Re: NTFS or FAT32?

microsoft.public.windowsxp.general

from [Rock]

Subject:	Re: NTFS or FAT32?
From:	Rock
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:23:55 -0800
Newsgroups:	microsoft.public.windowsxp.general

Al Dykes wrote:

In article <emN9nbhJGHA.208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Squire <jerrym526@xxxxxxx> wrote:

It's your choice,
Fat32 is limited to disksize usable somewhere around 132 gb.
NTFS has no limit

FAT32 has a max file size of either 2 or 4GB (I forget) .


It's 4GB.

--
Rock
MS MVP  Windows - Shell/User

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
NTFS or FAT32?, Dave Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Mike Hall \(MS-MVP\) Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Jonny Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Dave Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Squire Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Dave Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Al Dykes Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Dave Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Rock <= Re: NTFS or FAT32?, GreenieLeBrun Re: NTFS or FAT32?, R. C. White Re: NTFS or FAT32?, All Things Mopar

Previous by Date:	Re: Boy is this a weird problem, Strow
Next by Date:	Re: 2 hours to startup and even then not fully working on XP Pro machine., Danny Sanders
Previous by Thread:	Re: NTFS or FAT32?, Dave
Next by Thread:	Re: NTFS or FAT32?, GreenieLeBrun
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]