linux.debian.devel (date)

linux.debian.devel (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

September 30, 2007

Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, atomo64+debian, 21:10
Re: Bug#444673: ITP: nted -- A new musical score editor for Linux, SZERVÁC Attila, 19:41
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Bernd Zeimetz, 19:40
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, David Anderson, 19:40
Let your size never spoil your private life!, Lupe R. Akins, 19:39
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Bernd Zeimetz, 19:38
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Holger Levsen, 19:38
amavisd-new 2.5.2-1 uploaded to experimental, Alexander Wirt, 09:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Charles Plessy, 03:40
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Marco d'Itri, 02:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 02:20
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Daniel Jacobowitz, 01:20
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Bernd Zeimetz, 00:30

September 29, 2007

Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Marco d'Itri, 22:50
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Peter Samuelson, 22:20
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Peter Samuelson, 22:20
743-2979, jamey sletten, 18:20
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Bernd Zeimetz, 14:20
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Roger Leigh, 14:00
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 12:30
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Juan Céspedes, 10:30
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Anthony DeRobertis, 06:00
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Manoj Srivastava, 04:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Steve Langasek, 01:40
No more lonely nights! The new era of big pen!s begins!, Timmy X. Mcbride, 01:40
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Bernd Zeimetz, 01:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Josselin Mouette, 00:50
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 00:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 00:40
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Ben Finney, 00:30

September 28, 2007

Re: semi-virtual packages?, Bruce Sass, 23:40
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Roberto C. Sánchez, 23:30
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 23:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Steve Langasek, 22:50
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Simon Richter, 22:40
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, David Anderson, 22:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Andre Majorel, 22:20
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Ian Jackson, 19:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ian Jackson, 19:10
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, David Anderson, 18:10
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Don Armstrong, 18:10
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Julien BLACHE, 17:40
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Vincent Danjean, 17:20
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Sam Leon, 16:40
Wir wissen was Frauen wollern recommendations , which it -- science, and learning theory,, Lane Bynum, 16:40
Re: Link Exchange Request, Serviced Apartments London, 13:00
Link Exchange Request, Internet Marketing Manager, 12:30
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 12:00
Re: Re: hoi gia ve may bay, TranTuan QuocTuan, 10:10
Work-needing packages report for Sep 28, 2007, wnpp, 08:30
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Drew Parsons, 07:20
Intent to remove libxaw6 from Debian [security issues], Drew Parsons, 04:50
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Bruce Sass, 03:40
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Manoj Srivastava, 01:50
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Manoj Srivastava, 01:50

September 27, 2007

Call for tests: new ThinkFinger package in experimental (PAM-0.99.7.1), Luca Capello, 23:10
Re: Changing name of source package, Magnus Holmgren, 20:30
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Michelle Konzack, 20:00
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Michelle Konzack, 20:00
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Julien BLACHE, 19:10
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Shachar Shemesh, 19:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 18:10
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, paddy, 16:20
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Bruce Sass, 16:10
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Stephen Gran, 16:00
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Daniel Jacobowitz, 15:40
Re: Proposed menu changes, Bill Allombert, 15:20
Re: Releasing packages with 'pending' RC bugs, Daniel Baumann, 15:10
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Bastian Blank, 15:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, paddy, 14:50
Re: Maintainer of package joystick may be missing, laszlo kajan, 14:10
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Darren Salt, 14:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Stephen Gran, 14:00
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, David Anderson, 13:20
Re: Releasing packages with 'pending' RC bugs, Adam D. Barratt, 13:20
Releasing packages with 'pending' RC bugs, Daniel Baumann, 12:50
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 11:50
Re: Changing name of source package, Adeodato Simó, 11:40
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 11:30
Re: Changing name of source package, Francesco P. Lovergine, 11:10
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Holger Levsen, 10:40
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Manoj Srivastava, 09:50
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Manoj Srivastava, 09:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 08:50
[VAC] a few days (I hope). Bretagne, France., Santiago José Ruano Rincón, 08:20
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Lars Wirzenius, 08:10
Re: RFC: "autobuilder" pseudo-package, Goswin von Brederlow, 08:00
Teaching assembly (Re: Bug#443370: ITP: asmutils -- coreutils replacement written in i386 assembler), Oleg Verych, 06:40
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Jon Leonard, 06:10
Re: Changing name of source package, Steve Langasek, 04:30
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Paul Wise, 03:50
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Roberto C. Sánchez, 03:50
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Roberto C. Sánchez, 03:50
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Steve Langasek, 03:40
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Bernd Zeimetz, 03:30
Re: Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, Paul Wise, 03:20
Packaging a library that requires cross-compiled code, David Anderson, 03:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 02:30
Re: New adzapper package with Konqueror AdBlocK support, Michael Biebl, 01:10
ITH: libxmlrpc-c, sean finney, 00:20

September 26, 2007

Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Lars Wirzenius, 23:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Tyler MacDonald, 23:00
Mit unserem Produkt haben Sie wieder Spass am Leben! For the sake -- more complex., Aisha Pendleton, 22:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Roger Leigh, 22:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Mike Hommey, 22:40
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Patrick Schoenfeld, 20:10
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Don Armstrong, 19:23
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Piotr Roszatycki, 19:22
Re: New adzapper package with Konqueror AdBlocK support, Peter Samuelson, 18:50
New adzapper package with Konqueror AdBlocK support, Ludovic Drolez, 18:10
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Patrick Schoenfeld, 18:00
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, A Mennucc, 17:10
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Neil Williams, 16:50
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Jon Dowland, 16:20
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Patrick Schoenfeld, 16:20
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Martin Zobel-Helas, 16:10
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Don Armstrong, 16:00
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Luk Claes, 15:30
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Patrick Schoenfeld, 15:20
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Piotr Roszatycki, 14:50
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Don Armstrong, 14:40
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Martin Zobel-Helas, 14:40
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Patrick Schoenfeld, 14:30
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Piotr Roszatycki, 14:00
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Kevin Mark, 13:20
/usr/share/man/man8/ld.so.8.gz does not document the $ORIGIN, $PLATFORM and $LIB feature, Reinhard Tartler, 13:20
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Patrick Schoenfeld, 13:10
Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries, Pierre Habouzit, 13:10
Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 13:10
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 13:00
Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries, Mike Hommey, 12:50
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Edward Allcutt, 12:50
Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries, Reinhard Tartler, 12:40
Re: Maintainer of package joystick may be missing, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 12:20
Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries, Michael Koch, 12:10
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Bruce Sass, 12:10
Re: dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries, Francesco P. Lovergine, 12:00
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Don Armstrong, 12:00
dpkg-shlibdeps and private libraries, Raphael Hertzog, 11:40
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Patrick Schoenfeld, 10:00
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Patrick Schoenfeld, 10:00
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Bastian Blank, 09:20
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Manoj Srivastava, 07:40
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Manoj Srivastava, 07:40
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Hamish Moffatt, 05:20
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Edward Allcutt, 04:20
Re: Maintainer of package joystick may be missing, Paul Wise, 04:00
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Ben Finney, 03:40
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Hamish Moffatt, 03:30
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 03:10
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Manoj Srivastava, 01:50
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Manoj Srivastava, 01:40
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Russ Allbery, 01:30
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Bastian Blank, 01:10
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Hamish Moffatt, 00:50
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Piotr Roszatycki, 00:30
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 00:10
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 00:10
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Martin Zobel-Helas, 00:10
Re: AM status for Krystian Wlosek?, Piotr Roszatycki, 00:10

September 25, 2007

Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Piotr Roszatycki, 23:40
Bug#443406 closed by Torsten Werner <twerner@xxxxxxxxxx> (Bug#443406: fixed in liquidlnf 2.9.1-3), Debian Bug Tracking System, 23:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Steve Greenland, 22:30
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Kurt Roeckx, 22:30
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Piotr Roszatycki, 21:50
Re: Bug#444022: ITP: papi -- OpenPrinting PAPI suite, Jeff Licquia, 20:20
Re: Changing name of source package, Frank Lichtenheld, 19:50
unbelievable, Marilyn, 19:00
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Kurt Roeckx, 18:30
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Romain Beauxis, 18:00
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Florian Weimer, 17:50
Maintainer of package joystick may be missing, laszlo kajan, 17:50
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Piotr Roszatycki, 17:40
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Manoj Srivastava, 17:40
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Patrick Schoenfeld, 17:40
Changing name of source package, Uwe Steinmann, 17:10
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Romain Beauxis, 17:10
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Manoj Srivastava, 17:00
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Patrick Schoenfeld, 17:00
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Lars Wirzenius, 16:40
dh_install vs. dh_movefiles, Magnus Holmgren, 16:40
Re: Bug#444021: ITP/RFP: sugar, Holger Levsen, 16:40
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Martin Zobel-Helas, 16:30
Re: Bug#444021: ITP/RFP: sugar, Simon Huggins, 16:30
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Reinhard Tartler, 16:10
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Faidon Liambotis, 15:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Reinhard Tartler, 15:20
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, John Goerzen, 15:20
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 15:10
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Piotr Roszatycki, 15:00
Re: volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Martin Zobel-Helas, 14:50
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Jeremiah Foster, 14:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Edward Allcutt, 14:40
volatile.debian.org: Does Debian still support it?, Piotr Roszatycki, 14:20
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Jeremiah Foster, 13:20
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Don Armstrong, 13:20
Re: RFC: "autobuilder" pseudo-package, Holger Levsen, 13:10
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Goswin von Brederlow, 13:00
Re: RFC: "autobuilder" pseudo-package, Goswin von Brederlow, 13:00
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Reinhard Tartler, 12:50
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Hamish Moffatt, 12:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Lars Wirzenius, 12:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Sebastian Dröge, 12:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Simon Richter, 12:30
RFC: "autobuilder" pseudo-package, Simon Richter, 12:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Jon Dowland, 12:20
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Sebastian Dröge, 12:10
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Sebastian Dröge, 12:10
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Sebastian Dröge, 12:10
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Simon Richter, 12:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Andre Majorel, 12:00
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Jonas Meurer, 12:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Don Armstrong, 11:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Marco d'Itri, 11:40
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Patrick Schoenfeld, 11:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Jon Dowland, 11:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Jon Dowland, 11:30
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Clint Adams, 11:10
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Lars Wirzenius, 10:50
seax dadaism colog, castilian, 10:50
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Bruce Sass, 10:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Roger Leigh, 10:40
Re: How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 10:10
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 09:10
How to detect if inside a buildd chroot, Sebastian Dröge, 08:50
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Lars Wirzenius, 08:20
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 04:40
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Russ Allbery, 03:20
Text mode forever (or why all is so boring?), Oleg Verych, 02:50
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Benjamin A'Lee, 02:10
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Jörg Sommer, 02:00
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Manoj Srivastava, 01:40
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Hamish Moffatt, 00:50
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Martin Uecker, 00:30
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 00:20

September 24, 2007

Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, paddy, 23:20
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, paddy, 23:10
Re: Building packages three times in a row, paddy, 22:30
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Adeodato Simó, 20:50
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Goswin von Brederlow, 20:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Steve Greenland, 20:30
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Steve Greenland, 20:20
Re: How to start porting to a new ARCHITECTURE?, Shachar Shemesh, 19:20
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Manoj Srivastava, 17:10
unbelievable, 7 sites for free, Randolph, 15:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Andre Majorel, 11:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 10:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Marc Haber, 10:10
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Don Armstrong, 10:10
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Clint Adams, 09:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Andre Majorel, 09:20
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Lucas Nussbaum, 09:10
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Neil Williams, 08:30
Re: You must be The Real Woman with "huge dignity"!, ScarryJerry, 08:10
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Ben Finney, 07:40
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Manoj Srivastava, 06:40
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Martin Uecker, 05:20
Re: Some questions about Debian, Manoj Srivastava, 04:10
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Martin Uecker, 02:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Don Armstrong, 02:30
Re: Building packages with exact binary matches, Neil Williams, 02:30
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Hamish Moffatt, 02:20
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Martin Uecker, 01:40
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Benjamin A'Lee, 01:30
Re: Some questions about Debian, Ondrej Certik, 01:20
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Martin Uecker, 01:20
Re: Bug#443769: rt2500-source: Missing dependency on bzip2, Ben Hutchings, 01:00
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Neil Williams, 00:10

September 23, 2007

Re: Building packages three times in a row, Martin Uecker, 23:40
Re: using "Breaks:", or how to replace it?, Felipe Sateler, 23:30
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Manoj Srivastava, 23:20
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Manoj Srivastava, 23:10
Re: Bug#443370: ITP: asmutils -- coreutils replacement written in i386 assembler, Bernd Zeimetz, 22:50
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Bruce Sass, 22:30
Re: Bug#443370: ITP: asmutils -- coreutils replacement written in i386 assembler, Steffen Moeller, 22:20
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:00
Re: Some questions about Debian, Manoj Srivastava, 21:30
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Oleg Verych, 21:20
Re: Bug#443370: ITP: asmutils -- coreutils replacement written in i386 assembler, Oleg Verych, 21:20
Re: Bug#443528: ITP: xmms-pulse -- Pulseaudio Output plugin for xmms, Steve Greenland, 19:40
Re: semi-virtual packages?, Manoj Srivastava, 19:20
Re: Some questions about Debian, Ondrej Certik, 17:40
Re: Some questions about Debian, Lucas Nussbaum, 17:30
Re: Some questions about Debian, Ondrej Certik, 16:10
Re: First CFV for Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process, Juan Manuel García Molina, 14:10
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Andre Majorel, 13:40
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Mark Brown, 13:20
semi-virtual packages?, Bruce Sass, 12:20
Debian-devel your lucky day!, Isaac Holmes, 11:50
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Manoj Srivastava, 06:40
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Manoj Srivastava, 06:40
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Joey Hess, 03:40
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Joerg Jaspert, 01:40

September 22, 2007

Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Eduardo Trápani, 23:50
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Roberto C. Sánchez, 22:20
Re: Rfh: test mdadm 2.6.3-1, Elimar Riesebieter, 22:20
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Peter Eckersley, 22:00
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Peter Eckersley, 21:10
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Peter Eckersley, 21:10
Rfh: test mdadm 2.6.3-1, martin f krafft, 20:00
Re: Bug#443528: ITP: xmms-pulse -- Pulseaudio Output plugin for xmms, Daniel Baumann, 19:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Joerg Jaspert, 18:10
Your compensation money, wailter tobi, 17:00
Your compensation money, wailter tobi, 17:00
Re: Some questions about Debian, Raphael Hertzog, 16:30
Re: Some questions about Debian, martin f krafft, 14:20
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Marc Haber, 13:40
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Mark Brown, 12:40
Re: Bug#443370: ITP: asmutils -- coreutils replacement written in i386 assembler, Steinar H. Gunderson, 12:20
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Bruce Sass, 11:50
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Osamu Aoki, 11:50
Re: [RFH] Implementing "Homepage:" field support in lintian/linda, Faidon Liambotis, 11:10
Re: [RFH] Implementing "Homepage:" field support in lintian/linda, Christian Perrier, 11:10
Re: Bug#443528: ITP: xmms-pulse -- Pulseaudio Output plugin for xmms, Thomas Goirand, 11:10
Re: Bug#443528: ITP: xmms-pulse -- Pulseaudio Output plugin for xmms, Sjoerd Simons, 11:00
Re: [RFH] Implementing "Homepage:" field support in lintian/linda, Faidon Liambotis, 11:00
using "Breaks:", or how to replace it?, Lucas Nussbaum, 10:50
Re: [RFH] Implementing "Homepage:" field support in lintian/linda, Paul Wise, 10:30
Re: Bug#443528: ITP: xmms-pulse -- Pulseaudio Output plugin for xmms, Thomas Viehmann, 10:20
[RFH] Implementing "Homepage:" field support in lintian/linda, Christian Perrier, 10:10
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Christian Perrier, 10:00
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Manoj Srivastava, 09:50
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Christian Perrier, 09:00
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Oleg Verych (Gmane), 08:20
2008第五届上海国际皮革材料、技术、设备展览会, 陈俊, 05:30
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Marco d'Itri, 04:00
Re: User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Roberto C. Sánchez, 03:30
User-Agent strings, privacy and Debian browsers, Peter Eckersley, 03:20
Ad: Penknife Press Short Story Writing Contest, fans, 02:30
Re: Bug#440577: libdkim-dev: Package namespace conflict, Mike Markley, 02:20
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Adeodato Simó, 00:20
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Manoj Srivastava, 00:10

September 21, 2007

Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Lars Wirzenius, 21:30
Re: Bug#443392: ITP: gitpkg -- helper scripts for maintaining packages with git, Josselin Mouette, 21:20
Re: Bug#443392: ITP: gitpkg -- helper scripts for maintaining packages with git, Patrick Schoenfeld, 20:50
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Adeodato Simó, 16:50
Re: Bug#443222: ITP: uriparser -- URI parsing library compliant with RFC 3986, Adeodato Simó, 12:50
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Raphael Hertzog, 12:40
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Manoj Srivastava, 11:00
Proposed menu changes, Manoj Srivastava, 10:40
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Patrick Schoenfeld, 10:20
Re: Bug#443406: Use of our external site embedded into a Debian file, Varun Hiremath, 09:50
Bug#443406: Acknowledgement (Use of our external site embedded into a Debian file), Debian Bug Tracking System, 08:50
Re: Use of our external site embedded into a Debian file, Ian Campbell, 08:40
Re: Use of our external site embedded into a Debian file, Ian Campbell, 08:40
Some questions about Debian, Lucas Nussbaum, 08:30
Work-needing packages report for Sep 21, 2007, wnpp, 08:30
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Christian Perrier, 08:30
Re: Use of our external site embedded into a Debian file, Ben Finney, 07:50
Use of our external site embedded into a Debian file, John Nagle, 07:30
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Bruce Sass, 06:50
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Oleg Verych (Gmane), 05:40
Wiki page (was Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control), Philippe Cloutier, 04:10
Wiki page (was Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control), Philippe Cloutier, 04:10
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, David Given, 01:30

September 20, 2007

Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Joey Hess, 21:40
Become employed today in a respectable international company and reach the financial success. (no investment reqired), dougie hamid, 19:20
2008第五届上海国际皮革材料、技术、设备展览会, 陈俊, 16:30
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Luca Capello, 16:20
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 15:20
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Stefano Zacchiroli, 11:30
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Andreas Tille, 11:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Joerg Jaspert, 11:20
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Stefano Zacchiroli, 11:20
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Andreas Tille, 10:50
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Michal Čihař, 10:40
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Stefano Zacchiroli, 10:40
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Lars Wirzenius, 10:30
Re: [RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Christoph Haas, 10:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Thijs Kinkhorst, 08:30
[RFC] Promoting the use of "Homepage:" field in debian/control, Christian Perrier, 08:30
GFDL fixed? [Was: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom], Drew Parsons, 07:50
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Ben Finney, 05:00
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Ben Finney, 04:50
Re: pbuilder and configure, Russ Allbery, 04:00
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Charles Plessy, 02:50
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Bruce Sass, 01:10
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, John Goerzen, 01:00
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, David Given, 00:50
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Bernd Zeimetz, 00:40
Re: Bug#443222: ITP: uriparser -- URI parsing library compliant with RFC 3986, Elimar Riesebieter, 00:10

September 19, 2007

Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, John H. Robinson, IV, 23:20
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Andrea Bolognani, 23:00
Re: start-stop-daemon --exec is incorrect on unionfs systems, Bruce Sass, 22:30
start-stop-daemon --exec is incorrect on unionfs systems, Tzafrir Cohen, 21:10
Re: start-stop-daemon --exec is incorrect on unionfs systems, Tzafrir Cohen, 21:10
Re: How to start porting to a new ARCHITECTURE?, The Fungi, 17:20
World Celebrity Supermodels - Maria Menounos, FeedBlitz, 17:00
Re: How to start porting to a new ARCHITECTURE?, Michelle Konzack, 15:30
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Atsuhito Kohda, 15:30
Re: pbuilder and configure, Bernd Zeimetz, 11:20
Re: pbuilder and configure, Julien Cristau, 11:20
Re: pbuilder and configure, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 11:20
Re: pbuilder and configure, Atsuhito Kohda, 11:10
Re: pbuilder and configure, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 10:40
Re: modified email address in debian/copyright file, Thijs Kinkhorst, 10:20
Re: pbuilder and configure, Atsuhito Kohda, 10:00
Re: pbuilder and configure, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 09:50
Re: pbuilder and configure, Russ Allbery, 08:10
pbuilder and configure, Atsuhito Kohda, 08:00
modified email address in debian/copyright file, Atsuhito Kohda, 07:50
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Patrick Winnertz, 00:00

September 18, 2007

Re: Interpreting testing excuses, frank, 23:30
Re: ML improvement proposition (Re: SMTP 550 on replies to bugs), Oleg Verych (Gmane), 22:20
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Julien Cristau, 21:20
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Soeren Sonnenburg, 21:10
Re: Proposal regarding future packaging, Hendrik Sattler, 17:50
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Anthony Towns, 17:20
Tr :Re: 2 servers available, Greiner, Dominique, 17:20
Proposal regarding future packaging, Ken Spath, 17:10
Re: speed of COW directory copying: XFS 20x slower than ext3, Ondrej Certik, 16:50
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Charles Plessy, 16:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ian Jackson, 16:20
Re: How to start porting to a new ARCHITECTURE?, Michelle Konzack, 15:30
Re: ML improvement proposition (Re: SMTP 550 on replies to bugs), Bernd Zeimetz, 11:01
CONTACT REV.MAXWELL ATIKU FOR YOUR COMPENSATION, Emma Eze, 11:01
Re: Missing libatlas3 on arm prevents blitz++ from entering testing, Steve Langasek, 11:00
Re: Missing libatlas3 on arm prevents blitz++ from entering testing, Thomas Weber, 08:20
Re: ITP: pgplot-perl -- PGPLOT Perl module, Carlo Segre, 07:00
Re: speed of COW directory copying: XFS 20x slower than ext3, Oleg Verych, 05:10
ML improvement proposition (Re: SMTP 550 on replies to bugs), Oleg Verych (Gmane), 00:20

September 17, 2007

Re: Interpreting testing excuses, Julien Cristau, 23:00
[RKI-Spam-Verdacht]Missing libatlas3 on arm prevents blitz++ from entering testing, Andreas Tille, 22:50
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Peter Samuelson, 22:40
Interpreting testing excuses, Frank Küster, 22:20
Re: How to start porting to a new ARCHITECTURE?, David Given, 21:00
Re: Passing of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, Roberto C. Sánchez, 17:30
Re: Fixed UID in the 60000-64999 range, Alex Pennace, 17:20
Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?, Fabian Greffrath, 17:20
Fixed UID in the 60000-64999 range, oliva . g, 17:20
Re: New 'maint' facet for Debtags, Andreas Tille, 14:10
Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?, Fabian Greffrath, 14:00
Re: How to start porting to a new ARCHITECTURE?, Bastian Blank, 12:20
How to start porting to a new ARCHITECTURE?, Michelle Konzack, 10:40
Re: Building packages three times in a row, Neil Williams, 10:10
Re: Passing of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, Don Armstrong, 10:10
Passing of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, Roberto C. Sánchez, 07:20

September 16, 2007

Re: IEEE 754 conformance on various architectures, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, 17:30
Re: IEEE 754 conformance on various architectures, Steve Langasek, 08:50
Re: Why no Opera?, Manoj Srivastava, 04:30
Re: Why no Opera?, Ben Finney, 02:00
IEEE 754 conformance on various architectures, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, 00:00

September 15, 2007

Re: Why no Opera?, Russ Allbery, 21:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Russ Allbery, 21:00
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, paddy, 20:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, paddy, 20:20
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Miriam Ruiz, 18:10
Re: Why no Opera?, Stanislav Maslovski, 15:50
raptor.d.o down, Bastian Blank, 13:10
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Ben Finney, 05:10
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Charles Plessy, 04:40

September 14, 2007

uVme Online Games get in for FREE, KathyMitchell124, 20:00
Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?, Osamu Aoki, 16:40
Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?, Osamu Aoki, 16:20
Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?, Osamu Aoki, 16:10
check for non-free firmware (Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom), Robert Millan, 12:40
Re: There interest in emacs-snapshot. Is there sense to have it?, Robert Millan, 12:40
Re: Packages with RFCs deleted, Pierre Habouzit, 12:10
Re: Plans for gs-esp / gs-gpl / gs-afpl in lenny?, Fabian Greffrath, 11:50
Packages with RFCs deleted, Charles Plessy, 09:10
Work-needing packages report for Sep 14, 2007, wnpp, 08:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Peter Samuelson, 04:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Holger Levsen, 03:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, David Nusinow, 02:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ben Goodger, 01:20
Re: FTBFS of many packages in sid, Tatsuya Kinoshita, 01:10
Re: FTBFS of many packages in sid, Lucas Nussbaum, 01:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Roberto C. Sánchez, 00:30
FTBFS of many packages in sid, Tatsuya Kinoshita, 00:00

September 13, 2007

Probieren Sie es - Mann Lebt nur einmal that the firm -- learned by those, Darius Anderson, 22:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:20
Re: "Outside udebs" capability: what are we waiting for?, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 21:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Neil Williams, 19:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, kamping_kaiser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Russ Allbery, 19:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Russ Allbery, 18:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 18:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 18:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Peter Samuelson, 17:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 17:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 17:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 17:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, paddy, 16:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 16:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 16:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Micha Lenk, 15:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Micha Lenk, 15:10
OT: modifying licenses (Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom), Luk Claes, 14:50
[MailServer Notification]Attachment Blocking Notification, virus . notification . service, 12:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Jeremiah Foster, 12:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Karl Goetz, 11:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Karl Goetz, 11:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 11:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Josselin Mouette, 10:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Josselin Mouette, 09:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Josselin Mouette, 09:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Josselin Mouette, 09:40
Link Exchange Request, alana.deborah@xxxxxxxxx, 09:20
Re: There interest in emacs-snapshot. Is there sense to have it?, Romain Francoise, 09:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Mike Hommey, 08:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Anthony Towns, 03:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Anthony Towns, 03:10

September 12, 2007

Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Patrick Schoenfeld, 23:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, David Given, 23:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Joerg Jaspert, 23:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Joerg Jaspert, 23:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 23:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 23:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 23:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 23:00
Re: There interest in emacs-snapshot. Is there sense to have it?, Yaroslav Halchenko, 22:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John H. Robinson, IV, 22:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Marco d'Itri, 22:10
Re: There interest in emacs-snapshot. Is there sense to have it?, Romain Francoise, 22:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Marco d'Itri, 22:10
Re: There interest in emacs-snapshot. Is there sense to have it?, Alex Queiroz, 21:50
There interest in emacs-snapshot. Is there sense to have it?, Yaroslav Halchenko, 21:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 21:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 21:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Pierre Habouzit, 20:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Roland Mas, 20:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 20:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Miriam Ruiz, 20:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Faidon Liambotis, 20:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Benjamin A'Lee, 20:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 20:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Russ Allbery, 20:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Sven Luther, 19:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Faidon Liambotis, 19:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Sven Luther, 19:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Sune Vuorela, 19:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Sven Luther, 19:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Sven Luther, 19:40
SCALE 6x Gears Up, Gareth J. Greenaway, 19:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 19:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Russ Allbery, 19:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 19:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Frederik Schueler, 19:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Bernhard R. Link, 18:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 18:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Pierre Habouzit, 18:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 18:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Pierre Habouzit, 18:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Manoj Srivastava, 18:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 18:00
TONIGHT: "Mr. Woodcock" Movie Pre-Release & Hosted Vodka Bar @ Mood (Wed 9/12), guestlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 17:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Romain Beauxis, 17:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Russ Allbery, 16:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Karl Goetz, 16:20
Re: Package lists for (stable) distribution CDs/DVDs (integrating to package.d.o), Bernd Zeimetz, 16:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Sune Vuorela, 16:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Jon Dowland, 16:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Robert Millan, 15:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ondrej Certik, 15:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Robert Millan, 15:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Martin Zobel-Helas, 15:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 15:10
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Joerg Jaspert, 14:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Luk Claes, 14:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 14:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Miriam Ruiz, 14:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 14:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Colin Tuckley, 14:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Josselin Mouette, 14:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Florian Weimer, 14:00
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Toni Mueller, 12:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Josselin Mouette, 12:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 12:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Sam Morris, 12:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Josselin Mouette, 12:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Riku Voipio, 11:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Steve Langasek, 11:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Josselin Mouette, 11:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 11:30
Re: Why no Opera?, Bernhard R. Link, 11:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Miriam Ruiz, 11:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Steve Langasek, 11:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 11:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Ron Johnson, 11:30
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Bernd Zeimetz, 10:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Raphael Hertzog, 10:20
Re: Why no Opera?, Josselin Mouette, 10:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Raphael Hertzog, 10:00
Re: Package lists for (stable) distribution CDs/DVDs (integrating to package.d.o), Paul Cager, 09:50
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Miriam Ruiz, 09:40
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Julien Cristau, 09:20
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Luca Capello, 09:20
Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, John Kelly, 08:40
Re: Why no Opera?, Mike Hommey, 08:20
Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom, Nathanael Nerode, 07:00
"Outside udebs" capability: what are we waiting for?, Nathanael Nerode, 06:40
Re: Why no Opera?, Felipe Sateler, 04:40
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Steve Langasek, 03:00
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Luca Capello, 02:20
Re: Package lists for (stable) distribution CDs/DVDs (integrating to package.d.o), Steve McIntyre, 01:50
Re: Why no Opera?, Bernd Zeimetz, 01:50
Re: Why no Opera?, Ben Finney, 01:00
help, Lemmertz, 00:10

September 11, 2007

Re: making debian/copyright machine-interpretable, Frank Küster, 23:00
Mittel gegen Impotenz into voluntary -- "secret language", Therese Easley, 22:40
Re: Why no Opera?, Bruce Sass, 22:30
Re: Why no Opera?, Anthony Towns, 20:20
Re: Why no Opera?, Neil Williams, 20:20
Re: Why no Opera?, Patrick Schoenfeld, 20:20
Re: Why no Opera?, Felipe Sateler, 20:10
Re: Why no Opera?, Juliusz Chroboczek, 19:00
Re: making debian/copyright machine-interpretable, Joerg Jaspert, 18:40
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Evgeni Golov, 17:20
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Manoj Srivastava, 17:10
Re: Package lists for (stable) distribution CDs/DVDs (integrating to package.d.o), Frank Lichtenheld, 16:30
REPLY, anikpeter, 16:30
Re: Package lists for (stable) distribution CDs/DVDs (integrating to package.d.o), Bernd Zeimetz, 15:50
Re: US mirror troubles, Scott Auge, 15:10
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Steve Langasek, 13:10
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Josselin Mouette, 11:50
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Bruce Sass, 11:40
Re: making debian/copyright machine-interpretable, Frank Küster, 11:20
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Sune Vuorela, 10:50
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Roger Leigh, 10:50
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Mike Hommey, 10:10
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Neil Williams, 09:40
Re: best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Ian Campbell, 09:40
best way to check for an active X session from a maintainer script?, Steve Langasek, 09:10
Transaction of us$30,000,000, Mr Chokri Taylor, 08:40
Re: Why no Opera?, Ben Finney, 06:00
Khuyen mai nhan dip trung thu, Btsplaza.com.vn, 05:50
Re: Package lists for (stable) distribution CDs/DVDs (integrating to package.d.o), Steve McIntyre, 01:20

September 10, 2007

Re: Building packages three times in a row, Patrick Winnertz, 23:50
Building packages three times in a row, Patrick Winnertz, 23:30
Re: many packages FTBFS, if $TAPE is set, Russ Allbery, 21:40
Local representatives wanted. Really high wages, no investment is required., ginger ashutosh, 21:40
Re: many packages FTBFS, if $TAPE is set, Sergei Golovan, 21:20
Re: many packages FTBFS, if $TAPE is set, Steve Greenland, 21:00
Re: UTF-8 man pages, Colin Watson, 20:50
Ihanot received any response in regards the funds transfer Re urgently, RICHARD OPENE, 20:10
ayayibih, sfaf Taaffe, 19:50
asparami, Esperanza Bitzas, 18:20
Serious business in a sphere of financial services. No investment reqired., lenci roger, 16:20
Are you ready for football season?, haband.6h5t4-z8k.dsn7, 13:10
Re: Why no Opera?, David Given, 12:00
rlebende, Israel LEMONS, 11:00
atsosats, lise Hendon, 10:40
auohsnab, katsunori Brustuen, 10:30
Low Interest Loan, daron istvan, 09:50
IMMEDIATE cash to spend ANY way you like, enrico jenn-gan, 09:40
Football Fan Essentials, colelynette2000, 07:50
Football Season Is Here!, ekkam2001, 05:50
FYI: Medications, Gil E. Weeks, 05:40
Re: Dependencies on shared libs, news and difference between archs, Steve Langasek, 04:30
Re: Dependencies on shared libs, news and difference between archs, Guillem Jover, 04:10
Re: Why no Opera?, Juliusz Chroboczek, 04:00
Can you tell me what's wrong, and how we can fix it?, Shelia F. Vogel, 03:30
80% of women are unhappy with partners size??, Britney Paul, 03:00
Re: Why no Opera?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 03:00
Re: Why no Opera?, Ron Johnson, 02:20

September 09, 2007

0ginseng, Bessie FARTEK, 23:50
Re: X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with p-bank en-ht, Martin Zobel-Helas, 23:20
Re: Why no Opera?, Steffen Moeller, 23:10
Re: X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with p-bank en-ht, Elimar Riesebieter, 23:10
Re: X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with p-bank en-ht, Martin Zobel-Helas, 23:00
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with p-bank en-ht, Elimar Riesebieter, 22:50
damnoom, Hee Rieder, 21:40
daehtfos, dc matarazzo, 21:40
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Magnus Holmgren, 21:30
Free NFL Game Tracker, anu.hr, 21:00
Re: Why no Opera?, Manoj Srivastava, 20:30
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, David Given, 19:20
My boyfriend's shaft keeps slipping out., Manuel U. Cox, 18:50
Can you tell me what's wrong, and how we can fix it?, Natasha A. Meade, 18:00
doohal, kristie Salsbury, 18:00
You must be The Real Man with "huge dignity"!, Jeanette W. Montes, 17:50
j{ljenne, taher hayruzen, 17:40
jousiamm, folkert Petrole, 17:30
More sexual partners. More orgasms. More pleasure!, Ines Y. Boudreaux, 16:30
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Bernd Zeimetz, 15:00
We have drugs for everybody, tudor fyodor, 14:40
Re: Renaming libraries from upstream, Frank Lichtenheld, 13:40
Re: Renaming libraries from upstream, Ron Johnson, 12:40
Efficiency, Flexibility, Future, what are those? (Re: [CMake] Producing deb package with 'ar'), Oleg Verych (Gmane), 12:30
Renaming libraries from upstream, Neil Williams, 10:50
Re: many packages FTBFS, if $TAPE is set, Steve Langasek, 09:40
Re: many packages FTBFS, if $TAPE is set, Sergei Golovan, 09:30
Re: many packages FTBFS, if $TAPE is set, Neil Williams, 09:20
Re: many packages FTBFS, if $TAPE is set, Steve Langasek, 09:20
Re: many packages FTBFS, if $TAPE is set, Sergei Golovan, 09:10
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Ben Finney, 06:50

September 08, 2007

Hello, Hírlevél Szolgálat, 20:40
Re: Bug#441301: ITP: url2file -- wget a URL into a file an print the filename, Amaya, 15:30
Re: Bug#440823: ITP: kelbt -- backtracking LR parser, Chris Bannister, 13:40
Re: US mirror troubles, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 06:00
Re: US mirror troubles, Michael Banck, 01:50

September 07, 2007

Re: US mirror troubles, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 23:50
Re: US mirror troubles, Steinar H. Gunderson, 23:30
Re: US mirror troubles, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 23:10
UREGNT !!!, joceline kouame, 18:20
Re: Find complete set of debs, Goswin von Brederlow, 18:10
Re: Why no Opera?, Jeremiah Foster, 13:30
Re: US mirror troubles, Bernd Zeimetz, 12:30
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Edward Welbourne, 12:20
Re: Find complete set of debs, Peter Mathiasson, 12:10
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Steffen Moeller, 11:50
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Edward Welbourne, 11:50
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Edward Welbourne, 11:20
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Lionel Elie Mamane, 11:10
Re: Find complete set of debs, Adrian von Bidder, 11:10
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Steffen Moeller, 10:40
Re: directory for icons, Josselin Mouette, 10:40
Re: Find complete set of debs, Adeodato Simó, 09:50
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Michael Meskes, 09:20
Work-needing packages report for Sep 7, 2007, wnpp, 08:30
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Lionel Elie Mamane, 08:20
Re: Find complete set of debs, Adrian von Bidder, 07:50
Re: Wanted: really weird status files from production machines, David Weinehall, 01:40
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 00:40
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Edward Welbourne, 00:30
Re: US mirror troubles, Simon Paillard, 00:30
Re: US mirror troubles, Johan Kullstam, 00:10

September 06, 2007

Re: US mirror troubles, Kurt Roeckx, 22:40
Re: US mirror troubles, Joey Hess, 22:30
Re: US mirror troubles, Kurt Roeckx, 21:40
Re: Find complete set of debs, Neil Williams, 19:40
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Christian Perrier, 19:30
Re: US mirror troubles, Julien Cristau, 16:30
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Holger Levsen, 15:50
Re: US mirror troubles, Florian Lohoff, 15:50
Find complete set of debs, Adrian von Bidder, 15:50
Re: US mirror troubles, Johan Kullstam, 15:30
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 15:30
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Lionel Elie Mamane, 14:30
Re: US mirror troubles, Martin Zobel-Helas, 11:50
Re: Why no Opera?, Jeremiah Foster, 11:30
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Hamish Moffatt, 11:10
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Edward Welbourne, 10:40
US mirror troubles, John Goerzen, 03:50
Re: US mirror troubles, Tom Moore, 03:50

September 05, 2007

Re: debian/rules and environment variables, Neil Williams, 23:40
Re: debian/rules and environment variables, Bernd Zeimetz, 23:00
Re: [postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Delivery Status Notification], Max Vozeler, 22:30
Re: Agreement between parties achieved on IRC (Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?), Andrew M.A. Cater, 21:20
Re: debian/rules and environment variables, Neil Williams, 21:00
debian/rules and environment variables, Peter Eisentraut, 19:50
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Bernd Zeimetz, 18:00
sshd defaults (Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix), Oleg Verych (Gmane), 17:40
Agreement between parties achieved on IRC (Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?), Adeodato Simó, 17:40
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 17:20
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Hendrik Sattler, 17:10
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Edward Welbourne, 17:10
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Anthony Towns, 16:30
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Anthony Towns, 16:20
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Bernd Zeimetz, 15:50
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 15:40
Re: [PROPOSAL] virtual package for Japanese font package name, Josselin Mouette, 15:30
[PROPOSAL] virtual package for Japanese font package name, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu, 15:20
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Steffen Moeller, 15:20
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Raphael Hertzog, 15:00
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Daniel Baumann, 14:50
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Michael Meskes, 14:50
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Daniel Baumann, 14:50
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Patrick Winnertz, 14:40
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Michael Meskes, 14:40
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Julien BLACHE, 14:30
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Josselin Mouette, 14:30
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Patrick Winnertz, 14:20
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Michael Meskes, 14:10
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Daniel Baumann, 14:10
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Daniel Baumann, 14:10
Re: Fwd: Re: Why no Opera?, Edward Welbourne, 13:50
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Joerg Jaspert, 13:30
Re: Accepted librpcsecgss 0.14-2etch1 (source i386), Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 13:00
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Daniel Baumann, 13:00
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Patrick Winnertz, 12:40
Re: Why no Opera?, Ben Finney, 12:00
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Gabor Gombas, 12:00
Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Daniel Baumann, 11:50
virtualbox-ose: package hijack?, Michael Meskes, 10:50
Re: Why no Opera?, Johan Herland, 10:40
Re: menu policy & use of doc-base for programming documentation, Stefano Zacchiroli, 09:50
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Christian Perrier, 08:40
Solar-International Ltd.: Arbeitsangebot, Johanna Block, 03:00
Re: Why no Opera?, Gunnar Wolf, 02:50

September 04, 2007

Re: menu policy & use of doc-base for programming documentation, Eric Cooper, 23:40
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, John Kelly, 23:10
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Dwayne C. Litzenberger, 23:00
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Roberto C. Sánchez, 23:00
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Dwayne C. Litzenberger, 22:40
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Oleg Verych: gmane reading, 22:40
Re: menu policy & use of doc-base for programming documentation, Frank Küster, 22:10
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Adam D. Barratt, 19:30
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Joey Hess, 19:20
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Russ Allbery, 18:10
Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages, Russ Allbery, 18:10
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, John Kelly, 17:30
Re: RFC: dropping Linux capabilities support from pam_limits (bug #440130), Jörg Sommer, 14:40
Re: Why no Opera?, Dionysis Kalofonos, 14:30
Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages, Norbert Preining, 14:20
Re: packages.debian.org updated, Paul Wise, 14:10
Re: packages.debian.org updated, Martin Zobel-Helas, 14:00
Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages, Florent Rougon, 14:00
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Roger Leigh, 13:20
Re: packages.debian.org updated, Frank Lichtenheld, 13:20
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 12:10
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Lars Wirzenius, 12:00
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Ron Johnson, 10:40
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, John Kelly, 10:20
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Petter Reinholdtsen, 10:20
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Oleg Verych, 10:00
Re: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian, Oleg Verych, 09:30
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Christian Perrier, 08:40
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Christian Perrier, 08:30
Re: packages.debian.org updated, Lionel Elie Mamane, 07:40
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Don Armstrong, 06:20
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, John Kelly, 05:50
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Lars Wirzenius, 05:10
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Miles Bader, 03:40
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Daniel Jacobowitz, 00:10

September 03, 2007

Re: [RESENDING] Re: Request for rescheduled builds on mips, Michael Banck, 23:50
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Steve Langasek, 23:30
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Steve Langasek, 23:20
Re: RFC: dropping Linux capabilities support from pam_limits (bug #440130), Steve Langasek, 22:10
Re: RFC: dropping Linux capabilities support from pam_limits (bug #440130), Jörg Sommer, 20:40
Re: making debian/copyright machine-interpretable, Andreas Metzler, 20:00
Re: man-db's cron warns about dangling symlink, Russ Allbery, 20:00
Re: "Etch and a half" ( was Re: Bugfix/hardware support updates to stable releases?), Moritz Muehlenhoff, 19:50
Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages, Jörg Sommer, 19:00
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, The Fungi, 18:20
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Lars Wirzenius, 17:10
Re: packages.debian.org updated, Frank Lichtenheld, 17:10
Re: man-db's cron warns about dangling symlink, Lars Wirzenius, 17:10
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Wesley J. Landaker, 16:40
Re: man-db's cron warns about dangling symlink, Michael Banck, 16:10
Re: making debian/copyright machine-interpretable, Stefano Zacchiroli, 16:00
Man Lebt nur einmal - probiers aus ! It should be noted -- deep understanding of why, Hank Spaulding, 15:50
Re: backports tool, Luis Matos, 15:20
Re: backports tool, Luis Matos, 15:20
Re: backports tool, Sebastian Harl, 15:20
Re: backports tool, Roberto C. Sánchez, 15:10
Re: backports tool, Romain Beauxis, 14:50
Re: backports tool, Sebastian Harl, 14:50
backports tool, Luis Matos, 14:30
Re: Backports now appearing on debian.org package listings?, Alexander Wirt, 12:10
Cooperation for Waste Issues Conference, Popova Iryna, 12:00
Re: Backports now appearing on debian.org package listings?, Martin Zobel-Helas, 11:50
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Lars Wirzenius, 11:20
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Petter Reinholdtsen, 09:40
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Thijs Kinkhorst, 09:30
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Bas Zoetekouw, 09:00
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Stefano Zacchiroli, 08:50
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Christian Perrier, 08:00
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Daniel Jacobowitz, 04:30
Re: conflicting gssapi libraries, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 04:30
Re: conflicting gssapi libraries, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 04:10
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Steve Langasek, 02:30
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Roberto C. Sánchez, 02:30
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Roberto C. Sánchez, 01:40
Re: packages.debian.org updated, Jens Seidel, 00:10
Re: Backports now appearing on debian.org package listings?, Pierre Habouzit, 00:00

September 02, 2007

Backports now appearing on debian.org package listings?, Tim Hull, 23:50
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Steve Langasek, 23:40
Re: RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Lars Wirzenius, 23:30
Processed: block 438885 with 440574, Debian Bug Tracking System, 23:20
RFC: changes to default password strength checks in pam_unix, Steve Langasek, 21:50
"Etch and a half" ( was Re: Bugfix/hardware support updates to stable releases?), Tim Hull, 21:30
DUG: Debian User Groups, and their status., Junichi Uekawa, 14:50
Re: deb-ice -- violating the GPL since 2007-08-14, Joey Schulze, 12:00

September 01, 2007

Re: Thoughts about including scsiaddgui, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 22:50
[postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Delivery Status Notification], Colin Watson, 12:40