| Subject: | Re: Director 11 or MX 2004? |
|---|---|
| From: | Sean Wilson <webforumsuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:46:58 +1200 |
| Newsgroups: | macromedia.director.basics |
I am having a bunch of problems with Director 11.Should I just go back to MX 2004 - the changes don't seem to make too much of a difference to me. If you don't need to natively support Intel Macs under Shockwave there are *no* compelling reasons to upgrade (and far too many to not) And where can I find a full list of changes? You can't, because Adobe didn't bother to provide one, and no amount of badgering seems able to induce them to. There is a list of "fixes" provided at <http://blogs.adobe.com/shockwaves/2008/04/director_11_released.html> but since some of the fixes relate to new features it can't be taken seriously (while implementing such-and-such they introduced a bug which they subsequently fixed - that doesn't rate as a bug fix to my mind, rather it's what I'd call "programming") |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Director 11 or MX 2004?, ytlevine |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Director 11 or MX 2004?, alchemist |
| Previous by Thread: | Director 11 or MX 2004?, ytlevine |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Director 11 or MX 2004?, alchemist |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |