On Wed, 2009-11-04, BeartoothTpBkR wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:26:20 -0500, sinistra wrote:
>> Well, 'etch' is the old-faithful-steady-on-awfully-reliable and 'lenny'
>> is just stable
>> I assumed everyone knew that. [....]
> IOW, you imagine everyone runs debian?? And pays attention to all
> those offensively cutesy names that it and its offshoots use instead of
> honest release numbers?? What rock have you been living under?
Perhaps he has squeezed himself under a potato?
I'm a Debian user ever since Redhat Linux started to suck ten years
ago or so, but I have to admit that I don't know what the release I'm
running is called. I know it's the current stable one, but I can't
say if it's lenny or etch. (Judging from the above, it's lenny.)
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .