[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Addressing MC stagnation.

Subject: Re: Addressing MC stagnation.
From: Pavel Roskin
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:24:09 -0400
Hi, Leonard!

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 21:41 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> ?? Aren't you saying what I'm saying? MC_4_6_1_PRE should become
> mc-4.6.1 and HEAD should be used for the release of 4.7 (the viewer code
> is not well tested so I believe it shouldn't be used for 4.6.1). Where
> do we disagree?

I misunderstood you as saying we should use MC_4_6_1_PRE branch for 5.0
and further releases.

Pavel Roskin

Mc-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>