MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/01/31

• Re: MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa, Otavio Salvador, 2006/01/31
  • Re: MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/01/31
    • Re: MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa, Otavio Salvador, 2006/01/31
    • Re: MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/31
    • Re: MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/01/31

The Debian community should influence the next Haskell language standard, Isaac Jones, 2006/01/30

• Re: The Debian community should influence the next Haskell language standard, Florian Weimer, 2006/01/30

svn problem: Can you help me?, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/01/29

• Re: svn problem: Can you help me?, Thomas Weber, 2006/01/29
  • Re: svn problem: Can you help me?, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2006/01/30
    • Re: svn problem: Can you help me?, Jay Berkenbilt, 2006/01/30
    • Re: svn problem: Can you help me?, Jay Berkenbilt, 2006/01/30

Re: Bug#350397: ITP: dblatex -- Produces DVI, PostScript, PDF documents from DocBook sources, Frank Küster, 2006/01/29

• Re: Bug#350397: ITP: dblatex -- Produces DVI, PostScript, PDF documents from DocBook sources, Andreas Hoenen, 2006/01/29
  • Re: Bug#350397: ITP: dblatex -- Produces DVI, PostScript, PDF documents from DocBook sources, Frank Küster, 2006/01/30

how to link 2 bug reports ?, Marc Chantreux, 2006/01/29

• Re: how to link 2 bug reports ?, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2006/01/29
• Re: how to link 2 bug reports ?, Frans Pop, 2006/01/29
• Re: how to link 2 bug reports ?, Marc Chantreux, 2006/01/29

Multiple package variants with CDBS?, W. Borgert, 2006/01/28

• Re: Multiple package variants with CDBS?, Jay Berkenbilt, 2006/01/28
• Re: Multiple package variants with CDBS?, Michelle Konzack, 2006/01/30
  • Re: Multiple package variants with CDBS?, Michael Banck, 2006/01/30
    • Re: Multiple package variants with CDBS?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/30

what is the current status of kat in debian?, kamaraju kusumanchi, 2006/01/27

• Re: what is the current status of kat in debian?, Fathi Boudra, 2006/01/27
  • Re: what is the current status of kat in debian?, Jonas Genannt, 2006/01/28
    • Re: what is the current status of kat in debian?, kamaraju kusumanchi, 2006/01/28
  • Re: what is the current status of kat in debian?, Isaac Clerencia, 2006/01/28
    • Re: what is the current status of kat in debian?, Jonas Genannt, 2006/01/28

Kernel compile fails., Alejandro Bonilla Beeche, 2006/01/26

• Re: Kernel compile fails., Linas Zvirblis, 2006/01/26

How to purge linux-image-2.6.14, Cesare Leonardi, 2006/01/26

• Re: How to purge linux-image-2.6.14, Edward Shornock, 2006/01/26
• Re: How to purge linux-image-2.6.14, Sam Morris, 2006/01/26
  • Re: How to purge linux-image-2.6.14, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/01/26
    • Re: How to purge linux-image-2.6.14, Adeodato Simó, 2006/01/26
  • Re: How to purge linux-image-2.6.14, Cesare Leonardi, 2006/01/26

returning emeritus developer, no response from da-manager@xxxxxxxxxx, Britton Kerin, 2006/01/25

• Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from da-manager@xxxxxxxxxx, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/26
  • Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from da-manager@xxxxxxxxxx, Adeodato Simó, 2006/01/26
    • Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from da-manager@xxxxxxxxxx, Joe Smith, 2006/01/27
    • Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from da-manager@xxxxxxxxxx, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/01/27
• Re: returning emeritus developer, no response from da-manager@xxxxxxxxxx, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/30

Re: /run vs. /lib/run, Tim Cutts, 2006/01/25

• Re: /run vs. /lib/run, Thomas Hood, 2006/01/25
  • Re: /run vs. /lib/run, Russell Coker, 2006/01/27

Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/25

• Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Russell Coker, 2006/01/25
  • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Russell Coker, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/01/25
  • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Florian Weimer, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Jean-Christophe Dubacq, 2006/01/26
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Russell Coker, 2006/01/29
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Brian M. Carlson, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Bug#349693: ITP: gst-fluendo-mp3 -- MP3 decoder plugin for GStreamer, Daniel Baumann, 2006/01/25

Re: emacs 21.4, Chinese and utf-8, Kevin Mark, 2006/01/24

• Re: emacs 21.4, Chinese and utf-8, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/24

Re: Offline use of apt-cacher, Eduard Bloch, 2006/01/23

• Re: Offline use of apt-cacher, Kevin Mark, 2006/01/24
• Re: Offline use of apt-cacher, Anuradha Ratnaweera, 2006/01/24
• Re: Offline use of apt-cacher, Eduardo Silva, 2006/01/25

Re: Re: Arabic Linguist, LLA70, 2006/01/23

• Re: Re: Arabic Linguist, LLA70, 2006/01/23

Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Simon Richter, 2006/01/23

• Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/23
• Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Michael Banck, 2006/01/23
  • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Michael Banck, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Adeodato Simó, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Adeodato Simó, 2006/01/24
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Paul TBBle Hampson, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/24
• Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Frank Lichtenheld, 2006/01/23
• Re: Autobuilding and the build-arch target, again, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/23

What's wrong with update-excuses?, Frank Küster, 2006/01/23

• Message not available
  • Re: What's wrong with update-excuses?, Frank Küster, 2006/01/23
    • Re: What's wrong with update-excuses?, Luk Claes, 2006/01/23
• Message not available
  • Re: What's wrong with update-excuses?, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/23

zlib1g/zlib1g-dev mismatch on caballero/sarti builders ?, Xavier Roche, 2006/01/23

• Re: zlib1g/zlib1g-dev mismatch on caballero/sarti builders ?, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/23

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/01/23

• Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin, Alexander Sack, 2006/01/23
  • Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/01/23
• Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/01/23

Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, David Nusinow, 2006/01/23

• Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Joey Hess, 2006/01/23
  • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, David Nusinow, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, David Nusinow, 2006/01/24
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Mike Hommey, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, David Nusinow, 2006/01/24
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Joey Hess, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Matthias Klose, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Joey Hess, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, David Nusinow, 2006/01/24
  • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Colin Watson, 2006/01/23
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, David Nusinow, 2006/01/24
• Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/24
• Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/23
  • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/23
• Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/23
  • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/24
    • Re: Pre-Depends for Xorg 7.0, David Nusinow, 2006/01/24

Meta pkgs in debian, Ed Sweetman, 2006/01/23

• Re: Meta pkgs in debian, Tino Keitel, 2006/01/23
• Message not available
  • Re: Meta pkgs in debian, Ed Sweetman, 2006/01/24

A great weekend for Debian, Joseph Smidt, 2006/01/23

• Re: A great weekend for Debian, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/01/23
  • Re: A great weekend for Debian, Amaya, 2006/01/23
    • Re: A great weekend for Debian, Kevin Mark, 2006/01/24
  • Re: A great weekend for Debian, Amaya, 2006/01/23
    • Re: A great weekend for Debian, Gustavo Franco, 2006/01/23
    • Re: A great weekend for Debian, Kevin Mark, 2006/01/24

Re: Bug#349424: ITP: xcftools -- command-line tools for extracting data for XCF files, Daniel Kobras, 2006/01/23

• Re: Bug#349424: ITP: xcftools -- command-line tools for extracting data for XCF files, Henning Makholm, 2006/01/30

yet another mass bug filing on GFDL issues ?, Holger Levsen, 2006/01/22

• Re: yet another mass bug filing on GFDL issues ?, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/01/22
  • Re: yet another mass bug filing on GFDL issues ?, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2006/01/22
• Re: yet another mass bug filing on GFDL issues ?, Ben Burton, 2006/01/23

Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin, Ron Johnson, 2006/01/21

• Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/22
  • Re: Bug#349064: ITP: flash-plugin -- installer for Macromedia Flash Plugin, Ron Johnson, 2006/01/22

Apache2 bugs status, Olaf van der Spek, 2006/01/21

• Re: Apache2 bugs status, Jeroen Massar, 2006/01/21
  • Message not available
    • Re: Apache2 bugs status, Jeroen Massar, 2006/01/21

Dangling alternatives symlink on the autobuilders, Rafael Laboissiere, 2006/01/21

• Re: Dangling alternatives symlink on the autobuilders, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/21

Implicition declarations of functions and bugs, Samuel Thibault, 2006/01/20

• Re: Implicition declarations of functions and bugs, Samuel Thibault, 2006/01/20
  • Re: Implicition declarations of functions and bugs, Kurt Roeckx, 2006/01/21
    • Re: Implicition declarations of functions and bugs, Samuel Thibault, 2006/01/21
    • Re: Implicition declarations of functions and bugs, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/21
• Re: Implicition declarations of functions and bugs, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/21
  • Re: Implicition declarations of functions and bugs, Steve Greenland, 2006/01/21
• Re: Implicition declarations of functions and bugs, Loïc Minier, 2006/01/21

Re: KD-Tree library, Jacob Bensabat, 2006/01/20

• Re: KD-Tree library, martin f krafft, 2006/01/20

Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Christopher Martin, 2006/01/20

• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Don Armstrong, 2006/01/20
  • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Christopher Martin, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Brian Nelson, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Brian Nelson, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Brian Nelson, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/20
• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/01/21
• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Brian Nelson, 2006/01/20
• Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/21
  • For those who care about the GR, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/21
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/01/22
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/01/22
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/22
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/23
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/01/23
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2006/01/22
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/22
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/01/23
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/22
    • Re: For those who care about the GR, Frank Küster, 2006/01/23

statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Kurt Pfeifle, 2006/01/19

• Re: statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/20
• Re: Re: statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Kurt Pfeifle, 2006/01/20
  • Re: Re: statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Cameron Patrick, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Re: statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/20
    • Re: statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Peter Palfrader, 2006/01/20
    • Re: statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Bernhard R. Link, 2006/01/20
    • Re: statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/01/21
• Re: Re: Re: statement from one of the klik project members [was: The klik project and Debian], Kurt Pfeifle, 2006/01/20
  • Re: klik, loop mounts, and insecurity [was: statement from one of the klik project members], Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/20
    • Re: klik, loop mounts, and insecurity [was: statement from one of the klik project members], Sam Morris, 2006/01/20
    • Re: klik, loop mounts, and insecurity [was: statement from one of the klik project members], Joey Hess, 2006/01/20
    • Re: klik, loop mounts, and insecurity [was: statement from one of the klik project members], Don Armstrong, 2006/01/20

Backports, Joseph Smidt, 2006/01/19

• Re: Backports, Norbert Tretkowski, 2006/01/19
  • Re: Backports, Adeodato Simó, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Backports, Norbert Tretkowski, 2006/01/19
  • Re: Backports, Andreas Schuldei, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Backports, Norbert Tretkowski, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Backports, Frank Küster, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Backports, Adeodato Simó, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Backports, Andreas Schuldei, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Backports, Norbert Tretkowski, 2006/01/20
• Re: Backports, Daniel Ruoso, 2006/01/19
• Re: Backports, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/01/21
  • Re: Backports, Joseph Smidt, 2006/01/21
    • Re: Backports, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/01/21
    • Re: Backports, Joseph Smidt, 2006/01/21
  • Re: Backports, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/21

Obsolete packages in Experimental, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/01/19

• Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Frank Lichtenheld, 2006/01/19
  • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/01/19
• Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/19
• Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Adam D. Barratt, 2006/01/19
  • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Paul Brossier, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/01/25
    • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Daniel Burrows, 2006/01/26
    • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Anthony DeRobertis, 2006/01/26
    • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Michal Politowski, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/01/25

binNMU version detection, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/19

• Re: binNMU version detection, Ken Bloom, 2006/01/19
  • Re: binNMU version detection, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/19
• Re: binNMU version detection, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/19
  • Re: binNMU version detection, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/23

Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/19

• Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field, John Hasler, 2006/01/19
• Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field, Henning Makholm, 2006/01/20
  • Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/20
    • Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
  • Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/21
    • Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field, Martin Meredith, 2006/01/21
    • Re: Derived distributions and the Maintainer: field, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/01/22

The klik project and Debian, anonymous, 2006/01/19

• Re: The klik project and Debian, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/19
  • Re: The klik project and Debian, Romain Beauxis, 2006/01/19
    • Re: The klik project and Debian, Romain Beauxis, 2006/01/19
    • Re: The klik project and Debian, Isaac Clerencia, 2006/01/19
• Re: The klik project and Debian, Frank Küster, 2006/01/19
  • Re: The klik project and Debian, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/01/19
  • Re: The klik project and Debian, Adam Heath, 2006/01/19
• Re: The klik project and Debian, Kurt Pfeifle, 2006/01/19

Website Link Request, AJIT, 2006/01/19

• Website Link Request, AJIT, 2006/01/19

Re: Bug#348728: ITP: php-net-imap -- PHP PEAR module implementing IMAP protocol, Steffen Joeris, 2006/01/18

• Re: Bug#348728: ITP: php-net-imap -- PHP PEAR module implementing IMAP protocol, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/01/19
  • Re: Bug#348728: ITP: php-net-imap -- PHP PEAR module implementing IMAP protocol, Charles Fry, 2006/01/19

make-kpkg fails, Bug?, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche, 2006/01/18

• Re: make-kpkg fails, Bug?, Adam Heath, 2006/01/18
  • Re: make-kpkg fails, Bug?, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche, 2006/01/19
    • Re: make-kpkg fails, Bug?, Adam Heath, 2006/01/19
    • Re: make-kpkg fails, Bug?, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche, 2006/01/19

Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/18

• Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce, Dave Holland, 2006/01/18
• Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/01/18
  • Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce, Michael Poole, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce, Erinn Clark, 2006/01/18
    • Message not available
    • Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce, Erinn Clark, 2006/01/18
• Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/01/19

udev naming problems for eth*, Davide Natalini, 2006/01/18

• Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 2006/01/18
  • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, martin f krafft, 2006/01/18
    • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 2006/01/18
  • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/18
• Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/18
• Message not available
  • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Davide Natalini, 2006/01/19
    • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/19
    • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Arjan Oosting, 2006/01/19
• Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Thomas Hood, 2006/01/18
  • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/18
• Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Thomas Hood, 2006/01/18
• Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Davide Natalini, 2006/01/19
  • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/19
    • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 2006/01/19
    • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/19
    • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 2006/01/19
    • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Hamish Moffatt, 2006/01/19
    • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/19
• Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Davide Natalini, 2006/01/19
  • Re: udev naming problems for eth*, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/19

unsubscribe, Jeffrin, 2006/01/18

• Unsubscribe, mtcwlagw, 2006/01/27

Re: Ironies abound (was Re: GPL v3 draft), Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/18

• Re: Ironies abound (was Re: GPL v3 draft), Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/18
• Re: Ironies abound (was Re: GPL v3 draft), Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/18

How to determine complete reverse dependencies?, Pádraig Brady, 2006/01/17

• Re: How to determine complete reverse dependencies?, Andreas Metzler, 2006/01/17

Survey on Debian contributors, Niklas Vainio, 2006/01/17

• Re: Survey on Debian contributors, Thomas Weber, 2006/01/17

Reset of limits with su / new session, Reuti, 2006/01/17

• Re: Reset of limits with su / new session, Loïc Minier, 2006/01/29

when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Eric Cooper, 2006/01/17

• Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/17
  • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Adam Borowski, 2006/01/17
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Michael Banck, 2006/01/17
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Adam Borowski, 2006/01/17
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/17
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/17
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matthias Klose, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Hood, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Colin Watson, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Joey Hess, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Martin Michlmayr, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, David Nusinow, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, David Nusinow, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, David Nusinow, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/23
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/26
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, David Nusinow, 2006/01/27
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/27
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/27
    • [OT] Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Adam Heath, 2006/01/27
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Robert Collins, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Eduard Bloch, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Henning Makholm, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Lars Wirzenius, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Stephen Gran, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Eduard Bloch, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/29
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias, 2006/01/30
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Ron Johnson, 2006/01/30
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Martin Michlmayr, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Kevin Mark, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Joey Hess, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Jon Dowland, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Florian Weimer, 2006/01/27
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/27
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matthias Klose, 2006/01/28
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Joey Hess, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Agustin Martin, 2006/01/21
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matthias Klose, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matthias Klose, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Andreas Schuldei, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Bernhard R. Link, 2006/01/20
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/17
    • kernel size (was: Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?), Miles Bader, 2006/01/18
    • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Michelle Konzack, 2006/01/24
  • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matthias Klose, 2006/01/17
• Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Hood, 2006/01/18
• Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Hood, 2006/01/20
  • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/20
  • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Frank Küster, 2006/01/20
  • Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Eduard Bloch, 2006/01/21
• Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?, Thomas Hood, 2006/01/23

new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, A Mennucc, 2006/01/16

• Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Eric Dorland, 2006/01/17
• Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Paul TBBle Hampson, 2006/01/17
• Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Vedran Furač, 2006/01/17
• Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/19
  • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/01/19
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/19
• Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/19
  • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Christian Marillat, 2006/01/20
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/01/20
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Christian Marillat, 2006/01/20
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/01/20
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Ron Johnson, 2006/01/20
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/20
• Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/19
  • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/01/19
  • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Marco d'Itri, 2006/01/20
  • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/20
  • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/20
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/20
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/21
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Andrew Pollock, 2006/01/21
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/21
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, John Hasler, 2006/01/21
    • Re: new mplayer 1.0pre7try2 package, Andreas Schuldei, 2006/01/21

gerris FTBFS bug has not been fixed for 300 days, kamaraju kusumanchi, 2006/01/16

• Re: gerris FTBFS bug has not been fixed for 300 days, David Nusinow, 2006/01/16
  • Re: gerris FTBFS bug has not been fixed for 300 days, David Nusinow, 2006/01/16
  • Re: gerris FTBFS bug has not been fixed for 300 days, kamaraju kusumanchi, 2006/01/17

Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Mike Hommey, 2006/01/16

• Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Eric Dorland, 2006/01/16
• Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/16
  • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Mike Hommey, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Mike Hommey, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Mike Hommey, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Riku Voipio, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Per Olofsson, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Does it sometimes happen that people send mails before NMU ?, Adeodato Simó, 2006/01/17

making more packages binary NMU safe, Ken Bloom, 2006/01/16

• Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/16
  • Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Ken Bloom, 2006/01/16
    • Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Ken Bloom, 2006/01/17
    • Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Michael Banck, 2006/01/17
• Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Adam M., 2006/01/17
  • Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/17
  • Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/17
    • Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/01/17
    • Re: making more packages binary NMU safe, Ken Bloom, 2006/01/18

Emphasize teams, not packages, Frans Jessop, 2006/01/15

• Re: Emphasize teams, not packages, Bastian Venthur, 2006/01/15
• Re: Emphasize teams, not packages, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/16
• Re: Emphasize teams, not packages, Jérôme Warnier, 2006/01/17
  • Re: Emphasize teams, not packages, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/01/21
• Re: Emphasize teams, not packages, Thaddeus H. Black, 2006/01/22
• Re: Emphasize teams, not packages, John Gee, 2006/01/16
  • Re: Backports, John Gee, 2006/01/20

Andrew Suffield, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/01/15

• Re: Andrew Suffield, sean finney, 2006/01/15
  • Re: Andrew Suffield, Joe Wreschnig, 2006/01/16
    • Re: Andrew Suffield, Dallam Wych, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Andrew Suffield, Gustavo Franco, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Andrew Suffield, Dallam Wych, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Andrew Suffield, Gustavo Franco, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Andrew Suffield, Dallam Wych, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Andrew Suffield, Robert Collins, 2006/01/19
• Re: Andrew Suffield, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/01/15

Apology for MIA, Retiring, RFA: x-symbol, xmix, oneko, Steve Dunham, 2006/01/15

• Re: Apology for MIA, Retiring, RFA: x-symbol, xmix, oneko, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/01/15
• Re: Apology for MIA, Retiring, RFA: x-symbol, xmix, oneko, Steve McIntyre, 2006/01/15
  • Re: Apology for MIA, Retiring, RFA: x-symbol, xmix, oneko, Steve Dunham, 2006/01/15
• Re: Apology for MIA, Retiring, RFA: x-symbol, xmix, oneko, Joey Hess, 2006/01/15
• Re: Apology for MIA, Retiring, RFA: x-symbol, xmix, oneko, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/01/19

Re: For those who care about lesbians, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2006/01/14

• Re: For those who care about lesbians, Amaya, 2006/01/14
  • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Gustavo Franco, 2006/01/14
• Re: For those who care about lesbians, Roger Leigh, 2006/01/14
  • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Mike Bird, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Roger Leigh, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Roger Leigh, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Sven Mueller, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Brett Parker, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Brett Parker, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Wesley J. Landaker, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Decklin Foster, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Russ Allbery, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/01/15
  • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Christoph Haas, 2006/01/15
• Re: For those who care about lesbians, Adam Heath, 2006/01/15
  • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Frans Pop, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about lesbians, Adrian von Bidder, 2006/01/15

For those who care about Andrew Suffield, Andreas Tille, 2006/01/14

• Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/14
  • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Sami Haahtinen, 2006/01/14
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/14
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Willi Mann, 2006/01/14
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Jesus Climent, 2006/01/15
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Willi Mann, 2006/01/15
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Sami Haahtinen, 2006/01/14
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Russ Allbery, 2006/01/14
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Gerfried Fuchs, 2006/01/15
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Sami Haahtinen, 2006/01/15
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Adrian von Bidder, 2006/01/15
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Michael Meskes, 2006/01/15
    • Better communication between projects [Was: ad-hominem construct deleted], Sami Haahtinen, 2006/01/15
    • Re: Better communication between projects [Was: ad-hominem construct deleted], Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/15
    • Re: Better communication between projects, Roger Leigh, 2006/01/15
    • Re: Better communication between projects, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/01/15
    • Re: Better communication between projects, Sami Haahtinen, 2006/01/15
    • Re: Better communication between projects, Michael Meskes, 2006/01/15
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Gerfried Fuchs, 2006/01/16
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/17
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Joey Hess, 2006/01/17
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Robert Collins, 2006/01/17
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/01/17
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], John Hasler, 2006/01/17
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], John Hasler, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], martin f krafft, 2006/01/17
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Gerfried Fuchs, 2006/01/17
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/17
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Gerfried Fuchs, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Gerfried Fuchs, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Anthony Towns, 2006/01/19
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Kevin Mark, 2006/01/19
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Riku Voipio, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Isaac Clerencia, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis), 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Colin Watson, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis), 2006/01/19
  • Re: [ad-hominem construct deleted], Martin Langhoff, 2006/01/16

pbuilder testsuite support (Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing), Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/14

• A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine., Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/19
  • Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine., Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/01/21
    • Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine., Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/22
    • Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine., Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/24
    • Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine., Loïc Minier, 2006/01/24
    • Re: [Pbuilder-maint] Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine., Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/25

Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/01/13

• Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/14
  • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Christian Perrier, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, David Nusinow, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/15
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/16
  • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Andrew Suffield, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Alexander Schmehl, 2006/01/14
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/01/15
• Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Florian Weimer, 2006/01/14
  • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/14
• Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Joey Hess, 2006/01/15
  • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/01/16
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/16
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Joey Hess, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Mike Hommey, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, David Weinehall, 2006/01/17
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, David Nusinow, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Stephen Frost, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/18
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Adam Heath, 2006/01/17
    • Message not available
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Josselin Mouette, 2006/01/18
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Stephen Frost, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Marc Haber, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Bill Allombert, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Hamish Moffatt, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Anthony Towns, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Kevin B. McCarty, 2006/01/18
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Ian Murdock, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Matthew Garrett, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Christian Perrier, 2006/01/19
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Otavio Salvador, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Andreas Tille, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Otavio Salvador, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Andreas Tille, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Otavio Salvador, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Andreas Tille, 2006/01/18
    • Re: Debian derivatives and the Maintainer: field (again), Jonas Smedegaard, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Steffen Moeller, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, JanC, 2006/01/20
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matthew Palmer, 2006/01/20
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Mike Bird, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Mike Bird, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Reinhard Tartler, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Brian Nelson, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, John Hasler, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Peter Samuelson, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Steve Langasek, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Christian Perrier, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Raphael Hertzog, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Miles Bader, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/20
    • Derivatives and the Version: field (Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu), Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: Derivatives and the Version: field (Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/20
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Bill Allombert, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Matt Zimmerman, 2006/01/19
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/01/20
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Peter Mathiasson, 2006/01/18
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Adam Heath, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Joey Hess, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Joey Hess, 2006/01/17
    • Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu, Joey Hess, 2006/01/17

Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2006/01/13

• Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Anthony Towns, 2006/01/13
  • Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Andreas Schuldei, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Andreas Tille, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/14
    • Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/15
    • Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Andreas Barth, 2006/01/15
    • Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/15

Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Anthony Towns, 2006/01/13

• Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/13
  • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/13
  • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Geert Uytterhoeven, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Graham Wilson, 2006/01/13
  • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Anthony Towns, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Anthony Towns, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Daniel Widenfalk, 2006/01/14
    • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Wouter Verhelst, 2006/01/15
  • Re: Preparing the m68k port for the future., Zack Weinberg, 2006/01/15

packages.debian.org service stop ?, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/13

• Re: packages.debian.org service stop ?, Adam D. Barratt, 2006/01/13
  • Re: packages.debian.org service stop ?, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/14

Debian Games Team, Miriam Ruiz, 2006/01/13

• Re: Debian Games Team, Eddy Petrişor, 2006/01/13
  • Re: Debian Games Team, Isaac Clerencia, 2006/01/13
  • Re: Debian Games Team, Miriam Ruiz, 2006/01/13
    • Message not available
    • Re: Debian Games Team, Martin Meredith, 2006/01/13
• Re: Debian Games Team, Andreas Tille, 2006/01/13
  • Re: Debian Games Team, Ben Armstrong, 2006/01/13
• Re: Debian Games Team, Brian Powell, 2006/01/13
• Re: Debian Games Team, Luk Claes, 2006/01/13
• Re: Debian Games Team, Enrico Zini, 2006/01/14

Re: initramfs-tools backport?, Norbert Tretkowski, 2006/01/12

• Re: initramfs-tools backport?, Joerg Platte, 2006/01/13

pbuilder: cowdancer/cowbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/12

• Re: pbuilder: cowdancer/cowbuilder status update, Robert Collins, 2006/01/13
  • Re: pbuilder: cowdancer/cowbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/13
    • Re: pbuilder: cowdancer/cowbuilder status update, Robert Collins, 2006/01/13
    • Re: pbuilder: cowdancer/cowbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/13
    • Re: pbuilder: cowdancer/cowbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 2006/01/14

Re: HPPA, Arm, or M68k with g++ >= 4:4.0.2-2 ?, Ionut Georgescu, 2006/01/12

• Re: HPPA, Arm, or M68k with g++ >= 4:4.0.2-2 ?, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/01/13

Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Charles Plessy, 2006/01/12

• Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Steinar H. Gunderson, 2006/01/12
  • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Luk Claes, 2006/01/12
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Anthony Towns, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Charles Plessy, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Anthony Towns, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Anthony Towns, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Daniel Burrows, 2006/01/15
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Luk Claes, 2006/01/13
  • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Bill Allombert, 2006/01/12
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Jesus Climent, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable), Luk Claes, 2006/01/13
    • Re: Trivial