| Subject: | Re: install/9654 i386 upgrade instructions imply a floppy necessary |
|---|---|
| From: | David Holland |
| Date: | Tue, 19 May 2009 03:00:22 UTC |
| Newsgroups: | fa.netbsd.bugs |
The following reply was made to PR install/9654; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Holland <dholland-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: gnats-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: install-manager@xxxxxxxxxx, gnats-admin@xxxxxxxxxx,
netbsd-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx, jhawk@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: install/9654 (i386 upgrade instructions imply a floppy
necessary)
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 02:56:54 +0000
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:30:07AM +0000, John Hawkinson wrote:
> I don't think this PR is necesasrily still relevant, and I don't
> know what the fastest way to upgrade is.
I think what Soren was thinking was probably "./build.sh build", which
is what I've always done for updates.
--
David A. Holland
dholland@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bin/41457: patch(1) -p option dosen't allow to omit numeric argument., David Holland |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bin/41457: patch(1) -p option dosen't allow to omit numeric argument., David Holland |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: install/9654 (i386 upgrade instructions imply a floppy necessary), David Holland |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bin/41457: patch(1) -p option dosen't allow to omit numeric argument., David Holland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |