|
|
Hi,
On 2006/11/21, at 18:41, K.Kawaguchi wrote:
models | Home address from | Home address from
| Home network Prefix | Mobile network prefix
----------------------------------------------------------------
NEMO Extended | 1 | 2
Home Network | |
----------------------------------------------------------------
NEMO Aggregated | 3 | 4
Home Network | |
----------------------------------------------------------------
The product of each area doesn't have the interconnectivity. Moreover,
there is not default either. Therefore, we divide separately on
NEMO LOGO.
(A rich product will cover two or more areas.)
Because routing protocol is not necessary in area-1, routing
protocol is
not put under the area-1 test condition.
Because routing protocol is necessary in area-2, one routing
protocol is
decided under the area-2 test condition.
I think, there is no relationship between the mechanism to inject
routing entries and the method from where we get a home address
(either from a home network prefix or mobile network prefix).
We can put a routing entry either by statically or dynamically
regardless of the original location of the home address. So, even in
the case 2, we can put a routing entry for the mobile network prefix
by not using any routing protocol. And of course we can use a
routing protocol for the case 1.
---
Keiichi SHIMA
IIJ Research Laboratory <keiichi@xxxxxxxxxx>
WIDE Project <shima@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
|