> I think rather than a site that list other sites (lets face it, who really
> cares but cf people themselves) it woud be better to rally Adobe to open
> source the product and/or get them to make it surpass free/open products
> so that there is little doubt that it is still relavant.
A site that lists sites using CF does bring to attention that very
large companies are successfully using CF to power their needs.
Open source? While that would be lovely for those of us that
have to purchase server licenses, the down side would be that
then there is little if any money to continue its development.
Adobe hasn't supported CF enough probably because it really
hasn't been that long since it took over MM. It is a shame to see
better support for PHP in DWCS3 than CF. Adobe does need to
get on the stick and use their own product and support it better.