long long support on all archs?, Ondrej Sury, 2005/08/30

• Re: long long support on all archs?, Richard Atterer, 2005/08/30
  • Re: long long support on all archs?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/30

info tourisme Mailing List Confirmation, info tourisme, 2005/08/29

• info tourisme Mailing List Confirmation, info tourisme, 2005/08/29

Re: Accepted fam 2.7.0-8 (source i386), Chuan-kai Lin, 2005/08/29

• Re: Accepted fam 2.7.0-8 (source i386), Chuan-kai Lin, 2005/08/29

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/29

• Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Simon Josefsson, 2005/08/30
  • Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, J. Bruce Fields, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Simon Josefsson, 2005/08/30
  • Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Simon Josefsson, 2005/08/30

Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/29

• Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 2005/08/29
  • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Anthony Towns, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/30
  • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Frans Pop, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Mark Brown, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Frans Pop, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Mark Brown, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Anthony Towns, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Frans Pop, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/30

Re: Any reason why libmotif3 vanished for Sparc, Andreas Metzler, 2005/08/29

• Re: Any reason why libmotif3 vanished for Sparc, Andreas Tille, 2005/08/30
  • Re: Any reason why libmotif3 vanished for Sparc, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Any reason why libmotif3 vanished for Sparc, Andreas Tille, 2005/08/30

incoming, Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/08/29

• Re: incoming, Nico Golde, 2005/08/29
  • Re: incoming, Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/08/29
• Re: incoming, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/29
  • Re: incoming, martin f krafft, 2005/08/29
• Re: incoming, Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/08/29
  • Re: incoming, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/29

Additional binary package generated by a source package: how to handle this ?, Xavier Roche, 2005/08/28

• Re: Additional binary package generated by a source package: how to handle this ?, Adam Heath, 2005/08/29
• Re: Additional binary package generated by a source package: how to handle this ?, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/29

Re: Bug#325371: ITP: binfmtc -- a binfmt_misc hook for running C programs as scripts, Wouter van Heyst, 2005/08/28

• Re: Bug#325371: ITP: binfmtc -- a binfmt_misc hook for running C programs as scripts, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/08/28
  • Re: Bug#325371: ITP: binfmtc -- a binfmt_misc hook for running C programs as scripts, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/08/30

a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 2005/08/27

• Re: a place for a package directory in root, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/27
  • Re: a place for a package directory in root, martin f krafft, 2005/08/27
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 2005/08/28
  • Re: a place for a package directory in root, sean finney, 2005/08/28
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 2005/08/28
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/28
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/28
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/28
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 2005/08/29
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/29
    • Message not available
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Adeodato Simó, 2005/08/30
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/28
    • Message not available
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/29
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 2005/08/30
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/30
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Jim Crilly, 2005/08/29
  • Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 2005/08/28

get-orig-source target in debian/rules, George Danchev, 2005/08/26

• Re: get-orig-source target in debian/rules, George Danchev, 2005/08/26

Help in gcc-4.0.x transition issue, Andreas Tille, 2005/08/26

• Re: Help in gcc-4.0.x transition issue, "Martin v. Löwis", 2005/08/27
  • Re: Help in gcc-4.0.x transition issue, Andreas Tille, 2005/08/27

Making .deb packages, jdgamble, 2005/08/26

• Re: Making .deb packages, The Fungi, 2005/08/26
  • Re: Making .deb packages, jdgamble, 2005/08/26
    • Re: Making .deb packages, Bryan Donlan, 2005/08/26
• Re: Making .deb packages, Michael Spang, 2005/08/26

Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Thiemo Seufer, 2005/08/25

• Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Kurt Roeckx, 2005/08/25
  • Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Bastian Blank, 2005/08/25
  • Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Stephane Chauveau, 2005/08/26
    • Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Kurt Roeckx, 2005/08/26
• Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Stephane Chauveau, 2005/08/26
  • Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Thiemo Seufer, 2005/08/26
    • Re: Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Stephane Chauveau, 2005/08/26
    • Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Thiemo Seufer, 2005/08/26
    • Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Kurt Roeckx, 2005/08/26

Gaim & TLS, Maykel Moya, 2005/08/25

• Re: Gaim & TLS, Nathan Poznick, 2005/08/25

making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 2005/08/25

• Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Oliver Elphick, 2005/08/25
  • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, W. Borgert, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/26
• Re: making developer location from ldap public?, W. Borgert, 2005/08/25
  • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/25
  • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Jesus Climent, 2005/08/25
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Theodore Ts'o, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Jesus Climent, 2005/08/27
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/08/27
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/28
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ron Johnson, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ron Johnson, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ron Johnson, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 2005/08/26
• Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/26
  • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/26
  • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ron Johnson, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 2005/08/26
  • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, W. Borgert, 2005/08/26
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/28
    • Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/28

Xvidcap, mplayer and rte (was Re: Fun with the NEW queue), Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/25

• Re: Xvidcap, mplayer and rte (was Re: Fun with the NEW queue), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/25
• Re: Xvidcap, mplayer and rte (was Re: Fun with the NEW queue), Joerg Jaspert, 2005/08/25

Re: Fun with the NEW queue, Martin Wuertele, 2005/08/25

• Re: Fun with the NEW queue, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/25

Closing bugs in BTS, Grzegorz Bizon, 2005/08/25

• Re: Closing bugs in BTS, martin f krafft, 2005/08/25
  • Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Grzegorz Bizon, 2005/08/25
  • Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Frans Pop, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Closing bugs in BTS, martin f krafft, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Adeodato Simó, 2005/08/25
  • Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/25
• Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/08/25
• Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Blars Blarson, 2005/08/25

removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/24

• Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, martin f krafft, 2005/08/24
  • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/24
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, martin f krafft, 2005/08/24
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Horms, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Matt Taggart, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Horms, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Frans Pop, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/25
    • Message not available
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Horms, 2005/08/26
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Thiemo Seufer, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/27
  • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Gabor Gombas, 2005/08/24
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, martin f krafft, 2005/08/24
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, David Weinehall, 2005/08/25
• Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Julien BLACHE, 2005/08/24
  • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Gabor Gombas, 2005/08/24
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Jon Dowland, 2005/08/25
  • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/25
    • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Al Viro, 2005/08/25
• Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Nathanael Nerode, 2005/08/25
  • Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/25

better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 2005/08/24

• Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2005/08/24
• Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Ondrej Sury, 2005/08/24
• Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Miquel van Smoorenburg, 2005/08/24
  • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Peter Palfrader, 2005/08/24
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Andrew Porter, 2005/08/24
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, sean finney, 2005/08/24
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Mauro Calderara, 2005/08/24
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, sean finney, 2005/08/24
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Mauro Calderara, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Andrew Porter, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Andrew Porter, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 2005/08/26
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, David Weinehall, 2005/08/26
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/28
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, sean finney, 2005/08/25
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
  • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/08/26
    • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, David Weinehall, 2005/08/27
• Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, sean finney, 2005/08/24
• Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/24
• Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
  • Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 2005/08/26
• Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Humberto Massa Guimarães, 2005/08/24

Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Domenico Andreoli, 2005/08/24

• Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/24
  • Re: Bug#318590: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Domenico Andreoli, 2005/08/24
• Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Paul TBBle Hampson, 2005/08/25
  • Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/25
• Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/25

invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Shaun Jackman, 2005/08/24

• Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, martin f krafft, 2005/08/24
  • Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Shaun Jackman, 2005/08/24
    • Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Pierre Habouzit, 2005/08/24
    • Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, martin f krafft, 2005/08/24
• Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/24
• Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Tollef Fog Heen, 2005/08/24
  • Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Shaun Jackman, 2005/08/24
    • Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/25

Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/23

• Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23
  • Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Otavio Salvador, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23

Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Ondrej Sury, 2005/08/23

• Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Laurent Fousse, 2005/08/23
• Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Steinar H. Gunderson, 2005/08/23
  • Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Neil Schemenauer, 2005/08/24
• Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Oliver Korff, 2005/08/23

update of (several) config files, Tomas Davidek, 2005/08/23

• Re: update of (several) config files, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23
• Re: update of (several) config files, W. Borgert, 2005/08/23

Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Edward, 2005/08/23

• Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Ondrej Sury, 2005/08/23
• Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Gerrit Pape, 2005/08/23
  • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/08/23
  • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/08/23
  • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Brian May, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/25
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Fabio Tranchitella, 2005/08/29
    • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, John Hasler, 2005/08/29
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, sean finney, 2005/08/29
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • unsubscribe, Martin Kelly, 2005/08/29
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2005/08/29
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Brian May, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen, 2005/08/30
    • Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Daniel Burrows, 2005/08/30

WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, W. Borgert, 2005/08/23

• Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Frans Pop, 2005/08/23
  • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, W. Borgert, 2005/08/23
    • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Frans Pop, 2005/08/23
    • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, W. Borgert, 2005/08/23
    • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Christian Perrier, 2005/08/24
    • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, W. Borgert, 2005/08/24
  • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Bastian Blank, 2005/08/23
  • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Frans Pop, 2005/08/23
    • Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, "Martin v. Löwis", 2005/08/24
• Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Bryan Donlan, 2005/08/25

More pbuilder use!, Nathanael Nerode, 2005/08/23

• Re: More pbuilder use!, Joe Smith, 2005/08/23
  • Re: More pbuilder use!, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
  • Re: More pbuilder use!, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/23
  • Re: More pbuilder use!, John Hasler, 2005/08/23
  • Re: More pbuilder use!, Bastian Blank, 2005/08/23
  • Re: More pbuilder use!, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/25
• Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
• Re: More pbuilder use!, Humberto Massa Guimarães, 2005/08/23
  • Re: More pbuilder use!, Bastian Blank, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Piotr Roszatycki, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Bastian Blank, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
• Re: More pbuilder use!, Humberto Massa Guimarães, 2005/08/23
  • Re: More pbuilder use!, Paul TBBle Hampson, 2005/08/23
    • Re: More pbuilder use!, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/08/30

How coldplug works, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/23

• Re: How coldplug works, Joe Smith, 2005/08/23
  • Re: How coldplug works, Isaac Clerencia, 2005/08/23
    • Re: How coldplug works, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/23
    • Re: How coldplug works, Isaac Clerencia, 2005/08/23
    • Re: How coldplug works, Luca Capello, 2005/08/23
    • Re: How coldplug works, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/23
    • Re: How coldplug works, Isaac Clerencia, 2005/08/23

pvcreate on loopback file with lvm2, pavel.orehov@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/22

• Re: pvcreate on loopback file with lvm2, Simon Richter, 2005/08/22
• Re: pvcreate on loopback file with lvm2, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
  • Message not available
    • Re: pvcreate on loopback file with lvm2, pavel.orehov@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/23

Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, pavel.orehov@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/22

• Re: Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
  • Message not available
    • Re: Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, pavel.orehov@xxxxxxxxx, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, Matt Zimmerman, 2005/08/23
    • Message not available
    • Re: Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, Pavel Orehov, 2005/08/23

"block" feature description, Stefano Zacchiroli, 2005/08/22

• Re: "block" feature description, Christoph Berg, 2005/08/22

Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Jochens, 2005/08/22

• Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Jochens, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/08/22
• Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, John Hasler, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Peter Samuelson, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Joe Smith, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Pierre Habouzit, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Joe Smith, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/23
  • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/25
• Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
  • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
• Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/24

[PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/22

• Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/22
• how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/22
  • Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/22
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/22
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/22
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/22
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/24
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/24
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/24
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/24
  • Re: how to fully replace another package, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: how to fully replace another package, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/08/23
• Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/22
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/22
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/22
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Marc Haber, 2005/08/22
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/22
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Tollef Fog Heen, 2005/08/24
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/24
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Jon Dowland, 2005/08/24
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Tollef Fog Heen, 2005/08/25
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Steve Langasek, 2005/08/25
    • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Marc Haber, 2005/08/24
• Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Marcelo E. Magallon, 2005/08/22
  • Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/22

Re: version numbering, Robert Collins, 2005/08/22

• Re: version numbering, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
• Re: version numbering, Bob Proulx, 2005/08/22
  • Re: version numbering, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/22
    • Re: version numbering, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/22
    • Re: version numbering, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/08/22
    • Re: version numbering, David Nusinow, 2005/08/22
    • Re: version numbering, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
• version numbering, Neil Roeth, 2005/08/22

Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/22

• Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal), Mark Brown, 2005/08/22
• Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal), David Nusinow, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal), Emanuele Rocca, 2005/08/23
• Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23

vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/21

• Re: vancouver revisited, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/21
  • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/21
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Mark Brown, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter Samuelson, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Pierre Habouzit, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Joe Smith, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Bernd Eckenfels, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Blars Blarson, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/23
  • Re: vancouver revisited, Riku Voipio, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Riku Voipio, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Joey Hess, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Riku Voipio, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Joey Hess, 2005/08/26
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Joey Hess, 2005/08/26
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/26
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Adam Heath, 2005/08/26
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/08/23
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Alastair McKinstry, 2005/08/24
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/08/24
• Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/22
  • Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/08/22
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/08/23
  • Re: vancouver revisited, Sven Luther, 2005/08/24
    • Re: vancouver revisited, Michael Banck, 2005/08/24

Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Jonas Smedegaard, 2005/08/21

• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Bas Zoetekouw, 2005/08/21
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Joe Wreschnig, 2005/08/21
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Aurelien Jarno, 2005/08/21
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Laszlo Boszormenyi, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Jon Dowland, 2005/08/22
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, David Weinehall, 2005/08/21
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/21
• Be sure you pack your bags yourself (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 2005/08/21
  • Re: Be sure you pack your bags yourself (was: Results of the meeting...), Laszlo Boszormenyi, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Be sure you pack your bags yourself, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/22
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Richard Atterer, 2005/08/21
  • Sponsoring procedures, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Sponsoring procedures, Adam Heath, 2005/08/22
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/08/21
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Jonas Smedegaard, 2005/08/22
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Otavio Salvador, 2005/08/22
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Sven Luther, 2005/08/22
  • Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Matthew Palmer, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Steve Langasek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Stephen Frost, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Stephen Frost, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only, W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Hamish Moffatt, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Adrian von Bidder, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Hamish Moffatt, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Bernd Eckenfels, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Tomas Fasth, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Martin Pitt, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Tomas Fasth, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Marc Haber, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Using buildds only, Martin Pitt, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Using buildds only, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Using buildds only, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Using buildds only, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Using buildds only, Michael Spang, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Using buildds only, Martin Pitt, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Using buildds only, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/25
    • Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Mark Brown, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Using buildds only, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Jonas Smedegaard, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Aurelien Jarno, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Sven Luther, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Gunnar Wolf, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Sven Luther, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Adeodato Simó, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Martin Pitt, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Adeodato Simó, 2005/08/24
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Gunnar Wolf, 2005/08/22
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Tollef Fog Heen, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Michael Banck, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/24
    • Message not available
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, W. Borgert, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Tollef Fog Heen, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Roger Leigh, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, David Nusinow, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/23
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Ingo Juergensmann, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Jochens, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Marc Haber, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, W. Borgert, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Marc Haber, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Anthony Towns, 2005/08/24
    • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Peter Samuelson, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/22
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Mario Fux, 2005/08/22
• Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Walter Landry, 2005/08/23
• Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, GOTO Masanori, 2005/08/24
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/24
  • Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/24

Re: Bug#324296: ITP: ldapscripts -- Add and remove user and groups stored (using ldap), Pierre Habouzit, 2005/08/21

• Re: Bug#324296: ITP: ldapscripts -- Add and remove user and groups stored (using ldap), Roberto C. Sanchez, 2005/08/22
  • Re: Bug#324296: ITP: ldapscripts -- Add and remove user and groups stored (using ldap), W. Borgert, 2005/08/22

Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, martin f krafft, 2005/08/20

• Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Joe Smith, 2005/08/20
  • Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Jon Dowland, 2005/08/22
• Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Joe Smith, 2005/08/20
  • Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, martin f krafft, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Joe Smith, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Wouter van Heyst, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Tristan Seligmann, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Paul TBBle Hampson, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Marcelo E. Magallon, 2005/08/22

Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/20

• Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/26
  • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Raphael Hertzog, 2005/08/27
  • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Christian Perrier, 2005/08/27
    • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/27
    • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/08/27
    • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/27
    • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/08/27
    • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/27
    • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/08/27
    • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/27
    • Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/08/28

Re: pbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/08/20

• Re: pbuilder status update, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/20
• Re: pbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/08/21
  • Re: pbuilder status update, Anibal Monsalve Salazar, 2005/08/21

Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, Jon Dowland, 2005/08/19

• Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, martin f krafft, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, W. Borgert, 2005/08/19
    • Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, martin f krafft, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, W. Borgert, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, martin f krafft, 2005/08/20

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Piotr Roszatycki, 2005/08/19

• Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Piotr Roszatycki, 2005/08/19
    • Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2005/08/19
    • Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Julien BLACHE, 2005/08/19
    • Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Tollef Fog Heen, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Mark Brown, 2005/08/21
• Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Jon Dowland, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Pierre Habouzit, 2005/08/19
• Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/19

Re: Czech translation of po-debconf templates completed, Pascal Hakim, 2005/08/19

• Re: Czech translation of po-debconf templates completed, Christian Perrier, 2005/08/22

Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Adeodato Simó, 2005/08/19

• Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, martin f krafft, 2005/08/19
  • arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Marc Haber, 2005/08/19
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), martin f krafft, 2005/08/19
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Daniel Stone, 2005/08/19
    • OT: Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Adam Heath, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Amaya, 2005/08/22
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Roberto C. Sanchez, 2005/08/19
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Roland Mas, 2005/08/19
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Joey Hess, 2005/08/19
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, martin f krafft, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Adam Heath, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Roland Mas, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Tollef Fog Heen, 2005/08/21
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Peter Samuelson, 2005/08/22
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Tollef Fog Heen, 2005/08/24
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Steinar H. Gunderson, 2005/08/19
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), martin f krafft, 2005/08/19
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Miles Bader, 2005/08/30
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/19
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, martin f krafft, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, martin f krafft, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Robert Collins, 2005/08/22
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Christoph Hellwig, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Christoph Hellwig, 2005/08/21
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/21
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Matthew Palmer, 2005/08/21
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/20
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Christoph Hellwig, 2005/08/21
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/21
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Martin Langhoff, 2005/08/30
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, martin f krafft, 2005/08/30
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, George Danchev, 2005/08/30
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Francesco P. Lovergine, 2005/08/24
    • Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/24
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Martin Langhoff, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Matthew Palmer, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, David Weinehall, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Martin Langhoff, 2005/08/22
• Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Pierre Habouzit, 2005/08/19
• Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/19
• Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Alec Berryman, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Michael Poole, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Jaakko Niemi, 2005/08/19
• Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Stefan Hornburg, 2005/08/19
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Andreas Metzler, 2005/08/19
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Russ Allbery, 2005/08/19
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Romain Francoise, 2005/08/19
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Peter Samuelson, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Roland Mas, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Florian Weimer, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, martin f krafft, 2005/08/21
• Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Norbert Tretkowski, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/20
• Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/20
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Ron Johnson, 2005/08/21
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Daniel Burrows, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Matthew Palmer, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/23
  • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation withspecial emphasis in security, Gunnar Wolf, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation withspecial emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/08/23
    • Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation withspecialemphasis in security, Gunnar Wolf, 2005/08/23

Re: order of builds on a buildd: icu (optional/libs), Adeodato Simó, 2005/08/19

• Re: order of builds on a buildd: icu (optional/libs), Kurt Roeckx, 2005/08/19

Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, wnpp, 2005/08/19

• Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2005/08/19
  • Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas, 2005/08/20
  • Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/20
    • Mindterm, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Mindterm, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Mindterm, Radu Spineanu, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Mindterm, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2005/08/21
    • Re: Mindterm, Andrew Suffield, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Mindterm, Benjamin Seidenberg, 2005/08/22
    • Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Jaldhar H. Vyas, 2005/08/20
    • Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Thomas Viehmann, 2005/08/20

package tracking system issues, Jay Berkenbilt, 2005/08/12

• Re: package tracking system issues, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/08/12

runlevels remodeled, Timo Aaltonen, 2005/08/12

• Re: runlevels remodeled, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/12
• Re: runlevels remodeled, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/12
  • Re: runlevels remodeled, John Hasler, 2005/08/12
• Re: runlevels remodeled, Simon Richter, 2005/08/12
  • Re: runlevels remodeled, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/12
    • Re: runlevels remodeled, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/08/12
• Re: runlevels remodeled, W. Borgert, 2005/08/12
• Re: runlevels remodeled, John Hasler, 2005/08/12
• Re: runlevels remodeled, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/08/12

remove ruby1.6, akira yamada / やまだあきら, 2005/08/12

• Re: remove ruby1.6, Nico Golde, 2005/08/12
  • Re: remove ruby1.6, akira yamada / やまだあきら, 2005/08/12

bashisms in init scripts, Piotr Roszatycki, 2005/08/12

• Re: bashisms in init scripts, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/12
  • Re: bashisms in init scripts, Piotr Roszatycki, 2005/08/12
• Re: bashisms in init scripts, Frans Pop, 2005/08/12

RFH: libs11n (serialisation for C++), martin f krafft, 2005/08/12

• Re: RFH: libs11n (serialisation for C++), Isaac Clerencia, 2005/08/12
  • Re: RFH: libs11n (serialisation for C++), martin f krafft, 2005/08/12

alioth down ?, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/08/12

• Re: alioth down ?, Neil McGovern, 2005/08/12

libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome, Mike Hommey, 2005/08/11

• Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome, Graham Wilson, 2005/08/11
  • Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome, Mike Hommey, 2005/08/11
• Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/12

what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, kamaraju kusumanchi, 2005/08/11

• Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/11
  • Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/08/11
• Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Steve Langasek, 2005/08/12
• Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Adeodato Simó, 2005/08/12
• Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Andreas Barth, 2005/08/12

libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Piotr Roszatycki, 2005/08/11

• Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Tim Dijkstra, 2005/08/11
  • Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Piotr Roszatycki, 2005/08/12
    • Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Tim Dijkstra, 2005/08/12
• Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/08/12
  • Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/08/12
    • Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/08/12
  • Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/08/12

shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Sebastian Kuzminsky, 2005/08/11

• Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Thiemo Seufer, 2005/08/11
• Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Qingning Huo, 2005/08/11
  • Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Sebastian Kuzminsky, 2005/08/11
    • Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/12
• Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Marco d'Itri, 2005/08/11
  • Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/08/11
    • Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Sebastian Kuzminsky, 2005/08/11
    • Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, W. Borgert, 2005/08/11
    • Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Henning Makholm, 2005/08/11
    • Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, W. Borgert, 2005/08/11