Using setquantumclockdate facilitated the skipping over of the obsolete
events. That took care of getting NS back up and operational without
sending 4 months of old events.
OK now getting this history cleaned out. From my calcâs it think is going
to take about 20 days to get totally cleaned at 2500 Quantumâs an hour. Iâm
sure it will run faster as the volume is reduced. Without an existing
vacuum schedule will NSCONTROL UPDATE allow for a new schedule to be created?
I need to come up with a way to get this self sufficient.
Again thanks for your help. Any insight you have is appreciated.
> hi dave
> i am not quite sure if your problem is a backlog of events that have not
> been processed due to the disabled generator or loads of history data for
> events that have been processed and have not been vacuumed out.
> for the former,
> the incoming events are collected into the ns<app>eventbatches table in the
> instance database to wait for te generator to start. you could purge this
> table to remove the backlog of events. you could also adjust the quantum
> clock forward using setquantumclockdate to help it catch up and ignore all
> those old unprocessed quantums.
> if it is the latter and you just have history data for events that have been
> processed and there is so much that the vacuumer is going to run forever then
> i would just suggest an overnight job wich runs the vacuumer for short
> quantum intervals to remove the history bit by bit.
> hope this helps
> Alert Technologies
> "Dave Saylor" wrote:
> > I was asked to look into a problem a customer was having , Turned out they
> > moved SMTP server and in the process the generator got disabled. This was
> > back in May.
> > So I have that all squared away and now I'm looking for a quick way to
> > clear
> > out the events that have been backing up.
> > Vacuum was never scheduled and as a result there are over a million
> > Quantums
> > left to be cleaned. Running manual results in 2500 an hour.
> > Does anybody know a way I can just clean out the existing events with out
> > delete / create? Or just what the options are..
> > Thanks in advance
> > --
> > Dave