Re: 25+2 packages with (Glade) generated C source files without the source, Neil Williams, 2008/08/31

• Re: 25+2 packages with (Glade) generated C source files without the source, Josselin Mouette, 2008/08/31
  • Re: 25+2 packages with (Glade) generated C source files without the source, Neil Williams, 2008/08/31
    • Re: 25+2 packages with (Glade) generated C source files without the source, Changwoo Ryu, 2008/08/31
• Re: 25+2 packages with (Glade) generated C source files without the source, Sami Liedes, 2008/08/31

Source field in binary Packages list, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, 2008/08/30

• Re: Source field in binary Packages list, Raphael Geissert, 2008/08/30
  • Re: Source field in binary Packages list, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, 2008/08/31
    • Re: Source field in binary Packages list, Daniel Burrows, 2008/08/31

Debian on Zaurus ?, Hans-J. Ullrich, 2008/08/30

• Re: Debian on Zaurus ?, Neil Williams, 2008/08/30
  • RE : Debian on Zaurus ?, BOCAHU Sébastien, 2008/08/30
    • Re: Debian on Zaurus ?, Hans-J. Ullrich, 2008/08/30

Section of the sendmail manual page, Michael Schutte, 2008/08/29

• Re: Section of the sendmail manual page, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/08/29
  • Re: Section of the sendmail manual page, Michael Schutte, 2008/08/29

Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input, Lawrence Williams, 2008/08/29

• Re: Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input, Darren Salt, 2008/08/30
• Re: Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input, Ben Hutchings, 2008/08/30
• Re: Bug#496967: general: System completely blocks any input, Daniel Burrows, 2008/08/31

What should be on a rescue CD ? (was Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1), Ian Jackson, 2008/08/28

• Re: What should be on a rescue CD ? (was Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1), Mark Allums, 2008/08/28
• Re: What should be on a rescue CD ? (was Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1), Daniel Baumann, 2008/08/29

automatic bug filing by test robot, Ian Jackson, 2008/08/27

• Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Gonéri Le Bouder, 2008/08/28
  • Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Ian Jackson, 2008/08/28
• Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/08/28
  • Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Martin Michlmayr, 2008/08/28
  • Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Steve Greenland, 2008/08/29
• Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Holger Levsen, 2008/08/28
  • Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Brian May, 2008/08/28
    • Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Jonathan Wiltshire, 2008/08/28
      • Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Ian Jackson, 2008/08/28
        • Re: automatic bug filing by test robot, Gonéri Le Bouder, 2008/08/28

Needed information about a structure, Laurent Guignard, 2008/08/27

• Re: Needed information about a structure, Russ Allbery, 2008/08/27
  • Re: Needed information about a structure, Laurent Guignard, 2008/08/28

Processed: retitle, Debian Bug Tracking System, 2008/08/27

• Re: Processed: retitle, Vincent Bernat, 2008/08/27

Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1, Daniel Baumann, 2008/08/27

• Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1, Jerome BENOIT, 2008/08/31
• Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1, s. keeling, 2008/08/28
  • Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1, Daniel Baumann, 2008/08/28
    • Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1, s. keeling, 2008/08/29
• Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1, Didier Raboud, 2008/08/28
  • Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1, Daniel Baumann, 2008/08/29

Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Vincent Danjean, 2008/08/27

• Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Mike Hommey, 2008/08/28
  • Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Paul Wise, 2008/08/28
    • Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Mike Hommey, 2008/08/28
• Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/28
  • Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Peter Palfrader, 2008/08/28
    • Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/29
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Re: transfering files between *.debian.org hosts (was: people.debian.org to move to ravel), brian m. carlson, 2008/08/30
• Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Aurelien Jarno, 2008/08/28
  • Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Peter Palfrader, 2008/08/28
• Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/08/28
  • Re: people.debian.org to move to ravel, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/08/29

[Help] Problem with blitz++ package (debian lenny, amd64). (fwd), Andreas Tille, 2008/08/27

• Re: [Help] Problem with blitz++ package (debian lenny, amd64). (fwd), Raphael Geissert, 2008/08/28

Unusual version numbering systems, Dominic Hargreaves, 2008/08/27

• Re: Unusual version numbering systems, Ralf Treinen, 2008/08/27
• Re: Unusual version numbering systems, Martín Ferrari, 2008/08/27
• Re: Unusual version numbering systems, Bastian Blank, 2008/08/27
• Re: Unusual version numbering systems, Michal Čihař, 2008/08/27
• Re: Unusual version numbering systems, Neil Williams, 2008/08/27
• Re: Unusual version numbering systems, Manoj Srivastava, 2008/08/27
  • Re: Unusual version numbering systems, Dominic Hargreaves, 2008/08/29

Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Jonas Smedegaard, 2008/08/27

• Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, maximilian attems, 2008/08/27
  • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Bjørn Mork, 2008/08/27
    • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, maximilian attems, 2008/08/27
      • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Bjørn Mork, 2008/08/27
        • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, maximilian attems, 2008/08/27
    • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Luca Capello, 2008/08/27
  • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Jonas Smedegaard, 2008/08/27
• Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, William Pitcock, 2008/08/27
  • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Jonas Smedegaard, 2008/08/27
    • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, William Pitcock, 2008/08/27
      • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Sandro Tosi, 2008/08/27
      • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Julien BLACHE, 2008/08/27
      • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Bjørn Mork, 2008/08/27
        • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, William Pitcock, 2008/08/27
          • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, jidanni, 2008/08/29
      • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, maximilian attems, 2008/08/27
        • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Bjørn Mork, 2008/08/27
      • Re: Is it a "user error" to use lilo?, Jonas Smedegaard, 2008/08/27

packages up for adoption, James Troup, 2008/08/27

• Re: packages up for adoption, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 2008/08/27
  • Re: packages up for adoption, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/27
    • Re: packages up for adoption, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 2008/08/27
      • Re: packages up for adoption, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 2008/08/27
        • Re: packages up for adoption, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2008/08/27
• Re: packages up for adoption, Luk Claes, 2008/08/27
  • Re: packages up for adoption, Roger Leigh, 2008/08/27
• Re: packages up for adoption, Don Armstrong, 2008/08/27
• Re: packages up for adoption, maximilian attems, 2008/08/27
  • Re: packages up for adoption, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/27
    • Re: packages up for adoption, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/08/27
      • Re: packages up for adoption, maximilian attems, 2008/08/27
• Re: packages up for adoption, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/27
  • Re: packages up for adoption, Charles Plessy, 2008/08/27
• Re: packages up for adoption, Pierre Chifflier, 2008/08/27
• Re: packages up for adoption, James Troup, 2008/08/27
  • Re: packages up for adoption, James Vega, 2008/08/27

Packaging team best practice, Noah Slater, 2008/08/26

• Re: Packaging team best practice, Sandro Tosi, 2008/08/26
  • Re: Packaging team best practice, Noah Slater, 2008/08/26
    • Re: Packaging team best practice, Noah Slater, 2008/08/26
• Re: Packaging team best practice, Norbert Preining, 2008/08/26
• Re: Packaging team best practice, gregor herrmann, 2008/08/26

Etch->Lenny upgrade mutes some/many old laptops., Joona Kiiski, 2008/08/26

• Re: Etch->Lenny upgrade mutes some/many old laptops., Hendrik Sattler, 2008/08/26
  • Re: Etch->Lenny upgrade mutes some/many old laptops., Joona Kiiski, 2008/08/27
    • Re: Etch->Lenny upgrade mutes some/many old laptops., Sam Morris, 2008/08/27
      • Re: Etch->Lenny upgrade mutes some/many old laptops., Hendrik Sattler, 2008/08/27

[Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Kartik Mistry, 2008/08/26

• Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Paul Wise, 2008/08/26
• Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/08/26
  • Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/08/26
    • Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Brian May, 2008/08/27
  • Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/08/26
    • Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Kartik Mistry, 2008/08/27
• Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/08/26
  • Re: [Suggestion] Reject Mail to ITP Bug, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/08/27

Processed: reassign, Debian Bug Tracking System, 2008/08/25

• Processed: reassign, Debian Bug Tracking System, 2008/08/27
• Processed: reassign, Debian Bug Tracking System, 2008/08/27
• Processed: reassign, Debian Bug Tracking System, 2008/08/27
• Processed: reassign, Debian Bug Tracking System, 2008/08/27

Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2008/08/25

• Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Neil Williams, 2008/08/25
• Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Neil Williams, 2008/08/25

Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Christian Perrier, 2008/08/25

• Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2008/08/25
  • Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/25
• Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Charles Plessy, 2008/08/25
  • Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Raphael Geissert, 2008/08/26
• Re: Bug#496386: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2008/08/25

Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Neil Williams, 2008/08/24

• Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/24
  • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Neil Williams, 2008/08/25
    • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/08/25
    • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Peter Samuelson, 2008/08/25
    • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/25
      • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Neil Williams, 2008/08/25
        • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/25
          • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Martin Langhoff, 2008/08/25
          • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Neil Williams, 2008/08/25
  • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Russ Allbery, 2008/08/25
    • Re: Bug#496429: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/25

Minor bobble in etch->lenny upgrade, Steve Greenland, 2008/08/23

• Re: Minor bobble in etch->lenny upgrade, Paul Wise, 2008/08/24
  • Re: Minor bobble in etch->lenny upgrade, Vincent Danjean, 2008/08/24

1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/23

• Re: 1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, Russ Allbery, 2008/08/23
  • Re: 1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/23
    • Re: 1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/08/24
      • Re: 1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/08/27
      • Re: 1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/08/27
• Re: 1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, Florian Lohoff, 2008/08/29
• Re: 1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, Enrico Zini, 2008/08/31
• re: 1 of 400 dpkg databases corrupt?, peter green, 2008/08/24

newer sub package zaps main package instead of waiting, jidanni, 2008/08/22

• newer sub package zaps main package instead of waiting, jidanni, 2008/08/22
• Re: newer sub package zaps main package instead of waiting, Daniel Burrows, 2008/08/23
• Re: newer sub package zaps main package instead of waiting, jidanni, 2008/08/23
  • Re: newer sub package zaps main package instead of waiting, The Fungi, 2008/08/23
    • Re: newer sub package zaps main package instead of waiting, jidanni, 2008/08/23

how to keep the latest linux-doc package installed?, jidanni, 2008/08/22

• Re: how to keep the latest linux-doc package installed?, Paul Wise, 2008/08/23
  • Re: how to keep the latest linux-doc package installed?, jidanni, 2008/08/23
    • Re: how to keep the latest linux-doc package installed?, Paul Wise, 2008/08/23

Re: Xen status in lenny?, André Luís Lopes, 2008/08/22

• Re: Xen status in lenny?, Ben Hutchings, 2008/08/30

bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/08/22

• Re: bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/22
  • Re: bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/08/22
    • Re: bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Miriam Ruiz, 2008/08/22
      • Re: bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/08/22
      • Re: bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/08/22
        • Re: bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Paul Wise, 2008/08/22
          • Re: bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/08/22
          • Re: bitmap fonts: Can they be rejected by default instead of with manual intervention?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/22

On changelogs and version tracking, Don Armstrong, 2008/08/22

• Re: On changelogs and version tracking, Andreas Metzler, 2008/08/22

Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/21

• Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Mike Bird, 2008/08/21
  • Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Peter Samuelson, 2008/08/21
    • Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/21

Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Peter Palfrader, 2008/08/21

• Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Steve Langasek, 2008/08/21
  • Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Michael Biebl, 2008/08/21
  • Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Andreas Henriksson, 2008/08/21
    • Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Michael Tautschnig, 2008/08/21
      • Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Charles Plessy, 2008/08/21
    • Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Neil Williams, 2008/08/21
    • Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/08/21
    • Re: package deviates from standard mail-transport-agent dependency., Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2008/08/22

Newby packager need help during his training ;), Laurent Guignard, 2008/08/20

• Re: Newby packager need help during his training ;), Neil Williams, 2008/08/20
• Re: Newby packager need help during his training ;), Andreas Bombe, 2008/08/20
• Re: Newby packager need help during his training ;), sean finney, 2008/08/20
  • Re: Newby packager need help during his training ;), Laurent Guignard, 2008/08/20

postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig with a -dev package because of .so development files ?, Xavier Roche, 2008/08/20

• Re: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig with a -dev package because of .so development files ?, Aaron M. Ucko, 2008/08/20
  • Re: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig with a -dev package because of .so development files ?, Xavier Roche, 2008/08/20

Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/08/20

• Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/08/21
• Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/21
  • Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/08/22
• Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Chris Lamb, 2008/08/22
  • Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/08/24
  • Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Ben Hutchings, 2008/08/30
• Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Giacomo Catenazzi, 2008/08/22
  • Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Joe Smith, 2008/08/22
    • Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Giacomo A. Catenazzi, 2008/08/25
  • Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/08/23
    • Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Giacomo A. Catenazzi, 2008/08/25
      • Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Giacomo Catenazzi, 2008/08/26
• Re: Hardware compatibility test: draft proposal, Mikhail Gusarov, 2008/08/23

Re: Bug#495643: Catalan DDTP issues, Don Armstrong, 2008/08/19

• Re: Bug#495643: Catalan DDTP issues, Christian Perrier, 2008/08/20

Bug#477072: mysql-server-5.0: Arbitrary data input plus GIS functions, causes mysql server crash, tabris, 2008/08/18

• Re: Bug#477072: mysql-server-5.0: Arbitrary data input plus GIS functions, causes mysql server crash, Norbert Tretkowski, 2008/08/23
  • Re: Bug#477072: mysql-server-5.0: Arbitrary data input plus GIS functions, causes mysql server crash, tabris, 2008/08/23

Amarok: SECURITY ISSUE in Debian Etch and Lenny, thacrazze, 2008/08/18

• Re: Amarok: SECURITY ISSUE in Debian Etch and Lenny, Johannes Wiedersich, 2008/08/18

Re: RFH: clamav, Stephen Gran, 2008/08/16

• Re: RFH: clamav, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2008/08/18

Debian on the FreeRunner -- now official, Joachim Breitner, 2008/08/15

• Re: Debian on the FreeRunner -- now official, Paul Wise, 2008/08/15
  • Re: Debian on the FreeRunner -- now official, Joachim Breitner, 2008/08/16
    • Re: Debian on the FreeRunner -- now official, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/08/16
• Re: Debian on the FreeRunner -- now official, Jay Vaughan, 2008/08/18
• Re: Debian on the FreeRunner -- now official, Michelle Konzack, 2008/08/28

Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/15

• Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/08/15
  • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/15
    • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Bastian Blank, 2008/08/15
      • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Loïc Minier, 2008/08/15
    • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Pierre Habouzit, 2008/08/15
      • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Joshua Cummings, 2008/08/19
        • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/08/19
        • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Aurelien Jarno, 2008/08/19
  • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Ingo Juergensmann, 2008/08/15
    • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/08/15
• Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Ingo Juergensmann, 2008/08/15
  • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/08/15
    • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Ingo Juergensmann, 2008/08/15
  • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Charles Plessy, 2008/08/15
    • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Ingo Juergensmann, 2008/08/15
      • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Michael Casadevall, 2008/08/15
        • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/16
          • Re: Upcoming changes to supported architectures, Michael Casadevall, 2008/08/16

FTBS twice - what is the priority for it?, Shachar Shemesh, 2008/08/14

• Re: FTBS twice - what is the priority for it?, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/08/14
• Re: FTBS twice - what is the priority for it?, Carl Fürstenberg, 2008/08/15
• re: FTBS twice - what is the priority for it?, peter green, 2008/08/15

issues with aptitude dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, Henning Glawe, 2008/08/13

• Re: issues with aptitude dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, Niko Tyni, 2008/08/13
  • Re: issues with aptitude dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, Henning Glawe, 2008/08/14
    • Re: issues with aptitude dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, Brian May, 2008/08/18
  • Re: issues with aptitude dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, Henning Glawe, 2008/08/16
    • Re: issues with aptitude dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, Osamu Aoki, 2008/08/16
• Re: issues with aptitude dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, Tim Dijkstra, 2008/08/14
• Re: issues with aptitude dist-upgrade from etch to lenny, Brian May, 2008/08/14

Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Daniel Burrows, 2008/08/13

• Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Shachar Or, 2008/08/13
  • Re: Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Filipus Klutiero, 2008/08/16
• Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Adeodato Simó, 2008/08/14

Need g++-3.4 package in lenny, mvmvmv1234@xxxxxxxxx, 2008/08/11

• Re: Need g++-3.4 package in lenny, Bjoern Meier, 2008/08/11
• Re: Need g++-3.4 package in lenny, brian m. carlson, 2008/08/11
  • Re: Need g++-3.4 package in lenny, Florian Weimer, 2008/08/17
    • Re: Need g++-3.4 package in lenny, brian m. carlson, 2008/08/17
• Re: Need g++-3.4 package in lenny, Aaron M. Ucko, 2008/08/11

Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies, Francisco Moya, 2008/08/11

• Re: Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/08/15
  • RE: Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies, FRANCISCO MOYA FERNANDEZ, 2008/08/15
    • Re: Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/08/17
      • Re: Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies, Francisco Moya, 2008/08/18
        • Re: Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/08/20
    • Re: Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies, Andreas Metzler, 2008/08/18
    • Re: Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies, Andreas Metzler, 2008/08/18

Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Charles Plessy, 2008/08/11

• Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/08/11
  • Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Felipe Sateler, 2008/08/12
    • Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Charles Plessy, 2008/08/13
      • Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Felipe Sateler, 2008/08/13
        • Re: feature: to add explanations of recommendations and suggestions dependencies, Daniel Burrows, 2008/08/13

Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/11

• Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Steve Kemp, 2008/08/11
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/11
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Marco d'Itri, 2008/08/11
    • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/11
      • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Julien Cristau, 2008/08/11
        • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/11
• Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/11
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/11
    • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Joey Hess, 2008/08/11
      • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/12
• Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/11
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Steve Kemp, 2008/08/11
    • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/11
• Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Sam Morris, 2008/08/11
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/12
    • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, brian m. carlson, 2008/08/12
      • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/12
        • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 2008/08/12
          • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/12
            • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/08/13
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Michelle Konzack, 2008/08/28
• Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/12
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/12
• Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/13
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Brian May, 2008/08/13
    • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/13
      • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Bjørn Mork, 2008/08/13
    • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Ivan Jager, 2008/08/13
      • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Brian May, 2008/08/16
        • Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Vincent Danjean, 2008/08/16
• Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/13
• Re: Possible mass bug filing: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages, Dmitry E. Oboukhov, 2008/08/19

Possible mass bug filing: embedding perl hangs on hppa without PERL_SYS_INIT3, Niko Tyni, 2008/08/10

• Re: Possible mass bug filing: embedding perl hangs on hppa without PERL_SYS_INIT3, Sebastian Harl, 2008/08/13
  • Re: Possible mass bug filing: embedding perl hangs on hppa without PERL_SYS_INIT3, Niko Tyni, 2008/08/14

Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Fabio Tranchitella, 2008/08/10

• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Brian May, 2008/08/11
      • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/11
        • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Bastian Blank, 2008/08/11
          • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Bjørn Mork, 2008/08/11
            • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Fabio Tranchitella, 2008/08/11
          • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/11
        • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Soren Hansen, 2008/08/11
          • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/12
            • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/12
              • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Bastian Blank, 2008/08/12
              • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/13
              • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Bastian Blank, 2008/08/13
              • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/21
              • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Bastian Blank, 2008/08/21
              • Re: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/29

Re: Bug#494488: ITP: polyml -- Standard ML implementation, Achim D. Brucker, 2008/08/10

• Re: Bug#494488: ITP: polyml -- Standard ML implementation, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/08/10
  • Re: Bug#494488: ITP: polyml -- Standard ML implementation, Achim D. Brucker, 2008/08/10
    • Re: Bug#494488: ITP: polyml -- Standard ML implementation, Ben Finney, 2008/08/11
  • Re: Bug#494488: ITP: polyml -- Standard ML implementation, Florian Weimer, 2008/08/17

A tool for tracking masked updates to stable packages, Marcin Owsiany, 2008/08/10

• Re: A tool for tracking masked updates to stable packages, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/10
  • Re: A tool for tracking masked updates to stable packages, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/08/10
• Re: A tool for tracking masked updates to stable packages, Vincent Fourmond, 2008/08/10
  • Re: A tool for tracking masked updates to stable packages, Marcin Owsiany, 2008/08/23
• Re: A tool for tracking masked updates to stable packages, Frans Pop, 2008/08/14
  • Re: A tool for tracking masked updates to stable packages, Shachar Or, 2008/08/14
  • Re: A tool for tracking masked updates to stable packages, Brian May, 2008/08/14

Re: cipux-storage_3.4~svn2489-2_amd64.changes REJECTED, Jonas Smedegaard, 2008/08/09

• Re: cipux-storage_3.4~svn2489-2_amd64.changes REJECTED, Mark Hymers, 2008/08/09
  • Re: cipux-storage_3.4~svn2489-2_amd64.changes REJECTED, Jonas Smedegaard, 2008/08/09
    • Re: cipux-storage_3.4~svn2489-2_amd64.changes REJECTED, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/08/09
    • Re: cipux-storage_3.4~svn2489-2_amd64.changes REJECTED, Mark Hymers, 2008/08/09
• Re: cipux-storage_3.4~svn2489-2_amd64.changes REJECTED, Vincent Fourmond, 2008/08/09
  • Re: cipux-storage_3.4~svn2489-2_amd64.changes REJECTED, Jonas Smedegaard, 2008/08/09
  • Re: cipux-storage_3.4~svn2489-2_amd64.changes REJECTED, gregor herrmann, 2008/08/09

Annoying GTK2 file dialogue - where to file the BUG?, Rudi Effe, 2008/08/09

• Re: Annoying GTK2 file dialogue - where to file the BUG?, Michael Banck, 2008/08/09
• Re: Annoying GTK2 file dialogue - where to file the BUG?, Sam Morris, 2008/08/09
  • Re: Annoying GTK2 file dialogue - where to file the BUG?, Rudi Effe, 2008/08/10
    • Re: Annoying GTK2 file dialogue - where to file the BUG?, Michael Banck, 2008/08/10
• Re: Annoying GTK2 file dialogue - where to file the BUG?, Sam Morris, 2008/08/09
• Re: Annoying GTK2 file dialogue - where to file the BUG?, Johannes Wiedersich, 2008/08/13
  • Re: Annoying GTK2 file dialogue - where to file the BUG?, Rudi Effe, 2008/08/18

What is the target used by buildd?, Francisco Moya, 2008/08/09

• Re: What is the target used by buildd?, Michael Casadevall, 2008/08/09
• Re: What is the target used by buildd?, Felipe Sateler, 2008/08/09
• Re: What is the target used by buildd?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/08/09
  • Re: What is the target used by buildd?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/09

Scour invite from anand, anand, 2008/08/08

• Scour invite from anand, anand, 2008/08/08

tools/ and dftp on mirrors, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/08/07

• Re: tools/ and dftp on mirrors, Frans Pop, 2008/08/07
  • Re: tools/ and dftp on mirrors, Steve McIntyre, 2008/08/13
    • Re: tools/ and dftp on mirrors, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/08/18
• Re: tools/ and dftp on mirrors, Daniel Moerner, 2008/08/07
  • Re: tools/ and dftp on mirrors, Michelle Konzack, 2008/08/15
    • Re: tools/ and dftp on mirrors, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/15

disappointed ... APT HowTo removed from sid, Florian Rehnisch, 2008/08/07

• Re: disappointed ... APT HowTo removed from sid, Paul Wise, 2008/08/07
• Re: disappointed ... APT HowTo removed from sid, Mark Hymers, 2008/08/07
• Re: disappointed ... APT HowTo removed from sid, Osamu Aoki, 2008/08/25

Re: RFA: The Debian Jr. project, Miriam Ruiz, 2008/08/07

• Re: RFA: The Debian Jr. project, Holger Levsen, 2008/08/25
  • Re: RFA: The Debian Jr. project, Michael Schutte, 2008/08/25

Re: correct definition of localhost?, Aurelien Jarno, 2008/08/07

• Re: correct definition of localhost?, Aurelien Jarno, 2008/08/09

dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, martin f krafft, 2008/08/07

• Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Brian May, 2008/08/07
  • Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, martin f krafft, 2008/08/07
    • Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Brian May, 2008/08/07
      • Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Peter Samuelson, 2008/08/08
        • Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Brian May, 2008/08/08
    • Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Mike Hommey, 2008/08/07
• Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Theodore Tso, 2008/08/08
  • Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, martin f krafft, 2008/08/08
    • Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Theodore Tso, 2008/08/09
• Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Brian May, 2008/08/09
• Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, Daniel Bayer, 2008/08/23
  • Re: dhclient-script, hooks, and changing the environment, martin f krafft, 2008/08/24

Re: Bug#494043: ITP: ozymandns -- An experimental DNS server and miscellaneous DNS tools, Steve McIntyre, 2008/08/07

• Re: Bug#494043: ITP: ozymandns -- An experimental DNS server and miscellaneous DNS tools, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/08/07
  • Re: Bug#494043: ITP: ozymandns -- An experimental DNS server and miscellaneous DNS tools, Clint Adams, 2008/08/07
    • Re: Bug#494043: ITP: ozymandns -- An experimental DNS server and miscellaneous DNS tools, Jacob Appelbaum, 2008/08/07
  • Re: Bug#494043: ITP: ozymandns -- An experimental DNS server and miscellaneous DNS tools, Jacob Appelbaum, 2008/08/07
    • Re: Bug#494043: ITP: ozymandns -- An experimental DNS server and miscellaneous DNS tools, Marco d'Itri, 2008/08/07
• Re: Bug#494043: ITP: ozymandns -- An experimental DNS server and miscellaneous DNS tools, Jonathan Lassoff, 2008/08/09
  • Re: Bug#494043: ITP: ozymandns -- An experimental DNS server and miscellaneous DNS tools, Steve McIntyre, 2008/08/09

projectb users - we want you, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/08/06

• Re: projectb users - we want you, Charles Plessy, 2008/08/07
  • Re: projectb users - we want you, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/08/07
  • Re: projectb users - we want you, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/08/07
    • Re: projectb users - we want you, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/08/07
• Re: projectb users - we want you, Cameron Dale, 2008/08/11
  • Re: projectb users - we want you, Michael Casadevall, 2008/08/12

Re: tagging 231711, tagging 232113, tagging 236498, tagging 241414, tagging 250782, tagging 254248, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/06

• Re: tagging 231711, tagging 232113, tagging 236498, tagging 241414, tagging 250782, tagging 254248, Marc Haber, 2008/08/06

Re: Bug#493972: ITP: etherpuppet -- create a virtual interface from a remote Ethernet interface, Yves-Alexis Perez, 2008/08/06

• Re: Bug#493972: ITP: etherpuppet -- create a virtual interface from a remote Ethernet interface, Guus Sliepen, 2008/08/06
  • Re: Bug#493972: ITP: etherpuppet -- create a virtual interface from a remote Ethernet interface, Hamish Moffatt, 2008/08/06
  • Re: Bug#493972: ITP: etherpuppet -- create a virtual interface from a remote Ethernet interface, Vincent Bernat, 2008/08/06

trying to overwrite ..., which is also in package ..., jidanni, 2008/08/06

• Re: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in package ..., Olivier Berger, 2008/08/06
  • Re: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in package ..., Vincent Danjean, 2008/08/06
    • edos, mancoosi - Was: Re: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in package ..., Olivier Berger, 2008/08/06
      • Re: edos, mancoosi - Was: Re: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in package ..., Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/08/07
    • Re: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in package ..., Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/08/07
    • Re: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in package ..., Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/08/07
  • Re: trying to overwrite ..., which is also in package ..., jidanni, 2008/08/07

Invitation to connect on LinkedIn, Bjarke Bolding Rasmussen, 2008/08/05

• Invitation to connect on LinkedIn, Bjarke Bolding Rasmussen, 2008/08/05
• Invitation to connect on LinkedIn, Shobhit Jindal, 2008/08/29

html2text with utf8 support: please test, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 2008/08/05

• Re: html2text with utf8 support: please test, Kenshi Muto, 2008/08/18
  • Re: html2text with utf8 support: please test, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/18
    • Re: html2text with utf8 support: please test, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 2008/08/23
  • Re: html2text with utf8 support: please test, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 2008/08/18

Packages getting marked not-for-us, John Goerzen, 2008/08/05

• Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2008/08/05
• Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Mark Brown, 2008/08/05
  • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Michael Casadevall, 2008/08/06
    • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/06
      • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Steve McIntyre, 2008/08/06
        • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Matthew Johnson, 2008/08/06
          • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/06
            • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/08/07
              • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/08/07
              • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/08/07
              • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/07
              • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Luk Claes, 2008/08/07
        • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/08/07
          • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/07
            • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/08/07
              • Re: Packages getting marked not-for-us, Mark Brown, 2008/08/08

Re: Bug#493697: ITP: mobile-manager -- mobile manager GPRS/3G daemon, Juan Manuel García Molina, 2008/08/05

• Re: Bug#493697: ITP: mobile-manager -- mobile manager GPRS/3G daemon, Michelle Konzack, 2008/08/08
  • Re: Bug#493697: ITP: mobile-manager -- mobile manager GPRS/3G daemon, Hendrik Sattler, 2008/08/08

bug #292231 - fixed in upstream, pending 412 days, jaromil, 2008/08/05

• Re: bug #292231 - fixed in upstream, pending 412 days, Vincent Bernat, 2008/08/05

Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and secure httpd, Ben Hutchings, 2008/08/05

• Re: Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and securehttpd, Franklin PIAT, 2008/08/25
  • Re: Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast and securehttpd, Tzafrir Cohen, 2008/08/25
    • Re: Re: Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast andsecurehttpd, Franklin PIAT, 2008/08/27
      • Re: Re: Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast andsecurehttpd, Steve Greenland, 2008/08/27
        • Re: Bug#493645: ITP: nostromo -- small, simple, fast andsecurehttpd, Franklin PIAT, 2008/08/28

Please test syslinux 3.71+dfsg-1, Daniel Baumann, 2008/08/04

• Re: Please test syslinux 3.71+dfsg-1, Adeodato Simó, 2008/08/05
  • Re: Please test syslinux 3.71+dfsg-1, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/08/05
  • Re: Please test syslinux 3.71+dfsg-1, Daniel Baumann, 2008/08/05
    • Re: Please test syslinux 3.71+dfsg-1, Adeodato Simó, 2008/08/05

Shouldn't tar 1.20-1 be in testing?, Vincent Lefevre, 2008/08/04

• Re: Shouldn't tar 1.20-1 be in testing?, Julien Cristau, 2008/08/04
  • Re: Shouldn't tar 1.20-1 be in testing?, Theodore Tso, 2008/08/04
    • Re: Shouldn't tar 1.20-1 be in testing?, Joey Hess, 2008/08/04

Statically linking against bundled libagg, Dominic Hargreaves, 2008/08/04

• Re: Statically linking against bundled libagg, Russ Allbery, 2008/08/04
  • Message not available
    • Re: Statically linking against bundled libagg, Dominic Hargreaves, 2008/08/04

Re: Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Niko Tyni, 2008/08/03

• Re: Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Guillem Jover, 2008/08/21

Available papersizes vs. default papersizes, Frank Küster, 2008/08/03

• Re: Available papersizes vs. default papersizes, Ben Hutchings, 2008/08/03
  • Re: Available papersizes vs. default papersizes, Frank Küster, 2008/08/03
• Re: Available papersizes vs. default papersizes, Johannes Wiedersich, 2008/08/04
  • Re: Available papersizes vs. default papersizes, Frank Küster, 2008/08/04
• Re: Available papersizes vs. default papersizes, Aaron M. Ucko, 2008/08/04

Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, Robert Millan, 2008/08/03

• Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, Ben Armstrong, 2008/08/03
  • Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, Andreas Tille, 2008/08/04
• confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Robert Millan, 2008/08/03
  • Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Ben Armstrong, 2008/08/03
  • Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Giacomo A. Catenazzi, 2008/08/04
    • Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Robert Millan, 2008/08/04
      • Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Julien Cristau, 2008/08/04
      • Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Giacomo Catenazzi, 2008/08/04
      • Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Russ Allbery, 2008/08/04
        • Message not available
          • Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Russ Allbery, 2008/08/05
            • Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008), Marco d'Itri, 2008/08/05
• Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, Ben Armstrong, 2008/08/03
  • Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, Ben Finney, 2008/08/04
  • Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, Robert Millan, 2008/08/05
• Re: Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, Hans-J. Ullrich, 2008/08/05
  • Re: Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, jaromil, 2008/08/05
    • Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008, Hans-J. Ullrich, 2008/08/05

Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 2008/08/02

• Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/05
  • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/06
    • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/06
      • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Felipe Sateler, 2008/08/08
        • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Ben Finney, 2008/08/08
          • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/08/18
• Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/05

Re: Standard way to disable services, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/08/02

• Re: Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 2008/08/06
  • Re: Standard way to disable services, Guido Günther, 2008/08/08

Re: [Debconf-announce] Schedule for DebConf8, Florian Maier, 2008/08/02

• Re: [Debconf-announce] Schedule for DebConf8, Holger Levsen, 2008/08/02

[VAC] August 08, Thibaut Paumard, 2008/08/01

• Re: [VAC] August 08, Adam D. Barratt, 2008/08/01

Authentication with LP for DD's using gnupg, Neil Williams, 2008/08/01

• Re: Authentication with LP for DD's using gnupg, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2008/08/01
  • Re: Authentication with LP for DD's using gnupg, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/01
    • Re: Authentication with LP for DD's using gnupg, Jonathan McDowell, 2008/08/01
• Re: Authentication with LP for DD's using gnupg, UlisesVitulli, 2008/08/01
• Re: Authentication with LP for DD's using gnupg, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/08/01

Re: Needs help: CJK Debian users will not be able to read PDF with poppler-data in default Debian Desktop in Lenny, Paul Wise, 2008/08/01

• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Message not available
          • Message not available
            • Message not available
              • Re: Bug#481134: libpoppler does not use cmap files from xpdf-{japanese,...}, and fails to parse Japanese PDF files., Osamu Aoki, 2008/08/22
              • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Re: Please hint poppler-data for lenny inclusion, Hideki Yamane, 2008/08/29
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Message not available
          • Message not available
            • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Message not available
              • Re: Bug#481134: libpoppler does not use cmap files from xpdf-{japanese,...}, and fails to parse Japanese PDF files., Osamu Aoki, 2008/08/24
              • Re: Bug#481134: libpoppler does not use cmap files from xpdf-{japanese,...}, and fails to parse Japanese PDF files., Loïc Minier, 2008/08/24

Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Russ Allbery, 2008/08/01

• Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Jörg Sommer, 2008/08/02
  • Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/02
    • Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Johannes Wiedersich, 2008/08/04
• Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/02
  • Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Santiago Vila, 2008/08/03
    • Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Steve Langasek, 2008/08/05
• Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/08/07

Mass bug filing: init script "status" action, Dustin Kirkland, 2008/08/01

• Re: Mass bug filing: init script "status" action, Russ Allbery, 2008/08/01
  • Re: Mass bug filing: init script "status" action, Peter Samuelson, 2008/08/01
    • Re: Mass bug filing: init script "status" action, Russ Allbery, 2008/08/01
    • Re: Mass bug filing: init script "status" action, Peter Samuelson, 2008/08/01
  • Re: Mass bug filing: init script "status" action, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/08/01
  • Re: Mass bug filing: init script "status" action, Christian Perrier, 2008/08/01