| Subject: | Re: Building packages with exact binary matches |
|---|---|
| From: | Don Armstrong <don@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:10:17 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | linux.debian.devel |
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Martin Uecker wrote: > You are seriously stating that is as easy to hide a trojan in the > source code as in the binary? Consider the fact that we've already had such a case,[1] whereas we've not (to my knowledge) distributed a trojaned binary. I'm not sure which is easier to hide, but it seems that making a source trojan is at least more frequent if not easier to create. Don Armstrong 1: mICQ anyone? http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/02/msg00872.html -- [A] theory is falsifiable [(and therefore scientific) only] if the class of its potential falsifiers is not empty. -- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ §21 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Julien BLACHE |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, David Anderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |