Is there some guideline saying that native packages should be avoided?, Panu Kalliokoski, 2006/02/28

• Re: Is there some guideline saying that native packages should be avoided?, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/28

4GB address space, Mad Props, 2006/02/28

• Re: 4GB address space, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28
• Re: 4GB address space, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/02/28
• Re: 4GB address space, Jim Crilly, 2006/02/28

Re: Please reject to rule on the ndiswrapper question, Michael Poole, 2006/02/28

• Re: Please reject to rule on the ndiswrapper question, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28
• Re: Please reject to rule on the ndiswrapper question, Bas Zoetekouw, 2006/02/28

dspam in experimental. Please, test., Jesus Climent, 2006/02/28

• Re: dspam in experimental. Please, test., Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/28
• Re: dspam in experimental. Please, test., Florent Bayle, 2006/02/28

buildd and experimental, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28

• Re: buildd and experimental, Brian M. Carlson, 2006/02/28
  • Re: buildd and experimental, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: buildd and experimental, Brian M. Carlson, 2006/02/28
    • Re: buildd and experimental, Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/28
    • Re: buildd and experimental, Frank Lichtenheld, 2006/02/28
• Re: buildd and experimental, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28
  • Re: buildd and experimental, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28

gnucash 1.9.1, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28

• Re: gnucash 1.9.1, David Goodenough, 2006/02/28

Using /cdrom/.disk/udeb_(in|ex)clude to load custom udebs instead of d-i's?, Michael S. Peek, 2006/02/27

• Re: Using /cdrom/.disk/udeb_(in|ex)clude to load custom udebs instead of d-i's?, Xavier Oswald, 2006/02/27

/lib/modules/<kernelversion>/volatile on tmpfs, Sergio Callegari, 2006/02/27

• Re: /lib/modules/<kernelversion>/volatile on tmpfs, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/27
  • Re: Re: /lib/modules/<kernelversion>/volatile on tmpfs, Sergio Callegari, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Re: /lib/modules/<kernelversion>/volatile on tmpfs, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/02/28

Severity of architecture-dependent bugs, Shaun Jackman, 2006/02/25

• Re: Severity of architecture-dependent bugs, sean finney, 2006/02/25
  • Re: Severity of architecture-dependent bugs, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/25
• Re: Severity of architecture-dependent bugs, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/25
• Re: Severity of architecture-dependent bugs, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/25
• Re: Severity of architecture-dependent bugs, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/02/26
• Re: Severity of architecture-dependent bugs, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/02/26

debian zeroconf group?, Joey Hess, 2006/02/24

• Re: debian zeroconf group?, Sjoerd Simons, 2006/02/24
  • Re: debian zeroconf group?, Sebastien Estienne, 2006/02/24
• Re: debian zeroconf group?, Frederic Peters, 2006/02/24
  • Re: debian zeroconf group?, Jeremie Corbier, 2006/02/24
• Re: debian zeroconf group?, Simon Richter, 2006/02/24
  • Re: debian zeroconf group?, Ross Burton, 2006/02/26
• Re: debian zeroconf group?, Sylvain Le Gall, 2006/02/24

./configure in debian/rules, Pjotr Kourzanov, 2006/02/24

• Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Frank Küster, 2006/02/24
  • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Per Olofsson, 2006/02/24
    • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Frank Küster, 2006/02/24
    • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/24
    • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Osamu Aoki, 2006/02/26
    • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/27
  • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Aaron M. Ucko, 2006/02/24
  • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Russ Allbery, 2006/02/24
    • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/24
    • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/24
    • Re: ./configure in debian/rules, Russ Allbery, 2006/02/25

Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Matthew Grant, 2006/02/24

• Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/24
  • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/24
• Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Norbert Tretkowski, 2006/02/24
• Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/24
  • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Julien Danjou, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Julien Danjou, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Jurij Smakov, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Sven Luther, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, maximilian attems, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Sven Luther, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Julien Danjou, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/28
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Isaac Clerencia, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Isaac Clerencia, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Jonas Smedegaard, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Marc Haber, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/24
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/25
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/25
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/25
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/25
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Sven Luther, 2006/02/27
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Guido Trotter, 2006/02/28
• Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Ralph Passgang, 2006/02/24
• Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Matthew Grant, 2006/02/26
  • Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2006/02/26
    • Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/27

On binary compatibility, Michael Gilbert, 2006/02/24

• Re: On binary compatibility, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/02/24
• Re: On binary compatibility, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/02/24
• Re: On binary compatibility, Daniel Stone, 2006/02/26
• Re: On binary compatibility, Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/26

Re: ITP: root -- An object oriented data analysis framework, martin f krafft, 2006/02/23

• Re: Bug#325306: ITP: root -- An object oriented data analysis framework, Christian Holm Christensen, 2006/02/23
  • Re: Bug#325306: ITP: root -- An object oriented data analysis framework, martin f krafft, 2006/02/23

Re: May a package assume that builds are performed with root-like rights?, Frank Küster, 2006/02/23

• Re: May a package assume that builds are performed with root-like rights?, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/24

Re: May a package assume that builds are performed with root-like rights? (was: jadetex: FTBFS: mktexdir failed), Daniel Schepler, 2006/02/23

• Re: May a package assume that builds are performed with root-like rights?, Frank Küster, 2006/02/23
  • Re: May a package assume that builds are performed with root-like rights?, Daniel Schepler, 2006/02/23
    • Re: May a package assume that builds are performed with root-like rights?, Frank Küster, 2006/02/23
    • Re: May a package assume that builds are performed with root-like rights?, Thomas Viehmann, 2006/02/23
    • Re: May a package assume that builds are performed with root-like rights?, Frank Küster, 2006/02/23

How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken, Stephen Birch, 2006/02/23

• Re: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken, Miles Bader, 2006/02/23
  • Re: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken, Stephen Birch, 2006/02/23
    • Re: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/23
• Re: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2006/02/23
• How to identify origin [Was: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken], Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/02/23
  • Re: How to identify origin [Was: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken], Reinhard Tartler, 2006/02/23
• Re: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken, Carlos C Soto, 2006/02/24
  • Re: How to identify distro, lsb-release is broken, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/02/24

Re: Mirror split, amd64 update, Philip Charles, 2006/02/23

• Re: Mirror split, amd64 update, Joe Smith, 2006/02/27
  • Re: Mirror split, amd64 update, Julien BLACHE, 2006/02/27

Re: Bug#320119: sysklogd: Large file support is broken in the sarge version (fwd), Chris Stromsoe, 2006/02/22

• sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/23
  • Re: sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/23
    • Re: sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Thiemo Seufer, 2006/02/23
    • Re: sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/23
    • Re: sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/23
    • Re: sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/23
    • Re: sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/23
    • Re: sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Martin Michlmayr, 2006/02/23
    • Re: sysklogd -17.1 NMU build broken in mips/mipsel, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/23

Re: ITA pimppa, Gregory B. Prokopsky, 2006/02/22

• Re: ITA pimppa, Zak B. Elep, 2006/02/23

Marking BTS spam, Shaun Jackman, 2006/02/21

• Re: Marking BTS spam, Don Armstrong, 2006/02/21
• Re: Marking BTS spam, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/21
  • Re: Marking BTS spam, Nico Golde, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Marking BTS spam, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Marking BTS spam, Nico Golde, 2006/02/22
    • lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam), Cord Beermann, 2006/02/24
    • Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam), Cord Beermann, 2006/02/24
    • Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam), Nico Golde, 2006/02/24
    • Re: lists.d.o Spam, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw), 2006/02/27
    • Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam), Blars Blarson, 2006/02/24
    • Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam), Cord Beermann, 2006/02/25
    • Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam), Amaya, 2006/02/25
    • Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam), Cord Beermann, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Marking BTS spam, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Marking BTS spam, David Weinehall, 2006/02/22
  • Re: Marking BTS spam, Blars Blarson, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Marking BTS spam, Cord Beermann, 2006/02/24

Ubuntu patches, Scott James Remnant, 2006/02/21

• Re: Ubuntu patches, martin f krafft, 2006/02/21
  • Re: Ubuntu patches, Scott James Remnant, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Ubuntu patches, martin f krafft, 2006/02/21
• Re: Ubuntu patches, Frank Küster, 2006/02/21
  • Re: Ubuntu patches, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Ubuntu patches, Scott James Remnant, 2006/02/22
• Re: Ubuntu patches, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/22
  • Re: Ubuntu patches, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Ubuntu patches, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/22

Re: Bug#353777: ITP: multixterm -- drive multiple xterms separately or together, David Pashley, 2006/02/21

• Re: Bug#353777: ITP: multixterm -- drive multiple xterms separately or together, Fabio Tranchitella, 2006/02/21

PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Jari Aalto, 2006/02/21

• Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Russ Allbery, 2006/02/21
  • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Robert Collins, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Thomas Viehmann, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Michael Koch, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Michael Koch, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Ross Burton, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/21
    • Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
• Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Martin Wuertele, 2006/02/21
• Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Benjamin Mesing, 2006/02/21
• Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/02/21
• Re: PROPOSAL: debian/control file to include new License: field, Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27

TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Christian Perrier, 2006/02/20

• Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Paul Wise, 2006/02/20
• Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Mohammed Adnène Trojette, 2006/02/20
• Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Frank Küster, 2006/02/20
  • Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Christian Perrier, 2006/02/21
    • Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Miles Bader, 2006/02/21
    • Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Frank Küster, 2006/02/21
    • Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Florent Rougon, 2006/02/21
• Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Rene Engelhard, 2006/02/20
• Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Daniel Baumann, 2006/02/20
  • Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Jaldhar H. Vyas, 2006/02/20
    • Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Christian Perrier, 2006/02/21
• Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Marcus Better, 2006/02/20
  • Type1 fonts in Debian (was: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal), Frank Küster, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Type1 fonts in Debian (was: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal), martin f krafft, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Type1 fonts in Debian, Frank Küster, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Type1 fonts in Debian, martin f krafft, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Type1 fonts in Debian, Ralf Stubner, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Type1 fonts in Debian, Ralf Stubner, 2006/02/20
• Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Will Newton, 2006/02/20
• Re: TrueType fonts packages maintenance team proposal, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/02/20

Problems found by piuparts, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/20

• Re: Problems found by piuparts, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/20
  • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Frank Küster, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/02/21
• Message not available
  • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/22
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Frank Küster, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Julien Cristau, 2006/02/22
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Frank Küster, 2006/02/23
• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Don Armstrong, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Frank Küster, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Don Armstrong, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/02/24
• Re: Problems found by piuparts, Gustavo Franco, 2006/02/24
  • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Gustavo Franco, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/25
  • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Russ Allbery, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Gustavo Franco, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Thomas Viehmann, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Problems found by piuparts, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/28

Re: Accepted ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-1 (source all i386), Richard A Nelson, 2006/02/20

• Re: Accepted ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-1 (source all i386), Joerg Jaspert, 2006/02/20
  • Re: Accepted ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-1 (source all i386), Richard A Nelson, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Accepted ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-1 (source all i386), Adeodato Simó, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Accepted ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-1 (source all i386), Joerg Jaspert, 2006/02/21

Thomas Dickey, your mail is bouncing..., Richard Kettlewell, 2006/02/19

• Re: Thomas Dickey, your mail is bouncing..., Atsuhito Kohda, 2006/02/19
  • Re: Thomas Dickey, your mail is bouncing..., Atsuhito Kohda, 2006/02/19

Re: Bug#353381: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, Joe Smith, 2006/02/18

• Re: Bug#353381: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, Russ Allbery, 2006/02/19
  • Re: Bug#353381: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, Florian Weimer, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353381: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, David Weinehall, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353381: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, Florian Weimer, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353381: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, David Weinehall, 2006/02/21

Change .rm to mp3 or wav file, Peter Khwatenge, 2006/02/18

• Re: Change .rm to mp3 or wav file, Michael Banck, 2006/02/18
• Re: Change .rm to mp3 or wav file, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/18

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/18

• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michael Poole, 2006/02/18
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michael Poole, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Daniel Stone, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michael Poole, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michael Poole, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Kevin Mark, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Martin Wuertele, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Arthur de Jong, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Eduard Bloch, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Eduard Bloch, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michael Poole, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michael Poole, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michael Poole, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Marc Haber, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michael Poole, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michael Poole, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michael Poole, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Tom Rauchenwald, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), David Weinehall, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Jérôme Warnier, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Jérôme Warnier, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/18
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/18
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michael Poole, 2006/02/18
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Olaf Titz, 2006/02/18
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Steve Langasek, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Olaf Titz, 2006/02/20
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/20
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Steve Langasek, 2006/02/21
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Russ Allbery, 2006/02/20
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27

Re: AT&T Korn Shell, Josh Hurst, 2006/02/18

• Re: AT&T Korn Shell, Andrew Porter, 2006/02/20
  • Re: AT&T Korn Shell, Josh Hurst, 2006/02/28
    • Re: AT&T Korn Shell, Kevin B. McCarty, 2006/02/28
    • Re: AT&T Korn Shell, Aaron M. Ucko, 2006/02/28

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/18

• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/18
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Brett Parker, 2006/02/18
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michael Poole, 2006/02/18
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Robert Millan, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Bernhard R. Link, 2006/02/20
    • Message not available
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Robert Millan, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michael Poole, 2006/02/20
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/22
    • Message not available
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/02/21
    • Message not available
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Glenn Maynard, 2006/02/21
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/18
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Mike Hommey, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Eduard Bloch, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Mike Hommey, 2006/02/19
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adeodato Simó, 2006/02/20
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/19
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/20
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/20
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adeodato Simó, 2006/02/20
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Olaf Titz, 2006/02/20

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo, 2006/02/18

• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, John Hasler, 2006/02/18
• Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/21
  • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Steve Langasek, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Riku Voipio, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Steve Langasek, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Adam McKenna, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/24
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michael Poole, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Adam McKenna, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michael Poole, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Michael Poole, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/28
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Christian Pernegger, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Peter Samuelson, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Christian Pernegger, 2006/02/23
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Anthony Towns, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/22
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/21
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27
    • Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib), Michelle Konzack, 2006/02/27

Re: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/02/18

• Re: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/18
  • Re: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, David Weinehall, 2006/02/18
    • Re: ITP: freebsd-manpages -- Manual pages for a GNU/kFreeBSD system, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/18

need help with minc, Steve M. Robbins, 2006/02/17

• Re: need help with minc, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/17
• Re: need help with minc, Brian M. Carlson, 2006/02/17

limitations of reportbug and BTS, kamaraju kusumanchi, 2006/02/15

• Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/15
  • Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Frans Pop, 2006/02/15
    • Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Frans Pop, 2006/02/15
    • Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Frank Küster, 2006/02/16
    • Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Eduard Bloch, 2006/02/16
    • Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Miles Bader, 2006/02/16
    • Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Theodore Ts'o, 2006/02/17
• Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Brian M. Carlson, 2006/02/15
  • Re: limitations of reportbug and BTS, Michael Banck, 2006/02/16

Size matters. 7zip. Again., Eduard Bloch, 2006/02/15

• Re: Size matters. 7zip. Again., John Goerzen, 2006/02/15
  • Re: Size matters. 7zip. Again., Aurelien Jarno, 2006/02/15
    • Re: Size matters. 7zip. Again., Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/16
• Re: Size matters. 7zip. Again., Jari Aalto, 2006/02/15
  • Re: Size matters. 7zip. Again., Miriam Ruiz, 2006/02/15
    • Re: Size matters. 7zip. Again., Willi Mann, 2006/02/16

Re: Bug#352912: general: Reduce network load using zip packaging and VFS, Russ Allbery, 2006/02/15

• Re: Bug#352912: general: Reduce network load using zip packaging and VFS, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/15

Changing menu item name, Chandan M. C., 2006/02/15

• Re: Changing menu item name, Michael Biebl, 2006/02/15

User-defined fields in control file, Andre Majorel, 2006/02/14

• Re: User-defined fields in control file, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/15
  • Re: User-defined fields in control file, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/02/20

Recommending an image viewer, Henning Makholm, 2006/02/14

• Re: Recommending an image viewer, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/14
  • Re: Recommending an image viewer, Daniel Kobras, 2006/02/14
• Re: Recommending an image viewer, Christoph Berg, 2006/02/14

devscripts help: new script name?, Julian Gilbey, 2006/02/14

• Re: devscripts help: new script name?, Steve Greenland, 2006/02/14

Re: {SPAM} Question about GFDL licensed works, Glenn Maynard, 2006/02/13

• Re: {SPAM} Question about GFDL licensed works, Steve Greenland, 2006/02/14

How to contribute, Michael Rasmussen, 2006/02/13

• Re: How to contribute, Eduard Bloch, 2006/02/13
  • Re: How to contribute, Michael Rasmussen, 2006/02/13
    • Re: How to contribute, Michael Koch, 2006/02/13
    • Re: How to contribute, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/02/13
    • Re: How to contribute, Michael Rasmussen, 2006/02/13
    • Re: How to contribute, Frank Küster, 2006/02/13
• Re: How to contribute, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/13
  • Re: How to contribute, Michael Rasmussen, 2006/02/13
    • Re: How to contribute, Kevin Mark, 2006/02/13

update-inetd and xinetd, Klaus Ethgen, 2006/02/13

• Re: update-inetd and xinetd, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/13
  • Re: update-inetd and xinetd, Andrew Pollock, 2006/02/13
    • Re: update-inetd and xinetd, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/14
    • Re: update-inetd and xinetd, Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/14

Library interface version question, Shachar Shemesh, 2006/02/13

• Re: Library interface version question, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/13
• Re: Library interface version question, Henning Makholm, 2006/02/13
  • Re: Library interface version question, Shachar Shemesh, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Library interface version question, Henning Makholm, 2006/02/15

Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Ron Johnson, 2006/02/13

• Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/13
  • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Adeodato Simó, 2006/02/13
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Adeodato Simó, 2006/02/13
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/02/14
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Jari Aalto, 2006/02/15
• Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Henning Makholm, 2006/02/13
  • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Jari Aalto, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Ron Johnson, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Jari Aalto, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Glenn Maynard, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Ron Johnson, 2006/02/14
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/15
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Jari Aalto, 2006/02/15
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/16
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Steve Langasek, 2006/02/16
    • Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK), Miles Bader, 2006/02/16

pbuilder, xvfb and nonexisting /tmp/.X11-unix, Thomas Viehmann, 2006/02/12

• Re: pbuilder, xvfb and nonexisting /tmp/.X11-unix, Daniel Schepler, 2006/02/13
  • Re: pbuilder, xvfb and nonexisting /tmp/.X11-unix, Thomas Viehmann, 2006/02/13
    • Re: pbuilder, xvfb and nonexisting /tmp/.X11-unix, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/02/15
• Message not available
  • Re: [Pbuilder-maint] pbuilder, xvfb and nonexisting /tmp/.X11-unix, Thomas Viehmann, 2006/02/15

Security update modifies (inofficial) ABI and hidden API, Martin Schulze, 2006/02/12

• Re: Security update modifies (inofficial) ABI and hidden API, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/16

Provides: scheme-interpreter, Chad Walstrom, 2006/02/12

• Re: Provides: scheme-interpreter, Florian Weimer, 2006/02/12
  • Re: Provides: scheme-interpreter, Joe Smith, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Provides: scheme-interpreter, Florian Weimer, 2006/02/12

Re: Bug#352353: ITP: wmfrog -- A dockapp for showing weather in graphical way, Nico Golde, 2006/02/11

• Re: Bug#352353: ITP: wmfrog -- A dockapp for showing weather in graphical way, Jari Aalto, 2006/02/14

Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Osamu Aoki, 2006/02/11

• Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Christian Perrier, 2006/02/11
  • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Osamu Aoki, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Christian Perrier, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Sebastian Ley, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Osamu Aoki, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Osamu Aoki, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Mattia Dongili, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Osamu Aoki, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Mattia Dongili, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Bug#352303: ITP: gsynaptics -- configuration tool for Synaptics touchpad driver of X, Osamu Aoki, 2006/02/13

rules: unpatch as dependency (was Bug#351301), Jörg Sommer, 2006/02/10

• Re: rules: unpatch as dependency (was Bug#351301), Junichi Uekawa, 2006/02/12

documentation types, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/10

• Re: documentation types, Daniel Leidert, 2006/02/10
  • Re: documentation types, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/10
    • Re: documentation types, Roger Leigh, 2006/02/10
    • Re: documentation types, Remi Vanicat, 2006/02/10
    • Re: documentation types, Thaddeus H. Black, 2006/02/16
    • Re: documentation types, Remi Vanicat, 2006/02/16
    • Re: documentation types, Ralf Treinen, 2006/02/16
    • Re: documentation types, Frank Küster, 2006/02/17
• documentation types, Neil Roeth, 2006/02/10
  • Re: documentation types, Ross Burton, 2006/02/10
  • Re: documentation types, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/10
    • Re: documentation types, Neil Roeth, 2006/02/11
  • Re: documentation types, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/10
    • Re: documentation types, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/10
    • Re: documentation types, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/02/16
    • Re: documentation types, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/16
    • Re: documentation types, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/02/17
    • Draft DDP policy (was: documentation types), Frank Küster, 2006/02/17
    • Re: Draft DDP policy (was: documentation types), Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/02/17
    • Re: Draft DDP policy, Frank Küster, 2006/02/20
    • Re: documentation types, Hendrik Sattler, 2006/02/17
    • Re: documentation types, Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/17
    • Re: documentation types, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/02/17
    • Re: documentation types, Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/17
    • Re: documentation types, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/02/18
    • Re: documentation types, Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/16
    • Re: documentation types, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/02/17
    • Re: documentation types, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/17
    • Re: documentation types, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/02/17
    • Re: documentation types -- use common sense, Osamu Aoki, 2006/02/17
• Re: documentation types, Gabor Gombas, 2006/02/10
• Re: documentation types, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/10

Could you help me?, namth, 2006/02/10

• Re: Could you help me?, paddy, 2006/02/10

Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10

• Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Ron Johnson, 2006/02/10
  • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Ron Johnson, 2006/02/10
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
• Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/10
• Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
  • Message not available
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Stephen Gran, 2006/02/10
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
• Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Jari Aalto, 2006/02/15
  • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Miles Bader, 2006/02/16
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/02/16
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Miles Bader, 2006/02/17
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/02/17
  • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/16
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Gunnar Wolf, 2006/02/18

Seeking new maintainer for EVMS, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/02/09

• Re: Seeking new maintainer for EVMS, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/09
  • Re: Seeking new maintainer for EVMS, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/02/10

Change in Katie's messages, Loïc Minier, 2006/02/09

• Re: Change in Katie's messages, Adeodato Simó, 2006/02/09
  • Re: Change in Katie's messages, Loïc Minier, 2006/02/09
• Re: Change in Katie's messages, Don Armstrong, 2006/02/09

raptor.debian.org down, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/09

• raptor.debian.org down, Bastian Blank, 2006/02/17

Re: Bug#352073: ITP: gerwin -- CASE tool for edit data model, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak, 2006/02/09

• Re: Bug#352073: ITP: gerwin -- CASE tool for edit data model, Fernando Ike de Oliveira, 2006/02/20
  • Re: Bug#352073: ITP: gerwin -- CASE tool for edit data model, Otavio Salvador, 2006/02/20
• Re: Bug#352073: ITP: gerwin -- CASE tool for edit data model, Robert Lemmen, 2006/02/10

MailMonitor Alert, mmsmtp, 2006/02/09

• MailMonitor Alert, mmsmtp, 2006/02/09

helix player package for debian?, Britton Kerin, 2006/02/08

• Re: helix player package for debian?, David Weinehall, 2006/02/08
• Re: helix player package for debian?, Daniel Baumann, 2006/02/08
  • Re: helix player package for debian?, Britton Kerin, 2006/02/09
    • Re: helix player package for debian?, Daniel Baumann, 2006/02/09
  • Re: helix player package for debian?, Romain Beauxis, 2006/02/09

bug pages and source packages, Norbert Preining, 2006/02/08

• Re: bug pages and source packages, Adeodato Simó, 2006/02/10
  • Re: bug pages and source packages, Frank Küster, 2006/02/10

How to create Debian Live CD, Chandan M. C., 2006/02/08

• Re: How to create Debian Live CD, Rudi Effe, 2006/02/10

Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Nick Phillips, 2006/02/08

• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Raul Miller, 2006/02/08
  • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Nick Phillips, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/09
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Raul Miller, 2006/02/09
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Raul Miller, 2006/02/12
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Adam Borowski, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Weber, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Xavier Roche, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Simon Richter, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, MJ Ray, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Eric Dorland, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/10
    • GR2004-03 outcome was superceeded by GR2004-04, live with it, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Josselin Mouette, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marco d'Itri, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/09
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Steve Langasek, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Glenn Maynard, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/10
    • Re: Editorial changes to the Social Contract, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Editorial changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Editorial changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Editorial changes to the Social Contract, Jérôme Marant, 2006/02/12
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/09
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Anthony Towns, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/02/11
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Raul Miller, 2006/02/09
• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/02/08
  • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Nick Phillips, 2006/02/09
• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/02/09
• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/02/09
  • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Xavier Roche, 2006/02/09
• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Marc