[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes a

Subject: Re: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes assertion panic
From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:05:05 +0000 UTC
The following reply was made to PR port-arm/43339; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
 [email protected]
Subject: Re: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it
 causes assertion panic
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 03:03:35 +0100

 [email protected] wrote:
 > >Number:         43339
 > >Category:       port-arm
 > >Synopsis:       IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes 
 > >assertion panic
 >
 > ...
 >
 > >Fix:
 > Set proper IPL_SOFTfoo values?
 > ...
 
 Right, while from mutex(9) perspective IPL_NONE and IPL_SOFT* behave same,
 part of the reason for these definitions is a use for various assertions.
 Therefore, definitions should have unique values.
 
 -- 
 Mindaugas
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>