Using the SSL snakeoil certificate, Jaldhar H. Vyas, 2006/06/30

• Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate, James Westby, 2006/06/30

Re: Bug#374968: ITP: castpodder -- Multithreaded GUI Podcast Receiver, Hilko Bengen, 2006/06/30

• Re: Bug#374968: ITP: castpodder -- Multithreaded GUI Podcast Receiver, John Goerzen, 2006/06/30

code cpustat.c, Ozgur Karatas, 2006/06/30

• Re: code cpustat.c, Sebastian Harl, 2006/06/30
  • Re: code cpustat.c, Ozgur Karatas, 2006/06/30
    • Re: code cpustat.c, Tim Dijkstra, 2006/06/30
    • Re: code cpustat.c, Ozgur Karatas, 2006/06/30
    • Re: code cpustat.c, Tim Dijkstra, 2006/06/30
    • Re: code cpustat.c, Sebastian Harl, 2006/06/30
    • Re: code cpustat.c, Cesare Tensi, 2006/06/30
    • Re: code cpustat.c, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/30
    • Re: code cpustat.c, Mark Brown, 2006/06/30

#195752: Can somebody mark this bug as grave or critical?, Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/29

• Re: #195752: Can somebody mark this bug as grave or critical?, martin f krafft, 2006/06/29
  • Re: #195752: Can somebody mark this bug as grave or critical?, Al Stone, 2006/06/29

These new diffs are great, but..., Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/29

• Re: These new diffs are great, but..., martin f krafft, 2006/06/29
  • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Alec Berryman, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Marc Haber, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Marc Haber, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Florian Weimer, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Mike Hommey, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Florian Weimer, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Bastian Venthur, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Bastian Venthur, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., martin f krafft, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Bastian Venthur, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Robert Lemmen, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Bastian Venthur, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Joe Smith, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Miles Bader, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Kurt Roeckx, 2006/06/29
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Miles Bader, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Joey Hess, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Martin Michlmayr, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Marc Haber, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Andreas Barth, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Martin Schulze, 2006/06/30
    • Re: These new diffs are great, but..., Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/30

Dropping indirect dependencies from libgnutls-config --libs, Andreas Metzler, 2006/06/29

• Re: Dropping indirect dependencies from libgnutls-config --libs, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/29
  • Re: Dropping indirect dependencies from libgnutls-config --libs, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Dropping indirect dependencies from libgnutls-config --libs, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Dropping indirect dependencies from libgnutls-config --libs, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Dropping indirect dependencies from libgnutls-config --libs, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Dropping indirect dependencies from libgnutls-config --libs, Andreas Metzler, 2006/06/30

Debian mactel linux support?, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/06/29

• Re: Debian mactel linux support?, Gaudenz Steinlin, 2006/06/29
• Re: Debian mactel linux support?, Frans Pop, 2006/06/29
  • Re: Debian mactel linux support?, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/06/30
• Re: Debian mactel linux support?, Matthew Garrett, 2006/06/29
  • Re: Debian mactel linux support?, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Debian mactel linux support?, Joe Smith, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Debian mactel linux support?, Matthew Garrett, 2006/06/30
• Re: Debian mactel linux support?, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/30

Booting - new idea?, Arto Inkala, 2006/06/29

• Re: Booting - new idea?, Michal Čihař, 2006/06/29
  • Re: Booting - new idea?, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/29
    • Re: Booting - new idea?, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/29
    • Re: Booting - new idea?, Tim Dijkstra, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Booting - new idea?, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Booting - new idea?, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Booting - new idea?, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Booting - new idea?, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Booting - new idea?, Tim Dijkstra, 2006/06/30
• Re: Booting - new idea?, Yves-Alexis Perez, 2006/06/29

Re: News from the python policy transition, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/06/29

• Re: News from the python policy transition, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/06/29
  • Re: News from the python policy transition, Sam Morris, 2006/06/29
    • Re: News from the python policy transition, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/30
• Re: News from the python policy transition, Toni Mueller, 2006/06/30

Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards (proposed middle ground), Barak A. Pearlmutter, 2006/06/28

• Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards (proposed middle ground), Bdale Garbee, 2006/06/29
  • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards (proposed middle ground), Barak A. Pearlmutter, 2006/06/29

RFT: please test mdadm/experimental, martin f krafft, 2006/06/28

• problem with mdadm 2.5.2-1 / initramfs-tools <<0.65 (was: RFT: please test mdadm/experimental), martin f krafft, 2006/06/28
• problem with root on LVM on RAID (was: RFT: please test mdadm/experimental), martin f krafft, 2006/06/28
  • Re: problem with root on LVM on RAID (was: RFT: please test mdadm/experimental), martin f krafft, 2006/06/29

ITA: cyrus-sasl2?, Michael Alan Dorman, 2006/06/27

• Re: ITA: cyrus-sasl2?, James Westby, 2006/06/27
  • Re: ITA: cyrus-sasl2?, Michael Alan Dorman, 2006/06/27

Another weird tar issue (100 character filenames), Russ Allbery, 2006/06/27

• Re: Another weird tar issue (100 character filenames), Roger Leigh, 2006/06/27
  • Re: Another weird tar issue (100 character filenames), George Danchev, 2006/06/27
  • Re: Another weird tar issue (100 character filenames), Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Another weird tar issue (100 character filenames), Bdale Garbee, 2006/06/29

Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Joe Smith, 2006/06/27

• Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Russ Allbery, 2006/06/27
• Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/06/27
  • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/06/27
    • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/06/27
    • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Russ Allbery, 2006/06/27
    • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Neil Williams, 2006/06/27
    • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/06/27
    • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Tim Dijkstra, 2006/06/27
    • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/06/27
    • Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Bill Allombert, 2006/06/28
• Re: new tar behavior and --wildcards, Bill Allombert, 2006/06/29

Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/26

• Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Bastian Blank, 2006/06/26
• Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Marco d'Itri, 2006/06/26
• Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/06/26
  • Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Joe Smith, 2006/06/27
  • Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Michal Čihař, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Michal Čihař, 2006/06/28
• Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Bill Allombert, 2006/06/28
  • Re: Is OSS only support to be considered a bug?, Erast Benson, 2006/06/28

Re: sending debian-private postings to gmail, Martin Schulze, 2006/06/26

• Re: sending debian-private postings to gmail, Aigars Mahinovs, 2006/06/28
  • How to securely read debian-private for sure, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/28
  • Re: sending debian-private postings to gmail, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/28

Re: (doc) 31. sarge install and postfix building, Ozgur Karatas, 2006/06/26

• Re: (doc) 31. sarge install and postfix building, Ralf Hildebrandt, 2006/06/26

Testing excuses question, Jiri Palecek, 2006/06/26

• Re: Testing excuses question, Ozgur Karatas, 2006/06/26
• Re: Re: Testing excuses question, Jiri Palecek, 2006/06/26
  • Re: Testing excuses question, Andrew Vaughan, 2006/06/26

Reclaiming automake, Eric Dorland, 2006/06/26

• Re: Reclaiming automake, Artur R. Czechowski, 2006/06/26
  • Re: Reclaiming automake, Eric Dorland, 2006/06/26
• Re: Reclaiming automake, Norbert Tretkowski, 2006/06/26
• Re: Reclaiming automake, Scott James Remnant, 2006/06/26
  • Re: Reclaiming automake, Eric Dorland, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Reclaiming automake, Scott James Remnant, 2006/06/30
    • Re: Reclaiming automake, James Westby, 2006/06/30

Why is procps procps.sh in init.d?, Craig Small, 2006/06/26

• Re: Why is procps procps.sh in init.d?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/06/26

Re: Bug#375410: ITP: epdfview -- Lightweight pdf viewer based on poppler libs, James R. Van Zandt, 2006/06/25

• Re: Bug#375410: ITP: epdfview -- Lightweight pdf viewer based on poppler libs, Yves-Alexis Perez, 2006/06/25

Possibility to get a OLPC developer's board [Reply-to: debian-custom-list], Knut Yrvin, 2006/06/25

• Re: Possibility to get a OLPC developer's board [Reply-to: debian-custom-list], L. Redrejo, 2006/06/25

make -j in Debian packages, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/06/25

• Re: make -j in Debian packages, Bastian Blank, 2006/06/25
  • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/06/25
• Re: make -j in Debian packages, Turbo Fredriksson, 2006/06/25
  • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Bastian Blank, 2006/06/25
• Re: make -j in Debian packages, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/06/25
  • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/06/25
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/06/25
  • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Thomas Weber, 2006/06/25
  • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/25
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/06/25
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Sam Hocevar, 2006/06/25
  • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/06/25
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Chris Waters, 2006/06/26
  • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Henning Makholm, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Don Armstrong, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/30
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/06/30
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/30
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Jeremy Stanley, 2006/06/30
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Don Armstrong, 2006/06/29
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/28
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/30
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/06/30
    • Re: make -j in Debian packages, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/30

Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/24

• Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Domenico Andreoli, 2006/06/24
  • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/24
  • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/24
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Adeodato Simó, 2006/06/24
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/24
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/24
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, René van Bevern, 2006/06/24
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/24
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, James R. Van Zandt, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Joey Hess, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Frank Küster, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Martin Wuertele, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Martin Wuertele, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Martin Wuertele, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Frank Küster, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Martin Wuertele, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Frank Küster, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Frank Küster, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Thomas Viehmann, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Frank Küster, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2006/06/26
  • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Graham Wilson, 2006/06/24
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Rolf Kutz, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/25
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Sam Hocevar, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/26
• Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/24
  • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/24
    • *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/25
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, George Danchev, 2006/06/25
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/25
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/25
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/26
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, James R. Van Zandt, 2006/06/25
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, Paul Wise, 2006/06/26
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, Preben Randhol, 2006/06/26
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, George Danchev, 2006/06/26
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, Frank Küster, 2006/06/26
    • Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/25
• Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe, 2006/06/24
  • Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/25
    • Tests on fhs-2.3.pdf.gz, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/25
    • Problems with PDF creation (was: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?), Frank Küster, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation (was: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?), Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/26
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation, Frank Küster, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation, Osamu Aoki, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation, Frank Küster, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation, Frans Pop, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation, Frank Küster, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation, Frans Pop, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation, Frank Küster, 2006/06/27
    • Re: Problems with PDF creation, Vincent Danjean, 2006/06/27

additions to dpkg-architecture, Volker Grabsch, 2006/06/23

• Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Brendan O'Dea, 2006/06/25
  • Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Volker Grabsch, 2006/06/25
  • Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/29
• Re: additions to dpkg-architecture and dpkg-cross, Pjotr Kourzanov, 2006/06/26
  • Re: additions to dpkg-architecture and dpkg-cross, Volker Grabsch, 2006/06/27
    • Re: additions to dpkg-architecture and dpkg-cross, Pjotr Kourzanov, 2006/06/27
• Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Alexander Shishkin, 2006/06/27
  • Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2006/06/27
    • Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Pjotr Kourzanov, 2006/06/28
    • Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/29
    • Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Bernhard R. Link, 2006/06/29
• Re: additions to dpkg-architecture, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/29

NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Loïc Minier, 2006/06/23

• Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/06/23
  • Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Loïc Minier, 2006/06/23
• Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/23
  • Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/06/23
    • Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/23
    • Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Arthur de Jong, 2006/06/23
• Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Roland Mas, 2006/06/24
  • Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Loïc Minier, 2006/06/24
  • Re: NMUs for Python Policy -- please hold them a little, Frank Küster, 2006/06/26

Parallel port not recognized after latest update?, x0054, 2006/06/23

• Re: Parallel port not recognized after latest update?, x0054, 2006/06/24

Patch cplay to use mplayer with speed-control, Daniel Michalik, 2006/06/23

• Re: Patch cplay to use mplayer with speed-control, Kevin B. McCarty, 2006/06/23
  • Re: Patch cplay to use mplayer with speed-control, Daniel Michalik, 2006/06/26

&#1571;&#1583;&#1604;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1593;&#1580;&#1586;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1603;&#1576;&#1585;&#1609; &#1601;&#1610; &#1605;&#1603;&#1577; &#1608;&#1575;&#1604;&#1603;&#1593;&#1576;&#1577;, &#1588;&#1582;&#1589; &#1610;&#1601;&#1603;&#1585; &#1576;&#1603;, 2006/06/22

• &#1571;&#1583;&#1604;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1605;&#1593;&#1580;&#1586;&#1577; &#1575;&#1604;&#1603;&#1576;&#1585;&#1609; &#1601;&#1610; &#1605;&#1603;&#1577; &#1608;&#1575;&#1604;&#1603;&#1593;&#1576;&#1577;, &#1588;&#1582;&#1589; &#1610;&#1601;&#1603;&#1585; &#1576;&#1603;, 2006/06/22

how to execute a data-file's preferred app from the cmd-line?, David H. Cook, 2006/06/22

• Re: how to execute a data-file's preferred app from the cmd-line?, Sune Vuorela, 2006/06/22
  • Re: how to execute a data-file's preferred app from the cmd-line?, Török Edvin, 2006/06/22
    • Re: how to execute a data-file's preferred app from the cmd-line?, Ross Burton, 2006/06/22
    • Re: how to execute a data-file's preferred app from the cmd-line?, Gunnar Wolf, 2006/06/30
• Re: how to execute a data-file's preferred app from the cmd-line?, Martin Wuertele, 2006/06/22
• Re: how to execute a data-file's preferred app from the cmd-line?, Frank Küster, 2006/06/22

xserver-i810 killed by xrandr, Daniel Michalik, 2006/06/22

• Re: xserver-i810 killed by xrandr, Paul Wise, 2006/06/22

Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Christoph Haas, 2006/06/21

• Re: Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Norbert Preining, 2006/06/21
• Re: Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Adam Borowski, 2006/06/21
• Re: Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/21
  • Re: Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Christoph Haas, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Christoph Haas, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/21
• Re: Regexp to parse "Version:" fields, Brendan O'Dea, 2006/06/21

Grave error in X in unstable, Michael Rasmussen, 2006/06/21

• Re: Grave error in X in unstable, Sjoerd Simons, 2006/06/21

libssh request, any sponsor for it, Luciano Bello, 2006/06/20

• Re: libssh request, any sponsor for it, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester, 2006/06/21
  • Re: libssh request, any sponsor for it, Luciano Bello, 2006/06/21

pmount-hal hald and acl for storage media, Johannes Zellner, 2006/06/20

• pmount-hal hald and acl for storage media, Johannes Zellner, 2006/06/20
  • Re: pmount-hal hald and acl for storage media, Tim Dijkstra, 2006/06/21

Re: Easy way to incorporate Ubuntu improvements back into Debian?, Arne Götje (高盛華), 2006/06/20

• Re: Easy way to incorporate Ubuntu improvements back into Debian?, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2006/06/22

dxpc in sid and ready for backports, FYI, Jay Berkenbilt, 2006/06/20

• Re: dxpc in sid and ready for backports, FYI, Eric Dorland, 2006/06/20

cgiirc Hijacking, Damián Viano, 2006/06/20

• Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Elrond, 2006/06/20
  • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Margarita Manterola, 2006/06/20
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe, 2006/06/20
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Joe Smith, 2006/06/20
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe, 2006/06/21
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/06/21
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Florian Weimer, 2006/06/21
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2006/06/22
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/06/20
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/06/21
    • Re: cgiirc Hijacking, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/20

proposed mozilla-firefox security update, needs testing!, Eric Dorland, 2006/06/19

• Re: proposed mozilla-firefox security update, needs testing!, Martin Spoehrle, 2006/06/20
  • Re: proposed mozilla-firefox security update, needs testing!, Eric Dorland, 2006/06/21
    • Message not available
    • Re: proposed mozilla-firefox security update, needs testing!, Eric Dorland, 2006/06/28
    • Re: proposed mozilla-firefox security update, needs testing!, Alexander Sack, 2006/06/28
    • Re: proposed mozilla-firefox security update, needs testing!, Alexander Sack, 2006/06/28
    • Re: proposed mozilla-firefox security update, needs testing!, Alexander Sack, 2006/06/28

RFC: transitioning towards using BTS versioning for NMUs (and experimental), Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/19

• Re: RFC: transitioning towards using BTS versioning for NMUs (and experimental), Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/19
  • Re: RFC: transitioning towards using BTS versioning for NMUs (and experimental), Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/19
    • Re: RFC: transitioning towards using BTS versioning for NMUs (and experimental), Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/20
• Re: RFC: transitioning towards using BTS versioning for NMUs (and experimental), Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/20
  • Re: RFC: transitioning towards using BTS versioning for NMUs (and experimental), Matthew Palmer, 2006/06/21

gcalctool_5.8.16-2_*.changes REJECTED, Loïc Minier, 2006/06/19

• Re: gcalctool_5.8.16-2_*.changes REJECTED, Michael Banck, 2006/06/19

Choice of gcc versions for kernel modules, Russ Allbery, 2006/06/19

• Re: Choice of gcc versions for kernel modules, Bastian Blank, 2006/06/19
  • Re: Choice of gcc versions for kernel modules, Russ Allbery, 2006/06/19

Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Joe Smith, 2006/06/19

• Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/06/19
  • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Jacobo Tarrio, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Joe Smith, 2006/06/19
• Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Wesley J. Landaker, 2006/06/19
  • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Joey Hess, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Paul Wise, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Wesley J. Landaker, 2006/06/19
  • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Joe Smith, 2006/06/19
• Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically building a Google Earth Debian package, Miles Bader, 2006/06/19
  • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically ..., Ron Johnson, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automatically ..., Christian Perrier, 2006/06/19

ping for missing maintainers, christian . mchugh, 2006/06/19

• Re: ping for missing maintainers, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw), 2006/06/19
  • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/19
• Re: ping for missing maintainers, Hex Star, 2006/06/19
• Re: ping for missing maintainers, Chris Halls, 2006/06/19
  • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/20
    • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Chris Halls, 2006/06/20
    • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/20
    • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/22
    • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/22
    • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Frank Küster, 2006/06/22
    • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/22
    • Re: ping for missing maintainers, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/06/20
    • approx cacher (Re: ping for missing maintainers), Adeodato Simó, 2006/06/21

Correct dependencies on libgnutls-dev? (#370387), Loïc Minier, 2006/06/18

• Re: Correct dependencies on libgnutls-dev? (#370387), Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/19
  • Re: Correct dependencies on libgnutls-dev? (#370387), Loïc Minier, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Correct dependencies on libgnutls-dev? (#370387), Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/20
• Re: Correct dependencies on libgnutls-dev? (#370387), Michal Čihař, 2006/06/19
  • Re: Correct dependencies on libgnutls-dev? (#370387), Loïc Minier, 2006/06/19

Netatalk and SSL, Daniel Dickinson, 2006/06/18

• Re: Netatalk and SSL, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/06/18
  • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/18
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Marc Haber, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Marc Haber, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, James Westby, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Marc Haber, 2006/06/20
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Michael Biebl, 2006/06/19
• Re: Netatalk and SSL, Andrew Donnellan, 2006/06/18
• Re: Netatalk and SSL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/19
  • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Stephen Gran, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Stephen Gran, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Stephen Gran, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Russ Allbery, 2006/06/20
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Ben Pfaff, 2006/06/20
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Russ Allbery, 2006/06/20
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/20
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Jochen Voss, 2006/06/19
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/20
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Stephen Gran, 2006/06/20
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/21
    • Re: Netatalk and SSL, Stephen Gran, 2006/06/22

Hello and request for sponsor (DomainKeys packages), Magnus Holmgren, 2006/06/17

• Re: Hello and request for sponsor (DomainKeys packages), Andrew Donnellan, 2006/06/17
• Re: Hello and request for sponsor (DomainKeys packages), Kevin Mark, 2006/06/18

Re: Bug#374088: ITP: openmovieeditor -- a simple non-linear video editor, martin f krafft, 2006/06/17

• Re: Bug#374088: ITP: openmovieeditor -- a simple non-linear video editor, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/17
  • Re: Bug#374088: ITP: openmovieeditor -- a simple non-linear video editor, martin f krafft, 2006/06/17
    • Re: Bug#374088: ITP: openmovieeditor -- a simple non-linear video editor, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/06/18
• Re: Bug#374088: ITP: openmovieeditor -- a simple non-linear video editor, gregor herrmann, 2006/06/17

message/rfc822, Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/17

• Re: message/rfc822, Don Armstrong, 2006/06/17
  • Re: message/rfc822, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/17
    • Re: message/rfc822, Don Armstrong, 2006/06/17

egroupware upgrade drops several applications -- suggestions?, Peter Eisentraut, 2006/06/16

• Re: egroupware upgrade drops several applications -- suggestions?, Florian Weimer, 2006/06/16
• Re: egroupware upgrade drops several applications -- suggestions?, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/06/17
• Re: egroupware upgrade drops several applications -- suggestions?, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2006/06/17

Mass bug filing: lesstif1->lesstif2 transition, Kai Hendry, 2006/06/16

• Re: Mass bug filing: lesstif1->lesstif2 transition, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/06/16
  • Re: Mass bug filing: lesstif1->lesstif2 transition, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/16
    • Re: Mass bug filing: lesstif1->lesstif2 transition, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/16

python2.3/2.4 installation failure (and workaround), Matthias Klose, 2006/06/16

• RE: python2.3/2.4 installation failure (and workaround), Wolfgang Pfeiffer, 2006/06/16
  • Re: python2.3/2.4 installation failure (and workaround), Wolfgang Pfeiffer, 2006/06/16

please advise?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/16

• Re: please advise?, martin f krafft, 2006/06/16
• Re: please advise?, Adeodato Simó, 2006/06/16

x.org related question, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/15

• Re: x.org related question, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/15
  • Re: x.org related question, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/16

SQL Ledger and PostgreSQL: ID fault on create database, Chris Forsey, 2006/06/15

• Re: SQL Ledger and PostgreSQL: ID fault on create database, Matthew Palmer, 2006/06/16

some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Marc Chantreux, 2006/06/15

• Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/06/15
  • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Marc Chantreux, 2006/06/15
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/06/16
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/06/16
• Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/06/15
  • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Marc Chantreux, 2006/06/16
  • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Julien Danjou, 2006/06/16
• Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/06/17
  • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/06/18
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Marc Chantreux, 2006/06/19
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Marc Haber, 2006/06/19
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/20
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/06/20
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Michael Banck, 2006/06/20
    • Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/06/20

SUMMARY -- Generic handling of WORD, EXCEL, FILE MANGER ..., Jari Aalto+usenet, 2006/06/15

• Re: SUMMARY -- Generic handling of WORD, EXCEL, FILE MANGER ..., Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/15
  • Re: SUMMARY -- Generic handling of WORD, EXCEL, FILE MANGER ..., Adam Borowski, 2006/06/16
• Re: SUMMARY -- Generic handling of WORD, EXCEL, FILE MANGER ..., Bernhard R. Link, 2006/06/15
  • Re: SUMMARY -- Generic handling of WORD, EXCEL, FILE MANGER ..., Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2006/06/15
• Re: SUMMARY -- Generic handling of WORD, EXCEL, FILE MANGER ..., Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/06/15
• Re: SUMMARY -- Generic handling of WORD, EXCEL, FILE MANGER ..., Josselin Mouette, 2006/06/16

Re: Bug#373571: ITP: mugshot -- Client for integration between Mugshot and the Linux desktop, Kevin Mark, 2006/06/15

• Re: Bug#373571: ITP: mugshot -- Client for integration between Mugshot and the Linux desktop, Heikki Henriksen, 2006/06/15

installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release, Justin Pryzby, 2006/06/14

• Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release, Frank Küster, 2006/06/14
• Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/15
  • Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/06/16
    • Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release, Frank Küster, 2006/06/16
    • Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/06/16
    • Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release, Frank Küster, 2006/06/16
    • Re: installing a package from "Config-files" state earlier than the most recent stable release, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/06/17

debian Packages, Indraveni, 2006/06/14

• Re: debian Packages, Paul Wise, 2006/06/14

Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Paul van der Vlis, 2006/06/14

• Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/06/14
  • Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Paul van der Vlis, 2006/06/14
• Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Paul Wise, 2006/06/14
  • Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Paul Wise, 2006/06/14
  • Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Miriam Ruiz, 2006/06/14
    • Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Paul van der Vlis, 2006/06/14
  • Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Paul van der Vlis, 2006/06/14
• Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Loïc Minier, 2006/06/14
  • Re: Kernel bootsplash without recompiling, Paul van der Vlis, 2006/06/14

Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/06/14

• Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available, Daniel Kobras, 2006/06/14
  • Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/06/14
  • Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available, Brendan O'Dea, 2006/06/14
• Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available, George Danchev, 2006/06/15
  • Re: Cleaning /var/lib/dpkg/available, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/15

Re: Why isn't gnome in testing?, Julian Gilbey, 2006/06/14

• Re: Why isn't gnome in testing?, Andreas Barth, 2006/06/15
  • Re: Why isn't gnome in testing?, Julian Gilbey, 2006/06/15

Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc., Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2006/06/14

• Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc., Hendrik Sattler, 2006/06/14
  • Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc., Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2006/06/14
    • Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc., Guillem Jover, 2006/06/16
  • Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc., Thibaut Paumard, 2006/06/14
    • Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc., Jari Aalto+usenet, 2006/06/14
    • Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc., Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/14
• Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc., Gabor Gombas, 2006/06/14

Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Ben Burton, 2006/06/13

• Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Duck, 2006/06/13
  • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Ben Burton, 2006/06/13
• Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 2006/06/13
  • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Anthony Towns, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/06/14
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/06/14
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/06/14
• Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/13
  • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Matthias Klose, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Matthias Klose, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Matthias Klose, 2006/06/15
• Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, martin f krafft, 2006/06/13
  • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, martin f krafft, 2006/06/13
    • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, martin f krafft, 2006/06/13
  • Re: Move to python 2.4 / Changing the packaging style for python packages, Matthias Klose, 2006/06/13

A clean way to introduce delay between scripts in /etc/init.d?, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement), 2006/06/12

• Re: A clean way to introduce delay between scripts in /etc/init.d?, Joey Hess, 2006/06/12
  • Re: A clean way to introduce delay between scripts in /etc/init.d?, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/06/12
  • Re: A clean way to introduce delay between scripts in /etc/init.d?, LEE, Yui-wah (Clement), 2006/06/13
• Re: A clean way to introduce delay between scripts in /etc/init.d?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/12
• Re: A clean way to introduce delay between scripts in /etc/init.d?, Florian Weimer, 2006/06/12
• Re: A clean way to introduce delay between scripts in /etc/init.d?, Stephen Samuel, 2006/06/13
• Re: A clean way to introduce delay between scripts in /etc/init.d?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/13

/usr/share and -common pkgs, Justin Pryzby, 2006/06/12

• Re: /usr/share and -common pkgs, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/12
  • Re: /usr/share and -common pkgs, Tim Dijkstra, 2006/06/13

Hello!, KlarsDev, 2006/06/12

• Sound card issues [WAS: Re: Hello!], Roberto Sanchez, 2006/06/12

attention kernel module package maintainers: depmod changes, Joey Hess, 2006/06/12

• Re: attention kernel module package maintainers: depmod changes, Joey Hess, 2006/06/12

Sgt. Robert Greene Writes From Iraq, Sgt. Robert Greene, 2006/06/12

• Sgt. Robert Greene Writes From Iraq, Sgt. Robert Greene, 2006/06/12
• Sgt. Robert Greene Writes From Iraq, Sgt. Robert Greene, 2006/06/13

Re: outdated changelog timestamps (was Re: Date and Upsteam-URL fields), Joey Hess, 2006/06/12

• Re: outdated changelog timestamps (was Re: Date and Upsteam-URL fields), Adeodato Simó, 2006/06/12
  • Re: outdated changelog timestamps (was Re: Date and Upsteam-URL fields), Adeodato Simó, 2006/06/12

dak changes (names, version control, mail headers), James Troup, 2006/06/11

• Re: dak changes (names, version control, mail headers), Thomas Viehmann, 2006/06/11
• Re: dak changes (names, version control, mail headers), Bill Allombert, 2006/06/11

How to properly move a file from a .deb to another one ?, Xavier Roche, 2006/06/11

• Re: How to properly move a file from a .deb to another one ?, martin f krafft, 2006/06/11
• Re: How to properly move a file from a .deb to another one ?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/11
  • Re: How to properly move a file from a .deb to another one ?, Xavier Roche, 2006/06/11
    • Re: How to properly move a file from a .deb to another one ?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/11
    • Re: How to properly move a file from a .deb to another one ?, Xavier Roche, 2006/06/11
    • Re: How to properly move a file from a .deb to another one ?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/12
    • Re: How to properly move a file from a .deb to another one ?, Vincent Danjean, 2006/06/12

Conflict field for logical conflicts?, Jörg Sommer, 2006/06/11

• Re: Conflict field for logical conflicts?, Micha Lenk, 2006/06/11
• Re: Conflict field for logical conflicts?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/11
  • Re: Conflict field for logical conflicts?, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/06/12
    • Re: Conflict field for logical conflicts?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/12

CDBS and dh_install, Jean Parpaillon, 2006/06/09

• Re: CDBS and dh_install, Stephen Gran, 2006/06/09
  • Re: CDBS and dh_install, martin f krafft, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Andreas Metzler, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, martin f krafft, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Adeodato Simó, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, martin f krafft, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Christoph Berg, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Adeodato Simó, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, martin f krafft, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, martin f krafft, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, martin f krafft, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Russ Allbery, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Duck, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Duck, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, George Danchev, 2006/06/13
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/06/14
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, George Danchev, 2006/06/15
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Joey Hess, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Duck, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, George Danchev, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Thomas Weber, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Loïc Minier, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/11
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Duck, 2006/06/11
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/11
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Duck, 2006/06/13
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Duck, 2006/06/13
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/13
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Thomas Weber, 2006/06/11
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Mark Brown, 2006/06/11
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Thomas Weber, 2006/06/11
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/12
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Christoph Berg, 2006/06/12
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, martin f krafft, 2006/06/12
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Eduard Bloch, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Michael Banck, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Loïc Minier, 2006/06/10
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Jean Parpaillon, 2006/06/12
• Re: CDBS and dh_install, Andreas Metzler, 2006/06/09
  • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Jean Parpaillon, 2006/06/09
    • Re: CDBS and dh_install, Adeodato Simó, 2006/06/09

mystery of dh_installdirs, Atsuhito Kohda, 2006/06/09

• Re: mystery of dh_installdirs, Loïc Minier, 2006/06/09
• Re: mystery of dh_installdirs, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/06/11
  • Re: mystery of dh_installdirs, Atsuhito Kohda, 2006/06/14

GPL-compatible libcrypto replacement?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/09

• Re: GPL-compatible libcrypto replacement?, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/09
  • Re: GPL-compatible libcrypto replacement?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/09
• Re: GPL-compatible libcrypto replacement?, James Westby, 2006/06/09
  • Re: GPL-compatible libcrypto replacement?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/09

unstable? nah. :-), Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/08

• Re: unstable? nah. :-), Sebastian Harl, 2006/06/08
  • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/08
    • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Lars Wirzenius, 2006/06/08
    • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Anthony Towns, 2006/06/09
    • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/09
    • Re: unstable? nah. :-), The Fungi, 2006/06/09
    • Re: unstable? nah. :-), The Fungi, 2006/06/08
  • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Miguel Gea Milvaques, 2006/06/08
  • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Roland Mas, 2006/06/08
• Re: unstable? nah. :-), Ron Johnson, 2006/06/08
  • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/08
    • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006/06/09
    • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Adam M., 2006/06/09
• Re: unstable? nah. :-), Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/09
  • Re: unstable? nah. :-), Tyler MacDonald, 2006/06/09

severities of blocking bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/07

• Re: severities of blocking bugs, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/06/08
  • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/08
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/08
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/08
  • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/08
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/08
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/08
• Re: severities of blocking bugs, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/06/08
  • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Ian Jackson, 2006/06/09
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/09
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Stephen Gran, 2006/06/09
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/09
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/10
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Ian Jackson, 2006/06/14
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/06/15
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Steve Greenland, 2006/06/16
    • Re: severities of blocking bugs, Jari Aalto+usenet, 2006/06/13

GBit performance problem with nfs client, Gordon Grubert, 2006/06/07

• Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/06/07
  • Message not available
    • Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Gordon Grubert, 2006/06/08
    • Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Bastian Blank, 2006/06/09
    • Message not available
    • Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Gordon Grubert, 2006/06/09
    • Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Florian Weimer, 2006/06/09
• Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Pasi Kärkkäinen, 2006/06/08
  • Message not available
    • Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Gordon Grubert, 2006/06/08
• Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Bernhard R. Link, 2006/06/08
  • Message not available
    • Re: GBit performance problem with nfs client, Gordon Grubert, 2006/06/12

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys, Wookey, 2006/06/07

• Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/06/07

Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Martin Michlmayr, 2006/06/07

• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Darren Salt, 2006/06/08
  • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Bastian Blank, 2006/06/08
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Falk Hueffner, 2006/06/16
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Falk Hueffner, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Falk Hueffner, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Falk Hueffner, 2006/06/17
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Steve Langasek, 2006/06/08
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/06/08
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/08
  • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/09
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Martin Michlmayr, 2006/06/12
  • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Martin Michlmayr, 2006/06/12
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Colin Tuckley, 2006/06/08
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Zak B. Elep, 2006/06/08
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Thomas Girard, 2006/06/08
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Joost Yervante Damad, 2006/06/09
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Simon Kelley, 2006/06/09
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Andreas Metzler, 2006/06/12
• Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Andreas Metzler, 2006/06/16
  • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Henning Makholm, 2006/06/16
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Andreas Metzler, 2006/06/16
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Steve Greenland, 2006/06/16
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Falk Hueffner, 2006/06/16
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Philip Brown, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Falk Hueffner, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Tollef Fog Heen, 2006/06/18
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Bastian Blank, 2006/06/18
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Blars Blarson, 2006/06/18
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/06/18
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Joerg Friedrich, 2006/06/19
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Henning Makholm, 2006/06/18
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/18
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Henning Makholm, 2006/06/19
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Bastian Blank, 2006/06/19
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/19
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Daniel Stone, 2006/06/20
  • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/06/16
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Darren Salt, 2006/06/17
    • Re: GCC 4.1 now the default GCC version for etch, Ron Johnson, 2006/06/17

Re: Who can make binding legal agreements, George Danchev, 2006/06/07

• Re: Who can make binding legal agreements, Russ Allbery, 2006/06/07
• Re: Who can make binding legal agreements, Jon Kåre Hellan, 2006/06/07
  • Re: Who can make binding legal agreements, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/06/12
• Re: Who can make binding legal agreements, Joe Smith, 2006/06/07

Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Axel Beckert, 2006/06/07

• Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/06/07
  • Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Axel Beckert, 2006/06/07
    • Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/06/07
    • Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/06/08
    • Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Axel Beckert, 2006/06/08
  • Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Miles Bader, 2006/06/08
• Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Jon Dowland, 2006/06/07
• Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/06/07
• Re: Debian Light Desktop - meta package, Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2006/06/13

Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw), 2006/06/06

• Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/06
  • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw), 2006/06/06
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/06
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/07
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Denis Barbier, 2006/06/09
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/09
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Denis Barbier, 2006/06/09
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Christian Perrier, 2006/06/09
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Javier SOLA, 2006/06/10
• Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Denis Barbier, 2006/06/06
  • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/06
• Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/07
  • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/06
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/07
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/06
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Otavio Salvador, 2006/06/07
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/06/07
    • Re: Summary of Debconf i18n/l10n activities, Gustavo Franco, 2006/06/07

Hidden files, Klaus Ethgen, 2006/06/06

• Re: Hidden files, Mike Hommey, 2006/06/06
  • Re: Hidden files, Linas Žvirblis, 2006/06/06
    • Re: Hidden files, Javier Fernánd