mass ITPs, Paul Wise, 2008/02/29

• Re: mass ITPs, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/02/29
• Re: mass ITPs, Adeodato Simó, 2008/02/29
• Re: mass ITPs, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2008/02/29
  • Re: mass ITPs, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/02/29
  • Re: mass ITPs, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/29

Re: Many packaged programs that are doing the same thing, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/29

• Re: Many packaged programs that are doing the same thing, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/02/29

Unsupported? (Was: Bug#468183: ITP: monkey -- small webserver based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol), Andreas Tille, 2008/02/29

• Re: Unsupported? (Was: Bug#468183: ITP: monkey -- small webserver based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol), Paul Wise, 2008/02/29
  • Re: Unsupported?, William Pitcock, 2008/02/29
    • Re: Unsupported?, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/29
      • Re: Unsupported?, William Pitcock, 2008/02/29

Build of Paje on mipsel : what hapens ?, Vincent Danjean, 2008/02/29

• Re: Build of Paje on mipsel : what hapens ?, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2008/02/29

Intent to hijack pyicqt, Michal Čihař, 2008/02/28

• Re: Intent to hijack pyicqt, Patrick, 2008/02/28
  • Re: Intent to hijack pyicqt, Michal Čihař, 2008/02/28

FW by lidaobing@xxxxxxxxx : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale, Michelle Konzack, 2008/02/28

• Re: FW by lidaobing@xxxxxxxxx : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale, Adam Borowski, 2008/02/28
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bug#467249: FW by lidaobing@xxxxxxxxx : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale, brian m. carlson, 2008/02/28
      • Re: Bug#467249: man-db/groff and locales, Adam Borowski, 2008/02/29
• Re: FW by lidaobing@xxxxxxxxx : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/02/29
  • Re: FW by lidaobing@xxxxxxxxx : Bug#467249: man-db: over sensitive on the spell of locale, Colin Watson, 2008/02/29

apt-get and SOCKS!, Edward Tjornhammar, 2008/02/28

• Re: apt-get and SOCKS!, Nico Golde, 2008/02/28
• Re: apt-get and SOCKS!, Jon Dowland, 2008/02/28
  • Re: apt-get and SOCKS!, William Pitcock, 2008/02/28

Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/27

• Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/27
  • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Patrick Winnertz, 2008/02/27
    • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2008/02/27
      • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Patrick Winnertz, 2008/02/27
        • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Nico Golde, 2008/02/27
      • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/27
        • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/27
          • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Ondrej Certik, 2008/02/27
      • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/27
        • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2008/02/27
        • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/27
          • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Ondrej Certik, 2008/02/27
          • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/28
            • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/28
              • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/28
              • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Steve McIntyre, 2008/02/29
• Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Jon Dowland, 2008/02/27
  • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Anthony Towns, 2008/02/28
• Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Ondrej Certik, 2008/02/27
  • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/27
    • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Ondrej Certik, 2008/02/27
      • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/28
• Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Kevin Mark, 2008/02/27
• Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Andreas Schuldei, 2008/02/27
• Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/27
  • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/28
    • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/28
      • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/28
        • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/28
          • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/28
            • Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/28
• Re: Google Summer of Code 2008, Florian Weimer, 2008/02/29

mc with new utf-8 patch in experimental available - please test, Patrick Winnertz, 2008/02/26

• Re: mc with new utf-8 patch in experimental available - please test, Alexander E. Patrakov, 2008/02/27

Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/02/26

• Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/26

Dual-boot setup, incorrect time in Debian's side, Ismael Valladolid Torres, 2008/02/26

• Re: Dual-boot setup, incorrect time in Debian's side, Adam Borowski, 2008/02/26
• Re: Dual-boot setup, incorrect time in Debian's side, Frans Pop, 2008/02/26

Best medds 4 You!, Mary Workman, 2008/02/26

• Best medds 4 You!, Kyle Ross, 2008/02/26

conditional dependency?, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 2008/02/25

• Re: conditional dependency?, Mike Hommey, 2008/02/25
  • Re: conditional dependency?, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 2008/02/25
    • Re: conditional dependency?, Julien Cristau, 2008/02/25
      • Re: conditional dependency?, Stephen Gran, 2008/02/26
        • Re: conditional dependency?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/02/26
          • Re: conditional dependency?, Stephen Gran, 2008/02/26
            • Re: conditional dependency?, Hamish Moffatt, 2008/02/26
              • Re: conditional dependency?, Gabor Gombas, 2008/02/26
      • Re: conditional dependency?, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/26
        • Re: conditional dependency?, Loïc Minier, 2008/02/26
    • Re: conditional dependency?, Mike Hommey, 2008/02/25
      • Re: conditional dependency?, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 2008/02/25
    • Re: conditional dependency?, Roger Leigh, 2008/02/26
      • Re: conditional dependency?, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/26
      • Re: conditional dependency?, Gabor Gombas, 2008/02/26
    • Re: conditional dependency?, Loïc Minier, 2008/02/26
• Re: conditional dependency?, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/25
  • Re: conditional dependency?, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 2008/02/25
    • Re: conditional dependency?, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/25
• Re: conditional dependency?, Luk Claes, 2008/02/25

Re: Re: Idea of Debian mascot, nic, 2008/02/25

• Re: Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Paul Wise, 2008/02/26
• Re: Idea of Debian mascot, nic, 2008/02/26

Extending fortunes-debian-hints package, Kartik Mistry, 2008/02/25

• Re: Extending fortunes-debian-hints package, Miriam Ruiz, 2008/02/25
  • Re: Extending fortunes-debian-hints package, Kartik Mistry, 2008/02/26
    • Re: Extending fortunes-debian-hints package, William Pitcock, 2008/02/26
    • Re: Extending fortunes-debian-hints package, Alexander Schmehl, 2008/02/26

Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, nic, 2008/02/25

• Idea of Debian mascot, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/25
  • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Miriam Ruiz, 2008/02/25
    • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/02/25
      • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, nic, 2008/02/25
        • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Romain Beauxis, 2008/02/25
          • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/25
            • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Yves-Alexis Perez, 2008/02/25
          • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Adam Borowski, 2008/02/25
        • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/25
          • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, David Given, 2008/02/26
            • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Miriam Ruiz, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Harald Braumann, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, William Pitcock, 2008/02/26
      • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Hector Oron, 2008/02/26
        • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/02/26
        • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Kevin Mark, 2008/02/27
  • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/02/26
    • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/02/26
    • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, William Pitcock, 2008/02/26
      • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Hamish Moffatt, 2008/02/27
        • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, John Hasler, 2008/02/27
          • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Anibal Avelar, 2008/02/27
            • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Hamish Moffatt, 2008/02/27
              • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Jeremiah C. Foster, 2008/02/28
      • Re: Idea of Debian mascot, Gunnar Wolf, 2008/02/27

Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/25

• Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Pierre Habouzit, 2008/02/25
  • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/26
• Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Ian Jackson, 2008/02/26
  • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/27
    • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Ian Jackson, 2008/02/28
      • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Otavio Salvador, 2008/02/29
        • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Colin Watson, 2008/02/29
          • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Otavio Salvador, 2008/02/29
            • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Mike Bird, 2008/02/29
              • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/02/29
              • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Mike Bird, 2008/02/29
• Message not available
  • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Ian Jackson, 2008/02/26
• Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), John Goerzen, 2008/02/25
• Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), John Goerzen, 2008/02/25
  • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Otavio Salvador, 2008/02/25
  • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), James Westby, 2008/02/25
    • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Robert Collins, 2008/02/25
  • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/02/25
    • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Otavio Salvador, 2008/02/25
• Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Mark Brown, 2008/02/26
  • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Ian Jackson, 2008/02/28
    • Message not available
      • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Mark Brown, 2008/02/29
        • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/29
          • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Mike Bird, 2008/02/29
          • Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), Vincent Danjean, 2008/02/29
• Re: git bikeshedding (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance), John Goerzen, 2008/02/27

Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, martin f krafft, 2008/02/25

• Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/25
  • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 2008/02/25
    • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Holger Levsen, 2008/02/25
      • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Thomas Weber, 2008/02/25
        • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, David Paleino, 2008/02/25
          • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Thomas Weber, 2008/02/25
  • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Manoj Srivastava, 2008/02/25
    • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/25
  • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Anibal Avelar, 2008/02/26
    • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, martin f krafft, 2008/02/26
      • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Franklin PIAT, 2008/02/26
        • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, martin f krafft, 2008/02/26
          • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Paul Wise, 2008/02/26
            • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, martin f krafft, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, martin f krafft, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Nico Golde, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Romain Beauxis, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, martin f krafft, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Mike Hommey, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan, 2008/02/27
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 2008/02/26
          • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Patrick Schoenfeld, 2008/02/26
            • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, martin f krafft, 2008/02/26
          • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, gregor herrmann, 2008/02/27
            • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Ben Finney, 2008/02/27
        • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Patrick Schoenfeld, 2008/02/26
          • Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Franklin PIAT, 2008/02/27
• Re: Bits from the DPL: FTP assistants, marketing team, init scripts, elections, Franklin PIAT, 2008/02/25

Debian Configuration Packaging System, Timothy G Abbott, 2008/02/25

• Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/25
  • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Tim Abbott, 2008/02/25
    • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/25
      • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Tim Abbott, 2008/02/25
        • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/25
          • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/25
            • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/25
              • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/25
              • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/25
    • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/26
      • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Timothy G Abbott, 2008/02/27
        • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/27
          • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Timothy G Abbott, 2008/02/27
            • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/28
              • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Timothy G Abbott, 2008/02/28
  • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Marc Haber, 2008/02/27
• Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Frank Küster, 2008/02/25
  • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Timothy G Abbott, 2008/02/26
    • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Frank Küster, 2008/02/26
      • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Timothy G Abbott, 2008/02/26
    • Re: Debian Configuration Packaging System, Frans Pop, 2008/02/26

Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance, Mike Bird, 2008/02/24

• Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/24

Re: ITP: ASTK -- Code_Aster build/control system and front-end, Adam C Powell IV, 2008/02/23

• Re: ITP: ASTK -- Code_Aster build/control system and front-end, Guus Sliepen, 2008/02/23
  • Re: ITP: ASTK -- Code_Aster build/control system and front-end, Adam C Powell IV, 2008/02/24

custom package dependencies not installing, William Francis, 2008/02/22

• Re: custom package dependencies not installing, David Paleino, 2008/02/23

Erlang on UltraSparc III (again), Sergei Golovan, 2008/02/22

• Re: Erlang on UltraSparc III (again), Jurij Smakov, 2008/02/23
  • Re: Erlang on UltraSparc III (again), Sergei Golovan, 2008/02/27

Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Norbert Preining, 2008/02/22

• Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/22
  • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Norbert Preining, 2008/02/22
  • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Otavio Salvador, 2008/02/22
    • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Sergei Golovan, 2008/02/22
      • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Otavio Salvador, 2008/02/22
        • Message not available
          • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Mike Bird, 2008/02/22
            • Message not available
              • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/22
            • Message not available
              • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Mike Bird, 2008/02/22
            • Message not available
              • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Loïc Minier, 2008/02/23
        • Message not available
          • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Daniel Burrows, 2008/02/23
            • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/23
              • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/24
        • Message not available
          • Message not available
            • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/25
              • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Otavio Salvador, 2008/02/25
    • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, David Paleino, 2008/02/22
      • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Michael Koch, 2008/02/22
        • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, David Paleino, 2008/02/22
          • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Michael Koch, 2008/02/22
      • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Daniel Burrows, 2008/02/22
      • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Joe Smith, 2008/02/24
  • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/22
• Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Kevin B. McCarty, 2008/02/22
  • Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Kevin B. McCarty, 2008/02/22
• Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control Depends field??, Kevin B. McCarty, 2008/02/23

avoid conf file overwrite message?, William Francis, 2008/02/22

• Re: avoid conf file overwrite message?, Kumar Appaiah, 2008/02/22
  • Re: avoid conf file overwrite message?, Kumar Appaiah, 2008/02/22
    • Re: avoid conf file overwrite message?, Deepak Tripathi, 2008/02/22
• Re: avoid conf file overwrite message?, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/22
  • Re: avoid conf file overwrite message?, Daniel Burrows, 2008/02/22
    • Re: avoid conf file overwrite message?, Deepak Tripathi, 2008/02/22

Re: Bug#466728: ITP: python-trio -- RDF utilities, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/21

• Re: Bug#466728: ITP: python-trio -- RDF utilities, Andrew Vaughan, 2008/02/27

Re: [med-svn] r1456 - trunk/community/infrastructure/scripts, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/20

• Re: [med-svn] r1456 - trunk/community/infrastructure/scripts, David Paleino, 2008/02/20
  • Re: [med-svn] r1456 - trunk/community/infrastructure/scripts, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/21

the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, jidanni, 2008/02/20

• Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Ben Finney, 2008/02/20
  • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, John Goerzen, 2008/02/21
    • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Ben Finney, 2008/02/21
    • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Rene Engelhard, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Norbert Preining, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, John Goerzen, 2008/02/21
        • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Rene Engelhard, 2008/02/21
        • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, David Nusinow, 2008/02/22
          • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/22
            • Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, John Goerzen, 2008/02/22
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/22
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, David Nusinow, 2008/02/23
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/22
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/02/22
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/22
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Roland Mas, 2008/02/22
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/02/23
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/24
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, David Nusinow, 2008/02/23
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/23
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/24
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/25
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Tristan Seligmann, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/25
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/26
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, jidanni, 2008/02/23
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/23
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, David Nusinow, 2008/02/23
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, jidanni, 2008/02/27
              • Re: Practical solutions to: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/24
            • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/22
          • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/22
            • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Michael Tautschnig, 2008/02/22
              • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/22
              • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Michael Tautschnig, 2008/02/22
              • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/22
              • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, David Nusinow, 2008/02/23
              • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/23
              • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/22
            • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, David Nusinow, 2008/02/23
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Jon Dowland, 2008/02/26
        • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/26
    • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Daniel Burrows, 2008/02/22
• Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Mike Hommey, 2008/02/20
  • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/21
    • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Mike Hommey, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Theodore Tso, 2008/02/25
        • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/25
• Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Paul Wise, 2008/02/21
  • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Ben Finney, 2008/02/21
    • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, John Goerzen, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/24
  • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/21
    • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Bernhard R. Link, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Marc Haber, 2008/02/26
• Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Rene Engelhard, 2008/02/21
• Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/21
  • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Paul Wise, 2008/02/21
    • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/02/21
        • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Paul Wise, 2008/02/22
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Marc Haber, 2008/02/26
        • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/26
          • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, William Pitcock, 2008/02/26
            • Message not available
              • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, William Pitcock, 2008/02/27
    • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Michael Biebl, 2008/02/21
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Michael Tautschnig, 2008/02/21
        • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Charles Plessy, 2008/02/22
        • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Paul Slootman, 2008/02/22
      • Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/22
• Fwd: Re: the new style "mass tirage" of bugs, Rene Engelhard, 2008/02/21

Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Vincent Danjean, 2008/02/20

• Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, William Pitcock, 2008/02/20
  • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Ondrej Certik, 2008/02/21
    • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Ondrej Certik, 2008/02/24
      • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, William Pitcock, 2008/02/24
        • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Ondrej Certik, 2008/02/24
        • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Vincent Danjean, 2008/02/24
          • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, William Pitcock, 2008/02/24
• Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Vincent Danjean, 2008/02/24
  • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Steve Greenland, 2008/02/25
  • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Julian Andres Klode, 2008/02/25
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Edward Allcutt, 2008/02/26
          • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Ondrej Certik, 2008/02/26
            • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, John Goerzen, 2008/02/27
              • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, William Pitcock, 2008/02/27
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial, Steve McIntyre, 2008/02/26

Lintian over sensitivity?, Shachar Shemesh, 2008/02/20

• Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Bas Wijnen, 2008/02/20
  • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Ben Finney, 2008/02/20
• Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/20
  • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Frans Pop, 2008/02/20
    • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/20
      • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/20
        • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/20
      • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Frans Pop, 2008/02/20
• Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Yves-Alexis Perez, 2008/02/20
• Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, David Paleino, 2008/02/20
  • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Giacomo A. Catenazzi, 2008/02/21
    • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, David Paleino, 2008/02/21
      • Re: Lintian over sensitivity?, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/22

Re: Bug#466669: ITP: squirrelmail-gpg -- GnuPG plugin for SquirrelMail, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/20

• Re: Bug#466669: ITP: squirrelmail-gpg -- GnuPG plugin for SquirrelMail, Jan Hauke Rahm, 2008/02/20
  • Re: Bug#466669: ITP: squirrelmail-gpg -- GnuPG plugin for SquirrelMail, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/20
    • Re: Bug#466669: ITP: squirrelmail-gpg -- GnuPG plugin for SquirrelMail, Wolf Wiegand, 2008/02/22
  • Re: Bug#466669: ITP: squirrelmail-gpg -- GnuPG plugin for SquirrelMail, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/23
• Re: Bug#466669: ITP: squirrelmail-gpg -- GnuPG plugin for SquirrelMail, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/20
• Re: Bug#466669: ITP: squirrelmail-gpg -- GnuPG plugin for SquirrelMail, Milan P. Stanic, 2008/02/20

liblockfile L_PID behavior and use of stat atime, Rob Browning, 2008/02/20

• Re: liblockfile L_PID behavior and use of stat atime, Rob Browning, 2008/02/22
  • Re: liblockfile L_PID behavior and use of stat atime, Rob Browning, 2008/02/24

Re: Upstream API breakage question, Michal Čihař, 2008/02/19

• Re: Upstream API breakage question, Hamish Moffatt, 2008/02/19
• Re: Upstream API breakage question, Bernhard R. Link, 2008/02/19

Possible MBF: perl 5.10 and the "remove empty /usr/lib/perl5 dir" bug, Niko Tyni, 2008/02/18

• Re: Mass bug filing: perl 5.10 and the "remove empty /usr/lib/perl5 dir" bug, Niko Tyni, 2008/02/25

Re: Bug#466433: ITP: dkfilter -- implements domainKeys message signing and verification, Yves-Alexis Perez, 2008/02/18

• Re: Bug#466433: ITP: dkfilter -- implements domainKeys message signing and verification, Scott Kitterman, 2008/02/19

RFH: users/developers with Canadian Multilingual keyboards, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/18

• Re: RFH: users/developers with Canadian Multilingual keyboards, Paul Wise, 2008/02/18

Intent to hijack gtkglext, William Pitcock, 2008/02/18

• Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext, Guus Sliepen, 2008/02/18
  • Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext, William Pitcock, 2008/02/18
    • Re: Intent to hijack gtkglext, Aaron M. Ucko, 2008/02/19

Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/18

• Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Julien Cristau, 2008/02/18
  • Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/18
    • Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Stephen Gran, 2008/02/19
      • Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/19
        • Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/19
    • Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/19
      • Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/19
        • Re: Proposed MBF: packages defining useless RPATH's, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/20

Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/17

• Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/17
  • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/17
    • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/18
      • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/19
• Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Scott Kitterman, 2008/02/17
  • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/17
    • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Scott Kitterman, 2008/02/17
      • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/18
        • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Scott Kitterman, 2008/02/18
• Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Wesley J. Landaker, 2008/02/17
  • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/17
• Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/18
  • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/18
    • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/18
      • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/19
• Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Michal Čihař, 2008/02/18
  • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/19
    • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Michal Čihař, 2008/02/19
• Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Jörg Sommer, 2008/02/26
  • Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/28
• On the subject of watchfiles (was Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version), Jon Dowland, 2008/02/26
  • Re: On the subject of watchfiles (was Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version), Martín Ferrari, 2008/02/26
    • Re: On the subject of watchfiles (was Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version), Andreas Tille, 2008/02/26
      • Re: On the subject of watchfiles (was Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version), Gunnar Wolf, 2008/02/26
        • Re: On the subject of watchfiles (was Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version), Andreas Tille, 2008/02/26
          • Re: On the subject of watchfiles (was Re: Proposed MBF: Debian upstream version higher than watch file-reported upstream version), Gunnar Wolf, 2008/02/27

Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, namnd, 2008/02/17

• Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2008/02/17
  • Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, namnd, 2008/02/17
• Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, Hendrik Sattler, 2008/02/17
  • Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, namnd, 2008/02/17
• Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, namnd, 2008/02/17
• Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, Milan P. Stanic, 2008/02/17
• Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, Brian May, 2008/02/18
• Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, martin f krafft, 2008/02/18
  • Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, namnd, 2008/02/18
    • Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, martin f krafft, 2008/02/18
      • Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, martin f krafft, 2008/02/18
  • Re: Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features, Yves-Alexis Perez, 2008/02/18

two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade, Patrick Scharrenberg, 2008/02/17

• Re: two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade, Franklin PIAT, 2008/02/17
  • Re: two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade, sean finney, 2008/02/17
  • Re: two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade, Patrick Scharrenberg, 2008/02/17
• Re: two dpkg-instances / invoking module-assistant on kernel-upgrade, Philippe Cloutier, 2008/02/18

How to express bullet lists, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/17

• Re: How to express bullet lists, Simon Huggins, 2008/02/17
  • Re: How to express bullet lists, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/17
    • Re: How to express bullet lists, Simon Huggins, 2008/02/18
      • Re: How to express bullet lists, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/18
  • Re: How to express bullet lists, Guillem Jover, 2008/02/17

Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP), Raphael Bossek, 2008/02/16

• Re: Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP), David Bremner, 2008/02/16
  • Re: Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP), Michael Banck, 2008/02/17
    • Re: Idea for package name instead of "build" (ITP), David Bremner, 2008/02/17

FREE LINUX CDS-DVDS?, Ernesto Mora, 2008/02/15

• Re: FREE LINUX CDS-DVDS?, Kevin Mark, 2008/02/16

QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Harshula, 2008/02/14

• Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Felipe Sateler, 2008/02/14
• Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Thibaut Paumard, 2008/02/14
• Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Leo \"costela\" Antunes, 2008/02/14
• Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Josselin Mouette, 2008/02/14
  • Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Bas Zoetekouw, 2008/02/14
    • Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/24
      • Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Marvin Renich, 2008/02/24
• Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/14
  • Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/15
• Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages, Harshula, 2008/02/17

meena rawat wants to chat, meena rawat, 2008/02/14

• meena rawat wants to chat, meena rawat, 2008/02/18

Re: Bug#465689: ITP: cinebench -- CinePaint is a collection of free open source software tools for deep paint manipulation and image processing, Felipe Sateler, 2008/02/14

• Re: Bug#465689: ITP: cinebench -- CinePaint is a collection of free open source software tools for deep paint manipulation and image processing, Paul Wise, 2008/02/14
  • Re: Bug#465689: ITP: cinebench -- CinePaint is a collection of free open source software tools for deep paint manipulation and image processing, Paul Wise, 2008/02/14
    • Re: Bug#465689: ITP: cinebench -- CinePaint is a collection of free open source software tools for deep paint manipulation and image processing, Felipe Sateler, 2008/02/14

Re: Tcl/Tk release goals, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/14

• Re: Tcl/Tk release goals, Sergei Golovan, 2008/02/14

FSVS and versioning /etc, Philipp Marek, 2008/02/14

• Re: FSVS and versioning /etc, Joey Hess, 2008/02/14
• Re: FSVS and versioning /etc, Philipp Marek, 2008/02/14

Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Kapil Hari Paranjape, 2008/02/13

• Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", David Paleino, 2008/02/13
  • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Bas Wijnen, 2008/02/13
• Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/13
  • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/13
    • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/13
    • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Lucas Nussbaum, 2008/02/13
      • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/14
      • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Enrico Tassi, 2008/02/14
        • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Charles Plessy, 2008/02/15
          • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Stefano Zacchiroli, 2008/02/15
            • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Anthony Towns, 2008/02/15
            • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Bernhard R. Link, 2008/02/16
              • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Enrico Tassi, 2008/02/16
              • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/17
          • Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Joey Hess, 2008/02/15
• Re: Meaning of the "Altering package upload rules", Russ Allbery, 2008/02/13

Openssl in experimental: please test., Kurt Roeckx, 2008/02/12

• Re: Openssl in experimental: please test., Steve Langasek, 2008/02/12
• Re: Openssl in experimental: please test., Marc Haber, 2008/02/14
  • Re: Openssl in experimental: please test., Kurt Roeckx, 2008/02/15

Re: Bug#465402: O: directfb -- direct frame buffer graphics, Fathi Boudra, 2008/02/12

• Re: Bug#465402: O: directfb -- direct frame buffer graphics, Guillem Jover, 2008/02/16

Firewire support in lenny, Guus Sliepen, 2008/02/12

• Re: Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny, maximilian attems, 2008/02/12
  • Re: Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny, Guus Sliepen, 2008/02/12
    • Re: Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny, maximilian attems, 2008/02/12
      • Re: Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny, Guus Sliepen, 2008/02/12
        • Re: Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny, Guus Sliepen, 2008/02/13
    • Re: Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny, Holger Levsen, 2008/02/14

Bootstrapping GT.M [Was: 'OLPC-Health' takes off !!], Andreas Tille, 2008/02/12

• Re: Bootstrapping GT.M, Goswin von Brederlow, 2008/02/12
  • Re: Bootstrapping GT.M, Mirco Bauer, 2008/02/18
• Re: Bootstrapping GT.M, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/02/12
  • Re: Bootstrapping GT.M, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/16
    • Re: Bootstrapping GT.M, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/02/17
      • Re: Bootstrapping GT.M, Andreas Tille, 2008/02/17
        • Re: Bootstrapping GT.M, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2008/02/17

Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort, H. S. Teoh, 2008/02/12

• Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/12
  • Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort, Anibal Avelar, 2008/02/19
• Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort, Anibal Avelar, 2008/02/19
  • Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/19
• Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort, Colin Watson, 2008/02/23
  • Re: Bits of the gnome 1.x removal effort, Pierre Habouzit, 2008/02/23

[dak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes], Robert Edmonds, 2008/02/11

• Re: [dak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes], Julien Cristau, 2008/02/11
• Re: [dak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes], Luk Claes, 2008/02/11
  • Re: [dak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes], Robert Edmonds, 2008/02/11
    • Re: [dak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes], Steve Langasek, 2008/02/11
      • Re: [dak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes], Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2008/02/11
        • Re: [dak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes], Russ Allbery, 2008/02/11
          • Processing of .changes files by dak, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/02/12
            • Re: Processing of .changes files by dak, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/12
              • Re: Processing of .changes files by dak, Thomas Viehmann, 2008/02/12
              • Re: Processing of .changes files by dak, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/12
              • Re: Processing of .changes files by dak, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/02/12
      • Re: [dak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Processing of ip4r_1.03-1_multi.changes], Robert Edmonds, 2008/02/11

Progress on the mass bug filing for cross build support., Neil Williams, 2008/02/11

• Re: Progress on the mass bug filing for cross build support., Neil Williams, 2008/02/11

Re: Proposalto introduce compiler options passed from dpkg-buildpackage, Matthias Klose, 2008/02/11

• Re: Proposalto introduce compiler options passed from dpkg-buildpackage, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2008/02/13
  • Re: Proposalto introduce compiler options passed from dpkg-buildpackage, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/02/14
    • Re: Proposalto introduce compiler options passed from dpkg-buildpackage, Loïc Minier, 2008/02/14
      • Re: Proposalto introduce compiler options passed from dpkg-buildpackage, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2008/02/14

Where to put idesk in Menu Structure?, Anibal Avelar, 2008/02/11

• Re: Where to put idesk in Menu Structure?, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/11

Local root exploid, Klaus Ethgen, 2008/02/10

• Re: Local root exploid, Nico Golde, 2008/02/10

toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Sune Vuorela, 2008/02/10

• Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, fboudra, 2008/02/11
  • Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Patrick Winnertz, 2008/02/11
    • Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Michael Meskes, 2008/02/11
      • Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Fathi Boudra, 2008/02/11
        • Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Michael Meskes, 2008/02/12
• Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Michael Meskes, 2008/02/11
  • Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Sune Vuorela, 2008/02/11
• Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Sune Vuorela, 2008/02/12
• Re: toolchain issue makes qt3 drop symbols ?, Pierre Habouzit, 2008/02/13

dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/10

• Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/10
  • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/10
  • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/10
    • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, brian m. carlson, 2008/02/10
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, William Pitcock, 2008/02/11
        • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, brian m. carlson, 2008/02/11
  • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Pierre Habouzit, 2008/02/10
    • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Pierre Habouzit, 2008/02/10
• Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Pierre Habouzit, 2008/02/10
  • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/10
    • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Pierre Habouzit, 2008/02/10
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
        • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Pierre Habouzit, 2008/02/11
          • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
          • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, John H. Robinson, IV, 2008/02/12
            • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/24
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, William Pitcock, 2008/02/24
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, William Pitcock, 2008/02/24
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Sergei Golovan, 2008/02/24
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Ian Jackson, 2008/02/24
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/24
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Florian Weimer, 2008/02/24
  • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/10
    • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
        • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/11
          • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
            • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/11
            • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/11
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, William Pitcock, 2008/02/11
              • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
• Re: Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Mike Bird, 2008/02/11
  • Re: Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/11
    • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Mike Bird, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Bas Wijnen, 2008/02/11
        • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Mike Bird, 2008/02/11
          • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Ben Finney, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Holger Levsen, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Andreas Bombe, 2008/02/11
        • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Florian Weimer, 2008/02/11
          • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Andreas Bombe, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/11
        • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Mike Bird, 2008/02/11
          • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/11
          • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Luk Claes, 2008/02/11
        • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Mike Bird, 2008/02/11
    • Re: Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/02/11
      • Re: Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Raphael Geissert, 2008/02/11
  • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Frans Pop, 2008/02/11
    • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Patrick Winnertz, 2008/02/11
    • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Mike Bird, 2008/02/11
  • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Adam Borowski, 2008/02/11
    • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Mike Bird, 2008/02/11
      • Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal, Patrick Winnertz, 2008/02/11

Periodic automake cleanup: removal of automake1.8, Eric Dorland, 2008/02/10

• Re: Periodic automake cleanup: removal of automake1.8, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/02/10
• Re: Periodic automake cleanup: removal of automake1.8, Adeodato Simó, 2008/02/10
  • Re: Periodic automake cleanup: removal of automake1.8, Eric Dorland, 2008/02/10
• Re: Periodic automake cleanup: removal of automake1.8, Jörg Sommer, 2008/02/11

New version of refpolicy headed towards incoming, Manoj Srivastava, 2008/02/10

• Re: [DSE-Dev] New version of refpolicy headed towards incoming, Václav Ovsík, 2008/02/19

pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Evgeni Golov, 2008/02/09

• Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Philippe Cloutier, 2008/02/10
  • news from mips?, Charles Plessy, 2008/02/10
    • Re: news from mips?, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/10
    • Re: news from mips?, Riku Voipio, 2008/02/11
      • Re: news from mips?, Charles Plessy, 2008/02/11
        • Re: news from mips?, Martin Michlmayr, 2008/02/11
          • Re: news from mips?, Charles Plessy, 2008/02/12
    • Re: news from mips?, Florian Lohoff, 2008/02/13
      • Re: news from mips?, Charles Plessy, 2008/02/14
      • Re: news from mips?, Florian Lohoff, 2008/02/22
        • Re: news from mips?, Charles Plessy, 2008/02/25
  • Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Evgeni Golov, 2008/02/10
    • Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Charles Plessy, 2008/02/11
      • Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, William Pitcock, 2008/02/11
    • Re: Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Philippe Cloutier, 2008/02/11
      • Re: Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Charles Plessy, 2008/02/12
        • Re: Re: Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Philippe Cloutier, 2008/02/12
          • Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Joerg Jaspert, 2008/02/12
            • Re: Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Philippe Cloutier, 2008/02/12
    • Re: pre-building NEW packages, when they only introduce new binary packages, Vincent Danjean, 2008/02/13

Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/09

• Re: Binaries with the same name, sean finney, 2008/02/09
  • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/09
  • Re: Binaries with the same name, Frank Küster, 2008/02/10
    • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/10
      • Re: Binaries with the same name, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/10
        • Re: Binaries with the same name, Ben Finney, 2008/02/10
          • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/10
• Re: Binaries with the same name, Frans Pop, 2008/02/09
  • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/09
• Re: Binaries with the same name, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/10
  • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/10
    • Re: Binaries with the same name, Lars Wirzenius, 2008/02/10
      • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/10
        • Re: Binaries with the same name, Frank Lichtenheld, 2008/02/10
          • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/10
        • Re: Binaries with the same name, Frans Pop, 2008/02/10
          • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/10
    • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Moreno, 2008/02/11
      • Re: Binaries with the same name, David Paleino, 2008/02/11

Intent to hijack xfonts-wqy, Cai Qian, 2008/02/08

• Re: Intent to hijack xfonts-wqy, Deng Xiyue, 2008/02/08
  • Re: Intent to hijack xfonts-wqy, Cai Qian, 2008/02/10

Re: Bug#464551: general: USB devices missing in lsusb, Bas Wijnen, 2008/02/07

• Re: Bug#464551: general: USB devices missing in lsusb, Tzafrir Cohen, 2008/02/07

Re: Trying to get in touch with Daniel Glassey about Bibledit package, Salvatore Bonaccorso, 2008/02/07

• Re: Trying to get in touch with Daniel Glassey about Bibledit package, Teus Benschop, 2008/02/07

Re: Bug#464392: ITP: libdebian-package-make-perl -- Perl extension for autobuilding Debian packages, Hilko Bengen, 2008/02/07

• Re: Bug#464392: ITP: libdebian-package-make-perl -- Perl extension for autobuilding Debian packages, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/07
  • Re: Bug#464392: ITP: libdebian-package-make-perl -- Perl extension for autobuilding Debian packages, Steve Langasek, 2008/02/07
    • Re: Bug#464392: ITP: libdebian-package-make-perl -- Perl extension for autobuilding Debian packages, Christian Perrier, 2008/02/08
  • Re: Bug#464392: ITP: libdebian-package-make-perl -- Perl extension for autobuilding Debian packages, Hilko Bengen, 2008/02/11

Is Christian Meder MIA?, Walter Franzini, 2008/02/07

• Re: Is Christian Meder MIA?, Christian Meder, 2008/02/12

unknown-field-in-control homepage, Jonas Meurer, 2008/02/06

• Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Barry deFreese, 2008/02/06
  • Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Jonas Meurer, 2008/02/06
• Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Leo \"costela\" Antunes, 2008/02/06
  • Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Jonas Meurer, 2008/02/06
• Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Russ Allbery, 2008/02/06
  • Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Jonas Meurer, 2008/02/06
    • Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Guillem Jover, 2008/02/07
      • Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Frans Pop, 2008/02/07
      • Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Raphael Hertzog, 2008/02/07
        • Re: unknown-field-in-control homepage, Guillem Jover, 2008/02/07

Copyright question, Jean Parpaillon, 2008/02/06

• Re: Copyright question, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/06
  • Re: Copyright question, Sebastian Harl, 2008/02/06
    • Re: Copyright question, Cyril Brulebois, 2008/02/06
• Re: Copyright question, brian m. carlson, 2008/02/06
• Re: Copyright question, Bas Zoetekouw, 2008/02/06
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Ben Finney, 2008/02/07
          • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Russ Allbery, 2008/02/07
            • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Branden Robinson, 2008/02/07
              • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Russ Allbery, 2008/02/07
              • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Branden Robinson, 2008/02/08
              • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Russ Allbery, 2008/02/08
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Riku Voipio, 2008/02/09
        • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Joey Hess, 2008/02/09
          • Re: Copyright question (BSD with advertisement clause), Charles Plessy, 2008/02/11

[RFC] Changing priority of selinux back to optional, Frans Pop, 2008/02/05

• Re: [RFC] Changing priority of selinux back to optional, Erich Schubert, 2008/02/06
  • Re: [RFC] Changing priority of selinux back to optional, Reinhard Tartler, 2008/02/06
  • Re: [RFC] Changing priority of selinux back to optional, Manoj Srivastava, 2008/02/07
    • Re: [RFC] Changing priority of selinux back to optional, Václav Ovsík, 2008/02/07
      • Re: [RFC] Changing priority of selinux back to optional, Manoj Srivastava, 2008/02/07
        • Re: [RFC] Changing priority of selinux back to optional, Václav Ovsík, 2008/02/07
• Re: [RFC] Changing priority