linux.debian.devel (date)

linux.debian.devel (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

July 31, 2008

Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 22:10
Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Steve Langasek, 22:00
Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Steve Langasek, 22:00
Re: Standard way to disable services, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:40
Re: Standard way to disable services, Guido Günther, 17:00
Re: Standard way to disable services, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 16:10
Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 12:50
Re: Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Manuel Prinz, 12:40
Should the X packages pre-depend on awk?, Jörg Sommer, 12:00
Re: Standard way to disable services, Guido Günther, 10:40
[Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 10:00
Needs help: CJK Debian users will not be able to read PDF with poppler-data in default Debian Desktop in Lenny, Hideki Yamane, 03:40

July 30, 2008

Re: Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 21:40
Re: Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 21:20
dear t pin Whores mother prove ink., DanBarton97, 12:30
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Paul Wise, 09:00
Re: Bug#492922: ITP: arpon -- arp handler inspection, Ben Finney, 08:40
Re: Standard way to disable services, Marc Haber, 08:30
Cuide da Saúde Financeira da sua Empresa, K.L.A. Eventos Empresariais, 08:30
Re: Bug#492922: ITP: arpon -- arp handler inspection, Hamish Moffatt, 07:20
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Brian May, 04:20
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Charles Plessy, 03:40
Re: Bug#492922: ITP: arpon -- arp handler inspection, Ben Finney, 02:40
Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Steve Langasek, 02:40
Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Ian Jackson, 01:10

July 29, 2008

Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Ian Jackson, 23:40
Re: libpqxx in NEW fixes RC bug (was: Re: Lenny frozen), Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 23:40
Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Steve Langasek, 22:20
Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Andreas Barth, 21:40
Re: Lenny frozen, Adeodato Simó, 21:20
Re: Bug#492807: ITP: procinfo-ng -- displays system information from /proc, Bastian Blank, 20:00
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Ben Armstrong, 18:50
RE: Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 18:40
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 18:20
Re: Bug#492807: ITP: procinfo-ng -- displays system information from /proc, tabris, 18:00
Re: Lenny frozen, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 18:00
Re: Standard way to disable services, Steve Greenland, 17:10
Re: Bug#492376: ITP: libwwwbrowser-perl -- Platform independent means to start a WWW browser, Hamish Moffatt, 12:00
Re: Bug#492807: ITP: procinfo-ng -- displays system information from /proc, Bastian Blank, 10:10
When the newest release could be download, Jean Jacques, 09:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 05:10
Re: Standard way to disable services, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 04:00
Re: Standard way to disable services, Franklin PIAT, 03:30

July 28, 2008

Re: procinfo maintainership, Bernd Zeimetz, 22:40
Re: procinfo maintainership, tabris, 22:40
Re: procinfo maintainership, Bernd Zeimetz, 22:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Russ Allbery, 22:00
Re: New Testing Name ???, Adeodato Simó, 22:00
New Testing Name ???, Victor Muchica, 22:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Patrick Matthäi, 21:50
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 21:30
Re: Lenny frozen, Franklin PIAT, 19:00
Re: procinfo maintainership, tabris, 18:40
Re: Lenny frozen, Martin Meredith, 18:10
Re: Lenny frozen, Olivier Berger, 17:20
Re: Lenny frozen, Luk Claes, 17:10
Re: Lenny frozen, Cyril Brulebois, 16:10
Re: Lenny frozen, Olivier Berger, 16:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, James Westby, 16:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 15:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 15:10
Re: procinfo maintainership, Bernd Zeimetz, 14:00
Re: No announcement for etch&half seen ?, Cyril Brulebois, 13:10
No announcement for etch&half seen ?, Olivier Berger, 12:20
Re: Chao ban ve may bay, Phong Thanh, 01:50
Re: procinfo maintainership, tabris, 01:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 00:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 00:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 00:00

July 27, 2008

Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 23:40
Business proposal to present you as our Foreign beneficiary,, Maxwell Williams, 22:40
Re: Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics, Thomas Preud'homme, 22:30
Re: Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics, Thomas Preud'homme, 21:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 20:00
Re: Lenny frozen, Magnus Holmgren, 19:00
Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Roger Leigh, 18:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 17:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Osamu Aoki, 16:40
Debian PopCon & Linux Counter: Statistics, RalfGesellensetter, 15:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 15:40
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Ben Armstrong, 15:30
Re: Standard way to disable services, Osamu Aoki, 14:30
Scour.com invite from vijay singh, vijay singh, 13:50
Re: Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 13:40
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Loïc Minier, 12:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Eduard Bloch, 12:20
Re: Standard way to disable services, Lightning, 09:30
Re: Bug#492520: ITP: python-git -- python-git is a Python library used to interact with Git repositories., Daniel Watkins, 03:40
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Processed: Re: Bug#: apt-get also removes apache2 when i just wanted to remove mysql-server, Debian Bug Tracking System, 01:20

July 26, 2008

Re: Standard way to disable services, Florian Weimer, 22:30
Re: Standard way to disable services, Steve Langasek, 19:50
Re: Standard way to disable services, Luk Claes, 19:30
Re: Standard way to disable services, Steve Langasek, 19:30
Re: Standard way to disable services, Nico Golde, 17:50
Re: Standard way to disable services, Hans-J. Ullrich, 16:50
Re: Standard way to disable services, Josselin Mouette, 14:20
Re: Standard way to disable services, Enrico Zini, 14:10
Standard way to disable services, Harald Braumann, 13:30
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Ben Finney, 01:30

July 25, 2008

Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Paul Wise, 16:50
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), James Vega, 16:30
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Jon Dowland, 16:10
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Steffen Moeller, 14:40
Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Enrico Zini, 12:30
Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Enrico Zini, 11:30
Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Enrico Zini, 11:20
Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Peter Palfrader, 11:00
Work-needing packages report for Jul 25, 2008, wnpp, 08:30
Re: Package management unsafe?, Justin Samuel, 05:40
Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Raphael Geissert, 04:20
Processed: Re: Bug#492231: general: unable to mount fixed drives, Debian Bug Tracking System, 02:30
Re: Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Brian May, 02:10

July 24, 2008

sysinf0 - website indexation, Franklin PIAT, 21:00
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Ben Armstrong, 19:30
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Jose Luis Rivas, 18:50
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Steffen Moeller, 15:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 14:50
Re: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?", Josselin Mouette, 14:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Tollef Fog Heen, 12:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Tollef Fog Heen, 12:00
Packages built with unchecked dependencies, Enrico Zini, 10:30
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 10:20
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), John H. Robinson, IV, 03:20
machine figure, Jason mclaughlin, 03:00
Package renaming, and transitional dependencies, Ian Jackson, 02:50
Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Charles Plessy, 02:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 02:00
Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems, Nicolas Boullis, 02:00
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Drake Wilson, 01:30
Re: "glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?", James Vega, 01:00
"glib too old" OR "Lenny broken by default?", Eddy Petrișor, 00:40
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Stefano Zacchiroli, 00:40

July 23, 2008

Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems, Teodor, 22:50
Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems, Nicolas Boullis, 22:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Russ Allbery, 20:50
Re: FHS and /var/www, Loïc Minier, 20:40
Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems, Petter Reinholdtsen, 19:10
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Drake Wilson, 19:00
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Joey Hess, 18:50
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Enrico Zini, 18:50
Re: FHS and /var/www, Gunnar Wolf, 18:50
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Joey Hess, 18:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 18:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Joey Hess, 18:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 18:20
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Frederik Schueler, 18:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 18:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Andrei Popescu, 17:40
Re: amd64 buildd hosts, Walter Franzini, 17:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 17:20
Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification), Kel Modderman, 16:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Matthew Johnson, 16:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 16:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Matthew Johnson, 15:00
Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Josselin Mouette, 12:40
SUPERVISORES EFICACES - NO LO DEJE PASAR - publicidad, Hasta el 25 de Julio, 12:40
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Lucas Nussbaum, 10:50
Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Thomas Viehmann, 10:30
apt-utils package is broken in sid?, Dionysis Kalofonos, 10:00
Re: Adding lzma to dpkg's Pre-Depends, Guillem Jover, 05:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Paul Wise, 05:00
Re: DPL teams survey summary summary, Vid . A, 04:20
Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Charles Plessy, 04:00
Re: DPL teams survey summary summary, Scott, 01:10
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Raphael Geissert, 00:40
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Raphael Geissert, 00:20
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Raphael Geissert, 00:10

July 22, 2008

Re: Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification), Nicolas Boullis, 22:30
Re: FHS and /var/www, sean finney, 22:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Kees Cook, 20:30
Perfection is attainable, Beatriz Mcnamara, 19:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 19:30
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Gunnar Wolf, 19:10
RE: Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 19:10
Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Joerg Jaspert, 18:40
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Paul Wise, 18:40
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Roberto C. Sánchez, 18:30
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Raphael Hertzog, 18:20
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), John H. Robinson, IV, 18:10
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), John H. Robinson, IV, 18:10
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Loïc Minier, 18:00
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Loïc Minier, 18:00
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Bernhard R. Link, 18:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 17:50
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 17:50
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Paul Wise, 17:40
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Leo \"costela\" Antunes, 17:30
Re: Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Michael Banck, 17:30
Re: amd64 buildd hosts, Walter Franzini, 17:20
Screenshots of GUI applications (again), Christoph Haas, 17:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Daniel Burrows, 17:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Holger Levsen, 17:10
Re: amd64 buildd hosts, Cyril Brulebois, 16:10
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Gabor Gombas, 16:10
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Goswin von Brederlow, 15:10
machine representation, Jason mclaughlin, 14:40
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Lucas Nussbaum, 14:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 14:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, The Fungi, 13:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stephan Hermann, 12:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Hamish Moffatt, 12:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 12:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 12:00
amd64 buildd hosts, Walter Franzini, 11:00
RE: Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 10:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 10:20
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Thomas Viehmann, 09:40
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Paul Wise, 09:10
RE: Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 08:50
Re: FHS and /var/www, John H. Robinson, IV, 07:50
Re: ITH:: gerris - Gerris Flow Solver, Drew Parsons, 07:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Brian May, 07:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Brendan, 06:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Brian May, 05:00
Re: Intel Atom Processor, Paul Wise, 05:00
Re: Debian Project News - July 21st, 2008, Charles Plessy, 03:30
ITH:: gerris - Gerris Flow Solver, Drew Parsons, 03:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stefano Zacchiroli, 01:40
Re: FHS and /var/www, Franklin PIAT, 00:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Gunnar Wolf, 00:00

July 21, 2008

Please help me make athcool compatible with dependency-based init systems (was: Release Update: freeze, architecture requalification), Nicolas Boullis, 23:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 23:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Don Armstrong, 23:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 23:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 23:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Franklin PIAT, 22:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Franklin PIAT, 22:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 22:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, William Pitcock, 20:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 19:50
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, James Vega, 19:50
Intel Atom Processor, Kushal Koolwal, 19:50
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, John H. Robinson, IV, 19:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Steve Langasek, 18:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 17:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 17:20
Re: What to do with new upstream releases before Lenny is out ?, Francesco P. Lovergine, 17:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Stefano Zacchiroli, 16:50
Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 16:40
Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 16:40
Re: FHS and /var/www, Joey Hess, 16:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stefano Zacchiroli, 16:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, William Pitcock, 14:50
Re: FHS and /var/www, Gabor Gombas, 13:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 13:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 13:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Loïc Minier, 13:00
Re: glib inconsistencies in testing, Loïc Minier, 12:50
Re: esound [was: Re: Non-related 'Recommends' dependencies - bug or not?], Josselin Mouette, 12:10
Re: Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Jon Dowland, 11:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Lars Wirzenius, 11:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stefano Zacchiroli, 09:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Stephan Hermann, 09:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Thomas Viehmann, 08:00
Re: What to do with new upstream releases before Lenny is out ?, Russ Allbery, 06:50
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Kartik Mistry, 06:50
Re: What to do with new upstream releases before Lenny is out ?, Barry deFreese, 05:50
What to do with new upstream releases before Lenny is out ?, Charles Plessy, 05:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, William Pitcock, 05:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Charles Plessy, 04:50
Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 04:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Russ Allbery, 03:30
Re: FHS and /var/www, Steve Langasek, 03:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 03:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 02:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Brendan, 02:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 00:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Ben Finney, 00:10

July 20, 2008

Re: FHS and /var/www, Ben Finney, 23:30
Re: esound [was: Re: Non-related 'Recommends' dependencies - bug or not?], Jason D. Clinton, 23:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Steve Langasek, 22:50
Your order of a Degree, Marcy Price, 21:30
Re: FHS and /var/www, Steve Langasek, 21:20
Re: glib inconsistencies in testing, Steve Langasek, 21:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Steve Langasek, 21:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 20:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Reinhard Tartler, 20:30
Re: FHS and /var/www, Carl Fürstenberg, 20:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Edward Allcutt, 20:20
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 20:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 20:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Holger Levsen, 20:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 20:00
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 19:40
Re: FHS and /var/www, Carl Fürstenberg, 19:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Franklin PIAT, 19:10
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Bernhard R. Link, 18:50
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 18:50
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Neil Williams, 18:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Caroline Ford, 18:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Joey Hess, 18:40
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Scott Kitterman, 18:30
Re: Good communication with upstream is good idea, Florian Weimer, 18:10
Re: glib inconsistencies in testing, Frank Küster, 18:00
Re: glib inconsistencies in testing, Steve Langasek, 17:40
Re: x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Sergei Golovan, 16:40
Re: FHS and /var/www, Stephen Gran, 16:40
Good communication with upstream is good idea, Osamu Aoki, 15:00
Re: FHS and /var/www, Charles Plessy, 14:50
Re: x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Florian Weimer, 14:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Carl Fürstenberg, 13:40
glib inconsistencies in testing, Frank Küster, 12:51
Re: Symbol files and C++ name mangling, Raphael Hertzog, 11:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Aurelien Jarno, 11:10
Re: Pls help me, Paul Wise, 09:30
Symbol files and C++ name mangling, Michael Tautschnig, 09:20
Re: FHS and /var/www, Tollef Fog Heen, 09:10
Pls help me, Jithesh Chandran, 08:30
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Sergei Golovan, 06:10
Re: FHS and /var/www, Ben Finney, 02:50
Re: FHS and /var/www, Roberto C. Sánchez, 02:00
FHS and /var/www, Carl Fürstenberg, 01:50
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, The Fungi, 01:30
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Brian May, 01:20

July 19, 2008

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Ben Hutchings, 23:50
Delivery Status Notification (Failure), Mail Delivery Subsystem, 21:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, LM Jogbäck, 21:20
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Russ Allbery, 21:10
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Vincent Bernat, 21:00
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Mike Hommey, 19:50
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Stephen Gran, 19:40
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Sergei Golovan, 19:30
Re: Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Martijn van Oosterhout, 19:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Gunnar Wolf, 18:20
Clarification about bug #463538 is needed, Sergei Golovan, 15:30
Re: Call for keys for keysigning in Mar del Plata during DebConf8, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 13:40
Re: Bug#480563: Doesn't strip binary NMU version (+b1, +bN etc.) when reporting bugs, Sandro Tosi, 10:30
Re: ffmpeg2theora, Kapil Hari Paranjape, 07:40
Re: Bug#490805: ITP: txtreader -- text reader, mainly used for reading text originally novels, Ben Finney, 03:20
Re: Bug#480563: Doesn't strip binary NMU version (+b1, +bN etc.) when reporting bugs, Don Armstrong, 02:30
Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Ben Hutchings, 01:10

July 18, 2008

Re: Bug#490805: ITP: txtreader -- text reader, mainly used for reading text originally novels, Drake Wilson, 23:30
Re: Bug#480563: Doesn't strip binary NMU version (+b1, +bN etc.) when reporting bugs, Aaron M. Ucko, 22:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Guido Günther, 21:40
Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 17:10
Re: Bug#480563: Doesn't strip binary NMU version (+b1, +bN etc.) when reporting bugs, Sandro Tosi, 17:10
Re: Xen status in lenny? and vserver?, Gunnar Wolf, 17:00
Re: Bug#490805: ITP: txtreader -- text reader, mainly used for reading text originally novels, Chris Bannister, 14:40
Re: Xen status in lenny? and vserver?, Florian Reitmeir, 12:20
Re: Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 12:00
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 11:50
Re: Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 11:30
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 11:20
Re: Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 10:20
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Tollef Fog Heen, 10:00
Work-needing packages report for Jul 18, 2008, wnpp, 08:30
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bernd Eckenfels, 03:20
Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, peter green, 02:40
Re: Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 01:10
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 00:50
Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., William Pitcock, 00:30

July 17, 2008

Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Michael Biebl, 23:20
Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Jonas Meurer, 21:50
Re: Bootstrapping (was Re: ITP: MUMPS -- ...), Andreas Tille, 21:50
Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Adeodato Simó, 21:50
Bootstrapping (was Re: ITP: MUMPS -- ...), Ron Johnson, 20:00
Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 19:20
Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 18:50
Re: Debian release versioning, Lennart Sorensen, 17:40
RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 17:30
Re: Debian release versioning, Lennart Sorensen, 17:30
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Peter Jordan, 17:10
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 17:00
Re: Debian release versioning, Lennart Sorensen, 15:30
Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 15:10
Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Andreas Tille, 14:40
Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Adam D. Barratt, 14:20
Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Hendrik Sattler, 14:20
Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Andreas Tille, 14:00
Re: Bug#491156: ITP: postgresql-8.3-plr -- Procedural language interface between PostgreSQL 8.3 and R, Thomas Viehmann, 12:30
Re: font policy changes, Julien Cristau, 10:50
RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 09:30
Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}, Neil Williams, 08:10
Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Frans Pop, 07:40
Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}, Paul Wise, 06:00
Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., William Pitcock, 02:40
Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 01:20
Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Charles Plessy, 01:00
Re: RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., William Pitcock, 00:50
Re: Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, richs, 00:30

July 16, 2008

RFC: libprojectM, new upstream version., Francesco Namuri, 23:40
Re: sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Bernd Eckenfels, 23:40
Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Frans Pop, 23:20
Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Mike Hommey, 22:40
Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, brian m. carlson, 22:30
Re: ITP: MUMPS -- MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver, Ron Johnson, 22:20
Re: Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, richs, 22:00
Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}, Neil Williams, 21:50
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 21:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 21:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 21:20
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 21:10
Re: Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, Leo 'costela' Antunes, 19:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 19:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Teodor, 19:20
Re: font policy changes, Julien Cristau, 18:00
RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 17:40
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Goswin von Brederlow, 15:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Samuel Thibault, 15:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 14:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Gunnar Wolf, 14:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 14:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, William Pitcock, 14:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 14:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 14:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, William Pitcock, 14:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 14:10
Re: font policy changes, Josselin Mouette, 14:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 13:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 13:50
moltechnology@xxxxxxxxx hat Ihnen ein Google Gadget geschickt, moltechnology, 13:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Ian Campbell, 13:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 13:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 12:20
Include on first iso: m-a, build essential, kernel headers, richs, 11:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, maximilian attems, 11:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 11:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 11:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, William Pitcock, 11:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Bernd Zeimetz, 11:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 10:40
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, William Pitcock, 10:40
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Ben Hutchings, 03:00
Re: Status of Emdebian {ARM}, Loïc Minier, 00:50

July 15, 2008

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Goswin von Brederlow, 23:20
sysklogd/rsyslog switch, Joerg Jaspert, 21:40
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 21:30
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 21:10
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Julien Cristau, 21:10
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 20:50
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 20:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, John Goerzen, 20:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 19:10
Re: Bug#490857: ITP: watermelons -- watermelon bouncing game, Evgeni Golov, 17:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 17:10
Re: Bug#490857: ITP: watermelons -- watermelon bouncing game, unifoundry, 17:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 16:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, John Goerzen, 16:30
Re: Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 16:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 15:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 15:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 14:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 13:20
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Lucas Nussbaum, 13:20
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Goswin von Brederlow, 11:50
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Steve Langasek, 11:40
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Goswin von Brederlow, 11:40
Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, Paul Wise, 08:30

July 14, 2008

Re: Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, Teemu Likonen, 19:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Gunnar Wolf, 19:50
Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, RalfGesellensetter, 19:40
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Luk Claes, 19:40
Re: Package management unsafe?, Joe Smith, 19:10
Re: font policy changes, Russ Allbery, 18:20
Re: font policy changes, Julien Cristau, 18:10
Re: font policy changes, Russ Allbery, 18:00
Re: font policy changes, Vincent Bernat, 18:00
Re: Debian release versioning, martin f krafft, 17:50
Re: Debian release versioning, Bernhard R. Link, 17:50
Re: Debian release versioning, John Goerzen, 17:40
RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 16:50
Re: Package management unsafe?, Daniel Burrows, 16:40
Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Gabor Gombas, 15:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Paul van der Vlis, 15:00
Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Gabor Gombas, 15:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Loïc Minier, 14:20
Re: font policy changes, Julien Cristau, 11:40
Invitation to connect on LinkedIn, Gene Leshchinskiy, 10:50
Less than a Penny a Lead!, James, 08:20
RE: font policy changes, unifoundry, 07:40
Re: font policy changes, Russ Allbery, 07:20
font policy changes, unifoundry, 06:30
Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, Paul Wise, 05:00

July 13, 2008

Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Luk Claes, 23:50
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Russ Allbery, 22:20
Avoiding misconceptions about Etch+1/2... (was: Debian release versioning), Frans Pop, 22:20
Call for testing: mantis Debian package, Patrick Schoenfeld, 22:00
Opposed (Re: Debian release versioning), Filipus Klutiero, 22:00
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Lucas Nussbaum, 22:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Guido Trotter, 21:40
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 21:10
Re: Debian release versioning, Andrei Popescu, 21:10
Re: Debian release versioning, Russ Allbery, 20:50
Die Sensation im Vertrieb - Das ist es, was Sie gesucht haben - Das Produkt des Jahres 2008:, Vertriebssensation 2008, 20:20
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Steve Langasek, 19:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Steve Langasek, 19:30
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Stephen Gran, 18:40
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Andreas Tille, 18:10
Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, George Danchev, 18:00
Re: RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, Ansgar Burchardt, 17:20
Re: Debian release versioning, RalfGesellensetter, 17:10
RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, RalfGesellensetter, 16:50
RFC: Java (JAR) desktop integration/admin tool, RalfGesellensetter, 16:40
Re: Debian release versioning, Ben Finney, 15:40
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Raphael Hertzog, 15:40
Re: Debian release versioning, Magnus Holmgren, 15:20
Re: Debian release versioning, Michael Banck, 14:50
Re: Debian release versioning, Frank Lichtenheld, 13:40
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Frank Lichtenheld, 12:50
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Andreas Tille, 12:30
Re: Package management unsafe?, Franklin PIAT, 10:20
Re: Package management unsafe?, Karl Goetz, 09:00
Re: Debian release versioning, Lars Wirzenius, 08:10
Re: Debian release versioning, Frans Pop, 07:50
Re: Debian release versioning, Paul Wise, 06:20
Re: Debian release versioning, Ben Finney, 04:40
Re: Package management unsafe?, brian m. carlson, 04:30
Re: Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 04:10
Re: Package management unsafe?, Brian May, 03:50
Re: Debian release versioning, Gunnar Wolf, 02:40
Re: Debian release versioning, Gunnar Wolf, 02:30
Re: Debian release versioning, Stephen Gran, 02:30
Re: Package management unsafe?, Franklin PIAT, 02:20
Changes detected by lintian on rebuilt packages, Raphael Geissert, 02:00
Re: Debian release versioning, Franklin PIAT, 02:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Gunnar Wolf, 01:50
Re: Package management unsafe?, Joe Smith, 01:20
RFH: ppp, Marco d'Itri, 01:20
Re: Debian release versioning, Allan Wind, 01:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 00:20
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 00:10
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Franklin PIAT, 00:00

July 12, 2008

Re: Debian release versioning, martin f krafft, 23:50
Re: Debian release versioning, Adeodato Simó, 23:50
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Steve Langasek, 23:40
Re: Debian release versioning, Lucas Nussbaum, 23:30
Debian release versioning, martin f krafft, 22:50
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Bernd Eckenfels, 22:00
Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, The Fungi, 20:00
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Colin Watson, 19:50
Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Colin Watson, 19:40
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Colin Watson, 19:30
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Colin Watson, 19:20
Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Charles Plessy, 18:30
debian-reference: question and review, Osamu Aoki, 17:50
Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Carl Fürstenberg, 17:00
Re: [RFH] #486212 reportbug-ng segfaults, Bastian Venthur, 15:20
Re: Package management unsafe?, Andrei Popescu, 09:00
Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Steve Langasek, 08:40
Re: Package management unsafe?, Joe Smith, 08:20
Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Russ Allbery, 08:00
Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Russ Allbery, 07:50
Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails., Charles Plessy, 07:20
Re: A few Questions: Creating an arch indep pkg., Ben Finney, 05:20
A few Questions: Creating an arch indep pkg., Brian, 05:00
Re: Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, Steve Langasek, 04:10
Re: DPL teams survey summary summary [METOO], s. keeling, 03:40
Re: Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, Frank Lichtenheld, 03:40
Re: correct definition of localhost?, s. keeling, 03:30
Re: correct definition of localhost?, s. keeling, 03:30
Re: Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, James Vega, 03:20
Re: Package management unsafe?, Don Armstrong, 03:10
Re: Package management unsafe?, Michael Casadevall, 03:00
Re: Package management unsafe?, Frank Lichtenheld, 03:00
Kernel 2.6.25 broke iPod support for me, but who to bug?, Frank Lichtenheld, 02:40
Re: [RFH] #486212 reportbug-ng segfaults, Adeodato Simó, 00:50

July 11, 2008

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Vincent Bernat, 22:10
Re: DPL teams survey summary summary, gregor herrmann, 21:30
Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Jonas Meurer, 18:30
Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Carl Fürstenberg, 18:10
Re: Package management unsafe?, Florian Weimer, 18:00
Re: Package management unsafe?, Michael Casadevall, 17:50
Re: RFC: Removal of user/groups, Stephen Gran, 17:30
RFC: Removal of user/groups, Carl Fürstenberg, 17:20
menu applications-merged, Anthony, 16:50
Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Joey Hess, 15:40
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Arthur Loiret, 15:20
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Mark Brown, 15:10
Re: Package management unsafe?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 15:00
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 14:50
Package management unsafe?, Ron Johnson, 14:40
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Manuel Prinz, 14:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 13:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 13:00
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 12:30
Re: x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Sergei Golovan, 12:30
Re: x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Julien Cristau, 12:20
x11proto-core 7.0.13 will break Tk, Sergei Golovan, 12:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Paul van der Vlis, 12:10
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Bastian Blank, 11:30
Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Xen status in lenny?, Ian Campbell, 10:00
Work-needing packages report for Jul 11, 2008, wnpp, 08:30

July 10, 2008

Xen status in lenny?, Lucas Nussbaum, 22:20
moltechnology@xxxxxxxxx hat Ihnen ein Google Gadget geschickt, 3kTN2SAAADIMkliphu-kl2lsspz0z . kliphu . vyn, 18:30
Graduação Executiva Anhembi Morumbi, Universidade Anhembi Morumbi, 17:50
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Frank Küster, 13:40
Re: [RFH] #486212 reportbug-ng segfaults, Bastian Venthur, 12:50
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 11:40
Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Goswin von Brederlow, 11:30
Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Goswin von Brederlow, 11:30
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Goswin von Brederlow, 11:10
Re: Bug#490135: RFP: fdmf -- find duplicate music files, Steinar H. Gunderson, 10:50
Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Ben Finney, 01:10
Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Josselin Mouette, 00:30
Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Vincent Lefevre, 00:00

July 09, 2008

Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Fernando Ike de Oliveira, 23:00
Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Mike Hommey, 19:40
Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Roberto C. Sánchez, 18:40
Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Steinar H. Gunderson, 16:30
Comparison between Destkop entry and Debian menu specifications., Charles Plessy, 15:50
Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Chris Bannister, 15:40
Re: .desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Vincent Zweije, 14:50
.desktop files of GNOME apps and path to these applications, Vincent Lefevre, 13:40
Re: Bug#482528: heimdal-clients,krb5-user, Russ Allbery, 08:30
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 07:30
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Paul Wise, 06:10
Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bernd Eckenfels, 03:50
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Roger Leigh, 01:10
Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Wouter Verhelst, 00:50
Re: Bug#444980: udev not restarted after exiting runlevel 1, Wouter Verhelst, 00:40

July 08, 2008

Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Don Armstrong, 23:20
Re: Bug#489855: ITP: tudu -- Command line hierarchical ToDo list, Andrei Popescu, 20:30
DE MME ANTOINETE VAUDEQUIN, DE MME ANTOINETE VAUDEQUIN, 20:00
Re: correct definition of localhost?, sean finney, 19:50
Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Gunnar Wolf, 19:00
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Steve Langasek, 18:50
[RFH] #486212 reportbug-ng segfaults, Bastian Venthur, 16:10
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 16:00
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 14:30
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Roger Leigh, 14:30
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Ralf Hildebrandt, 14:00
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Martijn van Oosterhout, 13:50
Re: DPL teams survey summary summary, Per Andersson, 13:40
Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Charles Plessy, 12:10
Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Don Armstrong, 10:00
Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Goswin von Brederlow, 07:30
Re: Bug#489836: ITP: maq -- Mapping and Assembly with Quality, Paul Wise, 07:10
Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Ben Finney, 06:10
Re: Bug#489824: ITP: pllua -- PL/Lua is an implementation of Lua as a loadable procedural language for PostgreSQL, Ron Johnson, 05:20
Re: Bug#482528: heimdal-clients,krb5-user, Michael Tautschnig, 03:50
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Russ Allbery, 03:20
Bug#482528: heimdal-clients,krb5-user, Brian May, 03:20
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Charles Plessy, 02:50
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Joey Hess, 02:40
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 01:10
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 00:30
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 00:20
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 00:20
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 00:20
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 00:10
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 00:10

July 07, 2008

Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 23:50
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 23:50
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 23:50
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 23:20
Re: Help: Strange 64bit issue, William Pitcock, 23:10
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Roger Leigh, 23:10
Help: Strange 64bit issue, Andreas Tille, 23:00
Re: prerm option purge, Guillem Jover, 22:00
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Roger Leigh, 21:00
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 21:00
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 20:40
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Joerg Jaspert, 20:10
prerm option purge, Michael Meskes, 19:50
Re: Strange file problem, Andrea Ferraresi, 18:50
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 18:30
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Aurelien Jarno, 18:10
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 17:50
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 17:40
Re: Bug#444980: udev not restarted after exiting runlevel 1, Marco d'Itri, 17:40
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 17:30
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Tso, 17:20
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Frans Pop, 17:10
Re: Bug#444980: udev not restarted after exiting runlevel 1, Frans Pop, 17:00
Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bernd Eckenfels, 16:10
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Sune Vuorela, 15:50
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Neil Williams, 15:10
Re: Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Mike Hommey, 14:50
Policy or best practices for debug packages?, Theodore Ts'o, 14:40
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Josselin Mouette, 14:00
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Josselin Mouette, 13:50
Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bastian Blank, 13:40
Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bastian Blank, 13:30
Re: Bug#431066: install network/ip-up.d script to check for IP duplicates, Bernd Eckenfels, 11:50
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Michael Banck, 10:30
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 09:10
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 09:10
Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Tollef Fog Heen, 09:00
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 09:00
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Tollef Fog Heen, 08:50
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Mikhail Gusarov, 08:50
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Kurt Roeckx, 08:20
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Aurelien Jarno, 06:00
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Paul Wise, 05:50
Re: correct definition of localhost?, William Pitcock, 05:20
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Ben Hutchings, 02:20
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Steve Langasek, 02:20
Re: correct definition of localhost?, Kurt Roeckx, 01:50
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 01:00
correct definition of localhost?, Steve Langasek, 00:20

July 06, 2008

Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Sune Vuorela, 21:20
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Loïc Minier, 21:10
Re: Strange file problem, John H. Robinson, IV, 20:10
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Sune Vuorela, 20:00
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, James Vega, 19:30
Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Neil Williams, 18:40
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Jay Berkenbilt, 16:50
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Tilo Schwarz, 16:30
Re: Strange file problem, Ralf Hildebrandt, 13:30
Strange file problem, Andrea Ferraresi, 13:20
Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs), Marc Haber, 12:50
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Raphael Hertzog, 12:20
Re: Bug#444980: udev not restarted after exiting runlevel 1, Marco d'Itri, 01:10
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Ben Finney, 00:50

July 05, 2008

Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Joey Hess, 23:10
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Joey Hess, 22:40
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Magnus Holmgren, 21:50
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Russ Allbery, 21:40
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Bernhard R. Link, 20:20
Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs), Steve Langasek, 19:50
Re: tarball in tarball: opinions, Bart Martens, 19:00
tarball in tarball: opinions, Jay Berkenbilt, 18:30
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 17:00
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Marvin Renich, 16:50
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Charles Plessy, 16:10
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Bernhard R. Link, 15:20
Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs), Roger Leigh, 13:10
Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs), Raphael Hertzog, 12:20
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 12:00
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Daniel Dickinson, 12:00
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, William Pitcock, 11:20
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Russ Allbery, 11:10
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Thomas Viehmann, 11:00
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Russ Allbery, 10:50
Re: upgrade problems switching from conflictiong to depending packages, Andreas Metzler, 10:40
Re: gnome, kde, xfce use non-policy main menu, Paul Wise, 10:30
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 10:30
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Peter Samuelson, 08:40
FHS location for locally-compiled bytecode (was: FHS location for Python libraries as locally-compiled bytecode), Ben Finney, 06:30
Re: Intent to NMU tinyproxy, Jordi Mallach, 02:20

July 04, 2008

Re: Intent to NMU tinyproxy, Gunnar Wolf, 23:20
Re: Should DMs be allowed to upload to NEW, Ondrej Certik, 20:50
Intent to NMU tinyproxy, Jordi Mallach, 19:00
Re: Clarify what "sensible behaviour" is for init scripts, Ben Finney, 14:50
Re: ITP: password -- little ruby random password generator, Francesco P. Lovergine, 14:50
Re: Converting to source format "3.0 (quilt)", Ben Finney, 09:30
Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Neil Williams, 09:00
Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Tollef Fog Heen, 08:40
Re: Converting to source format "3.0 (quilt)" (was: Misc developer news (#9)), Raphael Hertzog, 08:40
Work-needing packages report for Jul 4, 2008, wnpp, 08:30
Re: Multiarch and idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Neil Williams, 08:00
Re: ITP: password -- little ruby random password generator, Paul Wise, 07:20
Re: ITP: password -- little ruby random password generator, Russ Allbery, 06:10
Converting to source format "3.0 (quilt)" (was: Misc developer news (#9)), Ben Finney, 04:10
Re: Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Brendan O'Dea, 03:50
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Gunnar Wolf, 00:20

July 03, 2008

Boletines Oficiales, Ana Gil Barrenechea, 23:00
Re: Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Raphael Hertzog, 22:20
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Marvin Renich, 22:00
Re: Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Don Armstrong, 21:50
Perl symbol problem - release critical (Re: Bug#489132), Ian Jackson, 21:30
Re: Bug#489132: lenny release notes, upgrade dpkg first, Holger Levsen, 20:20
upgrade problems switching from conflictiong to depending packages, Andreas Metzler, 20:10
Re: Bug#489059: ITP: mnemosyne-blog -- Maildir-to-blog compiler with XML templating and Python extensions, Decklin Foster, 18:10
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 16:00
Re: buildd path name length, Florian Weimer, 14:00
Re: buildd path name length, Simon Josefsson, 13:50
buildd path name length, Florian Weimer, 13:00
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Andreas Tille, 09:40
Re: bug closed by $p4m mail?, Johannes Wiedersich, 09:40
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 09:30
Re: bug closed by $p4m mail?, Lars Wirzenius, 09:00
bug closed by $p4m mail?, Johannes Wiedersich, 08:50
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Lars Wirzenius, 08:40
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Andreas Tille, 08:30
Re: Bug#489059: ITP: mnemosyne-blog -- Maildir-to-blog compiler with XML templating and Python extensions, Ben Finney, 07:30
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Hai Zaar, 01:10
Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Joey Hess, 01:00

July 02, 2008

Re: Dpkg triggers and user experience, aka "How do I disable those triggers" side effect., Tilo Schwarz, 23:20
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Joe Smith, 22:40
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Marvin Renich, 20:20
Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository, Mark Brown, 16:50
Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository, Reinhard Tartler, 13:20
Re: ITP: debian-backports-keyring -- GnuPG archive key of the backports.org repository, Ben Finney, 12:40
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 09:10
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 03:00
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 02:50
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Michael Tautschnig, 02:40
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Brian May, 02:20
Samuelson's Law (was: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian), Ben Finney, 01:50
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Steve Langasek, 00:40

July 01, 2008

Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives handling, Goswin von Brederlow, 18:50
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian, Bernhard R. Link, 18:20
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Peter Samuelson, 17:20
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 16:00
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 16:00
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Frans Pop, 15:50
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Thibaut Paumard, 15:20
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Michael Tautschnig, 15:10
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, Bernd Eckenfels, 15:10
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 15:10
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Hendrik Sattler, 14:40
Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?, James Westby, 14:10
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Lars Wirzenius, 12:40
Re: Please focus on one generic spell checker in Debian (Was: Bug#487732: O: ispell -- International Ispell (an interactive spelling corrector)), Thibaut Paumard, 12:20
Thua quy vi!, SP Viet Nam, 03:30
Re: Mixing dbconfig and gconf, Josselin Mouette, 00:10