| Subject: | Re: Lingo vs Javascript |
|---|---|
| From: | "alchemist" <unknown@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:27:57 +0300 |
| Newsgroups: | macromedia.director.lingo |
Good points, mziskandar. > 2. Easier to learn I doubt that many languages with similar functionality can claim to be easier than lingo. None that I know of, at least. > 3. Performance Director was built for lingo. Therefore, internally, even though for certain functions js could settle with less arguments (since it won't use them all, anyway) leading to faster execution speed, space for all arguments is allocated, as required for lingo. That's the case with Xtras, so I'd bet it is also the case with native objects. "mziskandar" <mziskandar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:g669mq$rn6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >I prefer Lingo over js in Director.. > 1. Examples - a lot on the web. > 2. Easier to learn - from the examples. > 3. Performance - maybe its the same - It will depend on your code - learn > from > the examples. > 4. Support/troubleshooting - almost all seniors in Director using Lingo. > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Lingo vs Javascript, mziskandar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Exporting a .dir file and importing to a .fla, Sean Wilson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lingo vs Javascript, mziskandar |
| Next by Thread: | Copy text to Windows clipboard, Ex Malterra |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |