Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Jörg Sommer, 2008/07/31

• Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Manuel Prinz, 2008/07/31
  • Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/31
    • Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/07/31
• Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/07/31
• Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/31

Re: Bug#492922: ITP: arpon -- arp handler inspection, Ben Finney, 2008/07/30

• Re: Bug#492922: ITP: arpon -- arp handler inspection, Hamish Moffatt, 2008/07/30
  • Re: Bug#492922: ITP: arpon -- arp handler inspection, Ben Finney, 2008/07/30

Re: Bug#492807: ITP: procinfo-ng -- displays system information from /proc, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/29

• Re: Bug#492807: ITP: procinfo-ng -- displays system information from /proc, tabris, 2008/07/29
  • Re: Bug#492807: ITP: procinfo-ng -- displays system information from /proc, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/29

New Testing Name ???, Victor Muchica, 2008/07/28

• Re: New Testing Name ???, Adeodato Simó, 2008/07/28

No announcement for etch&half seen ?, Olivier Berger, 2008/07/28

• Re: No announcement for etch&half seen ?, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/07/28

Re: procinfo maintainership, tabris, 2008/07/28

• Re: procinfo maintainership, Bernd Zeimetz, 2008/07/28
  • Re: procinfo maintainership, tabris, 2008/07/28
    • Re: procinfo maintainership, Bernd Zeimetz, 2008/07/28
      • Re: procinfo maintainership, tabris, 2008/07/28
        • Re: procinfo maintainership, Bernd Zeimetz, 2008/07/28

Re: Lenny frozen, Magnus Holmgren, 2008/07/27

• Re: Lenny frozen, Olivier Berger, 2008/07/28
  • Re: Lenny frozen, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/07/28
  • Re: Lenny frozen, Luk Claes, 2008/07/28
    • Re: Lenny frozen, Olivier Berger, 2008/07/28
      • Re: Lenny frozen, Martin Meredith, 2008/07/28
        • Re: Lenny frozen, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/28
• Re: Lenny frozen, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 2008/07/29
  • Re: Lenny frozen, Adeodato Simó, 2008/07/29
    • Re: libpqxx in NEW fixes RC bug (was: Re: Lenny frozen), Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 2008/07/29

Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics, RalfGesellensetter, 2008/07/27

• Re: Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics, Thomas Preud'homme, 2008/07/27
  • Message not available
    • Re: Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics, Thomas Preud'homme, 2008/07/27

Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 2008/07/26

• Re: Standard way to disable services, Enrico Zini, 2008/07/26
• Re: Standard way to disable services, Josselin Mouette, 2008/07/26
  • Re: Standard way to disable services, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/26
    • Re: Standard way to disable services, Luk Claes, 2008/07/26
      • Re: Standard way to disable services, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/26
        • Re: Standard way to disable services, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/29
          • Re: Standard way to disable services, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/07/29
            • Re: Standard way to disable services, Steve Greenland, 2008/07/29
            • Re: Standard way to disable services, Guido Günther, 2008/07/31
              • Re: Standard way to disable services, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/07/31
              • Re: Standard way to disable services, Guido Günther, 2008/07/31
              • Re: Standard way to disable services, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/07/31
      • Re: Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 2008/07/27
        • Re: Standard way to disable services, Osamu Aoki, 2008/07/27
• Re: Standard way to disable services, Hans-J. Ullrich, 2008/07/26
  • Re: Standard way to disable services, Nico Golde, 2008/07/26
    • Re: Standard way to disable services, Marc Haber, 2008/07/30
      • Re: Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 2008/07/30
• Re: Standard way to disable services, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/26
• Re: Standard way to disable services, Lightning, 2008/07/27
  • Re: Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 2008/07/30

Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Enrico Zini, 2008/07/24

• Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Brian May, 2008/07/25
  • Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Enrico Zini, 2008/07/25
    • Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Enrico Zini, 2008/07/25
• Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/25
• Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Peter Palfrader, 2008/07/25
  • Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Enrico Zini, 2008/07/25
• Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Roger Leigh, 2008/07/27

"glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?", Eddy Petrișor, 2008/07/24

• Re: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?", James Vega, 2008/07/24
• Re: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?", Josselin Mouette, 2008/07/24

Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Guillem Jover, 2008/07/23

• Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Andreas Barth, 2008/07/29
  • Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/29
    • Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Ian Jackson, 2008/07/30
      • Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/30

Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Christoph Haas, 2008/07/22

• Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Michael Banck, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Bernhard R. Link, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Enrico Zini, 2008/07/23
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Joey Hess, 2008/07/23
    • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Drake Wilson, 2008/07/23
      • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/07/24
        • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Drake Wilson, 2008/07/24
          • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/07/24
• Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Leo \"costela\" Antunes, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/07/22
    • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/22
      • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/23
• Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Paul Wise, 2008/07/22
• Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Raphael Hertzog, 2008/07/22
• Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/07/22
• Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Paul Wise, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/23
• Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/23
• Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Jon Dowland, 2008/07/25
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), James Vega, 2008/07/25
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Paul Wise, 2008/07/25
  • Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Ben Finney, 2008/07/26

amd64 buildd hosts, Walter Franzini, 2008/07/22

• Re: amd64 buildd hosts, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/07/22
  • Re: amd64 buildd hosts, Walter Franzini, 2008/07/22
• Re: amd64 buildd hosts, Walter Franzini, 2008/07/23

Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/22

• Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/23
    • Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/07/23
      • Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/24

ITH:: gerris - Gerris Flow Solver, Drew Parsons, 2008/07/22

• Re: ITH:: gerris - Gerris Flow Solver, Drew Parsons, 2008/07/22

Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification), Nicolas Boullis, 2008/07/21

• Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification), Nicolas Boullis, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification), Kel Modderman, 2008/07/23
    • Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/07/23
    • Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems, Nicolas Boullis, 2008/07/23
      • Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems, Teodor, 2008/07/23
        • Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems, Nicolas Boullis, 2008/07/24

Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 2008/07/21

• Re: Intel Atom Processor, Paul Wise, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/22
    • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Gabor Gombas, 2008/07/22
• Message not available
  • RE: Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 2008/07/22
    • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Paul Wise, 2008/07/22
    • Message not available
      • RE: Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 2008/07/22
        • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/22
          • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/22
            • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/23
            • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Joey Hess, 2008/07/23
        • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Steffen Moeller, 2008/07/24
          • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Jose Luis Rivas, 2008/07/24
          • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Ben Armstrong, 2008/07/24
            • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Steffen Moeller, 2008/07/25
              • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Ben Armstrong, 2008/07/27
    • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/22
      • RE: Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 2008/07/22
        • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/27
          • RE: Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 2008/07/29
            • Re: Intel Atom Processor, Ben Armstrong, 2008/07/29

What to do with new upstream releases before Lenny is out ?, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/21

• Re: What to do with new upstream releases before Lenny is out ?, Barry deFreese, 2008/07/21
• Re: What to do with new upstream releases before Lenny is out ?, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/21
• Re: What to do with new upstream releases before Lenny is out ?, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2008/07/21

Re: esound [was: Re: Non-related 'Recommends' dependencies - bug or not?], Jason D. Clinton, 2008/07/20

• Re: esound [was: Re: Non-related 'Recommends' dependencies - bug or not?], Josselin Mouette, 2008/07/21

Good communication with upstream is good idea, Osamu Aoki, 2008/07/20

• Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/20
  • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 2008/07/20
    • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/20
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 2008/07/20
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/21
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 2008/07/21
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/21
            • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Matthew Johnson, 2008/07/23
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/07/23
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Matthew Johnson, 2008/07/23
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/07/23
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Andrei Popescu, 2008/07/23
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/07/24
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Eduard Bloch, 2008/07/27
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/07/27
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/27
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 2008/07/27
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/27
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 2008/07/28
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/28
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 2008/07/28
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/23
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/28
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 2008/07/28
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, James Westby, 2008/07/28
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/28
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/28
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 2008/07/29
  • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Caroline Ford, 2008/07/20
  • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/20
    • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/20
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Holger Levsen, 2008/07/20
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/20
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 2008/07/21
            • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 2008/07/21
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/21
            • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/07/21
            • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/21
              • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 2008/07/21
    • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/20
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/21
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/21
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, William Pitcock, 2008/07/21
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/07/22
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Kartik Mistry, 2008/07/21
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/07/21
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/07/21
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/07/21
        • Message not available
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/07/22
    • Re: Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Jon Dowland, 2008/07/21
    • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/21
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/21
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/07/21
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, James Vega, 2008/07/21
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, William Pitcock, 2008/07/21
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Brian May, 2008/07/22
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Daniel Burrows, 2008/07/22
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/22
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/22
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Joey Hess, 2008/07/23
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/23
            • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 2008/07/24
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/22
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/22
          • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/22
    • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Hamish Moffatt, 2008/07/22
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 2008/07/22
  • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/07/20
  • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stephan Hermann, 2008/07/21
    • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/21
      • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stephan Hermann, 2008/07/22
        • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Kees Cook, 2008/07/22
• Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Joey Hess, 2008/07/20
  • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Osamu Aoki, 2008/07/27
• Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Bernhard R. Link, 2008/07/20
  • Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/20

glib inconsistencies in testing, Frank Küster, 2008/07/20

• Re: glib inconsistencies in testing, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/20
  • Re: glib inconsistencies in testing, Frank Küster, 2008/07/20
    • Re: glib inconsistencies in testing, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/20
• Re: glib inconsistencies in testing, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/21

Symbol files and C++ name mangling, Michael Tautschnig, 2008/07/20

• Re: Symbol files and C++ name mangling, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/07/20

Pls help me, Jithesh Chandran, 2008/07/20

• Re: Pls help me, Paul Wise, 2008/07/20

FHS and /var/www, Carl Fürstenberg, 2008/07/20

• Re: FHS and /var/www, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/07/20
• Re: FHS and /var/www, Ben Finney, 2008/07/20
  • Re: FHS and /var/www, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/07/20
    • Re: FHS and /var/www, Carl Fürstenberg, 2008/07/20
    • Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 2008/07/21
      • Re: FHS and /var/www, Holger Levsen, 2008/07/22
      • Re: FHS and /var/www, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/23
  • Re: FHS and /var/www, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/22
    • Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 2008/07/23
      • Re: FHS and /var/www, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/23
        • Re: FHS and /var/www, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/07/24
• Re: FHS and /var/www, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/20
• Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/20
  • Re: FHS and /var/www, Carl Fürstenberg, 2008/07/20
    • Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/20
      • Re: FHS and /var/www, Carl Fürstenberg, 2008/07/20
        • Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/20
          • Re: FHS and /var/www, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/20
      • Re: FHS and /var/www, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/20
        • Re: FHS and /var/www, Brendan, 2008/07/21
        • Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/21
          • Re: FHS and /var/www, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/21
            • Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/21
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Gabor Gombas, 2008/07/21
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, William Pitcock, 2008/07/21
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/21
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Brian May, 2008/07/22
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/07/22
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, The Fungi, 2008/07/22
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/21
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/21
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/21
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Don Armstrong, 2008/07/21
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/22
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 2008/07/23
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/24
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Brendan, 2008/07/22
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, sean finney, 2008/07/22
              • Re: FHS and /var/www, Paul Wise, 2008/07/23
    • Re: FHS and /var/www, Edward Allcutt, 2008/07/20
      • Re: FHS and /var/www, Ben Finney, 2008/07/20
        • Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 2008/07/21
          • Re: FHS and /var/www, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/07/21
            • Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 2008/07/21
  • Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 2008/07/21
• Message not available
  • Re: FHS and /var/www, Patrick Matthäi, 2008/07/28

Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Sergei Golovan, 2008/07/19

• Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2008/07/19
  • Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Sergei Golovan, 2008/07/19
    • Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/19
    • Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/19
    • Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Vincent Bernat, 2008/07/19
    • Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/19
      • Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Sergei Golovan, 2008/07/20
    • Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Brian May, 2008/07/20
      • Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, The Fungi, 2008/07/20

Re: Bug#480563: Doesn't strip binary NMU version (+b1, +bN etc.) when reporting bugs, Sandro Tosi, 2008/07/18

• Re: Bug#480563: Doesn't strip binary NMU version (+b1, +bN etc.) when reporting bugs, Aaron M. Ucko, 2008/07/18
• Re: Bug#480563: Doesn't strip binary NMU version (+b1, +bN etc.) when reporting bugs, Don Armstrong, 2008/07/19
  • Re: Bug#480563: Doesn't strip binary NMU version (+b1, +bN etc.) when reporting bugs, Sandro Tosi, 2008/07/19

Re: Bug#490805: ITP: txtreader -- text reader, mainly used for reading text originally novels, Chris Bannister, 2008/07/18

• Re: Bug#490805: ITP: txtreader -- text reader, mainly used for reading text originally novels, Drake Wilson, 2008/07/18
  • Re: Bug#490805: ITP: txtreader -- text reader, mainly used for reading text originally novels, Ben Finney, 2008/07/19

Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/07/17

• Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Andreas Tille, 2008/07/17
  • Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Adam D. Barratt, 2008/07/17
    • Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Andreas Tille, 2008/07/17
• Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Adeodato Simó, 2008/07/17

RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 2008/07/16

• Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., William Pitcock, 2008/07/17
  • Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 2008/07/17
  • Message not available
    • Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., William Pitcock, 2008/07/17
      • Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 2008/07/17
  • Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 2008/07/17
    • Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., William Pitcock, 2008/07/18
      • Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 2008/07/18

Re: ITP: MUMPS -- MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver, Ron Johnson, 2008/07/16

• Message not available
  • Bootstrapping (was Re: ITP: MUMPS -- ...), Ron Johnson, 2008/07/17
    • Re: Bootstrapping (was Re: ITP: MUMPS -- ...), Andreas Tille, 2008/07/17

Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, richs, 2008/07/16

• Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Leo 'costela' Antunes, 2008/07/16
  • Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, richs, 2008/07/16
    • Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, brian m. carlson, 2008/07/16
      • Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/16
        • Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Ben Hutchings, 2008/07/19
      • Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/17
      • Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Hendrik Sattler, 2008/07/17
    • Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Frans Pop, 2008/07/16
      • Re: Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, richs, 2008/07/17
        • Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Frans Pop, 2008/07/17

Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/16

• Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}, Neil Williams, 2008/07/16
• Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}, Paul Wise, 2008/07/17
  • Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}, Neil Williams, 2008/07/17

sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/07/15

• Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/16
  • Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/07/17
    • Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Jonas Meurer, 2008/07/17
      • Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Michael Biebl, 2008/07/17

Re: Bug#490857: ITP: watermelons -- watermelon bouncing game, unifoundry, 2008/07/15

• Re: Bug#490857: ITP: watermelons -- watermelon bouncing game, Evgeni Golov, 2008/07/15

font policy changes, unifoundry, 2008/07/14

• Re: font policy changes, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/14
  • Re: font policy changes, Julien Cristau, 2008/07/14
    • Re: font policy changes, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/14
      • Re: font policy changes, Vincent Bernat, 2008/07/14
      • Re: font policy changes, Julien Cristau, 2008/07/14
        • Re: font policy changes, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/14
• Re: font policy changes, Josselin Mouette, 2008/07/16
• RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 2008/07/14
• RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 2008/07/14
• RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 2008/07/16
  • Re: font policy changes, Julien Cristau, 2008/07/16
• RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 2008/07/17
  • Re: font policy changes, Julien Cristau, 2008/07/17
• RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 2008/07/17

RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, RalfGesellensetter, 2008/07/13

• Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, Ansgar Burchardt, 2008/07/13
• Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, George Danchev, 2008/07/13
• RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, RalfGesellensetter, 2008/07/13
  • Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, Paul Wise, 2008/07/14
    • Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, RalfGesellensetter, 2008/07/14
      • Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, Paul Wise, 2008/07/15

Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/13

• Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/13
  • Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/07/13
• Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/13
  • Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/15
    • Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/15
  • Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/15
• Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/13
  • Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/15
• Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Luk Claes, 2008/07/13
• Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 2008/07/15
  • Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Julien Cristau, 2008/07/15

Debian release versioning, martin f krafft, 2008/07/12

• Re: Debian release versioning, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/12
  • Re: Debian release versioning, martin f krafft, 2008/07/12
    • Re: Debian release versioning, Allan Wind, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Debian release versioning, John Goerzen, 2008/07/14
      • Re: Debian release versioning, Bernhard R. Link, 2008/07/14
      • Re: Debian release versioning, martin f krafft, 2008/07/14
  • Re: Debian release versioning, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Debian release versioning, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/13
  • Re: Debian release versioning, Lennart Sorensen, 2008/07/17
• Re: Debian release versioning, Adeodato Simó, 2008/07/12
  • Re: Debian release versioning, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Debian release versioning, Ben Finney, 2008/07/13
• Re: Debian release versioning, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/13
• Re: Debian release versioning, Paul Wise, 2008/07/13
  • Re: Debian release versioning, Frans Pop, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Debian release versioning, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Debian release versioning, Michael Banck, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Debian release versioning, RalfGesellensetter, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Debian release versioning, Lennart Sorensen, 2008/07/17
• Re: Debian release versioning, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/07/13
  • Re: Debian release versioning, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Debian release versioning, Andrei Popescu, 2008/07/13
    • Avoiding misconceptions about Etch+1/2... (was: Debian release versioning), Frans Pop, 2008/07/13
• Re: Debian release versioning, Magnus Holmgren, 2008/07/13
  • Re: Debian release versioning, Ben Finney, 2008/07/13
• Opposed (Re: Debian release versioning), Filipus Klutiero, 2008/07/13
• Re: Debian release versioning, Lennart Sorensen, 2008/07/17

Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Colin Watson, 2008/07/12

• Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/13
• Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Ian Jackson, 2008/07/29
  • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Charles Plessy, 2008/07/30
    • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Brian May, 2008/07/30

Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Charles Plessy, 2008/07/12

• Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Russ Allbery, 2008/07/12
  • Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Russ Allbery, 2008/07/12
    • Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Steve Langasek, 2008/07/12
  • Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Charles Plessy, 2008/07/12

A few Questions: Creating an arch indep pkg., Brian, 2008/07/12

• Re: A few Questions: Creating an arch indep pkg., Ben Finney, 2008/07/12

Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/07/12

• Re: Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, James Vega, 2008/07/12
  • Re: Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/07/12
• Re: Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/12
• Re: Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, Teemu Likonen, 2008/07/14

RFC: Removal of user/groups, Carl Fürstenberg, 2008/07/11

• Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Stephen Gran, 2008/07/11
  • Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Carl Fürstenberg, 2008/07/11
    • Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Jonas Meurer, 2008/07/11
      • Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Carl Fürstenberg, 2008/07/12
        • Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Colin Watson, 2008/07/12
          • Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Gabor Gombas, 2008/07/14
        • Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, The Fungi, 2008/07/12
        • Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Gabor Gombas, 2008/07/14

Package management unsafe?, Ron Johnson, 2008/07/11

• Re: Package management unsafe?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2008/07/11
  • Re: Package management unsafe?, Michael Casadevall, 2008/07/11
    • Re: Package management unsafe?, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/07/12
      • Re: Package management unsafe?, Michael Casadevall, 2008/07/12
      • Re: Package management unsafe?, Don Armstrong, 2008/07/12
  • Re: Package management unsafe?, Justin Samuel, 2008/07/25
• Re: Package management unsafe?, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/11
  • Re: Package management unsafe?, Joe Smith, 2008/07/12
    • Re: Package management unsafe?, Andrei Popescu, 2008/07/12
      • Re: Package management unsafe?, Joe Smith, 2008/07/13
        • Re: Package management unsafe?, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/13
          • Re: Package management unsafe?, brian m. carlson, 2008/07/13
          • Re: Package management unsafe?, Karl Goetz, 2008/07/13
            • Re: Package management unsafe?, Franklin PIAT, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Package management unsafe?, Brian May, 2008/07/13
      • Re: Package management unsafe?, Joe Smith, 2008/07/14
• Re: Package management unsafe?, Daniel Burrows, 2008/07/14

x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Sergei Golovan, 2008/07/11

• Re: x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Julien Cristau, 2008/07/11
  • Re: x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Sergei Golovan, 2008/07/11
• Re: x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/20
  • Re: x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Sergei Golovan, 2008/07/20

Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/10

• Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Ian Campbell, 2008/07/11
  • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Paul van der Vlis, 2008/07/11
  • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Guido Günther, 2008/07/18
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/19
• Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/11
  • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/11
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/11
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/11
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Vincent Bernat, 2008/07/11
      • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/13
        • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Bernd Zeimetz, 2008/07/16
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/12
      • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/07/13
        • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/13
          • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/07/13
          • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Guido Trotter, 2008/07/13
          • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/14
          • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Paul van der Vlis, 2008/07/14
            • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Luk Claes, 2008/07/14
            • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/14
      • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/13
        • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/13
          • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/15
            • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, John Goerzen, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, John Goerzen, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Ben Hutchings, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, William Pitcock, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, William Pitcock, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, William Pitcock, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, William Pitcock, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Ian Campbell, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Teodor, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, LM Jogbäck, 2008/07/19
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Ben Hutchings, 2008/07/19
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/15
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Samuel Thibault, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/16
              • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Aurelien Jarno, 2008/07/20
            • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/15
  • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/15
• Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/15
  • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2008/07/16
    • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/17
      • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Peter Jordan, 2008/07/17
      • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/18
        • Re: Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/18
          • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/18
          • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/07/18
            • Re: Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/18
          • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/18
            • Re: Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/18
              • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/18
              • Re: Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 2008/07/18
              • Re: Xen status in lenny? and vserver?, Florian Reitmeir, 2008/07/18
              • Re: Xen status in lenny? and vserver?, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/18
          • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Frederik Schueler, 2008/07/23
            • Re: Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2008/07/24

moltechnology@xxxxxxxxx hat Ihnen ein Google Gadget geschickt, 3kTN2SAAADIMkliphu-kl2lsspz0z . kliphu . vyn, 2008/07/10

• moltechnology@xxxxxxxxx hat Ihnen ein Google Gadget geschickt, moltechnology, 2008/07/16

.desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Vincent Lefevre, 2008/07/09

• Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Vincent Zweije, 2008/07/09
  • Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/07/09
    • Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/09
  • Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Vincent Lefevre, 2008/07/10
    • Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Joey Hess, 2008/07/11
• Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Josselin Mouette, 2008/07/10
• Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Josselin Mouette, 2008/07/23

[RFH] #486212 reportbug-ng segfaults, Bastian Venthur, 2008/07/08

• Message not available
  • Re: [RFH] #486212 reportbug-ng segfaults, Bastian Venthur, 2008/07/10
    • Re: [RFH] #486212 reportbug-ng segfaults, Adeodato Simó, 2008/07/12
      • Re: [RFH] #486212 reportbug-ng segfaults, Bastian Venthur, 2008/07/12

Re: DPL teams survey summary summary, Per Andersson, 2008/07/08

• Re: DPL teams survey summary summary [METOO], s. keeling, 2008/07/12
• Re: DPL teams survey summary summary, gregor herrmann, 2008/07/11
• Re: DPL teams survey summary summary, Scott, 2008/07/23
  • Re: DPL teams survey summary summary, Vid . A, 2008/07/23

Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Paul Wise, 2008/07/08

• Message not available
  • Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Don Armstrong, 2008/07/08
    • Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/08
      • Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/08
      • Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Don Armstrong, 2008/07/08

Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Ron Johnson, 2008/07/08

• Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Ben Finney, 2008/07/08
  • Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Chris Bannister, 2008/07/09
    • Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2008/07/09
      • Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Fernando Ike de Oliveira, 2008/07/09
    • Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Ben Finney, 2008/07/10

Bug#482528: heimdal-clients,krb5-user, Brian May, 2008/07/08

• Re: Bug#482528: heimdal-clients,krb5-user, Michael Tautschnig, 2008/07/08
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Re: Bug#482528: heimdal-clients,krb5-user, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/09

Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 2008/07/07

• Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, William Pitcock, 2008/07/07
  • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 2008/07/07
  • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 2008/07/08
    • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/10
      • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 2008/07/10
        • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Arthur Loiret, 2008/07/11
    • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Manuel Prinz, 2008/07/11
      • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 2008/07/11
        • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Mark Brown, 2008/07/11
        • Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/15

prerm option purge, Michael Meskes, 2008/07/07

• Re: prerm option purge, Guillem Jover, 2008/07/07

Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Ts'o, 2008/07/07

• Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/07
  • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Sune Vuorela, 2008/07/07
    • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2008/07/08
  • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 2008/07/07
    • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/07
    • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/07
      • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 2008/07/07
        • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/07
      • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2008/07/07
        • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/07
          • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2008/07/08
        • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 2008/07/08
          • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2008/07/08
            • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 2008/07/08
              • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2008/07/08
    • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Roger Leigh, 2008/07/07
      • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/07
        • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Roger Leigh, 2008/07/07
          • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2008/07/07
            • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 2008/07/08
              • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2008/07/08
            • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Roger Leigh, 2008/07/09
              • Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 2008/07/09
• Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Neil Williams, 2008/07/07
• Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/07/07
• Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/07/22

Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/07

• Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bastian Blank, 2008/07/07
  • Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/07
• Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/07/09
  • Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/09

correct definition of localhost?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/07

• Re: correct definition of localhost?, Kurt Roeckx, 2008/07/07
  • Re: correct definition of localhost?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/07
    • Re: correct definition of localhost?, William Pitcock, 2008/07/07
    • Re: correct definition of localhost?, Kurt Roeckx, 2008/07/07
• Re: correct definition of localhost?, Aurelien Jarno, 2008/07/07
  • Re: correct definition of localhost?, Michael Banck, 2008/07/07
    • Re: correct definition of localhost?, Aurelien Jarno, 2008/07/07
• Re: correct definition of localhost?, Joey Hess, 2008/07/08
  • Re: correct definition of localhost?, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2008/07/08
    • Re: correct definition of localhost?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 2008/07/08
      • Re: correct definition of localhost?, Roger Leigh, 2008/07/08
      • Re: correct definition of localhost?, s. keeling, 2008/07/12
    • Re: correct definition of localhost?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/08
      • Re: correct definition of localhost?, sean finney, 2008/07/08
        • Re: correct definition of localhost?, s. keeling, 2008/07/12

Strange file problem, Andrea Ferraresi, 2008/07/06

• Re: Strange file problem, Ralf Hildebrandt, 2008/07/06
• Re: Strange file problem, John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/07/06
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Strange file problem, Andrea Ferraresi, 2008/07/07

Re: Bug#444980: udev not restarted after exiting runlevel 1, Marco d'Itri, 2008/07/06

• Re: Bug#444980: udev not restarted after exiting runlevel 1, Frans Pop, 2008/07/07
  • Re: Bug#444980: udev not restarted after exiting runlevel 1, Marco d'Itri, 2008/07/07
  • Re: Bug#444980: udev not restarted after exiting runlevel 1, Wouter Verhelst, 2008/07/09

tarball in tarball: opinions, Jay Berkenbilt, 2008/07/05

• Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Bart Martens, 2008/07/05
• Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Bernhard R. Link, 2008/07/05
  • Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Ben Hutchings, 2008/07/07
• Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Magnus Holmgren, 2008/07/05
  • Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Joey Hess, 2008/07/05
    • Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Frank Küster, 2008/07/10
• Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Joey Hess, 2008/07/05
• Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Ben Finney, 2008/07/06
• Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/07/06
• Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Jay Berkenbilt, 2008/07/06

Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs), Raphael Hertzog, 2008/07/05

• Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs), Roger Leigh, 2008/07/05
  • Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs), Steve Langasek, 2008/07/05
• Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs), Marc Haber, 2008/07/06

Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Paul Wise, 2008/07/05

• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/07/05
  • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/07/05
  • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/07/05
  • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/05
    • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/05
      • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Charles Plessy, 2008/07/08
        • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/08
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/05
  • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/05
  • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, William Pitcock, 2008/07/05
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Bernhard R. Link, 2008/07/05
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Tilo Schwarz, 2008/07/06
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, James Vega, 2008/07/06
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Sune Vuorela, 2008/07/06
  • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Loïc Minier, 2008/07/06
    • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Sune Vuorela, 2008/07/06
    • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Josselin Mouette, 2008/07/07
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/07/07
  • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Mikhail Gusarov, 2008/07/07
    • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/07/07
    • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/07/07
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Paul Wise, 2008/07/07
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 2008/07/07
  • Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Josselin Mouette, 2008/07/07
• Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Paul Wise, 2008/07/09

Intent to NMU tinyproxy, Jordi Mallach, 2008/07/04

• Re: Intent to NMU tinyproxy, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/04
  • Re: Intent to NMU tinyproxy, Jordi Mallach, 2008/07/05

Re: ITP: password -- little ruby random password generator, Russ Allbery, 2008/07/04

• Re: ITP: password -- little ruby random password generator, Paul Wise, 2008/07/04
  • Re: ITP: password -- little ruby random password generator, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2008/07/04

Converting to source format "3.0 (quilt)" (was: Misc developer news (#9)), Ben Finney, 2008/07/04

• Re: Converting to source format "3.0 (quilt)" (was: Misc developer news (#9)), Raphael Hertzog, 2008/07/04
  • Re: Converting to source format "3.0 (quilt)", Ben Finney, 2008/07/04

Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Ian Jackson, 2008/07/03

• Re: Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Don Armstrong, 2008/07/03
• Re: Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Raphael Hertzog, 2008/07/03
  • Re: Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Brendan O'Dea, 2008/07/04

upgrade problems switching from conflictiong to depending packages, Andreas Metzler, 2008/07/03

• Re: upgrade problems switching from conflictiong to depending packages, Andreas Metzler, 2008/07/05

buildd path name length, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/03

• Re: buildd path name length, Simon Josefsson, 2008/07/03
  • Re: buildd path name length, Florian Weimer, 2008/07/03

bug closed by $p4m mail?, Johannes Wiedersich, 2008/07/03

• Re: bug closed by $p4m mail?, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/07/03
  • Re: bug closed by $p4m mail?, Johannes Wiedersich, 2008/07/03

Re: Bug#489059: ITP: mnemosyne-blog -- Maildir-to-blog compiler with XML templating and Python extensions, Ben Finney, 2008/07/03

• Re: Bug#489059: ITP: mnemosyne-blog -- Maildir-to-blog compiler with XML templating and Python extensions, Decklin Foster, 2008/07/03

Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Tilo Schwarz, 2008/07/02

• Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Joey Hess, 2008/07/03
  • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Andreas Tille, 2008/07/03
    • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Lars Wirzenius, 2008/07/03
      • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Andreas Tille, 2008/07/03
        • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Gunnar Wolf, 2008/07/04
        • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Colin Watson, 2008/07/12
          • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/12
          • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Andreas Tille, 2008/07/13
            • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Raphael Hertzog, 2008/07/13
              • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Andreas Tille, 2008/07/13
              • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Stephen Gran, 2008/07/13
    • Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Colin Watson, 2008/07/12

Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository, Ben Finney, 2008/07/02

• Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository, Mark Brown, 2008/07/02
• Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/07/02

Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/01

• Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Neil Williams, 2008/07/04
  • Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/07/04
    • Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Neil Williams, 2008/07/04
      • Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/07/07
      • Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/10
  • Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/08
• Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Neil Williams, 2008/07/06
  • Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/07/10

Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 2008/07/01

• Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/01
  • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 2008/07/01
    • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/01
      • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/02
        • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/02
          • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/02
            • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/02
          • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Marvin Renich, 2008/07/02
            • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Joe Smith, 2008/07/02
              • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/03
            • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Hai Zaar, 2008/07/03
            • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/03
              • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Marvin Renich, 2008/07/03
              • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Peter Samuelson, 2008/07/05
              • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 2008/07/05
              • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Marvin Renich, 2008/07/05
              • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2008/07/05
              • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2008/07/07
• Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Frans Pop, 2008/07/01
  • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 2008/07/01
    • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Frans Pop, 2008/07/07
      • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 2008/07/07
        • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 2008/07/29
          • Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Paul Wise, 2008/07/30

Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Thibaut Paumard, 2008/07/01

• Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Lars Wirzenius, 2008/07/01
  • Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Hendrik Sattler, 2008/07/01
    • Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Michael Tautschnig, 2008/07/01
      • Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Thibaut Paumard, 2008/07/01
      • Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Peter Samuelson, 2008/07/01
        • Samuelson's Law (was: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian), Ben Finney, 2008/07/02
      • Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Brian May, 2008/07/02
        • Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Michael Tautschnig, 2008/07/02
    • Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian, Bernhard R. Link, 2008/07/01