linux.kernel
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Synchronizing Bit operations V2

Subject: Re: Synchronizing Bit operations V2
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:50:08 +0200
Newsgroups: linux.kernel
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > MODE_BARRIER
> >     An atomic operation that is guaranteed to occur between
> >     previous and later memory operations.
> I think it's a bad idea to create such an complicated interface.
> The chances that an average kernel coder will get these right are
> quite small. And it will be 100% untested outside IA64 I guess
> and thus likely be always slightly buggy as kernel code continues
> to change.

Powerpc can do similar things AFAIK. Not sure what other arches have 
finer grained control over barriers but it could cover a lot of special 
cases for other processors as well.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at                                  www.tux.org/lkml/">http://www.tux.org/lkml/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Privacy Policy