[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NS Logic for Enabled Users

Subject: Re: NS Logic for Enabled Users
From: "Andy Wilbourn"
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:49:25 -0500
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.notificationsvcs
I looked at the view and it is only looking at my subscriptions table where 
Enabled = 1. I will try to see if I can find what we did with prior beta's 
to get it to work, or may just submit as a bug if warranted.

Thanks for the help Joe.

"Andy Wilbourn" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:OJVtu$Y%[email protected]
> Yes I am. I will test it one more time in our QA environment, but our DEV 
> it is not working. We went through and did an update to the subscriber 
> table to set all disabled, we also tried using the NS API to do the same, 
> but our subscriptions were still coming back. I guess I can look at the 
> view in our application DB to see what the code is for ACTIVE 
> subscriptions.
> I am not sure if Shyam is monitoring this group anymore, he does not have 
> a primary focus of NS. Hopefully that does not get me in trouble, since I 
> don't know if that is common knowledge. We went to Redmond and fully 
> stress tested our solution for the SQL 2005, but did not test this aspect. 
> It came up when we were wanting to stress another part of our solution in 
> house, but did not want to generate alerts to all our test subscribers. To 
> our surprise we did generate millions of alerts.
> "Joe Webb" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
> news:[email protected]
>> Hi Andy -
>> Your understanding of the Subscriber.Enabled property is correct. If
>> the property is set to true, the subscriber's subscriptions are
>> candidates for the matching rules and can generate notifications. If
>> the property is set to false, the subscriptions associated with the
>> disabled subscriber will not produce notifications.
>> You are seeing something contrary to this in RTM?
>> -- 
>> Joe Webb
>> SQL Server MVP
>> ~~~
>> Get up to speed quickly with SQLNS
>> I support PASS, the Professional Association for SQL Server.
>> (
>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:04:54 -0500, "Andy Wilbourn"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>I thought I had tested and validated that if a Subscriber is disabled, 
>>>none of their subscriptions would be matched without having to disable 
>>>I am using SQL 2005 NS. I believe we tested this on June CTP and it was
>>>working, but now with RTM it is not.
>>>Can someone tell what is supposed to happen?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>