2008/12/20 Eric Blake <ebb9@xxxxxxx>:
> Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:
>> So which option should I use?
>> Option 1 - make 1.6 dumpdef always go to stderr
>> Option 2 - make 2.0 dumpdef always go to debugfile
> I just thought of a new option:
> Option 3 - add a flag to both 1.6 and 2.0 debugmode that controls where
> output goes
> Would allow the client to choose (autoconf would choose stderr, but the
> would be debugfile)
> Friendly to autoconf, which is already using another debugmode flag added in
> 1.6 to control whether popdef(undefined) triggers an error
>> My personal preference is option 1, unless someone can speak up with a
>> counter-argument soon.
> At this point, option 3 is the most flexible (it allows both behaviors, thus
> preserving backwards compatibility). What letter should I consume as the
> mnemonic for the ability to redirect dumpdef to stderr, remembering that
> acdefilmpqstxv are already claimed? Maybe 'o' for 'Output dumpdef to stderr'?
I concur on both counts: option 3 with 'o' for output.
Email me: gary@xxxxxxx (\(\
Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net ( o.O)
And my other blog: http://www.machaxor.net (uu )o
...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook ("("_)
m4-discuss mailing list