| Subject: | Re: best apache loadbalancing techniques |
|---|---|
| From: | Cole Tuininga <colet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:00:21 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | linux.debian.isp |
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 18:31 +0200, emilio wrote: > hello, > > you will get better balancing then dns roundrobin and more availability > as if one server goes down then the balancer can automatically put it > out of the balancing. Can't argue with the fact that lvs will do better balancing, but if you want to do it automagically with DNS, I know that Dynect has a product that will monitor a server and take it out of DNS if it doesn't respond. There's a blurb at http://www.dynect.com/features-failover/ I'm sure there's other folks that do the same thing, this is just the one I happen to be familiar with. -- Cole Tuininga <colet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Code Energy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-isp-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: best apache loadbalancing techniques, Keith Edmunds |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bind9 ns1 and ns2 not authoritative, randall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: best apache loadbalancing techniques, Keith Edmunds |
| Next by Thread: | Re: best apache loadbalancing techniques, Maarten Vink |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |