netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: port-amd64/39283: Kernel crash on Dell Poweredge 2950

Subject: Re: port-amd64/39283: Kernel crash on Dell Poweredge 2950
From:
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:55:02 +0000 UTC
The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/39283; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: fredrik@xxxxxxxxx
To: gnats-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: port-amd64-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxx,
 gnats-admin@xxxxxxxxxx,
 netbsd-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx,
 fredrik@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: port-amd64/39283: Kernel crash on Dell Poweredge 2950
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:52:10 +0100 (CET)

 > The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/39283; it has been noted by
 > GNATS.
 >
 > From: David Holland <dholland-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx>
 > To: fredrik@xxxxxxxxx
 > Cc: David Holland <dholland-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx>, gnats-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx,
 >      port-amd64-maintainer@xxxxxxxxxx, gnats-admin@xxxxxxxxxx,
 >      netbsd-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx
 > Subject: Re: port-amd64/39283: Kernel crash on Dell Poweredge 2950
 > Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:50:28 +0000
 >
 >  On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:01:01AM +0200, fredrik@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
 >   > > > > My guess is a bad callout, but that doesn't narrow it down very
 > much.
 >   > > [...]
 >   > > @@ -722,6 +722,7 @@ callout_softclock(void *v)
 >   > > [...]
 >   > > +              KASSERT(func != NULL);
 >   >
 >   > We are already running with DEBUG and DIAGNOSTIC, hopefully it will be
 > a
 >   > little more verbose after your patch.
 >
 >  Have you seen this again recently? PR 39655, which might be the same
 >  problem, was fixed in -current on October 10.
 >
 >  --
 >  David A. Holland
 >  dholland@xxxxxxxxxx
 >
 >
 
 We did a test with 5.0_BETA and the machines was alive for about 23 hours
 then it paniced.
 
 Regards
 Fredrik
 
 
 
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>