotala, 13:03
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 12:59
Re: Plans for 8.4, Markus Wanner, 12:37
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Zdenek Kotala, 12:36
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:26
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Andrew Dunstan, 12:25
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Dimitri Fontaine, 12:21
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 12:08
Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements, Tom Lane, 12:03
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Simon Riggs, 11:58
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 11:47
Plans for 8.4, Simon Riggs, 11:35
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Tom Lane, 11:25
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Zdenek Kotala, 11:25
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Gregory Stark, 11:00
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Tom Lane, 10:55
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Christopher Browne, 10:54
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Tom Lane, 10:53
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 10:50
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Zdenek Kotala, 10:42
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Andrew Sullivan, 10:39
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Tom Lane, 10:34
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Zdenek Kotala, 10:32
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "Dave Page", 09:47
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Gregory Stark, 09:39
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 08:43
Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Zdenek Kotala, 08:21
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, "Jonah H. Harris", 07:28
pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10, Zdenek Kotala, 06:57
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Peter Eisentraut, 05:48
Re: overlaps performance, Gregory Stark, 05:15
Postgres-R: tuple serialization, Markus Wanner, 04:04
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Martijn van Oosterhout, 02:33
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, "Matthew T. O'Connor", 00:31

July 21, 2008

Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Owen Hartnett, 23:53
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, "Jonah H. Harris", 22:51
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, Tom Lane, 22:19
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, "Jonah H. Harris", 21:39
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Tom Lane, 21:32
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, "Jonah H. Harris", 21:29
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, Tom Lane, 19:59
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, Tom Lane, 19:38
Re: Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, Alvaro Herrera, 18:15
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, Andrew Sullivan, 18:13
Concurrent VACUUM and ANALYZE, "Jonah H. Harris", 17:50
Re: typedefs for indent, Andrew Dunstan, 17:27
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, Decibel!, 16:58
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Dave Cramer, 16:55
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 16:38
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 16:37
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Andrew Sullivan, 16:28
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 16:21
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Andrew Dunstan, 16:19
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 16:18
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 16:17
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Marc Munro, 16:17
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, "David E. Wheeler", 16:14
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Tom Lane, 16:07
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, Andrew Sullivan, 15:59
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Josh Berkus, 15:53
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Robert Lor, 15:47
Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?, Tom Lane, 15:43
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, "David E. Wheeler", 14:55
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit, Cédric Villemain, 12:50
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit, "Heikki Linnakangas", 12:14
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit, Cédric Villemain, 12:07
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Tom Lane, 11:27
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit, "Heikki Linnakangas", 11:23
Re: overlaps performance, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz, 11:09
Re: Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit, Tom Lane, 11:02
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Markus Wanner, 10:55
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, chris, 10:45
Re: overlaps performance, Tom Lane, 10:44
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721, "Pavel Stehule", 10:41
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Tom Lane, 10:31
Re: overlaps performance, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz, 10:29
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721, Tatsuo Ishii, 10:22
Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0721, Markus Wanner, 10:14
Re: overlaps performance, Gregory Stark, 09:46
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the, Markus Wanner, 07:33
overlaps performance, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz, 07:08
Default of max_stack_depth and getrlimit, "Heikki Linnakangas", 04:53
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 04:40
Re: TODO item: Have psql show current values for a sequence, Tom Lane, 01:38

July 20, 2008

Any reason not to return row_count in cursor of plpgsql?, laser, 21:39
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), "Radek Strnad", 21:15
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717, Tatsuo Ishii, 21:13
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717, David Fetter, 20:00
Re: CommitFest dragging?, Josh Berkus, 18:38
Re: CommitFest dragging?, Andrew Chernow, 18:20
Re: CommitFest dragging?, Tom Lane, 15:05
Re: CommitFest dragging?, "Joshua D. Drake", 13:22
CommitFest dragging?, Josh Berkus, 13:17
Re: temp table problem, Tom Lane, 12:04
Re: temp table problem, "Heikki Linnakangas", 11:27
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin, Tom Lane, 09:48
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin, Peter Eisentraut, 03:50
Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands, Bruce Momjian, 02:08
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin, Tom Lane, 01:36

July 19, 2008

Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Alvaro Herrera, 20:21
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin, Peter Eisentraut, 19:42
Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands, Peter Eisentraut, 19:16
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin, "Florian G. Pflug", 13:00
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin, Tom Lane, 12:39
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 11:54
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 11:52
Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search, Jan Urbański, 08:40
Re: Getting to universal binaries for Darwin, Adriaan van Os, 07:35
gsoc, oprrest function for text search, Jan Urbański, 07:15
Re: phrase search, Oleg Bartunov, 03:41
Re: phrase search, Sushant Sinha, 00:30

July 18, 2008

Getting to universal binaries for Darwin, Tom Lane, 23:28
Re: temp table problem, "Robert Haas", 22:13
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, "Gurjeet Singh", 21:39
Re: temp table problem, Tom Lane, 21:11
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Kenneth Marshall, 16:58
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, Tom Lane, 16:42
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Kenneth Marshall, 13:23
Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands, Bruce Momjian, 13:20
Re: typedefs for indent, Bruce Momjian, 13:16
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 13:12
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, "David E. Wheeler", 12:53
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Alvaro Herrera, 12:30
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Tom Lane, 12:23
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 12:08
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, "Marko Kreen", 12:01
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 11:48
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 11:47
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 11:41
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Gregory Stark, 11:15
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Tom Lane, 11:06
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Tom Lane, 10:55
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Jonah H. Harris", 10:53
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Gregory Stark, 10:52
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, chris, 10:48
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Heikki Linnakangas", 10:44
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, David Fetter, 10:18
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, David Fetter, 09:45
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Alvaro Herrera, 09:42
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 09:04
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Simon Riggs, 06:35
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Gregory Stark, 06:07
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, Michael Paesold, 04:39
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, "Marko Kreen", 04:22
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Simon Riggs, 03:52
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, Andrew Sullivan, 02:23
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, "Pavel Stehule", 02:01
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Tom Lane, 01:37
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Jonah H. Harris", 01:21
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Tom Lane, 01:19
Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, "Pavel Stehule", 01:13
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, "Gurjeet Singh", 01:11
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Tom Lane, 01:00
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, Andrew Sullivan, 00:51
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, Tom Lane, 00:46
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, "Gurjeet Singh", 00:45
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, "Gurjeet Singh", 00:35
Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, Tom Lane, 00:28
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display., Tom Lane, 00:22

July 17, 2008

Re: Load spikes on 8.1.11, "Gurjeet Singh", 23:57
Load spikes on 8.1.11, "Gurjeet Singh", 23:46
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display., Alvaro Herrera, 23:35
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display., Bruce Momjian, 22:20
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Sushant Sinha, 21:16
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Jonah H. Harris", 20:40
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, David Fetter, 20:10
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Dann Corbit", 19:37
TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql, Tom Lane, 19:13
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Simon Riggs, 19:09
Patch to eliminate duplicate b64 code from pgcrypto, Marc Munro, 18:52
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Tom Lane, 18:28
Re: ecpg generated files ignorable?, Alvaro Herrera, 17:18
Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer, Alvaro Herrera, 17:03
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Kenneth Marshall, 17:01
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Jonah H. Harris", 16:24
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 14:47
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Alvaro Herrera, 14:11
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Kenneth Marshall, 14:02
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Jonah H. Harris", 14:00
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Kenneth Marshall, 13:54
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Jonah H. Harris", 13:48
Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer, Alvaro Herrera, 13:17
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, "David E. Wheeler", 13:07
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, Alvaro Herrera, 12:42
Re: postmaster.pid not visible, Decibel!, 12:19
Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer, Tom Lane, 11:55
Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer, Alvaro Herrera, 11:49
Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer, Alvaro Herrera, 11:48
Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches, chris, 11:01
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add column storage type to psql \d+ display., Alvaro Herrera, 10:39
Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving, "Jonah H. Harris", 10:34
Re: autovacuum crash due to null pointer, Alvaro Herrera, 10:15
Re: hash distinct, "Pavel Stehule", 08:11
Re: hash distinct, "Jonah H. Harris", 08:04
hash distinct, "Pavel Stehule", 07:38
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, Michael Paesold, 06:45
[PATCH]-hash index improving, "Xiao Meng", 05:26
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, "H.Harada", 05:20
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, David Fetter, 03:28
Re: avoid recasting text to tsvector when calculating selectivity, Jan Urbański, 02:35
Re: avoid recasting text to tsvector when calculating selectivity, Jan Urbański, 02:27
Re: Postgres-R source code release, David Fetter, 01:53
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow TRUNCATE foo, foo to succeed, per report from Nikhils., Tom Lane, 01:35
Re: avoid recasting text to tsvector when calculating selectivity, Tom Lane, 01:26

July 16, 2008

temp table problem, "Abbas", 23:36
small bug in hlCover, Sushant Sinha, 23:01
Re: Change lock requirements for adding a trigger, Bruce Momjian, 21:34
Re: .psqlrc output for \pset commands, Bruce Momjian, 20:44
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Oleg Bartunov, 19:28
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Sushant Sinha, 19:08
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Oleg Bartunov, 18:53
avoid recasting text to tsvector when calculating selectivity, Jan Urbański, 16:56
Re: Postgres-R: current state of development, Dimitri Fontaine, 15:55
Postgres-R: primary key patches, Markus Wanner, 15:36
Re: Postgres-R source code release, Markus Wanner, 15:35
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, "David E. Wheeler", 14:38
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, Robert Treat, 14:20
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, "David E. Wheeler", 13:54
Re: ExecuteTruncate quirk: expects a unique list of relations, Bruce Momjian, 12:55
Re: Overhauling GUCS, Bruce Momjian, 11:30
autovacuum crash due to null pointer, Tom Lane, 10:54
Re: gsoc, store hash index tuple with hash code only, "Xiao Meng", 06:29
Re: gsoc, store hash index tuple with hash code only, "Xiao Meng", 05:37
postmaster.pid not visible, cinu, 02:10
PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v4, "David E. Wheeler", 01:23
Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint, Greg Smith, 01:19
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 00:54

July 15, 2008

Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Sushant Sinha, 23:54
Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch, Tom Lane, 23:33
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 23:26
Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch, Decibel!, 22:53
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 22:49
Re: rfc: add pg_dump options to dump output, Bruce Momjian, 21:20
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 20:45
gsoc, store hash index tuple with hash code only, "Xiao Meng", 20:23
Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch, Tom Lane, 19:15
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL, Bruce Momjian, 18:56
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL, Alvaro Herrera, 18:32
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL, Bruce Momjian, 18:24
Re: Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch, "Pavel Stehule", 18:22
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL, Alvaro Herrera, 18:18
Lookup penalty for VARIADIC patch, Tom Lane, 17:58
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Andrew Dunstan, 17:27
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Kless, 16:04
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 15:56
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Mark Mielke, 15:38
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 14:07
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 13:45
Postgres-R: current state of development, Markus Wanner, 12:48
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Kless, 11:34
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL, Bruce Momjian, 11:03
Re: Postgres-R source code release, Markus Wanner, 10:59
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 10:58
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, Tom Lane, 10:56
Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Tom Lane, 10:33
Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily?, "Jonah H. Harris", 10:27
Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily?, "Jonah H. Harris", 10:26
Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily?, Tom Lane, 10:22
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 10:09
Re: Hint Bits and Write I/O, Bruce Momjian, 09:55
Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily?, "Xiao Meng", 08:18
Re: Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily?, "Heikki Linnakangas", 08:04
[PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 07:38
Is there anyway to create a TupleDesc with uint32 attribute easily?, "Xiao Meng", 05:56
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, Teodor Sigaev, 05:29
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, Simon Riggs, 04:31
Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch, "Heikki Linnakangas", 04:23
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 03:25
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 01:09
Re: posix advises ..., Greg Smith, 01:07
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, Simon Riggs, 00:51
Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline, "Sushant Sinha", 00:50

July 14, 2008

Re: DROP ROLE dependency tracking ..., Bruce Momjian, 23:35
Re: TODO item: Have psql show current values for a sequence, Bruce Momjian, 23:17
Re: Postgres-R source code release, "Andrej Ricnik-Bay", 20:13
Re: Postgres-R source code release, "David E. Wheeler", 20:03
Re: Postgres-R source code release, David Fetter, 19:54
Re: Postgres-R source code release, "Joshua D. Drake", 19:22
Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, David Fetter, 19:04
Re: Exposing quals, David Fetter, 19:02
Re: idea: storing view source in system catalogs, Bruce Momjian, 18:57
Re: Postgres-R source code release, Alvaro Herrera, 17:56
Re: Postgres-R source code release, David Fetter, 17:41
Re: Postgres-R source code release, Alvaro Herrera, 17:35
Re: Postgres-R source code release, David Fetter, 17:19
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 16:11
Re: Security and Data Protection Issues, Bruce Momjian, 15:49
Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues, Tom Lane, 15:48
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Mark Mielke, 15:39
Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues, Bruce Momjian, 15:38
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Tom Lane, 15:34
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Gregory Stark, 15:09
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 15:04
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 14:49
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Mark Mielke, 14:47
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Andrew Dunstan, 14:46
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, "David E. Wheeler", 14:34
Re: Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error, "Knight, Doug", 14:27
Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch, Gregory Stark, 14:24
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 14:10
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Mark Mielke, 14:07
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 14:06
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 14:00
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 13:58
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 13:57
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Andrew Dunstan, 13:55
Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch, Tom Lane, 13:55
Re: testing locales and encodings, "David E. Wheeler", 13:51
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 13:50
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Kless, 13:49
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 13:48
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 13:36
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, "David E. Wheeler", 13:33
A note about proargmodes and Pavel's pending patches, Tom Lane, 13:33
Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch, Gregory Stark, 13:15
Re: Postgres-R source code release, "Jonah H. Harris", 12:54
Re: Postgres-R source code release, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 12:01
Re: Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error, "Dave Page", 11:51
Re: Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error, Tom Lane, 11:43
Postgres-R source code release, Markus Wanner, 11:42
Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch, Tom Lane, 11:23
Building under Visual Studio 2008 - pqcomm.c compile error, "Knight, Doug", 11:21
Re: 8.1 index corruption woes, Decibel!, 11:20
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 10:26
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 10:24
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 10:08
testing locales and encodings, Alvaro Herrera, 09:49
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Andrew Dunstan, 09:05
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Oleg Bartunov, 08:38
Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Martijn van Oosterhout, 04:34
Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type, Kless, 04:04
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Oleg Bartunov, 03:47
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 03:21
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Rudolf Lippan, 02:51
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 02:39
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 02:37
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 01:06
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Alvaro Herrera, 01:01
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 00:02

July 13, 2008

Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Alvaro Herrera, 23:52
Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch, "Pavan Deolasee", 23:50
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 21:17
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 20:54
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 19:13
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 19:06
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 18:51
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 18:49
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 13:31
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 13:19
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 13:16
Re: COPY command, support for mixing binary and text columns?, Tom Lane, 12:47
COPY command, support for mixing binary and text columns?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 12:24
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 12:22
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 00:44

July 12, 2008

Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 23:30
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 18:13
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 17:57
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 17:50
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 16:59
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, Tom Lane, 16:50
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, Tom Lane, 16:06
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 15:52
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, "Jaime Casanova", 15:32
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 15:17
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Tom Lane, 12:48
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Simon Riggs, 12:47
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Tom Lane, 12:04
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Simon Riggs, 11:51
Re: posix advises ..., Tom Lane, 11:26
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Tom Lane, 11:17
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Martijn van Oosterhout, 09:08
Re: posix advises ..., Abhijit Menon-Sen, 07:34
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 07:30
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), "Dave Page", 04:56
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Simon Riggs, 04:16
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Zdenek Kotala, 04:02
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 00:32
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 00:27

July 11, 2008

Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 23:22
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 23:10
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 22:35
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 22:18
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), "Dave Page", 19:57
Re: posix advises ..., Gregory Stark, 19:52
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 19:49
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Tom Lane, 19:45
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Simon Riggs, 19:41
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 17:31
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Tom Lane, 17:26
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Simon Riggs, 17:19
Re: Follow-up on replication hooks for PostgreSQL, chris, 17:03
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Alvaro Herrera, 17:01
Change of site, Simon Riggs, 16:44
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Zdenek Kotala, 16:02
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 15:52
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Zdenek Kotala, 15:52
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Zdenek Kotala, 15:37
Re: _bt_delitems: change before WAL?, Tom Lane, 15:31
Re: 8.1 index corruption woes, Tom Lane, 15:17
Re: 8.1 index corruption woes, Alvaro Herrera, 14:02
_bt_delitems: change before WAL?, Alvaro Herrera, 13:06
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, "Jaime Casanova", 12:57
building postgres test examples in win32, "claudio lezcano", 12:31
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 11:31
Re: Auto-explain patch, Simon Riggs, 10:38
Re: Should SPI_gettypeid be extended to support returning the typmod?, Tom Lane, 09:59
Re: CommitFest rules, Simon Riggs, 07:10
Re: CommitFest rules, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 06:45
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2], Abhijit Menon-Sen, 06:31
Should SPI_gettypeid be extended to support returning the typmod?, Gregory Stark, 06:12
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2], KaiGai Kohei, 06:10
Re: posix advises ..., Abhijit Menon-Sen, 06:02
Re: Auto-explain patch, Dean Rasheed, 05:33
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Simon Riggs, 03:34
Re: [WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), Martijn van Oosterhout, 03:29
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 02:30
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 02:23
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 02:18
Postgres 8.1 doesn't like pg_standby's -l option, "Gurjeet Singh", 00:23

July 10, 2008

Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Oleg Bartunov, 19:12
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 18:19
Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes, Tom Lane, 18:09
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 17:26
[WIP] collation support revisited (phase 1), "Radek Strnad", 17:24
Re: Generating code coverage reports, Michelle Caisse, 17:24
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 17:02
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 16:37
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 16:32
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Alvaro Herrera, 16:27
Re: Generating code coverage reports, Tom Lane, 16:19
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 16:15
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, Tom Lane, 16:11
Generating code coverage reports, Michelle Caisse, 15:37
Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers?, Tom Lane, 15:07
Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers?, Josh Berkus, 14:08
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Gregory Stark, 14:01
Re: digest, "A.M.", 13:37
Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 13:30
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Tom Lane, 13:24
digest, Fabrízio de Royes Mello, 13:20
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, Kless, 13:11
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Gregory Stark, 13:09
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 13:05
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, Gregory Stark, 12:56
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, Kaare Rasmussen, 12:43
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 12:40
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, "David E. Wheeler", 12:38
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, "Joshua D. Drake", 12:13
Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, Aidan Van Dyk, 12:09
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, Mark Mielke, 12:05
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, Mark Mielke, 12:01
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, Tom Lane, 12:00
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, Mark Mielke, 11:52
Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, David Fetter, 11:34
Re: CREATE CAST too strict?, Tom Lane, 11:34
Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, Alvaro Herrera, 11:31
Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?, Tom Lane, 11:25
Re: UUID - Data type inefficient, Andrew Dunstan, 11:21
Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, Aidan Van Dyk, 11:01
Re: CommitFest rules, Tom Lane, 10:52
UUID - Data type inefficient, Kless, 10:37
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Andrew Dunstan, 10:30
Re: CommitFest rules, "Dave Page", 10:28
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Tom Lane, 10:22
Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, David Fetter, 10:18
Re: CommitFest rules, Tom Lane, 10:16
Re: CREATE CAST too strict?, Peter Eisentraut, 08:56
Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?, Sushant Sinha, 08:52
Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?, Andrew Dunstan, 08:47
Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?, "Pavan Deolasee", 08:25
Re: Auto-explain patch, Dean Rasheed, 08:17
initdb in current cvs head broken?, Sushant Sinha, 08:06
Re: Follow-up on replication hooks for PostgreSQL, "Marko Kreen", 07:56
Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, Gregory Stark, 06:52
Re: WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 06:42
Re: Security and Data Protection Issues, Jan Urbański, 06:30
Re: Auto-explain patch, Gregory Stark, 06:19
Re: Auto-explain patch, Simon Riggs, 05:48
Re: Security and Data Protection Issues, Richard Huxton, 04:43
Re: Security and Data Protection Issues, "Stuart Gundry", 04:37
Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 01:54

July 09, 2008

Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, Tom Lane, 23:31
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 23:11
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Alvaro Herrera, 17:01
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 16:50
Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues, Martijn van Oosterhout, 16:45
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, Alvaro Herrera, 16:40
Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?, Gregory Stark, 16:30
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 16:28
Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers?, Tom Lane, 15:14
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, Alvaro Herrera, 15:11
Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues, "Ken Camann", 15:03
Re: Extending grant insert on tables to sequences, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 14:58
Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers?, Neil Conway, 14:51
Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 14:50
Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers?, Josh Berkus, 14:50
Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?, Alvaro Herrera, 14:47
Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?, Neil Conway, 14:42
Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?, Alvaro Herrera, 14:38
Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?, Josh Berkus, 14:30
Re: CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers?, Neil Conway, 14:28
Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?, Neil Conway, 14:24
Re: No answers on CommitFest procedures?, "Pavan Deolasee", 14:11
CommitFest: how does handoff work for non-committer reviewers?, Josh Berkus, 13:59
No answers on CommitFest procedures?, Josh Berkus, 13:58
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Josh Berkus, 13:51
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 12:49
Re: Security and Data Protection Issues, Jan Urbański, 12:47
Security and Data Protection Issues, "Stuart Gundry", 12:13
Re: Auto-explain patch, Simon Riggs, 11:08
Re: Auto-explain patch, Tom Lane, 10:45
CREATE CAST too strict?, Peter Eisentraut, 10:09
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 09:18
Re: Auto-explain patch, "Marko Kreen", 08:15
Re: Auto-explain patch, Dean Rasheed, 08:06
Re: Auto-explain patch, Dean Rasheed, 08:01
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Gregory Stark, 07:42
Re: Auto-explain patch, Simon Riggs, 07:22
Re: Auto-explain patch, "Marko Kreen", 07:22
review: table function support, "Marko Kreen", 07:05
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Tino Wildenhain, 06:32
Re: Auto-explain patch, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 05:48
Re: Auto-explain patch, Dean Rasheed, 05:11
Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues, Peter Eisentraut, 04:20
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Peter Eisentraut, 03:59
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Andreas Joseph Krogh, 03:42
Re: Summary of some postgres portability issues, Martijn van Oosterhout, 03:35
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Martijn van Oosterhout, 03:10
(NONE), takanori, 01:33

July 08, 2008

Re: Identifier case folding notes, Russell Smith, 20:29
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Gregory Stark, 19:19
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Andrew Dunstan, 19:18
Summary of some postgres portability issues, "Ken Camann", 19:01
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 18:43
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Tom Lane, 18:35
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 18:33
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Tom Lane, 18:30
Re: Identifier case folding notes, "Kevin Grittner", 18:00
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Ron Mayer, 17:51
Re: Identifier case folding notes, "Kevin Grittner", 17:33
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Andreas Joseph Krogh, 17:20
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Josh Berkus, 17:04
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 15:16
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 15:05
Re: Exposing quals, Jan Wieck, 14:41
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Tom Lane, 14:23
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Peter Eisentraut, 14:18
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Tom Lane, 14:08
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Tom Lane, 13:53
Re: Identifier case folding notes, Simon Riggs, 13:47
Identifier case folding notes, Peter Eisentraut, 13:25
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2], Josh Berkus, 12:44
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 12:42
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Michael Paesold, 12:33
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Josh Berkus, 12:31
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 12:16
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 12:13
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Simon Riggs, 12:11
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Joshua D. Drake", 11:58
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Simon Riggs, 11:52
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 11:43
Re: Exposing quals, David Fetter, 11:38
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 11:29
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Joshua D. Drake", 11:24
Re: Exposing quals, "Heikki Linnakangas", 11:22
Re: Exposing quals, Simon Riggs, 11:20
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Martijn van Oosterhout, 11:02
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Andrew Dunstan, 10:54
Re: Exposing quals, "Heikki Linnakangas", 10:51
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Tom Lane, 10:31
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Tom Lane, 09:49
Re: CommitFest rules, Gregory Stark, 09:39
Re: New relkind (was Re: Exposing quals), Hans-Juergen Schoenig, 09:06
Re: CommitFest rules, Simon Riggs, 08:50
Re: 8.1 index corruption woes, Decibel!, 08:42
Re: CommitFest rules, Robert Treat, 08:38
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, Simon Riggs, 08:16
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 07:23
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Martijn van Oosterhout, 06:19
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 06:00
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Martijn van Oosterhout, 05:49
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 05:27
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, Simon Riggs, 05:21
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2], KaiGai Kohei, 05:08
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 04:22
Re: CommitFest rules, "Dave Page", 03:26
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, Zdenek Kotala, 03:12
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, Martijn van Oosterhout, 02:54
Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes, Simon Riggs, 02:50
Re: CONNECT BY and WITH ..., David Fetter, 02:31
Re: New relkind (was Re: Exposing quals), Simon Riggs, 02:01
CONNECT BY and WITH ..., Hans-Juergen Schoenig, 01:28
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2], KaiGai Kohei, 00:26

July 07, 2008

Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 23:45
Re: SSL configure patch: review, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 23:05
SSL configure patch: review, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 22:57
Re: 8.1 index corruption woes, Alvaro Herrera, 22:18
Re: Windows 64-bit work in progress patch, Bruce Momjian, 22:08
Re: deadlock_timeout, Bruce Momjian, 22:07
Re: Missing descriptions for aggregates, Bruce Momjian, 22:00
Re: CommitFest rules, Bruce Momjian, 21:56
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 21:29
Re: 8.1 index corruption woes, Tom Lane, 21:28
Re: 8.1 index corruption woes, Alvaro Herrera, 21:17
PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3, "David E. Wheeler", 21:03
Re: 8.1 index corruption woes, Tom Lane, 20:39
Re: Data type OID numbers fixed?, imad, 20:38
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 20:34
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 20:26
Re: Data type OID numbers fixed?, Tom Lane, 20:21
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 20:18
Re: Data type OID numbers fixed?, Alvaro Herrera, 20:16
Re: \SET QUIET and \timing, "David E. Wheeler", 20:15
Re: \SET QUIET and \timing, Tom Lane, 20:14
Data type OID numbers fixed?, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 20:05
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 20:03
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 19:58
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 19:37
New relkind (was Re: Exposing quals), David Fetter, 19:26
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 19:26
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 19:24
Re: \SET QUIET and \timing, "David E. Wheeler", 19:09
\SET QUIET and \timing, "David E. Wheeler", 19:07
Re: Exposing quals, andrew, 18:46
Re: the un-vacuumable table, "Andrew Hammond", 18:04
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 17:53
Re: Exposing quals, Simon Riggs, 17:33
8.1 index corruption woes, Alvaro Herrera, 17:16
Re: the un-vacuumable table, "Andrew Hammond", 17:08
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 17:05
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Gregory Stark, 16:59
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 16:15
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 16:13
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 16:10
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "Pavel Stehule", 15:48
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Zdenek Kotala, 15:46
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 15:38
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "Pavel Stehule", 15:36
Re: the un-vacuumable table, Tom Lane, 15:33
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 15:26
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 15:23
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 15:21
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Zdenek Kotala, 15:13
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "Pavel Stehule", 15:10
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 15:06
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 15:03
Re: the un-vacuumable table, "Andrew Hammond", 15:00
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, Zdenek Kotala, 14:57
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, Zdenek Kotala, 14:54
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Alvaro Herrera, 14:54
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 14:47
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Alvaro Herrera, 14:44
GEQO Publications, Adriano Lange, 14:42
Re: CommitFest rules, Tom Lane, 14:37
Re: CommitFest rules, "Jaime Casanova", 14:17
Windows 64-bit work in progress patch, "Ken Camann", 14:13
Questions and notes on CommitFest patch review, Josh Berkus, 14:06
Re: CommitFest rules, Josh Berkus, 14:03
Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others, David Fetter, 13:47
Re: CommitFest rules, "Brendan Jurd", 13:47
Re: CommitFest rules, Josh Berkus, 13:36
Re: CommitFest rules, Josh Berkus, 13:33
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2], Josh Berkus, 13:28
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 13:20
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 13:20
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 13:09
Re: Auto-explain patch, Simon Riggs, 13:03
Re: [PATCHES] column level privileges, Stephen Frost, 12:31
Re: pg_ctl -w with postgresql.conf in non-default path, HIRANO Yoshitaka, 12:11
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 11:58
Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches [try#2], Peter Eisentraut, 11:39
Re: deadlock_timeout, Simon Riggs, 11:35
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Bernd Helmle, 11:21
Re: deadlock_timeout, Tom Lane, 11:16
Userset logging, Simon Riggs, 11:13
deadlock_timeout, Simon Riggs, 11:11
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Andrew Dunstan, 11:09
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Tom Lane, 11:07
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, Andrew Dunstan, 11:01
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Bernd Helmle, 10:53
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, Tom Lane, 10:51
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, Zdenek Kotala, 10:41
Re: Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Tom Lane, 10:33
Schema-qualified statements in pg_dump output, Bernd Helmle, 09:46
Missing descriptions for aggregates, Bernd Helmle, 09:20
Re: pg_ctl -w with postgresql.conf in non-default path, Andrew Dunstan, 09:07
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Zdenek Kotala, 03:46
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, Simon Riggs, 03:10

July 06, 2008

pg_ctl -w with postgresql.conf in non-default path, yo, 22:21
Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 22:03
Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint, ITAGAKI Takahiro, 21:29
Priority of timezone names vs abbreviations in AT TIME ZONE, Tom Lane, 18:02
Re: log_rotation_age integer overflow display quirk, Tom Lane, 15:50
Re: Auto-explain patch, Dean Rasheed, 13:58
Re: Auto-explain patch, Simon Riggs, 11:42
Re: CommitFest rules, "Brendan Jurd", 10:58
Re: CommitFest rules, Bruce Momjian, 09:44
Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others, David Fetter, 09:01
Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others, Michael Meskes, 08:58
Re: CommitFest rules, "Dave Page", 06:48
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, "H.Harada", 06:15
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Jan Urbański, 05:43
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, Simon Riggs, 05:22
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, "H.Harada", 04:39
PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2, "David E. Wheeler", 02:31
Re: CommitFest rules, Tom Lane, 01:29
Re: time_stamp type, Tom Lane, 01:19

July 05, 2008

Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 20:47
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 20:46
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 20:46
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Ron Mayer, 20:40
Re: [PATCHES] Solaris ident authentication using unix domain sockets, Andrew Dunstan, 19:13
Re: CommitFest rules, Robert Treat, 18:44
Re: CommitFest rules, Robert Treat, 18:10
Re: CommitFest rules, Robert Treat, 18:07
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, Simon Riggs, 16:12
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, "H.Harada", 14:46
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, "H.Harada", 14:40
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, Simon Riggs, 13:21
time_stamp type, "Stephen R. van den Berg", 12:34
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 11:13
Re: introduction of WIP window function patch, Martijn van Oosterhout, 10:20
introduction of WIP window function patch, "H.Harada", 06:04
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Gregory Stark, 05:58
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Gregory Stark, 05:58
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in win32 shmem name generation: * Don't cut, Magnus Hagander, 05:34
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 02:06
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 01:54
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 01:39

July 04, 2008

Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, "Heikki Linnakangas", 15:20
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Zdenek Kotala, 13:50
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Zdenek Kotala, 13:42
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Alvaro Herrera, 13:33
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Alvaro Herrera, 13:30
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Zdenek Kotala, 13:26
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Zdenek Kotala, 13:19
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Tom Lane, 12:22
Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2, Tom Lane, 12:01
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 11:53
Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Alvaro Herrera, 11:05
Review: DTrace probes (merged version), Zdenek Kotala, 10:38
Re: log_rotation_age integer overflow display quirk, Bernd Helmle, 09:18
Re: Concurrent Restores, Zdenek Kotala, 08:36
Re: [GENERAL] pg crashing, Magnus Hagander, 06:27
Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes, Simon Riggs, 05:48
log_rotation_age integer overflow display quirk, Stefan Kaltenbrunner, 05:31
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Martijn van Oosterhout, 04:51
Multi-column GIN, "Heikki Linnakangas", 04:26
Re: the un-vacuumable table, Gregory Stark, 04:20
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, "Heikki Linnakangas", 03:32
Re: the un-vacuumable table, "Andrew Hammond", 01:57

July 03, 2008

Re: Truncated queries when select * from pg_stat_activity - wishlist / feature request, Alvaro Herrera, 22:09
Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others, "Robert Haas", 20:57
Truncated queries when select * from pg_stat_activity - wishlist / feature request, Dave Witt, 20:06
Re: the un-vacuumable table, Tom Lane, 18:47
Re: CommitFest rules, "Dave Page", 18:16
Re: the un-vacuumable table, "Andrew Hammond", 18:16
Re: CommitFest rules, Tom Lane, 17:37
Re: the un-vacuumable table, Tom Lane, 17:35
Re: CommitFest rules, "Merlin Moncure", 16:45
Re: the un-vacuumable table, "Andrew Hammond", 16:42
Re: CommitFest rules, "Dave Page", 15:45
Re: CommitFest rules, "Alex Hunsaker", 15:34
Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments, Tom Lane, 15:25
Re: CommitFest rules, "Merlin Moncure", 15:14
Re: CommitFest rules, "Joshua D. Drake", 15:12
Re: CommitFest rules, "Dave Page", 15:06
Re: CommitFest rules, "Marko Kreen", 15:02
CommitFest rules, "Dave Page", 14:44
Re: Auto-explain patch, "Alex Hunsaker", 13:53
Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes, "Pavel Stehule", 13:42
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Mark Mielke, 13:18
Re: Auto-explain patch, Dean Rasheed, 12:58
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Alvaro Herrera, 12:53
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Tom Lane, 12:07
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 12:03
Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes, Tom Lane, 12:01
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 12:01
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, chris, 11:30
Re: Switching between terminals, Gregory Stark, 11:09
Re: Switching between terminals, Csaba Nagy, 10:59
Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes, Bernd Helmle, 10:36
Switching between terminals, cinu, 10:26
Re: Command execution, Aaron Spiteri, 09:37
Re: Command execution, Csaba Nagy, 09:27
Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes, Simon Riggs, 09:24
Re: Command execution, "A. Kretschmer", 09:22
Command execution, Aaron Spiteri, 09:15
Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with relateddatatypes, Gregory Stark, 08:54
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Peter Eisentraut, 08:53
Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes, Simon Riggs, 08:34
Re: Attaching and using the Postgres shared memory segment, "Heikki Linnakangas", 07:33
Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes, "Heikki Linnakangas", 07:11
Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes, Simon Riggs, 06:51
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Zdenek Kotala, 06:47
Re: Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes, "Pavel Stehule", 06:22
Attaching and using the Postgres shared memory segment, Paul van den Bogaard, 06:01
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Mark Cave-Ayland, 05:38
Resolving polymorphic functions with related datatypes, Simon Riggs, 05:36
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Gregory Stark, 05:29
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Mark Cave-Ayland, 05:01
Concurrent Restores, Volkan YAZICI, 04:10
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Teodor Sigaev, 03:31
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Mark Mielke, 03:19
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Teodor Sigaev, 03:19
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, "Ken Camann", 01:45
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 01:14
Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others, Yoshiyuki Asaba, 00:56
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 00:41
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 00:40
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Tom Lane, 00:39
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 00:39
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 00:38
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, "Ken Camann", 00:13

July 02, 2008

Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 23:48
Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others, David Fetter, 23:08
Re: DTrace probes., Robert Treat, 23:00
Re: Git Repository for WITH RECURSIVE and others, Yoshiyuki Asaba, 22:16
Re: pg_dump lock timeout, Stephen Frost, 21:33
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Tom Lane, 20:51
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Tom Lane, 20:43
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 20:21
Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, "Joshua D. Drake", 20:00
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Decibel!, 19:47
Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, Decibel!, 19:39
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Tom Lane, 19:19
Re: [GENERAL] pg crashing, Tom Lane, 19:06
Re: Working on native Windows x64 version of PostgreSQL, "Dave Page", 17:50
Working on native Windows x64 version of PostgreSQL, "Ken Camann", 17:41
Re: Commitfest status?, Robert Treat, 17:11
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, "Dave Page", 16:14
Re: Commitfest status?, "Merlin Moncure", 15:48
Re: Auto-explain patch, Dean Rasheed, 15:42
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, "Ken Camann", 15:32
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, "Radek Strnad", 15:21
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Teodor Sigaev, 15:18
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Martijn van Oosterhout, 15:11
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Gregory Stark, 14:22
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Alvaro Herrera, 13:02
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Tom Lane, 12:55
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Tom Lane, 12:52
Re: [GENERAL] pg crashing, Magnus Hagander, 12:46
Re: Postgresql 8.3 issue, Peter Eisentraut, 12:44
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Peter Eisentraut, 12:39
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Zdenek Kotala, 12:13
Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level, Alvaro Herrera, 11:14
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Alvaro Herrera, 11:05
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Tom Lane, 10:28
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 10:10
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Magnus Hagander, 10:10
Re: A Windows x64 port of MySQL, Bernd Helmle, 09:09
Re: Please claim review items for commit fest!, Gregory Stark, 08:39
Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes, Magnus Hagander, 08:11
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Zdenek Kotala, 08:03
Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL, Zdenek Kotala, 08:01
A Windows x64 port of MySQL, "Ken Camann", 07:39
pg_compresslog/pg_decompresslog, "Mario Weilguni", 07:15
Re: [patch] plproxy v2, "Marko Kreen", 07:09
Re: Please claim review items for commit fest!, "Dave Page", 06:53
Re: Please claim review items for commit fest!, "Marko Kreen", 06:44
Re: Please claim review items for commit fest!, "Dave Page", 06:42
Re: Please claim review items for commit fest!, "Marko Kreen", 06:37
Re: Commitfest status?, Zdenek Kotala, 03:55
Re: Commitfest status?, Zdenek Kotala, 03:37
Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, Abhijit Menon-Sen, 03:28
Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, Guillaume Lelarge, 03:16
Re: Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml?, Magnus Hagander, 02:36
Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, Tom Lane, 02:23
Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, "Joshua D. Drake", 01:32
Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, Devrim GÜNDÜZ, 00:20

July 01, 2008

Re: Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, "Greg Sabino Mullane", 23:56
Limits of backwards compatibility for psql's \d commands, Tom Lane, 22:33
Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme, "Gregory Williamson", 19:10
OT: Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme, Steve Crawford, 18:28
Please claim review items for commit fest!, "Josh Berkus", 18:08
Please claim review items for commit fest!, "Josh Berkus", 18:06
Re: TODO assignment, "Josh Berkus", 18:02
Re: Commitfest status?, "Josh Berkus", 17:38
Should enum GUCs be listed as such in config.sgml?, Tom Lane, 17:12
Re: Commitfest status?, Alvaro Herrera, 17:04
Re: Commitfest status?, Joe Conway, 16:55
Commitfest status?, Tom Lane, 16:19
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Tom Lane, 16:02
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Greg Smith, 15:48
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Magnus Hagander, 15:34
Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme, Gregory Stark, 15:31
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Alvaro Herrera, 15:27
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Magnus Hagander, 15:18
Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes, Tom Lane, 15:17
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Tom Lane, 15:11
Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes, Magnus Hagander, 15:10
Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes, Tom Lane, 15:07
Re: Access to localized_str_tolower(), "David E. Wheeler", 15:03
Re: Access to localized_str_tolower(), Tom Lane, 14:59
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Magnus Hagander, 14:58
Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes, Magnus Hagander, 14:57
Re: Location for pgstat.stat, Tom Lane, 14:56
Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes, Tom Lane, 14:51
Location for pgstat.stat, Magnus Hagander, 14:48
Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme, Shane Ambler, 14:46
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Tom Lane, 14:43
Re: Access to localized_str_tolower(), Bruce Momjian, 14:30
Re: triggers on prepare, commit, rollback... ?, Bruce Momjian, 14:26
Re: Access to localized_str_tolower(), "David E. Wheeler", 14:25
Re: Access to localized_str_tolower(), Bruce Momjian, 14:11
Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes, Magnus Hagander, 14:06
Re: Access to localized_str_tolower(), "David E. Wheeler", 13:45
Re: Access to localized_str_tolower(), Bruce Momjian, 13:38
Access to localized_str_tolower(), "David E. Wheeler", 13:33
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, "David E. Wheeler", 12:33
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0, "Marko Kreen", 12:07
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 11:43
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 11:36
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0, "Marko Kreen", 11:33
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0, Bruce Momjian, 11:25
Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump), Richard Huxton, 11:22
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0, "Marko Kreen", 11:13
[WIP] patch - Collation at database level, "Radek Strnad", 10:58
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 10:52
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0, "Marko Kreen", 10:50
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Tom Lane, 10:38
Re: A new take on the foot-gun meme, Robert Treat, 10:36
Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes, Zdenek Kotala, 10:32
Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0, Zdenek Kotala, 10:26
Re: Confusing message in log file, "Gurjeet Singh", 10:07
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Tom Lane, 09:53
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Mark Cave-Ayland, 09:11
Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes, Zdenek Kotala, 09:10
Re: TODO assignment, Zdenek Kotala, 09:03
Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump), Robert Treat, 08:51
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, "Guillaume Smet", 08:39
Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing, Mark Cave-Ayland, 07:15
Re: Explain XML patch, Gregory Stark, 06:18
Re: Bucket and batch, Gregory Stark, 05:22
Re: Planned obsolescence in identify_system_timezone(), Gregory Stark, 05:11
Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump), Richard Huxton, 03:45

June 30, 2008

Re: the un-vacuumable table, "Andrew Hammond", 22:20
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Alvaro Herrera, 21:13
Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again), Tom Lane, 20:27
Re: Bucket and batch, Tom Lane, 19:54
Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump), Tom Lane, 19:45
Re: Confusing message in log file, Tom Lane, 19:33
Re: odd output in restore mode, Andrew Dunstan, 19:29
Planned obsolescence in identify_system_timezone(), Tom Lane, 19:23
Re: Confusing message in log file, Alvaro Herrera, 19:02
Re: Confusing message in log file, Bruce Momjian, 18:54
Re: Confusing message in log file, Tom Lane, 18:50
Re: Adding variables for segment_size, wal_segment_size and block sizes, Bruce Momjian, 18:47
Re: Confusing message in log file, Bruce Momjian, 18:43
Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error, Bruce Momjian, 18:39
Re: odd output in restore mode, Bruce Momjian, 18:13
Re: odd output in restore mode, Bruce Momjian, 18:11