The following reply was made to PR kern/40163; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Greg Oster <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: kern/40163: mv(1) cause WAPBL panic
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:40:37 -0600
David Holland writes:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/40163; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: David Holland <[email protected]>
> To: Lloyd Parkes <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: kern/40163: mv(1) cause WAPBL panic
> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:22:14 +0000
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:10:05AM +0000, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
> >> Untested (I don't have any wapbl volumes on hand) patch:
> > Not untested anymore. The patch seems to have fixed the problem, and
> > I get the same error message from NetBSD as I do from other systems,
> > so the error path can't be too far wrong.
> Can you still unmount the fs afterwards? :-)
> (Anything wrong would almost certainly be vnode refcounting.)
> Did you (or anyone else listening) test it on 5.0? I need to file a
> pullup, and while there should be no reason for it to behave
> differently on 5.0, everything connected with rename is so bodgy that
> I'd like some positive confirmation. And I don't currently have a 5.0
I applied your changes to a 5.0_BETA tree and tested using that.
I've also just run a fsck on the filesystem (it's been mounted and
unmounted dozens of times since the first check) and it's showing
everything as clean.