linux.debian.devel (date)

linux.debian.devel (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

May 31, 2008

Re: Bits from the ftp team, Raphael Hertzog, 17:20
Re: 37.5% boot time reduction in Lenny is possible (recipe), Petter Reinholdtsen, 13:20
Re: 37.5% boot time reduction in Lenny is possible (recipe), Goswin von Brederlow, 12:30
Re: Bug#449097: Bits from the ftp team, Don Armstrong, 00:50

May 30, 2008

Re: Bits from the ftp team, Joerg Jaspert, 23:50
Re: Bits from the ftp team, Raphael Hertzog, 22:40
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Stephen Powell, 22:40
Re: Bits from the ftp team, Josip Rodin, 22:00
Re: Handling of removed packages, Mike Bird, 19:40
Re: Handling of removed packages, Russ Allbery, 19:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Wolf Wiegand, 13:50
Re: Generated changes and patch systems, Simon McVittie, 12:20
Re: Bits from the ftp team, Thomas Viehmann, 11:10
Re: Handling of removed packages, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 11:10
Re: Generated changes and patch systems, Neil Williams, 11:00
Re: Bits from the ftp team, Josip Rodin, 10:40
Re: Handling of removed packages, Daniel Burrows, 09:10
Re: Handling of removed packages, Franklin PIAT, 08:40
Work-needing packages report for May 30, 2008, wnpp, 08:30
Re: libweather-com-perl useless in Etch, Paul Wise, 07:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Mike Bird, 05:20
Re: Handling of removed packages, Guillem Jover, 04:10
Use origin (Handling of removed packages), Filipus Klutiero, 03:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Russ Allbery, 03:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Geissert, 03:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Bernd Eckenfels, 02:50
Re: libweather-com-perl useless in Etch, Peter Samuelson, 02:40
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Peter Samuelson, 02:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Franklin PIAT, 01:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Raphael Geissert, 00:40
Re: Handling of removed packages, Wolf Wiegand, 00:10

May 29, 2008

Disruptive changes in dhelp, Esteban Manchado Velázquez, 23:30
libweather-com-perl useless in Etch, Christoph Haas, 21:50
Re: Handling of removed packages, Mike Bird, 21:50
Re: Handling of removed packages, Franklin PIAT, 21:40
Re: debian.ch: board changes, Daniel Baumann, 21:00
Re: Generated changes and patch systems, Russ Allbery, 21:00
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Lennart Sorensen, 21:00
Re: Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Lennart Sorensen, 21:00
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Lennart Sorensen, 20:50
Re: 37.5% boot time reduction in Lenny is possible (recipe), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 19:50
Re: Handling of removed packages, John H. Robinson, IV, 19:30
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Ron Johnson, 19:30
37.5% boot time reduction in Lenny is possible (recipe), Petter Reinholdtsen, 19:10
Hola porfavor ayúdenme a difundir esta página se las recomiendo, Richard Olives Peña, 19:00
Re: Handling of removed packages, Steve Greenland, 18:50
Re: Handling of removed packages, Adeodato Simó, 18:40
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Frans Pop, 18:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Frans Pop, 18:20
Re: Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Julien Cristau, 17:40
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Ron Johnson, 17:30
Re: Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Stephen Powell, 17:00
Re: funny outputs of ssh-vulnkey, Atsuhito Kohda, 16:00
Re: Handling of removed packages, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 15:40
Re: Handling of removed packages, Ron Johnson, 15:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, James Vega, 15:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Kai Wasserbäch, 15:10
Re: Handling of removed packages, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 15:10
Re: Handling of removed packages, Stefano Zacchiroli, 14:30
Re: Handling of removed packages, Frans Pop, 14:10
Re: Handling of removed packages, Olivier Berger, 14:10
Re: Handling of removed packages, Lucas Nussbaum, 13:50
Handling of removed packages, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 13:30
Re: Re: Generated changes and patch systems, Simon McVittie, 13:20
Re: funny outputs of ssh-vulnkey, Francesco P. Lovergine, 12:50
Re: ssl security desaster, Patrik Fimml, 12:00
Re: funny outputs of ssh-vulnkey, Paul Wise, 09:40
funny outputs of ssh-vulnkey, Atsuhito Kohda, 08:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Stefano Zacchiroli, 08:40
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Christian Perrier, 08:40
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Yves-Alexis Perez, 08:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Daniel Jacobowitz, 08:00
ITH/ITA fvwm-crystal, Vincent Bernat, 07:50
Lap ADSL va DTCD chi 100k tang them may Dien thoai!, hant, 06:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Geissert, 03:00
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Ben Finney, 00:20
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Mark Eichin, 00:10

May 28, 2008

Re: Availability of debian changelogs, Frank Lichtenheld, 21:20
security embargos (was: Re: ssl security desaster), Klaus Ethgen, 17:40
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Lennart Sorensen, 16:10
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Goswin von Brederlow, 16:10
Re: Debian's eboard package, Riku Voipio, 16:10
Re: Debian's eboard package, Josselin Mouette, 15:40
Re: Debian's eboard package, Patrik Fimml, 14:40
Re: Alioth slowness - web pages not loading, top showing 10.00+, Stephen Gran, 14:20
Re: Generated changes and patch systems, Neil Williams, 13:10
Re: Processed: tagging 480716, Neil Williams, 13:00
Re: Processed: tagging 480716, Julien Cristau, 11:50
Thanks for the response on DSA-1571 OpenSSL vulnerability (was: ssl security desaster), Ben Finney, 10:50
Alioth slowness - web pages not loading, top showing 10.00+, no-from-header-present, 10:10
Re: Debian Menu transition status, Christian Perrier, 09:20
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Christian Perrier, 09:20
Re: Debian's eboard package, Chris Bannister, 02:40
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Martin Langhoff, 01:40
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Colin Watson, 01:20
Re: ssl security desaster, Colin Watson, 01:10
Re: Availability of debian changelogs, Michael Banck, 00:30
Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Joey Hess, 00:10

May 27, 2008

Re: Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Lennart Sorensen, 23:20
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Raphael Geissert, 23:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Florian Weimer, 22:40
Mouse configuration during installation needs improvement, Stephen Powell, 22:30
erotic grx Cuties at shelf belief., eliseboozer472847, 21:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Mike Hommey, 20:50
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Daniel Jacobowitz, 20:40
Re: ssl security desaster, Florian Weimer, 19:20
Re: ssl security desaster, Florian Weimer, 18:30
Re: ssl security desaster, Patrik Fimml, 18:00
Re: Availability of debian changelogs, Don Armstrong, 17:00
Re: ssl security desaster, Florian Weimer, 17:00
Re: ssl security desaster, Florian Weimer, 16:00
Re: Availability of debian changelogs, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 16:00
Re: ssl security desaster, Patrik Fimml, 16:00
Re: Processed: tagging 480716, Neil Williams, 15:20
Re: Availability of debian changelogs, Neil Williams, 15:10
Re: Availability of debian changelogs, Neil Williams, 15:00
Re: Processed: tagging 480716, Michael Schutte, 15:00
Availability of debian changelogs, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 12:50
Crown Victoria 5,555, Ford, 09:20
Edge 7,777, Ford, 09:20
RE: Online Pha .., Bryce Mclaughlin, 08:20
Re: ssl security desaster, Russ Allbery, 02:50
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Klaus Ethgen, 02:40
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Joey Hess, 01:40
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Colin Watson, 01:20

May 26, 2008

Processed (with 1 errors): block 480722 with 483076, Debian Bug Tracking System, 23:40
Re: Processed: tagging 480716, Neil Williams, 22:50
Re: Processed: tagging 480716, Neil Williams, 22:10
Debian's eboard package, Patrik Fimml, 21:10
Re: Processed: tagging 480716, Neil Williams, 21:00
Re: Processed: tagging 480716, William Pitcock, 20:40
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Joerg Jaspert, 20:30
Re: Debian's eboard package, Daniel Burrows, 20:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Darren Salt, 19:10
Processed: tagging 480716, Debian Bug Tracking System, 18:00
Urgent healthcare info, Alec Miles, 16:40
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Hubert Chathi, 15:30
Re: packages up for adoption, Bart Samwel, 15:10
Re: Re: packages up for adoption, Michael Meskes, 15:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Filipus Klutiero, 14:10
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Goswin von Brederlow, 13:30
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Francesco P. Lovergine, 12:40
Edge 7,777, Ford, 12:10
Crown Victoria 5,555, Ford, 11:40
Re: Bug#482913: ITP: daptup -- see changes in new & upgradeable lists after aptitude update, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 11:30
debug packages, was: Large data packages in the archive, Reinhard Tartler, 10:20
Re: packages up for adoption, Miriam Ruiz, 09:40
Re: packages up for adoption, Anibal Avelar, 07:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Alexander E. Patrakov, 06:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Charles Plessy, 02:40
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Joerg Jaspert, 02:10
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Joerg Jaspert, 02:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Charles Plessy, 01:50
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Goswin von Brederlow, 01:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Luk Claes, 00:00
Processed: Re: Bug#482902: please provide libc6-hppa64 and libc6-hppa64-dev packages, Debian Bug Tracking System, 00:00

May 25, 2008

Re: Large data packages in the archive, Raphael Geissert, 23:30
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Luk Claes, 22:30
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Raphael Geissert, 22:10
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Ove Kaaven, 22:00
Re: Large data packages in the archive, Michael Hanke, 20:50
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Ron Johnson, 20:30
Re: packages up for adoption, Joey Hess, 20:20
Large data packages in the archive, Joerg Jaspert, 20:20
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Chris Bannister, 20:20
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Manuel Prinz, 18:10
Re: Generated files and patch systems, Russ Allbery, 17:50
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Ron Johnson, 16:30
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Fernando Cerezal, 16:10
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Noah Slater, 16:00
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Neil Williams, 15:50
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, David Paleino, 15:40
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Manuel Prinz, 15:40
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Ron Johnson, 15:40
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Neil Williams, 15:20
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Neil Williams, 15:20
Re: Generated files and patch systems, Neil Williams, 15:20
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Mikhail Gusarov, 15:10
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Fernando Cerezal, 15:10
Re: Generated files and patch systems, Neil Williams, 15:10
Re: What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 14:50
What about use xml for descriptions of packages?, Fernando Cerezal, 14:50
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Stefano Zacchiroli, 11:50
Crown Victoria 5,555, Ford, 11:30
Edge 7,777, Ford, 11:10
Re: Packages in section python/perl simply because implemented in python/perl, Osamu Aoki, 06:40

May 24, 2008

Re: Packages in section python/perl simply because implemented in python/perl, Steve Greenland, 18:00
Re: Packages in section python/perl simply because implemented in python/perl, Hendrik Sattler, 14:30
Re: Packages in section python/perl simply because implemented in python/perl, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe, 12:20
Packages in section python/perl simply because implemented in python/perl, Sami Liedes, 11:30
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, George Danchev, 07:10
Patch peer review., Charles Plessy, 04:20
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Timothy G Abbott, 03:10
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Don Armstrong, 02:40

May 23, 2008

Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Luciano Bello, 23:20
Re: packages up for adoption, David Watson, 22:30
Re: Re: packages up for adoption, Bart Samwel, 21:30
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 18:50
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Don Armstrong, 18:40
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Stefano Zacchiroli, 18:10
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Osamu Aoki, 15:20
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Osamu Aoki, 14:50
Work-needing packages report for May 23, 2008, wnpp, 08:30
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Brian May, 06:10
Re: packages up for adoption, Joey Hess, 01:30
Re: track bugs in VCS, not the other way around, Sam Vilain, 00:50

May 22, 2008

Re: packages up for adoption, Adeodato Simó, 23:20
Re: Bug#482414: ITP: guake -- A drop-down terminal for Gnome Desktop Environment, Yves-Alexis Perez, 22:50
Re: Bug#482414: ITP: guake -- A drop-down terminal for Gnome Desktop Environment, William Pitcock, 22:30
Re: packages up for adoption, Serafeim Zanikolas, 22:20
Re: Bug#482414: ITP: guake -- A drop-down terminal for Gnome Desktop Environment, Yves-Alexis Perez, 21:50
Re: packages up for adoption, Bart Martens, 20:20
Re: packages up for adoption, Joey Hess, 19:50
Re: packages up for adoption, Joey Hess, 19:50
Re: packages up for adoption, Joey Hess, 19:40
Re: packages up for adoption, Bart Martens, 19:00
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Felipe Sateler, 18:40
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Stefano Zacchiroli, 16:10
Uno dei fafrcnmaci piu popolari per il trattamento dei problemi di ereziogone, Emily Flanagan, 15:30
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Bernhard R. Link, 15:20
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Guillem Jover, 15:00
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Osamu Aoki, 14:40
Re: Proposing a new source control header to link to upstream BTSs, Raphael Hertzog, 14:00
Re: Proposing a new source control header to link to upstream BTSs, Martín Ferrari, 13:30
Re: RFH: Bug #481575: courier: FTBFS, Josselin Mouette, 10:20
Re: packages up for adoption, Anibal Avelar, 08:10
RFH: Bug #481575: courier: FTBFS, Christian Perrier, 07:20
Re: packages up for adoption, Lars Wirzenius, 07:10
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Ron Johnson, 04:40
Re: packages up for adoption, Michael Meskes, 04:40
Familien- Wellnessurlaub - Inteli Tours, ungarn-info.de, 04:10
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Andreas Bombe, 03:50
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Bernd Eckenfels, 03:50
IPhone big problem, ggusti.ar, 03:40
IPhone big problem, gusti, 03:30
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Ben Finney, 01:00
Re: track bugs in VCS, not the other way around, Ben Finney, 00:40

May 21, 2008

Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Luciano Bello, 22:40
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Mike Hommey, 22:30
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Michal Čihař, 22:30
Re: FYI: VCS choice these days, Steve Greenland, 22:20
Gutenprint 5.2 prerelease in experimental, Roger Leigh, 21:30
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, peter green, 21:10
packages up for adoption, Joey Hess, 21:00
elegant tgs tw Bitch total while then., freidafrankum772534, 20:50
FYI: VCS choice these days, Osamu Aoki, 18:30
Re: track bugs in VCS, not the other way around, martin f krafft, 17:50
Re: track bugs in VCS, not the other way around, Jelmer Vernooij, 17:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 16:00
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Ron Johnson, 15:50
vserver Linux image packages in Lenny ?, Olivier Berger, 15:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, martin f krafft, 15:20
track bugs in VCS, not the other way around (was: divergence from upstream as a bug), martin f krafft, 15:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, martin f krafft, 15:20
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 13:10
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Ben Finney, 12:30
Re: package config, Josselin Mouette, 12:30
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Raphael Hertzog, 12:20
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 11:20
Re: package config, Anthony, 10:50
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Raphael Hertzog, 10:30
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Enrico Zini, 10:20
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 10:10
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Lars Wirzenius, 09:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 09:40
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 09:20
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Miriam Ruiz, 09:10
bright.paul1747 has asked you a question, Question_It, 09:00
Re: package config, Manoj Srivastava, 07:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Ben Finney, 06:40
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Bernd Eckenfels, 06:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 06:30
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, John Hasler, 06:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 06:20
Re: debian-installer: driver disk compatibility, Roberto C. Sánchez, 05:00
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Ron Johnson, 04:50
debian-installer: driver disk compatibility, Ken Teague, 04:50
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Nicolas François, 01:50
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, William Pitcock, 01:20
Re: what about an special QA package priority?, Miriam Ruiz, 00:00

May 20, 2008

Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Bernd Eckenfels, 23:00
Re: Bug#481973: ITP: libiptables-parse-perl -- Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets, Franck JONCOURT, 23:00
what about an special QA package priority?, Luciano Bello, 22:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 21:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Stefano Zacchiroli, 21:10
Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field, Stefano Zacchiroli, 21:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Michael Banck, 17:40
Re: Heads up: ffmpeg transition (SONAME Change!), Paul Wise, 17:20
Re: Heads up: ffmpeg transition (SONAME Change!), Reinhard Tartler, 17:20
Re: Heads up: ffmpeg transition (SONAME Change!), Adeodato Simó, 16:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Gunnar Wolf, 16:00
Re: possible mass-bug filing on fc-cache-using packages, Adam D. Barratt, 15:30
Re: possible mass-bug filing on fc-cache-using packages, martin f krafft, 14:50
Re: possible mass-bug filing on fc-cache-using packages, brian m. carlson, 14:30
Re: possible mass-bug filing on fc-cache-using packages, Josselin Mouette, 14:30
possible mass-bug filing on fc-cache-using packages, martin f krafft, 13:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Pierre Habouzit, 12:00
Re: Heads up: ffmpeg transition (SONAME Change!), Reinhard Tartler, 12:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 11:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 11:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Stefano Zacchiroli, 11:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 10:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Stefano Zacchiroli, 10:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Stefano Zacchiroli, 10:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 10:00
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Lars Wirzenius, 09:10
package config, Anthony, 08:40
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Charles Plessy, 08:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Goswin von Brederlow, 08:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Goswin von Brederlow, 08:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Goswin von Brederlow, 08:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 08:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Andreas Tille, 08:00
Bug#481973: ITP: libiptables-parse-perl -- Perl extension for parsing iptables firewall rulesets, Franck JONCOURT, 01:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Ben Finney, 01:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 00:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Pierre Habouzit, 00:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Gunnar Wolf, 00:10
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 00:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Stefano Zacchiroli, 00:00

May 19, 2008

Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Stefano Zacchiroli, 23:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Stefano Zacchiroli, 23:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Michael Banck, 22:50
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Bernd Eckenfels, 22:50
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 20:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 18:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 17:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Pierre Habouzit, 17:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 17:30
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Manoj Srivastava, 17:30
utilisation de ucf - paquet de configuration., Anthony, 17:00
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Raphael Hertzog, 16:10
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Ben Finney, 16:00
Re: pwsafe and OpenSSL?, Daniel Burrows, 15:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Russ Allbery, 15:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, George Danchev, 14:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Goswin von Brederlow, 14:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Raphael Hertzog, 13:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Mark Brown, 11:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 11:20
Re: Mailing list code of conduct, again, Andrew Vaughan, 11:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Miriam Ruiz, 11:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Goswin von Brederlow, 10:50
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Bernhard R. Link, 10:20
Patch license, Charles Plessy, 10:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Lucas Nussbaum, 09:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Lucas Nussbaum, 09:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 09:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Hertzog, 09:30
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 09:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Lucas Nussbaum, 09:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Raphael Hertzog, 09:20
Re: deactivated native samba support in mc, Andreas Tille, 09:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 09:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Goswin von Brederlow, 09:10
Has recibido una postal de Michael, Michael, 09:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 09:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 08:50
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Richard A Nelson, 07:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, George Danchev, 06:00
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Hamish Moffatt, 05:30
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Brian May, 05:20
Re: ssl security desaster, Martin Uecker, 03:30
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Martin Langhoff, 03:00
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Ben Finney, 02:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Martin Langhoff, 02:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Charles Plessy, 02:20
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Ben Finney, 01:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Ben Finney, 01:40
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Bernd Eckenfels, 00:50
deactivated native samba support in mc, Patrick Winnertz, 00:00

May 18, 2008

Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 23:30
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Pierre Habouzit, 23:20
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Neil Williams, 22:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Martin Langhoff, 22:10
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Lucas Nussbaum, 21:50
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Clint Adams, 21:10
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Neil Williams, 21:00
Re: Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug, Neil Williams, 21:00
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Mark Brown, 20:30
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Mark Brown, 20:30
Re: Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 20:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 19:50
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Lucas Nussbaum, 19:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Niko Tyni, 19:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Frans Pop, 19:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Michael Banck, 19:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bastian Blank, 19:30
Re: RFS: figtoipe / difficulties with Replaces:, Steve Greenland, 19:30
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Neil Williams, 19:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, George Danchev, 19:00
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Clint Adams, 18:50
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Lucas Nussbaum, 18:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Frans Pop, 18:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, George Danchev, 18:20
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Raphael Hertzog, 18:10
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Miriam Ruiz, 18:00
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Pierre Habouzit, 17:50
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Neil Williams, 17:50
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Clint Adams, 17:50
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Julien Cristau, 17:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Bernhard R. Link, 17:40
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Frans Pop, 17:30
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Ben Finney, 17:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bernhard R. Link, 17:30
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras, 17:30
Re: Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Pierre Habouzit, 17:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 17:20
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again (was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Vincent Bernat, 17:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Lucas Nussbaum, 17:10
Which problem are we trying to solve? (Was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Lucas Nussbaum, 17:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Daniel Burrows, 17:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bernd Eckenfels, 17:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 17:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 17:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Neil Williams, 17:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bernhard R. Link, 17:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Lucas Nussbaum, 16:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Lucas Nussbaum, 16:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bas Wijnen, 16:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bas Wijnen, 16:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Cyril Brulebois, 16:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bernhard R. Link, 16:30
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Ben Finney, 16:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 16:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 16:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 16:20
Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field, Ben Finney, 16:20
Re: Mailing lsit code of conduct, again, Russ Allbery, 16:20
Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field, Bernd Eckenfels, 16:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Aurelien Jarno, 16:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 16:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bernhard R. Link, 16:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Aurelien Jarno, 16:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 16:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 16:00
Mailing lsit code of conduct, again (was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Ben Finney, 16:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 15:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 15:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 15:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 15:40
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Russ Allbery, 15:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 15:40
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Hamish Moffatt, 15:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 15:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 15:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 15:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 15:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 15:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 15:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 15:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 15:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bastian Blank, 15:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Bernhard R. Link, 14:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, George Danchev, 13:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Raphael Hertzog, 13:00
Re: Is sbackup maintained? If not, what to do?, Charles Plessy, 12:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Riku Voipio, 12:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 12:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Lucas Nussbaum, 12:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 12:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Mike Hommey, 12:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Hertzog, 12:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Aurelien Jarno, 12:20
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Raphael Hertzog, 12:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Lucas Nussbaum, 12:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Aurelien Jarno, 12:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Hertzog, 12:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 12:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 12:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 11:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, George Danchev, 11:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, George Danchev, 11:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 11:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 11:30
Re: Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug, Neil Williams, 11:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Hertzog, 11:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 11:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Loïc Minier, 11:20
Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field, Ben Finney, 11:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 11:10
Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field, Lars Wirzenius, 11:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 11:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Loïc Minier, 11:00
Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field, Ben Finney, 10:50
Re: Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 10:50
Re: Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Neil Williams, 10:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Neil Williams, 10:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, George Danchev, 10:00
Should dpkg-source -x list patches (Re: How to handle Debian patches), Andreas Tille, 10:00
Re: Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug, Neil Williams, 09:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Andreas Tille, 09:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Goswin von Brederlow, 09:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Andreas Tille, 09:50
Re: Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field (was: How to handle Debian patches), Lars Wirzenius, 09:40
Feel proud that you're a real man!, Rodolfo Griffith, 09:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Ben Finney, 08:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, George Danchev, 07:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 05:10
Re: Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug (was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Joey Hess, 05:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 05:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Filipus Klutiero, 05:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 05:00
Re: Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 04:10
Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug (was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Ben Finney, 04:10
Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug (was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Ben Finney, 04:10
Tracking divergence from upstream as a bug (was: divergence from upstream as a bug), Ben Finney, 04:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Ben Finney, 03:50
Packages using VCS but with no 'Vcs-*' control field (was: How to handle Debian patches), Ben Finney, 03:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 03:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 01:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 01:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 01:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 01:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 01:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 01:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Josselin Mouette, 01:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 01:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 01:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 01:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 01:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Josselin Mouette, 01:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 01:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 01:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 01:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 01:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 01:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Don Armstrong, 01:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 00:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Lucas Nussbaum, 00:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Stefano Zacchiroli, 00:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Lucas Nussbaum, 00:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 00:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 00:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Mike Hommey, 00:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 00:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Russ Allbery, 00:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 00:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Russ Allbery, 00:00
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 00:00

May 17, 2008

Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Neil Williams, 23:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 23:50
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Mike Hommey, 23:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 23:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 23:40
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 23:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Roger Leigh, 23:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 23:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Neil Williams, 23:30
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Loïc Minier, 23:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Mike Hommey, 23:20
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Mike Hommey, 23:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Pierre Habouzit, 23:10
divergence from upstream as a bug, Joey Hess, 23:10
Re: divergence from upstream as a bug, Pierre Habouzit, 23:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 23:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Pierre Habouzit, 22:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Pierre Habouzit, 22:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 22:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 21:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 21:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Kurt Roeckx, 21:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 21:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 21:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, George Danchev, 21:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 21:10
xkcd, A Mennucc, 21:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Theodore Tso, 21:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 20:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 20:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 20:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 19:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 19:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, George Danchev, 19:40
Re: RFS: figtoipe / difficulties with Replaces:, Daniel Burrows, 19:40
Re: RFS: figtoipe, Steve Greenland, 19:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Russ Allbery, 18:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Charles Plessy, 18:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Vincent Untz, 18:10
Re: RFS: figtoipe, Vincent Bernat, 16:30
Re: RFS: figtoipe, Vincent Fourmond, 16:20
Re: ssl security desaster, Tollef Fog Heen, 15:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Pierre Habouzit, 15:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Stefano Zacchiroli, 15:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Stefano Zacchiroli, 15:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 15:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Guido Günther, 15:10
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Tollef Fog Heen, 15:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Vincent Untz, 14:40
Re: ssl security desaster, Martin Uecker, 14:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Lucas Nussbaum, 14:40
Re: ssl security desaster, Florian Weimer, 12:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Lucas Nussbaum, 12:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 11:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Cyril Brulebois, 11:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 09:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Mike Hommey, 09:00
Re: ssl security desaster, Mike Hommey, 09:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Christian Perrier, 08:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Guillem Jover, 07:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Charles Plessy, 06:50
Re: extensive patching, Martin Uecker, 04:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 04:20
Re: Alioth and SSH: restored, Ben Finney, 03:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 03:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Don Armstrong, 02:30
Re: acpid package needs love and an active maintainer, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 02:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Russ Allbery, 02:20
Re: extensive patching, Don Armstrong, 02:10
Re: conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Filipus Klutiero, 02:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, George Danchev, 02:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Michael Banck, 01:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, George Danchev, 01:40
Re: extensive patching, Michal Čihař, 01:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 01:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Russ Allbery, 01:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 01:00
Re: extensive patching, Joerg Jaspert, 01:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 00:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Manoj Srivastava, 00:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Miriam Ruiz, 00:50
Re: ssl security desaster, Russ Allbery, 00:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Hertzog, 00:40
Re: ssl security desaster, Tollef Fog Heen, 00:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Russ Allbery, 00:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Hertzog, 00:30

May 16, 2008

Re: pwsafe and OpenSSL?, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 23:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Russ Allbery, 23:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Adam Majer, 23:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, George Danchev, 23:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, George Danchev, 23:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 22:40
Re: ssl security desaster, Adam Majer, 22:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Josselin Mouette, 22:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Joey Hess, 22:10
Re: extensive patching, Kevin B. McCarty, 21:50
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Agustin Martin, 21:30
Re: ssl security desaster, Russ Allbery, 21:10
Re: extensive patching, Martin Uecker, 21:00
Re: ssl security desaster, Martin Uecker, 20:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, martin f krafft, 20:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Donnie Berkholz, 20:20
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Goswin von Brederlow, 20:10
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Stefano Zacchiroli, 20:00
Re: extensive patching, Michal Čihař, 19:40
Re: extensive patching, Martin Uecker, 19:30
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Martin Uecker, 19:00
Re: How to handle Debian patches, Miriam Ruiz, 18:50
Re: ssl security desaster, Kevin B. McCarty, 18:50
Re: extensive patching, Barry deFreese, 18:40
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), brian m. carlson, 18:40
Re: How to handle Debian patches, martin f krafft, 18:30
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), James Vega, 18:20
extensive patching, Martin Uecker, 18:10
How to handle Debian patches, Raphael Hertzog, 18:00
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), nicolas vigier, 18:00
Debian patches, Lucas Nussbaum, 16:50
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was:Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Thibaut Paumard, 16:40
Re: changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Richard Kettlewell, 16:30
Re: changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Miriam Ruiz, 15:50
NewInLenny: stuff that's changed between etch and lenny, martin f krafft, 15:50
Re: conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Lennart Sorensen, 15:20
Re: changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Thibaut Paumard, 15:20
changing subjects when discussion becomes slightly off-topic - Was: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Olivier Berger, 15:10
Re: acpid package needs love and an active maintainer, Michael Meskes, 15:00
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Thibaut Paumard, 14:50
Re: acpid package needs love and an active maintainer, Jose Carlos Medeiros, 14:20
Re: Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Martin Uecker, 14:10
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Roberto C. Sánchez, 11:10
Re: [DSA 1571-1] Heimdal, Guido Günther, 10:30
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Ove Kaaven, 10:10
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Roger Leigh, 10:00
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Stefano Zacchiroli, 09:20
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Roland Mas, 09:20
Re: openssh-blacklist for !Debian, Colin Watson, 09:10
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Norbert Preining, 08:50
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Raphael Hertzog, 08:40
Work-needing packages report for May 16, 2008, wnpp, 08:30
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Mike Hommey, 08:20
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Kevin Buhr, 05:50
pwsafe and OpenSSL?, Daniel Burrows, 05:40
Re: Bug#427697: Is sbackup maintained? If not, what to do?, Andrew Vaughan, 05:30
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Goswin von Brederlow, 05:00
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Ben Finney, 03:50
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Steve Langasek, 03:40
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Ben Finney, 03:00
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Steve Langasek, 02:50
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Stephen Gran, 02:50
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov, 02:30
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Steve Langasek, 01:50
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Ben Finney, 01:50
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Russ Allbery, 01:30
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Steve Langasek, 01:30
re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, peter green, 01:20
Re: conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Filipus Klutiero, 00:40
Re: Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Mike Bird, 00:30
Sorting out mail-transport-agent mess, Sune Vuorela, 00:20

May 15, 2008

Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Peter Palfrader, 23:40
Re: ssl security desaster, Kevin B. McCarty, 22:00
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Thibaut Paumard, 21:00
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Peter Samuelson, 20:50
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Mike Bird, 20:20
Re: ssl security desaster, Russ Allbery, 20:20
Re: ssl security desaster, Mikhail Gusarov, 19:50
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Peter Samuelson, 19:50
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Kevin B. McCarty, 19:40
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Martin Uecker, 18:50
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Thijs Kinkhorst, 18:50
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Mike Bird, 18:40
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Mike Bird, 18:20
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Thijs Kinkhorst, 17:40
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Norbert Preining, 17:30
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Peter Palfrader, 17:20
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Mike Hommey, 17:20
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Martin Uecker, 17:10
Re: ssl security desaster, Russ Allbery, 17:00
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Mike Hommey, 17:00
Re: [DSA 1571-1] Heimdal, Russ Allbery, 17:00
Re: [DSA 1571-1] Heimdal, Guido Günther, 16:50
Re: ssl problems: gpg affected?, Florian Weimer, 16:30
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Osamu Aoki, 16:10
Re: conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Lennart Sorensen, 16:00
Re: ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Thijs Kinkhorst, 15:30
ssl security desaster (was: Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA), Martin Uecker, 15:20
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Peter Palfrader, 15:10
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Osamu Aoki, 15:00
acpid package needs love and an active maintainer, Raphael Hertzog, 12:30
Re: openssh-blacklist for testing-updates ?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 11:40
openssh-blacklist for testing-updates ?, Olivier Berger, 11:30
La disfunzione errreettile - impoootenzzza - non e sempre una causa mentale .., Violet Hadley, 11:00
Re: ssl problems: gpg affected?, Michal Čihař, 11:00
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA, Steinar H. Gunderson, 10:00
Re: ssl problems: gpg affected?, Karl Goetz, 08:50
ssl problems: gpg affected?, Norbert Preining, 08:30
[DSA 1571-1] Heimdal, Brian May, 07:40
openssh-blacklist for !Debian, Martin Langhoff, 05:30
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA, Goswin von Brederlow, 05:20
Re: Is openssl actually safe now?, Goswin von Brederlow, 05:10
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), brian m. carlson, 02:30
Re: conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Filipus Klutiero, 02:20
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA, Russ Allbery, 02:10
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), Steinar H. Gunderson, 02:10
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), Steinar H. Gunderson, 02:00
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), Steve Greenland, 01:50
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), brian m. carlson, 01:30
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), brian m. carlson, 01:20
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Ondrej Certik, 01:20
Re: SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), The Fungi, 01:20
Re: package for configuration - Some suggestions, Timothy G Abbott, 00:40
SSH keys: DSA vs RSA (was: Alioth and SSH: restored), Ben Finney, 00:20

May 14, 2008

Re: Is openssl actually safe now? (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset), Steinar H. Gunderson, 23:10
Re: Is openssl actually safe now? (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset), Ivan Jager, 22:20
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Adam D. Barratt, 20:20
Re: db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Luk Claes, 20:00
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Timothy G Abbott, 19:10
db.debian.org/password.html : Why ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub to setup OpenSSH for RSA, Osamu Aoki, 17:00
Re: conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Lennart Sorensen, 15:50
Re: Is openssl actually safe now? (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset), David Härdeman, 12:20
Re: Is openssl actually safe now? (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset), Richard Kettlewell, 12:00
Re: analyzing popcon data for bogus recommends, Enrico Zini, 11:50
Re: Is openssl actually safe now? (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset), Steve Kemp, 11:20
Re: Is openssl actually safe now? (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset), Miriam Ruiz, 11:10
Is openssl actually safe now? (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset), BALLABIO GERARDO, 10:50
Re: analyzing popcon data for bogus recommends, Petter Reinholdtsen, 08:50
Regenerated SSL certificates for debian.org (was: debian infrastructure ssh key logins disabled, passwords reset), Ben Finney, 08:20
Re: analyzing popcon data for bogus recommends, Daniel Burrows, 05:50
Re: analyzing popcon data for bogus recommends, Felipe Sateler, 05:20
analyzing popcon data for bogus recommends, Joey Hess, 05:00
Re: conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Filipus Klutiero, 04:40
Re: conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Lennart Sorensen, 04:00
conglomeration packages (Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?), Filipus Klutiero, 03:40
Re: Specification for the 'Bugs' field in 'debian/control', Ben Finney, 02:20
Re: Split a package, rename an init file, Bertrand Marc, 01:50

May 13, 2008

Re: Split a package, rename an init file, Adam Majer, 22:00
Re: Split a package, rename an init file, Roberto C. Sánchez, 21:50
Re: Split a package, rename an init file, Andreas Metzler, 21:40
Re: Split a package, rename an init file, Bertrand Marc, 21:20
Re: Split a package, rename an init file, Adam Majer, 20:00
Split a package, rename an init file, Bertrand Marc, 19:40
Re: Specification for the 'Bugs' field in 'debian/control', Aaron M. Ucko, 19:30
asdekaa, asdekaa, 16:30
Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Lennart Sorensen, 15:50
package for configuration - Some suggestions, Anthony, 15:00
Specification for the 'Bugs' field in 'debian/control', Ben Finney, 14:30
Re: Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Filipus Klutiero, 04:00
Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Filipus Klutiero, 03:50

May 12, 2008

Bug#479953: marked as done (uniform field for automated package maintenance email messages), Debian Bug Tracking System, 22:40
Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:00
Processed: block 480925 with 480910 480914, Debian Bug Tracking System, 20:50
Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Lennart Sorensen, 16:40
Re: Bug#480718: buildd.emdebian.org: Unable to update gnome-vfs, new version fails to cross build, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 16:30
Re: buildd.emdebian.org pseudo-package and Emdebian bugs, Neil Williams, 16:00
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Domenico Andreoli, 15:50
Re: Debian tcl/tk policy: where to put shared libs?, Francesco P. Lovergine, 14:40
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Raphael Hertzog, 14:00
Re: Bug#480718: buildd.emdebian.org: Unable to update gnome-vfs, new version fails to cross build, Raphael Hertzog, 14:00
Re: Bug#480718: buildd.emdebian.org: Unable to update gnome-vfs, new version fails to cross build, Neil Williams, 13:20
Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Daniel Baumann, 09:20
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Domenico Andreoli, 00:50

May 11, 2008

Re: Bug#480718: buildd.emdebian.org: Unable to update gnome-vfs, new version fails to cross build, Joerg Jaspert, 22:50
Debian tcl/tk policy: where to put shared libs?, Steve M. Robbins, 22:40
Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Filipus Klutiero, 21:50
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Holger Levsen, 20:30
Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Daniel Baumann, 18:40
Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, Ian Campbell, 17:20
Re: Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Lennart Sorensen, 17:20
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Raphael Hertzog, 17:00
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Thijs Kinkhorst, 16:50
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Raphael Hertzog, 15:20
Re: clive: volatile or not-for-stable?, Luk Claes, 14:20
Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, Daniel Widenfalk, 12:10
Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender, Mail Delivery System, 11:20
clive: volatile or not-for-stable?, Mikhail Gusarov, 11:10
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Andreas Metzler, 10:10
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Thijs Kinkhorst, 09:20
Re: Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Filipus Klutiero, 03:20
Re: Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Filipus Klutiero, 03:10
Processed: Uniform field for automated package maintenance email messages (was: Bug#479953: uniform header for automated package maintenance emails), Debian Bug Tracking System, 02:50
Re: ITP: xinha -- powerful WYSIWYG HTML editor, Gregory Colpart, 02:20
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Don Armstrong, 02:10
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Raphael Geissert, 01:00

May 10, 2008

Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Lennart Sorensen, 23:50
Re: Will nvidia-graphics-drivers ever transition to testing?, Mike Bird, 21:50
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 20:50
Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH, David Paleino, 20:20
Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH, brian m. carlson, 20:00
Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH, David Paleino, 19:50
Re: Manpages for binaries not in $PATH, Mikhail Gusarov, 19:40
Manpages for binaries not in $PATH, David Paleino, 19:30
Processed: block 480521 with 450483, Debian Bug Tracking System, 18:10
Processed: block 480518 with 448615, Debian Bug Tracking System, 18:00
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Raphael Hertzog, 09:40
Re: Mail headers for automated package maintenance emails, Lionel Elie Mamane, 08:30
Re: How do I trace aptitude dependencies?, Daniel Burrows, 07:30

May 09, 2008

Re: How to express bullet lists, Simon Huggins, 17:20
Re: how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package, Giovanni Mascellani, 17:00
Re: Bug#480165: ITP: synce-trayicon -- GNOME system tray icon for SynCE, Michael Banck, 12:30
Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 11:00
Work-needing packages report for May 9, 2008, wnpp, 08:30
Davide Puricelli and the chicken package, Ivan Raikov, 07:30
Alioth commit notification Git script, Russ Allbery, 03:50
Final Notice Anti-Money Laundering III for Financial Institutions: New Developments, Economic Sanctions and Global Compliance Requirements LIVE Teleconference, llumbao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 01:00

May 08, 2008

the most beautiful legs in allll the world-!!!, Estela, 23:20
asdekaa, asdekaa, 21:50
Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, Ian Campbell, 15:10
Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, Goswin von Brederlow, 14:50
Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, Daniel Widenfalk, 14:30
Re: Hi all, Jens Seidel, 14:30
Re: Hi all, Christian Perrier, 14:10
Hi all, Yannik Stadelmaier, 14:00
Re: how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package, Kov Chai, 13:20
BTS pseudo-package: buildd.emdebian.org ?, Neil Williams, 09:30
Re: Bug#479953: uniform header for automated package maintenance emails, Thijs Kinkhorst, 09:20
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Timothy G Abbott, 07:50
Re: Bug#480104: ITP: ice -- Internet Communications Engine, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 05:00
Re: question about the libpam-ldap debian package., Brian May, 03:30
Processed: Uniform control field for automated package maintenance emails (was: Bug#479953: uniform header for automated package maintenance emails), Debian Bug Tracking System, 01:40
Re: question about the libpam-ldap debian package., Petter Reinholdtsen, 00:00

May 07, 2008

Re: morse package is "Architecture: any" but build daemons won't act, Joop Stakenborg, 23:10
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Timothy G Abbott, 22:20
Re: morse package is "Architecture: any" but build daemons won't act, Adam D. Barratt, 22:10
morse package is "Architecture: any" but build daemons won't act, Joop Stakenborg, 22:00
Re: a small program for Fritz!Box owner, Matthias Heinisch, 21:20
Re: bts-link fuck up, Pierre Habouzit, 16:30
Re: question about the libpam-ldap debian package., Anthony, 14:50
Re: question about the libpam-ldap debian package., Anthony, 13:30
am-utils and recent kernels, Tim Cutts, 11:00
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Riku Voipio, 10:50
Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 10:20
Re: How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, Gabor Gombas, 09:40
Re: question about the libpam-ldap debian package., Petter Reinholdtsen, 08:10
How to build XEN dom0 and domU kernels based on 2.6.25?, lillgran, 00:50
Intent to hijack xbattbar-acpi, Francesco Polsinelli, 00:40

May 06, 2008

Re: bts-link fuck up, Pierre Habouzit, 23:50
Re: bts-link fuck up, Pierre Habouzit, 23:20
Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#473752: Bug#473752: Bug#473752: Boost 1.35 has been released, Roger Leigh, 22:50
bts-link fuck up, Pierre Habouzit, 22:50
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Timothy G Abbott, 21:50
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Kevin B. McCarty, 21:10
Default Gnome-theme, József Makay, 20:40
Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#473752: Bug#473752: Bug#473752: Boost 1.35 has been released, Steve M. Robbins, 20:20
Re: how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package, Julien BLACHE, 19:20
how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package, Kov Chai, 19:20
how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package, Kov Chai, 19:20
how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package, Kov Chai, 19:00
how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package, Kov Chai, 18:30
Dropping http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/{stable,testing,unstable}_probs .html, Adeodato Simó, 17:50
Re: ITP: xinha -- powerful WYSIWYG HTML editor, Raphael Hertzog, 14:30
ITP: xinha -- powerful WYSIWYG HTML editor, Mathieu PARENT, 13:10
Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Mark Brown, 11:40
Re: SAGE packages for Debian, Bernhard R. Link, 11:40
SAGE packages for Debian, Timothy G Abbott, 08:50
Ofertas día de la madre !!!, PC FULL, 07:00
Re: Bug#479553: ITP: thinkcspy2 -- free Python book for beginning programmers, Manoj Srivastava, 02:40

May 05, 2008

Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Simon Huggins, 20:50
Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Don Armstrong, 20:40
Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Simon Huggins, 20:20
Re: Bug#479553: ITP: thinkcspy2 -- free Python book for beginning programmers, Eugene V. Lyubimkin, 18:30
Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Bug#473752: Bug#473752: Bug#473752: Boost 1.35 has been released, Domenico Andreoli, 18:30
Re: Bug#479553: ITP: thinkcspy2 -- free Python book for beginning programmers, Evgeni Golov, 18:30
Re: building a package two times, Adeodato Simó, 16:00
Re: [OT] Need old Packages.gz and Release Files, Jens Seidel, 15:50
Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork, Paul Wise, 12:30
Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork, Mohammed Sameer, 12:20
Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Colin Watson, 11:20
Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork, William Pitcock, 10:10
Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork, Joachim Breitner, 09:20
Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork, Yves-Alexis Perez, 08:20
Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork, Kevin Mark, 07:30
Re: Can I use 'apt-get source' from debian/rules ?, Goswin von Brederlow, 06:00
Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork, Mohammed Sameer, 02:30
Re: Can I use 'apt-get source' from debian/rules ?, Dirk Eddelbuettel, 02:10
Re: Can I use 'apt-get source' from debian/rules ?, Goswin von Brederlow, 01:40
Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Adam Borowski, 01:10
Re: Bug#479440: ITP: funpidgin -- A pidgin fork, Ben Hutchings, 00:40
Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Adam Majer, 00:40

May 04, 2008

Re: Can I use 'apt-get source' from debian/rules ?, Joerg Jaspert, 23:40
Re: Can I use 'apt-get source' from debian/rules ?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 22:30
Re: Can I use 'apt-get source' from debian/rules ?, Russ Allbery, 22:30
Can I use 'apt-get source' from debian/rules ?, Dirk Eddelbuettel, 22:20
Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Colin Watson, 21:20
Re: quiltrc, Russ Allbery, 20:30
Re: Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Don Armstrong, 20:10
Re: building a package two times, Goswin von Brederlow, 19:10
Re: Bug#479238: ITP: res -- OCaml library for automatically resizing contiguous data structure, Roberto C. Sánchez, 15:30
Re: quiltrc, Philipp Matthias Hahn, 14:40
Is master unsuitable to receive mail from lists.debian.org?, Santiago Vila, 14:10
Re: Bug#479238: ITP: res -- OCaml library for automatically resizing contiguous data structure, Ben Finney, 12:20
Re: Bug#479238: ITP: res -- OCaml library for automatically resizing contiguous data structure, Stefano Zacchiroli, 10:10
Re: Bug#479238: ITP: res -- OCaml library for automatically resizing contiguous data structure, Ben Finney, 09:20
Re: Bug#479238: ITP: res -- OCaml library for automatically resizing contiguous data structure, Stefano Zacchiroli, 08:50