| Subject: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free? |
|---|---|
| From: | Francesco Poli <frx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:00:23 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | linux.debian.legal |
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:22:16 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote: [...] > Unfortunatly I do not have time to dig up relevant case law (nor am I > sure that it exists). That said, it seems likely a priori that this > argument can be made. > > In light of this, claiming categorically that the AGPLv3 restricts > rights beyond what copyright already does is currently unfounded. It > may, or it may not. Ah, I think I now understand what you meant and it seems reasonable to me. Thanks a lot for clarifying. -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs The nano-document series is here! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Genicorp General Public Licence, Maximilian Gaß |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bug#496346: openarena: contains lcc, which is not free software, Francesco Poli |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?, Don Armstrong |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?, MJ Ray |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |