|
|
On Saturday 04 March 2006 00:46, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> More likely is a disabled interrupt period is longer than a
> tick period, or similar.
Then the ticks wouldn't be attributed to idle and softirq.
They are both special in that they do an unconditional local_irq_enable()
instead of the usual save/restore.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at www.tux.org/lkml/">http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
|