|
|
Without going into why you would want a query to return 350k records,
you may have to change some parameters in the OJB.properties file.
Look for the following and you may need to change maxActive to a
non-positive number. This can give out of memory errors.
# maximum number of brokers that can be borrowed from the
# pool at one time. When non-positive, there is no limit.
maxActive=100
-----Original Message-----
From: WHIRLYCOTT [mailto:phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 October 2004 12:02 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Query problem for hundreds of thousands of records
If you need the entire resultset in memory, you probably need to provide
more memory to your jvm or add more memory physically to your hardware.
It sounds like, in effect, that you are basically making a copy of your
database table with ~350k records in memory!
What happens when 2 users hit your website at the same time? What
happens when 100 users hit your site?
I don't know the specifics of what you are doing, but it doesn't sound
like a particularily good solution. Why do you think you need to have
the entire result set in memory?
phil.
[ Muliawan Sjarif ] wrote:
> If I need the entire resultset in the memory what would be the best
> approach? It seems that broker.getCollectionByQuery(q) stuck with huge
> records.
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:09:11 -0400, WHIRLYCOTT <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>>You probably are doing something like this:
>>
>> Collection c = broker.getCollectionByQuery(q);
>>
>>... and ought to be doing something like this:
>>
>> Iterator i = broker.getIteratorByQuery(q);
>>
>>Unless you need the entire result set in memory, this should be your
>>preferred approach. Just iterate through the results and do what you
>>need to do to each of them.
>>
>>phil.
>>
>>[ Muliawan Sjarif ] wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I was doing a quick test for OJB particularly using PersistenceBroker
>>>on one table that consists of 352544 records. No matter how many
times
>>>I tried, in the end all I got was the browser not responding (no
>>>result displayed on the page) and tomcat throwed
java.lang.OutOfMemory
>>>exception. For this test, dynamic proxy was utilized.
>>>
>>>Pertaining to this problem, I wonder if anyone has encountered
similar
>>>problem. Or is there somewhere in the OJB's properties that need to
be
>>>tweaked?
>>>
>>>Many thanks.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Muliawan
>>
>>--
>> Whirlycott
>> Philip Jacob
>> phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Whirlycott
Philip Jacob
phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|