| Subject: | Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea |
|---|---|
| From: | Scott Kitterman <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:00:23 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | linux.debian.devel |
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:58:57 +0100 Neil Williams <codehelp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Why force activation in the first place? All the information needed to >"activate" a DD account already exists - our GnuPG fingerprints, our DD >email addresses and full names. If an email is received that is signed >by a known key belonging to a DD, LP should just accept the blasted >thing and stop looking for any other authentication or activation or >login or anything else of any kind, ever. If someone can send an email >to LP signed by my key then I have a lot more to worry about than >whether LP is going to refuse to authenticate that email. Any email >signed by a known key belonging to a DD should be accepted without >question or authentication or activation or anything else. Great idea. Bug filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252368 Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Lenny frozen, Magnus Holmgren |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics, Thomas Preud'homme |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |