>> An XML document is a sequence of characters. This character sequence
>> cannot be constructed from
>> <http://schneegans.de/sv/test-cases/?case=meta-only-encoding>. So
>> there's no document that must be either well-formed or not.
> I don't follow what you are saying.
> We've established that your document is not a conforming XML document
What's the definition of a "conforming XML document"?
> But do you agree that your demo complies with the defined list of
> well-formedness constraints as laid out in the spec, if not do you
> have an url to support this?
I really like my explanation that there's no XML document.
Of course, there's no WFC to prohibit invalid byte sequences. WFCs apply
to productions, and productions deal with characters, not bytes.
All free men, wherever they may live, are citizens of Denmark. And
therefore, as a free man, I take pride in the words "Jeg er dansker!"