linux.debian.devel (date)

linux.debian.devel (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

May 31, 2007

Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, sean finney, 20:10
Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution license, Marco d'Itri, 19:50
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian?release a program is running on?, Gabor Gombas, 19:30
Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Ian Jackson, 19:20
Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution license, Miriam Ruiz, 18:50
Re: Source package taking over removed package's place in the namespace, The Fungi, 18:40
Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Guillem Jover, 18:00
Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Guillem Jover, 18:00
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Francesco P. Lovergine, 18:00
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Kris Deugau, 16:50
What happened to popcon graphs?, Nico Golde, 16:50
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Santiago Vila, 16:10
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 16:00
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 15:50
Re: Source package taking over removed package's place in the namespace, Magnus Holmgren, 15:40
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 15:30
Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Daniel Leidert, 15:30
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Raphael Hertzog, 15:10
Re: Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Josselin Mouette, 15:00
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Mike Hommey, 15:00
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 14:50
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Daniel Baumann, 14:50
Re: Source package taking over removed package's place in the namespace, Adam D. Barratt, 14:40
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Santiago Vila, 14:10
Source package taking over removed package's place in the namespace, Magnus Holmgren, 14:10
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Frans Pop, 14:00
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 13:40
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 12:40
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Gabor Gombas, 12:20
Re: undo configuration file changes, Kushal Kumaran, 12:00
undo configuration file changes, Pascal.Speck, 11:20
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 10:40
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Oleg Verych, 10:30
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 09:00
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 09:00
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Daniel Baumann, 08:30
Re: checklib, Guillem Jover, 07:40
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Joey Hess, 07:10
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Russ Allbery, 05:00
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Steve Langasek, 03:30
Re: http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Gustavo Franco, 03:30
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Ben Hutchings, 03:20
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 03:20
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Ben Hutchings, 03:00
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Bernd Zeimetz, 01:50
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Steve Langasek, 01:50
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Oleg Verych, 01:20
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Santiago Vila, 00:40
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Robert Collins, 00:30
http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/ still used?, Joachim Breitner, 00:10

May 30, 2007

Re: checklib, Manoj Srivastava, 23:50
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Steve Greenland, 23:30
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Nico Golde, 23:20
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, The Fungi, 23:20
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Stephen Gran, 23:20
Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Kris Deugau, 23:10
Re: Is there a way to positively, uniquely identify which Debian release a program is running on?, Stefano Zacchiroli, 23:10
Re: checklib, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 23:00
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Ben Hutchings, 22:40
Re: checklib, Manoj Srivastava, 19:20
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Warren Turkal, 18:50
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 18:50
Re: checklib, Raphael Hertzog, 18:40
Re: checklib, Manoj Srivastava, 18:30
Re: python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, Michael Alan Dorman, 18:20
Re: Better documenting what does not work in Etch., Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 18:20
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Neil Williams, 17:40
python, then C++, or C++ from the start?, martin f krafft, 17:40
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Pierre Habouzit, 17:30
Re: checklib, Guillem Jover, 17:00
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Jonas Meurer, 16:50
Re: Better documenting what does not work in Etch., Petter Reinholdtsen, 16:50
Re: to join wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages, Josip Rodin, 15:50
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 15:50
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 15:40
Re: cvs commit access to webwml files (Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams), Josip Rodin, 15:40
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Enrico Zini, 15:20
to join wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages, Herbert P Fortes Neto, 14:00
Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 13:10
Re: Why do I get this mail? (was: [Archive Administrator] Processing of texlive-bin_2007-9_sparc.changes), Steve Langasek, 13:10
Why do I get this mail? (was: [Archive Administrator] Processing of texlive-bin_2007-9_sparc.changes), Frank Küster, 13:10
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Steve Langasek, 12:20
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 12:00
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 11:50
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, paddy, 11:20
Re: checklib, Manoj Srivastava, 09:30
cvs commit access to webwml files (Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams), Bart Martens, 09:30
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Roberto C. Sánchez, 09:20
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Raphael Hertzog, 09:10
Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Steve Langasek, 08:20
Bug#426625: marked as done (general: /etc/adjtime etc. wetbacks), Debian Bug Tracking System, 07:20
Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful, Guillem Jover, 07:00
Purging of unneeded localization (cleaL10n), Oleg Verych, 06:50
Bug#426625: general: /etc/adjtime etc. wetbacks, Dan Jacobson, 05:50
Re: BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Steve Langasek, 04:50
Re: Bug#426069: ITP: spip -- website engine for publishing, Romain Beauxis, 03:40
Re: Better documenting what does not work in Etch., Don Armstrong, 03:00
Better documenting what does not work in Etch., Charles Plessy, 02:50
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, David Nusinow, 02:20
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Clint Adams, 01:50
Re: A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Josip Rodin, 01:10
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 01:10
BoF: Supporting 15,000 packages - How much support do we mean?, Ben Hutchings, 01:00
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Clint Adams, 00:40
Re: A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 00:30

May 29, 2007

Re: Bug#426069: ITP: spip -- website engine for publishing, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 23:20
Re: Is flac still maintained?, Andrei Popescu, 23:20
Re: Is flac still maintained?, Elimar Riesebieter, 23:10
Re: Is flac still maintained?, Elimar Riesebieter, 23:10
Re: net-tools maintenance status, Olaf van der Spek, 22:10
Re: Is flac still maintained?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 22:00
Re: Is flac still maintained?, Joshua Kwan, 21:50
Is flac still maintained?, Elimar Riesebieter, 21:30
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Frans Pop, 20:50
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 20:40
Re: Yahoo voice-chat client for Debian, The Fungi, 20:30
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Pierre Habouzit, 20:10
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 20:10
Yahoo voice-chat client for Debian, arnuld, 20:00
Re: Wanted: introductory page for all teams, Josip Rodin, 20:00
Re: A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Josip Rodin, 19:50
Re: Reasons for recommends and suggests, Ian Jackson, 19:00
Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 16:40
Re: Making a multi-binary-kernel-module-package, Sam Morris, 14:30
Re: Making a multi-binary-kernel-module-package, Pascal Speck, 14:20
Re: Making a multi-binary-kernel-module-package, Sune Vuorela, 14:00
Making a multi-binary-kernel-module-package, Pascal Speck, 13:50
Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 13:30
Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Don Armstrong, 13:30
Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Don Armstrong, 13:10
Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 12:50
Re: Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Steve Langasek, 12:10
Can/should debconf notes still be used?, Frank Küster, 09:00
Re: removing 'printtool' from archives, Paul Wise, 05:30
Re: [Pbuilder-maint] A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Junichi Uekawa, 02:50
Re: A sane guess at default Debian mirror for pbuilder, Junichi Uekawa, 02:40
Re: New package containing binaries with same name as some from the packages cons, pscan and hsffig., Charles Plessy, 01:40

May 26, 2007

Re: Draft spec for new dpkg "triggers" feature (v2, repost), Roberto C. Sánchez, 23:10

January 02, 2007

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates, Michal Čihař, 21:10
Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates, Santiago Vila, 21:10
Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates, Michal Čihař, 20:20
MY PROPOSAL [CODE NO:AM-002], MR . MING YANG, 20:20

September 13, 2006

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386), Thomas Dickey, 17:40
Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386), Steinar H. Gunderson, 17:40