[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Thank you to the author of MC

Subject: Re: Thank you to the author of MC
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:08:39 -0500 CDT
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Tim wrote:

> Robert Black wrote:
>> When I was teaching myself Linux about nine years ago and X was still having
>> growing pains Midnight Commander probably meant the difference between
>> learning linux and giving up as most work was done from the command line.
>> I realized today that I never said thanks back then when it probably would
>> have meant a lot more. Not sure what the status of the original author is but
>> if anyone knows let me know.
>> Robert
> I have to agree.  I don't even bother with GUIs and MC is my main tool ... 
> and it should
> be.  I think it's important to have a good system maintenace tool independant 
> of X.
> -- 
> See you,
> Tim.                          http://members.iinet.net.au/~timdougl/
> _______________________________________________
> Mc mailing list
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc

In spite of, or perhaps because of the fact that I sent in a hot letter 
complaining about a usability issue the other day, I would like to say 
that I strongly endorse these comments. They very much agree with my 
experiences way back when. I heartily agree with the continuing need to 
have powerful tools which are independent of a GUI. I do a lot of work in 
X these days because I am doing camera support for ghoto and need the 
graphics capability. But to this day I do not run any of the fancy 
desktops. Just a locally customized FVWM2, with MC the typical tool for 
getting work done.

So I definitely do not want anyone to think this is an old, outmoded piece 
of software and decide to go and do something sexy instead. Sorry if I 
have appeared to criticize and not help, but I am pretty busy writing 
code, too.

Incidentally, do I have it right that now Alt-I is doing what Alt-O used 
to do? Perhaps I can just get used to it.

I also said in my previous letter that I might have some suggestions. 
Here's one:

We have a directory called /mnt, and we also have things like USB cameras 
and flash drives. And for that matter there are old things like floppies 
(huh? Daddy, what's a floppy?). How nice it would be if, without needing 
to do something really silly like intermittent device polling, but, 
perhaps with appropriate fstab entries, one could set up MC to

-- mount a USB stick automatically. That is, if one does something like 
to open the directory /mnt/usb and the stick is connected, then the stick 
gets mounted.

-- warn if copying, or refuse to copy,  to /mnt/usb if no storage device 
is present (who would want to copy anything there if no device is present, 
anyway?), or refuse to open said directory without a warning statement 
that no drive is present.

-- warn immediately if some idiot jerks the flash drive loose while its 
associated directory is open.

-- offer the choice to the user (in setup and explained in the man page) 
of umounting the flash drive when the associated directory is closed, or 
of popping up a dialog box asking if it should remain mounted or be 
unmounted immediately.

The above things should of course be optional features, which can be 
turned on or off by root for all the users. These are things which would 
really add to user-friendliness for home systems, but obviously could be 
security nightmares in some other environments.

Something like this would be really helpful for people who like to use MC 
anyway and would alleviate the need of some others to have to have a popup 
icon on the desktop when someone sticks a flash drive in the USB slot. 
Popup icons are all very nice. But for that matter if a popup icon can be 
done without wasting system resources, it might also be possible to cause 
MC to pop open in a window automatically when something is plugged in, 
with one of the panels open to the flash drive, and the drive gets 
unmounted when the window is closed.

Me, I think the first proposal might be easier to implement. Also this is 
MC and it does not have to be done exactly the same way it is done in KDE 
or in Windows or in OS-10.

I am not the world's living expert on USB stuff, but I do know a little 
about it and have a little bit of practical experience with things like 
hotplug and udev, from my work on USB cameras. So I could probably help 
from that side. What I definitely do not know is the internals of the MC 
code. Anybody interested?

Theodore Kilgore
Mc mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>