| Subject: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free? |
|---|---|
| From: | MJ Ray <mjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:40:13 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | linux.debian.legal |
"Anthony W. Youngman" <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You want the software to be BSD-Free. [...] No, I want the software to be DFSG-Free. Don't start a BSD-GNU fire. [...] > The whole point of the AGPL is keep software GNU-Free and close a > loophole where the web allows public use of GPL software but allows a > modifier to keep the modifications private. Is it a loophole that I am not compelled to give Sarah my modified Iceweasel's source code if I let her use my laptop's copy? I don't think it is. The point of the AGPL seems to be to dress up compulsary distribution to users like that in phrases like "ensure cooperation" which are absurd if you think analyse them. Hope that explains, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?, MJ Ray |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: What kind of copyright/license statement is required here?, MJ Ray |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?, Francesco Poli |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?, MJ Ray |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |