Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution license, Miriam Ruiz, 2007/05/31

• Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution license, Marco d'Itri, 2007/05/31

Source package taking over removed package's place in the namespace, Magnus Holmgren, 2007/05/31

• Re: Source package taking over removed package's place in the namespace, Adam D. Barratt, 2007/05/31
  • Re: Source package taking over removed package's place in the namespace, Magnus Holmgren, 2007/05/31
• Re: Source package taking over removed package's place in the namespace, The Fungi, 2007/05/31

undo configuration file changes, Pascal.Speck, 2007/05/31

• Re: undo configuration file changes, Kushal Kumaran, 2007/05/31

http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Joachim Breitner, 2007/05/31

• Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Gustavo Franco, 2007/05/31
• Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Daniel Baumann, 2007/05/31
• Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2007/05/31
  • Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Daniel Baumann, 2007/05/31
    • Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2007/05/31
    • Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Mike Hommey, 2007/05/31
    • Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Raphael Hertzog, 2007/05/31
    • Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2007/05/31
    • Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2007/05/31

Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Kris Deugau, 2007/05/30

• Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2007/05/30
• Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Stephen Gran, 2007/05/30
  • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2007/05/31
  • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Ben Hutchings, 2007/05/31
    • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Russ Allbery, 2007/05/31
• Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, The Fungi, 2007/05/30
  • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Kris Deugau, 2007/05/31
• Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Nico Golde, 2007/05/30
• Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Santiago Vila, 2007/05/31
  • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2007/05/31
    • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Santiago Vila, 2007/05/31
    • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2007/05/31
    • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Santiago Vila, 2007/05/31
• Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Gabor Gombas, 2007/05/31
  • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Frans Pop, 2007/05/31
    • Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian?release a program is running on?, Gabor Gombas, 2007/05/31

python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 2007/05/30

• Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Michael Alan Dorman, 2007/05/30
  • Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 2007/05/30
  • Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Oleg Verych, 2007/05/31
    • Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 2007/05/31
    • Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Oleg Verych, 2007/05/31
    • Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 2007/05/31
• Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Warren Turkal, 2007/05/30
• Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Robert Collins, 2007/05/31
  • Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 2007/05/31
• Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2007/05/31

to join wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages, Herbert P Fortes Neto, 2007/05/30

• Re: to join wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/30

Why do I get this mail? (was: [Archive Administrator] Processing of texlive-bin_2007-9_sparc.changes), Frank Küster, 2007/05/30

• Re: Why do I get this mail? (was: [Archive Administrator] Processing of texlive-bin_2007-9_sparc.changes), Steve Langasek, 2007/05/30

Re: checklib, Manoj Srivastava, 2007/05/30

• Re: checklib, Guillem Jover, 2007/05/30
  • Re: checklib, Manoj Srivastava, 2007/05/30
    • Re: checklib, Raphael Hertzog, 2007/05/30
    • Re: checklib, Manoj Srivastava, 2007/05/30
    • Re: checklib, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2007/05/30
    • Re: checklib, Manoj Srivastava, 2007/05/30
    • Re: checklib, Guillem Jover, 2007/05/31

Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Guillem Jover, 2007/05/30

• Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Josselin Mouette, 2007/05/31
  • Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Guillem Jover, 2007/05/31
• Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Daniel Leidert, 2007/05/31
  • Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Guillem Jover, 2007/05/31
• Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Ian Jackson, 2007/05/31
  • Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, sean finney, 2007/05/31

Bug#426625: general: /etc/adjtime etc. wetbacks, Dan Jacobson, 2007/05/30

• Bug#426625: marked as done (general: /etc/adjtime etc. wetbacks), Debian Bug Tracking System, 2007/05/30

Better documenting what does not work in Etch., Charles Plessy, 2007/05/30

• Re: Better documenting what does not work in Etch., Don Armstrong, 2007/05/30
• Re: Better documenting what does not work in Etch., Petter Reinholdtsen, 2007/05/30
  • Re: Better documenting what does not work in Etch., Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2007/05/30

BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Ben Hutchings, 2007/05/30

• Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Steve Langasek, 2007/05/30
  • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 2007/05/30
    • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, paddy, 2007/05/30
    • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Bernd Zeimetz, 2007/05/31
  • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Ben Hutchings, 2007/05/30
    • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Steve Langasek, 2007/05/31
    • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Ben Hutchings, 2007/05/31
    • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Steve Langasek, 2007/05/31
    • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Joey Hess, 2007/05/31
• Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Enrico Zini, 2007/05/30
• Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Jonas Meurer, 2007/05/30
  • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Pierre Habouzit, 2007/05/30
    • Message not available
    • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Steve Greenland, 2007/05/30
  • Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Neil Williams, 2007/05/30

Re: Bug#426069: ITP: spip -- website engine for publishing, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2007/05/29

• Re: Bug#426069: ITP: spip -- website engine for publishing, Romain Beauxis, 2007/05/30

Is flac still maintained?, Elimar Riesebieter, 2007/05/29

• Re: Is flac still maintained?, Joshua Kwan, 2007/05/29
  • Re: Is flac still maintained?, Elimar Riesebieter, 2007/05/29
• Re: Is flac still maintained?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2007/05/29
  • Re: Is flac still maintained?, Elimar Riesebieter, 2007/05/29
    • Re: Is flac still maintained?, Andrei Popescu, 2007/05/29

Yahoo voice-chat client for Debian, arnuld, 2007/05/29

• Re: Yahoo voice-chat client for Debian, The Fungi, 2007/05/29

Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/29

• Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Pierre Habouzit, 2007/05/29
  • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Frans Pop, 2007/05/29
• Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/29
  • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, David Nusinow, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/30
• Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/29
  • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Clint Adams, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Clint Adams, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Steve Langasek, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Raphael Hertzog, 2007/05/30
    • cvs commit access to webwml files (Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams), Bart Martens, 2007/05/30
    • Re: cvs commit access to webwml files (Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams), Josip Rodin, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/30

Making a multi-binary-kernel-module-package, Pascal Speck, 2007/05/29

• Re: Making a multi-binary-kernel-module-package, Sune Vuorela, 2007/05/29
  • Re: Making a multi-binary-kernel-module-package, Pascal Speck, 2007/05/29
    • Re: Making a multi-binary-kernel-module-package, Sam Morris, 2007/05/29

Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 2007/05/29

• Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Steve Langasek, 2007/05/29
  • Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 2007/05/29
• Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Don Armstrong, 2007/05/29
  • Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 2007/05/29
    • Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Don Armstrong, 2007/05/29
    • Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 2007/05/29
    • Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Steve Langasek, 2007/05/30
    • Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 2007/05/30

Re: A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Junichi Uekawa, 2007/05/29

• Re: A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/29
  • Re: A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2007/05/30
    • Re: A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Josip Rodin, 2007/05/30

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates, Michal Čihař, 2007/01/02

• Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates, Santiago Vila, 2007/01/02
  • Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates, Michal Čihař, 2007/01/02

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386), Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/09/13

• Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386), Thomas Dickey, 2006/09/13