| Subject: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Bernhard R. Link" <brlink@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:30:10 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | linux.debian.legal |
* Benjamin M. A'Lee <bma+lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [080823 21:03]:
> > So everything is fine until someone wants to modify the software.
> > But if they do, you say they are no longer allowed to run it without
> > fullfilling some restrictions. I fail to see how anyone can consider that
> > free.
>
> How is that different to the GPL? The GPL requires anybody who distributes
> the software to fulfill some restrictions (i.e., provide source). The
> only difference I can see is that under the AGPL, "usage" always implies
> "distribution", which I don't think is completely unreasonable for
> webapps and similar.
Except that that running software is nothing that a sane copyright law
should interfere with and nothing anything wanting to be called free
license has a right to limit.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | GNU Simpler Free Documentation License: discussion draft, Ben Finney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?, Bernhard R. Link |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?, Benjamin M. A'Lee |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?, Anthony W. Youngman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |