macromedia.director.lingo
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Lingo vs Javascript

Subject: Re: Lingo vs Javascript
From: "alchemist" <unknown@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:27:57 +0300
Newsgroups: macromedia.director.lingo

Good points, mziskandar.
> 2. Easier to learn
I doubt that many languages with similar functionality can claim to be
easier
than lingo. None that I know of, at least.

> 3. Performance
Director was built for lingo. Therefore, internally, even though for certain
functions js could settle with less arguments (since it won't use them all,
anyway) leading to faster execution speed, space for all arguments is
allocated, as required for lingo. That's the case with Xtras, so I'd bet it
is also the case with native objects.


"mziskandar" <mziskandar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g669mq$rn6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I prefer Lingo over js in Director..
> 1. Examples - a lot on the web.
> 2. Easier to learn - from the examples.
> 3. Performance - maybe its the same - It will depend on your code - learn
> from
> the examples.
> 4. Support/troubleshooting - almost all seniors in Director using Lingo.
>
>





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>