Etch, apache-perl and php5 needs manual config, Patrick Frank, 2006/11/30

• Re: Etch, apache-perl and php5 needs manual config, Steve Kemp, 2006/11/30
• Re: Etch, apache-perl and php5 needs manual config, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/30
• Re: Etch, apache-perl and php5 needs manual config, sean finney, 2006/11/30

BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?, Magnus Holmgren, 2006/11/30

• Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/30
• Re: BTS: Why no "invalid" or "notabug" tag?, Darren Salt, 2006/11/30

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2.2 (source i386), Thomas Dickey, 2006/11/30

• Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2.2 (source i386), Guus Sliepen, 2006/11/30
  • Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2.2 (source i386), Thomas Dickey, 2006/11/30
    • Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2.2 (source i386), Guus Sliepen, 2006/11/30
    • Message not available
    • Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2.2 (source i386), Andreas Barth, 2006/11/30
    • Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2.2 (source i386), Thomas Dickey, 2006/11/30

localisation in system wide daemons, Nico Golde, 2006/11/29

• Re: localisation in system wide daemons, Josselin Mouette, 2006/11/29

Re: out-of-date non-free packages, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2006/11/29

• Re: out-of-date non-free packages, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2006/11/29
• Re: out-of-date non-free packages, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/29
• Re: out-of-date non-free packages, Andreas Tille, 2006/11/29
• Re: out-of-date non-free packages, Rafael Laboissiere, 2006/11/29
• Re: out-of-date non-free packages, Carlo Segre, 2006/11/30

Possibly RC bug 399980, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky, 2006/11/29

• Re: Possibly RC bug 399980, Guus Sliepen, 2006/11/29
  • Re: Possibly RC bug 399980, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky, 2006/11/29

Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough., Nathanael Nerode, 2006/11/29

• Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough., Michael Banck, 2006/11/29
  • Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough., Andreas Barth, 2006/11/29
    • Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough., Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/30
    • Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough., Andreas Barth, 2006/11/30
    • Re: Ftpmaster bug reports are not processed nearly fast enough., Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/30

Which architectures are 64-bit?, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/28

• Re: Which architectures are 64-bit?, Yves-Alexis Perez, 2006/11/28
• Re: Which architectures are 64-bit?, Steve Langasek, 2006/11/28
  • Re: Which architectures are 64-bit?, Stephen Frost, 2006/11/29
• Re: Which architectures are 64-bit?, Stephen Frost, 2006/11/29
  • Re: Which architectures are 64-bit?, Steve Langasek, 2006/11/29

RC class bug, dataloss grade, No 398373, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky, 2006/11/28

• Re: RC class bug, dataloss grade, No 398373, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/28
  • Re: RC class bug, dataloss grade, No 398373, Josselin Mouette, 2006/11/28
    • Re: RC class bug, dataloss grade, No 398373, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/28
    • Re: RC class bug, dataloss grade, No 398373, Josselin Mouette, 2006/11/28
    • Re: RC class bug, dataloss grade, No 398373, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/28
    • Re: RC class bug, dataloss grade, No 398373, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky, 2006/11/29

Mirror pulses now twice a day, Santiago Vila, 2006/11/28

• Re: Mirror pulses now twice a day, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/28
  • Re: Mirror pulses now twice a day, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Mirror pulses now twice a day, Simon Paillard, 2006/11/29

Re: Call for testers: cyrus-sasl2, Jan Wagner, 2006/11/28

• Re: Call for testers: cyrus-sasl2, Fabian Fagerholm, 2006/11/28
• Re: Call for testers: cyrus-sasl2, Michael Alan Dorman, 2006/11/28
  • Re: Call for testers: cyrus-sasl2, Michael Alan Dorman, 2006/11/28

Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/27

• Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/27
  • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Steve Langasek, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Michael Banck, 2006/11/29
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/29
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/30
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/30
    • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Ian Campbell, 2006/11/28
• Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/11/28
• Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/28
  • Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/28

Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/27

• Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Ola Lundqvist, 2006/11/28
  • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Matthew Johnson, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Andrew Haley, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Ola Lundqvist, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/30
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Ola Lundqvist, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/11/28
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Florian Weimer, 2006/11/29
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/11/29
    • Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/29
• Re: Naming a 32-bit/64-bit specific Java package, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/28

KDE4 packages?, Jiri Palecek, 2006/11/27

• Re: KDE4 packages?, Isaac Clerencia, 2006/11/27

Re: genel soru (register.com the robbery), Ozgur Karatas, 2006/11/27

• Re: genel soru (register.com the robbery), Andrew Donnellan, 2006/11/27
  • Re: genel soru (register.com the robbery), blackwind, 2006/11/27
    • Re: genel soru (register.com the robbery), Andrew Donnellan, 2006/11/27

Where to put non-locale global environment settitngs ?, Charles Plessy, 2006/11/27

• Re: Where to put non-locale global environment settitngs ?, Ian Jackson, 2006/11/27

apt hangs for ever, Brian May, 2006/11/27

• Re: apt hangs for ever, Andreas Fester, 2006/11/27
  • Re: apt hangs for ever, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/11/27
    • Re: apt hangs for ever, Andreas Fester, 2006/11/27
    • Re: apt hangs for ever, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz, 2006/11/27
    • Re: apt hangs for ever, Joey Hess, 2006/11/28
    • Re: apt hangs for ever, Brian May, 2006/11/29
• Re: apt hangs for ever, Andrew Vaughan, 2006/11/27
  • Re: apt hangs for ever, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2006/11/27

Re: Bug#400070: RFP: gaia -- Google Earth client, Bill Allombert, 2006/11/26

• Re: Bug#400070: RFP: gaia -- Google Earth client, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/11/26
  • Re: Bug#400070: RFP: gaia -- Google Earth client, Fabricio \"aybabtu\" Cannini, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Bug#400070: RFP: gaia -- Google Earth client, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Bug#400070: RFP: gaia -- Google Earth client, Andrew M.A. Cater, 2006/11/27
  • Re: Bug#400070: RFP: gaia -- Google Earth client, Bill Allombert, 2006/11/26

Automatically collect hardware information from users?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/11/25

• Re: Automatically collect hardware information from users?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/27
  • Re: Automatically collect hardware information from users?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/11/27
    • Re: Automatically collect hardware information from users?, Luca Capello, 2006/11/27
    • Re: Automatically collect hardware information from users?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/28

Elive requires donation to download, Ottavio Caruso, 2006/11/24

• Re: Elive requires donation to download, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/24
  • Re: Elive requires donation to download, Federico Di Gregorio, 2006/11/24
• Re: Elive requires donation to download, Ben Armstrong, 2006/11/24
• Re: Elive requires donation to download, Paul Cager, 2006/11/24
• Re: Elive requires donation to download, Ozgur Karatas, 2006/11/24

[Fwd: XS-X-Vcs-Svn or XS-Vcs-Svn was: [Pkg-kde-extras] Re: rev 4976 - kde-extras/digikam/trunk/debian], Mark Purcell, 2006/11/24

• Re: [Fwd: XS-X-Vcs-Svn or XS-Vcs-Svn was: [Pkg-kde-extras] Re: rev 4976 - kde-extras/digikam/trunk/debian], Stefano Zacchiroli, 2006/11/24

Cannot find -lncurses, zj_31529, 2006/11/23

• Re: Cannot find -lncurses, Michael Ott, 2006/11/24

Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Klaus Ethgen, 2006/11/23

• Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Steve Kemp, 2006/11/23
• Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Kevin Mark, 2006/11/23
• Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Jan C. Nordholz, 2006/11/23
  • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Dwayne C. Litzenberger, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Tim Dijkstra, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Jon Dowland, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Jon Dowland, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Greg Folkert, 2006/11/25
    • Bug in Perl man page (was Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp), Ron Johnson, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Bug in Perl man page, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Bug in Perl man page, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Bug in Perl man page, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Bug in Perl man page, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/26
    • Back to the original topic (was Re: Bug in Perl man page), Ron Johnson, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Back to the original topic, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Back to the original topic, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Bug in Perl man page, Stephen Gran, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Bug in Perl man page, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Greg Norris, 2006/11/25
  • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Julien Cristau, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/11/24
  • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Charles Plessy, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Brian May, 2006/11/24
• Re: Bash /dev/tcp and /dev/udp, Oleg Verych, 2006/11/23

Re: Accepted jokosher 0.2-1 (source all), Daniel Holbach, 2006/11/23

• Re: Accepted jokosher 0.2-1 (source all), Daniel Holbach, 2006/11/23

RFH: linux-2.6 patch needs tester, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/23

• Re: RFH: linux-2.6 patch needs tester, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/23
  • Re: RFH: linux-2.6 patch needs tester, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/23

Seeking sponsor for MaxDB r-c upload, Martin Kittel, 2006/11/22

• Re: Seeking sponsor for MaxDB r-c upload, Amaya, 2006/11/23
  • Re: Seeking sponsor for MaxDB r-c upload, Martin Kittel, 2006/11/23

double GPG signature in Release files, A Mennucc, 2006/11/22

• Re: double GPG signature in Release files, A Mennucc, 2006/11/22

Re: Progress report on CodeFestAkihabara, macbook Debian installation experience, Johannes Muelmenstaedt, 2006/11/22

• Re: Progress report on CodeFestAkihabara, macbook Debian installation experience, Julien BLACHE, 2006/11/22
• Re: Progress report on CodeFestAkihabara, macbook Debian installation experience, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/11/22

p.d.o and f.d.o inconsistency, Milan P. Stanic, 2006/11/21

• Re: p.d.o and f.d.o inconsistency, Michael Banck, 2006/11/22

Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/21

• Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2006/11/21
  • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/21
  • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Peter Samuelson, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Andreas Tille, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Frans Pop, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Paul Cager, 2006/11/22
    • just wait more next time, Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, A Mennucc, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Luca Capello, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, A Mennucc, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Julien Cristau, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, A Mennucc, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Joey Hess, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, David Weinehall, 2006/11/22
  • Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?, A Mennucc, 2006/11/22

d-i, unattended installation, Michael Welle, 2006/11/21

• Re: d-i, unattended installation, Frans Pop, 2006/11/21
  • Re: d-i, unattended installation, Michael Welle, 2006/11/21

Do we need an upgrade package?, Shachar Shemesh, 2006/11/21

• Re: [Debian-hebrew-common] Do we need an upgrade package?, Lior Kaplan, 2006/11/21

Debian Developer Database, up to date?, Marc André Tanner, 2006/11/20

• Re: Debian Developer Database, up to date?, Christian Perrier, 2006/11/21

Re: Bug#399284: gettext-el: loads other packages' site-files when byte-compiling for xemacs, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz, 2006/11/20

• Re: Bug#399284: gettext-el: loads other packages' site-files when byte-compiling for xemacs, Santiago Vila, 2006/11/28

Re: azureus upload, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/19

• Re: azureus upload, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/21
  • Re: azureus upload, Michael Banck, 2006/11/22
    • Re: azureus upload, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/22
    • Re: azureus upload, Shaun Jackman, 2006/11/22

Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/19

• Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Jim Crilly, 2006/11/19
  • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Ben Armstrong, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Jari Aalto, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Jari Aalto, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Jari Aalto, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Steve Langasek, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Jari Aalto, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", David Weinehall, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Jim Crilly, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Russ Allbery, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Jari Aalto, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Stephen Gran, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Brett Parker, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/11/27
• Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Andreas Metzler, 2006/11/19
  • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Jim Crilly, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/24
• Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Oleg Verych, 2006/11/20
  • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Andreas Barth, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Oleg Verych, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Ian Jackson, 2006/11/21
    • bash features (Re: Question about "Depends: bash"), Oleg Verych, 2006/11/22
    • Re: bash features (Re: Question about "Depends: bash"), Jean-Christophe Dubacq, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Darren Salt, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Oleg Verych, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Dwayne C. Litzenberger, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Gunnar Wolf, 2006/11/27
  • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", David Weinehall, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Oleg Verych, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Question about "Depends: bash", Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/25

[RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1, Franz Pletz, 2006/11/19

• Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/11/19
  • Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1, Franz Pletz, 2006/11/19
    • Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/20
    • Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1, Florian Ludwig, 2006/11/27
• Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2006/11/20
• Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1, Toni Mueller, 2006/11/21
  • Re: [RFC] apt-zeroconf 0.1, Florian Ludwig, 2006/11/27

base-files: please ship /etc/networks and include "link-local 169.254.0.0" to it, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/19

• Re: base-files: please ship /etc/networks and include "link-local 169.254.0.0" to it, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/19
  • Re: base-files: please ship /etc/networks and include "link-local 169.254.0.0" to it, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/19
    • Re: base-files: please ship /etc/networks and include "link-local 169.254.0.0" to it, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/19
    • Re: base-files: please ship /etc/networks and include "link-local 169.254.0.0" to it, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/11/20

Re: Bug#399305: ITP: subversive -- The Subversive is a Eclipse plug-in that provides Subversion support, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/19

• Message not available
  • Re: Bug#399305: ITP: subversive -- The Subversive is a Eclipse plug-in that provides Subversion support, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Bug#399305: ITP: subversive -- The Subversive is a Eclipse plug-in that provides Subversion support, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006/11/19

[q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, Oleg Verych, 2006/11/18

• Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, Michael Banck, 2006/11/18
  • Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, martin f krafft, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, Oleg Verych, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, martin f krafft, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, Bernd Zeimetz, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [q] maintainance of xfsprogs and util-linux, Warren Turkal, 2006/11/20

[RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, George Danchev, 2006/11/17

• Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/17
  • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, George Danchev, 2006/11/18
• Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Michael Banck, 2006/11/17
• Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/11/18
  • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, George Danchev, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Thomas Perl, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/19
    • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/11/20
    • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/18
    • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Hubert Chan, 2006/11/21
    • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, George Danchev, 2006/11/21
    • Re: [RFC] new virtual package names for optical discs burning applications, Hubert Chan, 2006/11/21

Supported upgrade path, Luigi Gangitano, 2006/11/17

• Re: Supported upgrade path, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/17
  • Re: Supported upgrade path, Luigi Gangitano, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Supported upgrade path, Steve Langasek, 2006/11/17
• Re: Supported upgrade path, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/17
• Re: Supported upgrade path, Ian Jackson, 2006/11/21

displeasing package names, Nico Golde, 2006/11/17

• Re: displeasing package names, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/17
  • Re: displeasing package names, Nico Golde, 2006/11/17

Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe, 2006/11/17

• Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/11/17
  • Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Anton Piatek, 2006/11/17
  • Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/11/19
  • Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/19
• Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Marc Haber, 2006/11/19
• Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/19
  • Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Fwd: FC6 downloads and installs, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/11/25

Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/11/16

• Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Stephen Gran, 2006/11/16
• Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/11/17
  • Re: Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/11/17
• Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Don Armstrong, 2006/11/17
  • Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Don Armstrong, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Stephen Gran, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Bug#398793: [Adduser-devel] Bug#398793: adduser: Non system wide readable (home) directories should not be 751, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/11/25

sarge->etch upgrade: plenty of locales errors., martin f krafft, 2006/11/16

• Re: sarge->etch upgrade: plenty of locales errors., Matthias Julius, 2006/11/16
  • Re: sarge->etch upgrade: plenty of locales errors., martin f krafft, 2006/11/16

flock() and sendmail, John Kelly, 2006/11/16

• Re: flock() and sendmail, Richard A Nelson, 2006/11/16
  • Re: flock() and sendmail, John Kelly, 2006/11/16
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, Roger Leigh, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, John Kelly, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, Michael Banck, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, John Kelly, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, Michael Banck, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, John Kelly, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, Michael Banck, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, John Kelly, 2006/11/17
  • Re: flock() and sendmail, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, John Kelly, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, Richard A Nelson, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, John Kelly, 2006/11/17
    • Re: flock() and sendmail, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/11/17

Virtual package "editor" gone?, Christoph Haas, 2006/11/15

• Re: Virtual package "editor" gone?, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/11/16

Re: Accepted wine 0.9.21-1 (source i386), Paul Seelig, 2006/11/15

• ***SPAM*** Re: Accepted wine 0.9.21-1 (source i386), Ove Kaaven, 2006/11/15
  • Re: Accepted wine 0.9.21-1 (source i386), Paul Seelig, 2006/11/15
  • Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Accepted wine 0.9.21-1 (source i386), Michael Biebl, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Accepted wine 0.9.21-1 (source i386), Steve Langasek, 2006/11/16

init script output, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2006/11/15

• Re: init script output, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2006/11/21

Re: XS-Vcs-field, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/14

• Re: XS-Vcs-field, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2006/11/15
  • Re: XS-Vcs-field, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/16
    • Re: XS-Vcs-field, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/11/16

Something wrong with Console-data package, eduardo.oliva barruzi, 2006/11/14

• Re: Something wrong with Console-data package, Christian Perrier, 2006/11/14

Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006/11/14

• Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2006/11/14
  • Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006/11/14
• Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Frans Pop, 2006/11/14
• Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/14
  • Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/16
  • Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Theodore Tso, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Steve Langasek, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Oleg Verych, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Theodore Tso, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Oleg Verych, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released, Theodore Tso, 2006/11/20

default ext3 options (was: Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released), Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/14

• Re: default ext3 options (was: Re: Debian Installer etch RC1 released), Frans Pop, 2006/11/14
• Re: default ext3 options, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/11/14
  • Re: default ext3 options, Sam Morris, 2006/11/14
    • Re: default ext3 options, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/14
    • Re: default ext3 options, Frans Pop, 2006/11/14
    • Re: default ext3 options, Theodore Tso, 2006/11/16
  • Re: default ext3 options, Darren Salt, 2006/11/14
    • Re: default ext3 options, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/14
    • Re: default ext3 options, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/15

Re: Bug#397715: ITP: dudki -- a process maintenance daemon, Amaya, 2006/11/13

• Re: Bug#397715: ITP: dudki -- a process maintenance daemon, Emmanuel Bouthenot, 2006/11/14

BTS Question, Brian May, 2006/11/13

• Re: BTS Question, Don Armstrong, 2006/11/13
• Re: BTS Question, Andreas Metzler, 2006/11/13

ITP: vala -- Compiler for the GObject type system, Marc-André Lureau, 2006/11/12

• Re: ITP: vala -- Compiler for the GObject type system, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/12
  • Re: ITP: vala -- Compiler for the GObject type system, Marc-André Lureau, 2006/11/12
    • Re: ITP: vala -- Compiler for the GObject type system, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/12

RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Julian Gilbey, 2006/11/12

• Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/12
• Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/11/12
  • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Don Armstrong, 2006/11/12
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/11/12
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/11/13
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Don Armstrong, 2006/11/13
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Julian Gilbey, 2006/11/16
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Don Armstrong, 2006/11/17
  • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Julian Gilbey, 2006/11/12
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/11/12
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Julian Gilbey, 2006/11/12
• Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Theodore Tso, 2006/11/16
  • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Julian Gilbey, 2006/11/16
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Damián Viano, 2006/11/16
    • Re: RFC: behaviour of "bts show" command with new BTS default behaviour, Julian Gilbey, 2006/11/16

Re: Bug#397939: Proposal: Packages must have a working clean target, Sune Vuorela, 2006/11/11

• Re: Bug#397939: Proposal: Packages must have a working clean target, Darren Salt, 2006/11/12
• Re: Bug#397939: Proposal: Packages must have a working clean target, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/12

Re: Accepted update-manager 0.42.2ubuntu22-6 (source all), Mike Hommey, 2006/11/11

• Re: Accepted update-manager 0.42.2ubuntu22-6 (source all), Andreas Metzler, 2006/11/11

Re: Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported, Osamu Aoki, 2006/11/11

• Re: Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported, Steve Langasek, 2006/11/11
  • Re: Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported, Osamu Aoki, 2006/11/11
    • Re: Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported, Steve Langasek, 2006/11/11
    • Re: Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported, Mattia Dongili, 2006/11/11
• Re: Bug#397917: gsynaptics - lists s390 as supported, Steve Langasek, 2006/11/11

Seattle Area Debian Gnomes, Paul Ford, O'Neil, 2006/11/11

• Re: Seattle Area Debian Gnomes, Kevin Mark, 2006/11/11

apt-file: Looking for a sponsor for NMU (#397381), Kevin Glynn, 2006/11/10

• Re: apt-file: Looking for a sponsor for NMU (#397381), Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2006/11/11
  • Re: apt-file: Looking for a sponsor for NMU (#397381), Kevin Glynn, 2006/11/11

Hijacking ITA: sa-exim, Magnus Holmgren, 2006/11/10

• Re: Hijacking ITA: sa-exim, Magnus Holmgren, 2006/11/30

#397716 - please provide a debian-icon on the default desktop install, not an ubuntu one, Holger Levsen, 2006/11/10

• Re: #397716 - please provide a debian-icon on the default desktop install, not an ubuntu one, Josselin Mouette, 2006/11/10
  • Re: #397716 - please provide a debian-icon on the default desktop install, not an ubuntu one, Luis Matos, 2006/11/10
• Re: #397716 - please provide a debian-icon on the default desktop install, not an ubuntu one, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/10

LWN subscription, Al Nikolov, 2006/11/09

• Re: LWN subscription, Steve Kemp, 2006/11/09

Re: Bug#397646: exim4-config: reportbug mail issue, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/11/09

• Re: Bug#397646: exim4-config: reportbug mail issue, sean finney, 2006/11/09
• Re: Bug#397646: exim4-config: reportbug mail issue, Don Armstrong, 2006/11/10
  • Re: Bug#397646: exim4-config: reportbug mail issue, Blars Blarson, 2006/11/10
  • Re: Bug#397646: exim4-config: reportbug mail issue, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/11/10

Re: Bug#397615: ITP: fuzzyocr -- spamassassin plugin to check image attachments, Michael Biebl, 2006/11/08

• Re: Bug#397615: ITP: fuzzyocr -- spamassassin plugin to check image attachments, Stephen Gran, 2006/11/09

Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95, Daniel Martin, 2006/11/08

• Re: Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/08
  • Re: Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95, Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/09
• Re: Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/11/09
  • Re: Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/11/09

Re: Bug#397577: ITP: renrot -- A program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/11/08

• Re: Bug#397577: ITP: renrot -- A program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags, Andy Shevchenko, 2006/11/08

Purging configurations of non-installed transitional packages, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/11/07

• Re: Purging configurations of non-installed transitional packages, SZALAY Attila, 2006/11/08
  • Re: Purging configurations of non-installed transitional packages, Michael Biebl, 2006/11/09
    • Re: Purging configurations of non-installed transitional packages, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/11/09
    • Re: Purging configurations of non-installed transitional packages, SZALAY Attila, 2006/11/09
    • Re: Purging configurations of non-installed transitional packages, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/11/09
    • Re: Purging configurations of non-installed transitional packages, SZALAY Attila, 2006/11/09
    • Re: Purging configurations of non-installed transitional packages, Brian May, 2006/11/10

IPW3945, Martín Ferrari, 2006/11/07

• Re: IPW3945, Michael Meskes, 2006/11/07
• Re: IPW3945, Philippe Cloutier, 2006/11/07
  • Re: IPW3945, Daniel Baumann, 2006/11/08
    • Re: IPW3945, Amaya, 2006/11/13
• Re: IPW3945, Jurij Smakov, 2006/11/08
  • Re: IPW3945, Martín Ferrari, 2006/11/08
    • Re: IPW3945, Jurij Smakov, 2006/11/11
    • Re: IPW3945, Martín Ferrari, 2006/11/13
• Status of IPW3945 (Was: IPW3945), Loïc Minier, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Status of IPW3945 (Was: IPW3945), David Weinehall, 2006/11/12
    • Re: Status of IPW3945 (Was: IPW3945), Darren Salt, 2006/11/12
    • Re: Status of IPW3945 (Was: IPW3945), Martín Ferrari, 2006/11/13
  • Re: Status of IPW3945 (Was: IPW3945), Evgeni Golov, 2006/11/12
    • Re: Status of IPW3945 (Was: IPW3945), Kel Modderman, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Status of IPW3945 (Was: IPW3945), Jurij Smakov, 2006/11/13

Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts, Kapil Hari Paranjape, 2006/11/07

• Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts, Bjørn Mork, 2006/11/07
• Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts, Tiago Saboga, 2006/11/07
  • Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts, Bjørn Mork, 2006/11/07
• Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/07
• Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts, Székelyi Szabolcs, 2006/11/07
• Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/11/08
• Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts, Székelyi Szabolcs, 2006/11/11

Pozdrav!, Robert, 2006/11/07

• Pozdrav!, Robert, 2006/11/08

Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/07

• Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Holger Levsen, 2006/11/07
• Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/10
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Andreas Metzler, 2006/11/11
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/15
• Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/12
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Mark Brown, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/12
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Darren Salt, 2006/11/13
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/14
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/14
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Joey Hess, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/14
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Eduard Bloch, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Theodore Tso, 2006/11/16
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/12
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/13
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/13
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/14
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/11/13
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/13
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Andreas Metzler, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Michelle Konzack, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Andreas Metzler, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Florian Weimer, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Florian Weimer, 2006/11/24
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/14
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/14
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/16
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/17
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/16
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Kevin Locke, 2006/11/17
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Clint Adams, 2006/11/18
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/18
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Clint Adams, 2006/11/18
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/18
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Andreas Metzler, 2006/11/18
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/18
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, David Weinehall, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/19
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/20
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/20
    • Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jeff Bailey, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Anthony Towns, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/21
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Clint Adams, 2006/11/22
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Marvin Renich, 2006/11/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Russ Allbery, 2006/11/24
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, David Weinehall, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, David Weinehall, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, David Weinehall, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, David Weinehall, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, David Weinehall, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, David Weinehall, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Bruce Sass, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/25
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/24
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/25
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/27
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, David Weinehall, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/23
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Hubert Chan, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Jari Aalto, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Stephen Gran, 2006/11/25
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Stephen Gran, 2006/11/25
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Dwayne C. Litzenberger, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Hubert Chan, 2006/11/26
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/11/25
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/11/25
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/23
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, version two, Ganesan Rajagopal, 2006/11/24
• Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Matthias . Beier . Gronau, 2006/11/15
  • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/11/15
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Matthias . Beier . Gronau, 2006/11/15
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy, Andreas Barth, 2006/11/16

Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Loïc Minier, 2006/11/06

• Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Jan Wagner, 2006/11/06
• Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Emmanuel Bouthenot, 2006/11/06
  • Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Jan Wagner, 2006/11/06
• Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Loïc Minier, 2006/11/06
  • Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Jan Wagner, 2006/11/06
    • Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Loïc Minier, 2006/11/06
    • Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Jan Wagner, 2006/11/06
    • Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Loïc Minier, 2006/11/06
    • Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Joey Schulze, 2006/11/07
    • Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Jan Wagner, 2006/11/07
    • Re: [php-maint] Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], sean finney, 2006/11/07
    • Re: [php-maint] Re: Bug#397291: ITP: php-tidy -- tidy module for php[45], Jan Wagner, 2006/11/07

Re:New Job Offers...., Mr Wan Tan Jin, 2006/11/05

• Re:New Job Offers...., Mr Wan Tan Jin, 2006/11/05

Re: arches and etch, Tim Cutts, 2006/11/03

• Re: arches and etch, Ron Johnson, 2006/11/03
• Re: arches and etch, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/11/03

ITP: libauthen-simple-perl -- Simple and consistent framework for authentication, Xavier Oswald, 2006/11/03

• Re: ITP: libauthen-simple-perl -- Simple and consistent framework for authentication, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/11/04
  • Re: ITP: libauthen-simple-perl -- Simple and consistent framework for authentication, Xavier Oswald, 2006/11/04

release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/02

• Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/02
  • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, sean finney, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Kris Deugau, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, sean finney, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Jean-Christophe Dubacq, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Luca Capello, 2006/11/05
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/06
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/06
  • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Bastian Venthur, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/02
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/11/04
  • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Brian May, 2006/11/03
  • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Jean-Christophe Dubacq, 2006/11/03
    • Re: release critical bug in apache2.2?, Mike Hommey, 2006/11/03

How to remove imapproxy?, kurt, 2006/11/02

• Re: How to remove imapproxy?, Arjan Oosting, 2006/11/02

More accurate package classification, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky, 2006/11/02

• Re: More accurate package classification, Michal Čihař, 2006/11/02
• Re: More accurate package classification, Thomas Perl, 2006/11/02
• Re: More accurate package classification, George Danchev, 2006/11/02

Building in a directory named "something:something", Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/02

• Re: Building in a directory named "something:something", Gabor Gombas, 2006/11/02

Re: Bug#396648: ITP: rt73 -- Linux device driver for Ralink RT73 a/b/g WLAN Card, Kel Modderman, 2006/11/02

• Message not available
  • Re: Bug#396648: ITP: rt73 -- Linux device driver for Ralink RT73 a/b/g WLAN Card, Jon Dowland, 2006/11/02
• Re: Bug#396648: ITP: rt73 -- Linux device driver for Ralink RT73 a/b/g WLAN Card, md, 2006/11/03
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bug#396648: ITP: rt73 -- Linux device driver for Ralink RT73 a/b/g WLAN Card, Marco d'Itri, 2006/11/03

Re: .ssh/authorized_keys on alioth is disappearing, Peter Samuelson, 2006/11/02

• Re: .ssh/authorized_keys on alioth is disappearing, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/11/02

Re: Bug#396618: ITP: dns-flood-detector -- DNS Flood Detector was developed to detect abusive usage levels on high traffic nameservers and to enable quick response in halting the use of one's nameserver to facilitate spam., Andrea Bolognani, 2006/11/01

• Message not available
  • Re: Bug#396618: ITP: dns-flood-detector -- DNS Flood Detector was developed to detect abusive usage levels on high traffic nameservers and to enable quick response in halting the use of one's nameserver to facilitate spam., Hendrik Sattler, 2006/11/02
• Message not available
  • Re: Bug#396618: ITP: dns-flood-detector -- DNS Flood Detector was developed to detect abusive usage levels on high traffic nameservers and to enable quick response in halting the use of one's nameserver to facilitate spam., Magnus Holmgren, 2006/11/02

Re: Bug#396611: ITP: mach -- make a chroot of a rpm-based distribution, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/11/01

• Re: Bug#396611: ITP: mach -- make a chroot of a rpm-based distribution, Loïc Minier, 2006/11/02
• Re: Bug#396611: ITP: mach -- make a chroot of a rpm-based distribution, Guillem Jover, 2006/11/03

Upgrading the priority of ucf, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/11/01

• Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/11/02
  • Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/11/02
  • Re: Upgrading the priority of ucf, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/11/02
  <