linux.debian.devel (date)

linux.debian.devel (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

August 30, 2005

Re: Bug#325709: ITP: xmms2 -- XMMS2 is a redesign of the XMMS music player, Peter Samuelson, 21:50
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 21:50
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 21:20
Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Simon Josefsson, 20:20
Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Simon Josefsson, 20:20
Re: arch, svn, cvs, George Danchev, 20:20
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Russ Allbery, 19:50
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Russ Allbery, 19:50
Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Russ Allbery, 19:50
Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Russ Allbery, 19:50
Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Manoj Srivastava, 19:30
Re: More pbuilder use!, Manoj Srivastava, 19:10
Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, J. Bruce Fields, 19:00
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Daniel Burrows, 18:10
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader, 18:00
Re: long long support on all archs?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 15:30
Re: arch, svn, cvs, martin f krafft, 14:40
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen, 14:20
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Martin Langhoff, 14:10
Re: long long support on all archs?, Richard Atterer, 14:00
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Adeodato Simó, 13:50
long long support on all archs?, Ondrej Sury, 13:30
Re: Bug#325696: ITP: arno-iptables-firewall -- Single- and multi-homed firewall script with DSL/ADSL support, Michael Hanke, 12:40
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Steve Langasek, 12:30
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Hamish Moffatt, 12:00
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Frans Pop, 11:10
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Brian May, 10:50
Re: Any reason why libmotif3 vanished for Sparc, Andreas Tille, 10:10
Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Simon Josefsson, 10:00
Re: Any reason why libmotif3 vanished for Sparc, Petter Reinholdtsen, 09:40
Re: Any reason why libmotif3 vanished for Sparc, Andreas Tille, 09:40
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Steve Langasek, 08:50
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 08:00
Regalos para este 18 Septiembre, Bull, 07:50
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 07:30
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Anthony Towns, 07:10
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Anthony Towns, 07:10
Re: Bruce Perens hosts party at OSCON Wednesday night, Miles Bader, 06:50
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Miles Bader, 06:50
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 03:30
Re: Bug#325371: ITP: binfmtc -- a binfmt_misc hook for running C programs as scripts, Junichi Uekawa, 02:20
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Hamish Moffatt, 00:50
info tourisme Unsubscription, info tourisme, 00:10

August 29, 2005

Re: a place for a package directory in root, Jim Crilly, 23:30
info tourisme Mailing List Confirmation, info tourisme, 23:20
Re: incoming, Steve Langasek, 23:00
info tourisme Mailing List Confirmation, info tourisme, 23:00
Re: incoming, Elimar Riesebieter, 22:40
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Roger Leigh, 22:30
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Roberto C. Sanchez, 22:10
Re: incoming, Elimar Riesebieter, 22:00
les bons achats de forfaits d'info tourisme, info tourisme, 22:00
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Mark Brown, 21:20
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 21:10
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Frans Pop, 20:50
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Andreas Barth, 20:50
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 20:40
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 20:40
Re: Accepted fam 2.7.0-8 (source i386), Chuan-kai Lin, 20:40
Re: Accepted fam 2.7.0-8 (source i386), Chuan-kai Lin, 20:40
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 20:40
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 20:40
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Frans Pop, 20:30
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Mark Brown, 20:30
Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?, Russ Allbery, 20:20
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, martin f krafft, 20:20
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, John Hasler, 20:20
Re: Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 20:20
Re: Bug#325539: ITP: polyglot -- is a chess engine protocol adaptor. It connects a UCI protocol engine to xboard frontend., Neil Schemenauer, 20:00
Version tracking in the BTS, Florian Weimer, 20:00
Re: Any reason why libmotif3 vanished for Sparc, Andreas Metzler, 19:30
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Raphaël Hertzog, 19:10
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Branden Robinson / Debian Project Leader, 19:10
unsubscribe, Martin Kelly, 19:00
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, sean finney, 18:50
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Fabio Tranchitella, 18:50
Stocks discovered for quick profit kegful, cammie Norfleet, 18:40
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:10
Re: incoming, martin f krafft, 02:40
Re: incoming, Roger Leigh, 02:20
Re: incoming, Nico Golde, 01:00
Re: Additional binary package generated by a source package: how to handle this ?, Wouter Verhelst, 01:00
Re: Additional binary package generated by a source package: how to handle this ?, Adam Heath, 00:50
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 00:50
incoming, Elimar Riesebieter, 00:40

August 28, 2005

Additional binary package generated by a source package: how to handle this ?, Xavier Roche, 23:20
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Roger Leigh, 22:30
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Goswin von Brederlow, 16:40
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Petter Reinholdtsen, 16:40
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Goswin von Brederlow, 16:30
Re: Bug#325289: ITP: debian-hebrew -- Hebrew support in the Debian desktop, Shachar Shemesh, 15:00
Re: Is that your password?, ebay, 14:50
Re: Bug#325389: ITP: gprsec -- GPRS Easy Connect - Connect to the Internet with a GPRS phone, martin f krafft, 13:30
Re: Bug#325371: ITP: binfmtc -- a binfmt_misc hook for running C programs as scripts, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 13:00
Re: Bug#325371: ITP: binfmtc -- a binfmt_misc hook for running C programs as scripts, Wouter van Heyst, 12:40
libphp-adodb: Don't do silent transitions of library files! (from /usr/share/adodb to /usr/share/php/adodb), Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 10:50
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 02:50
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 02:50
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 02:50
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Wouter Verhelst, 01:20
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 01:00
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 01:00
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 00:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 00:50
Re: a place for a package directory in root, sean finney, 00:40

August 27, 2005

Looking for co-maintainers for Pan, Søren Boll Overgaard, 22:20
Re: a place for a package directory in root, Steve Langasek, 22:00
Re: a place for a package directory in root, martin f krafft, 22:00
a place for a package directory in root, Joerg Sommer, 21:10
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Andreas Barth, 11:20
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, David Weinehall, 11:00
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Thijs Kinkhorst, 10:50
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Florian Weimer, 10:40
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Thijs Kinkhorst, 10:30
Re: Help in gcc-4.0.x transition issue, Andreas Tille, 10:20
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Florian Weimer, 10:20
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Thijs Kinkhorst, 10:20
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Florian Weimer, 10:10
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Florian Weimer, 10:00
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Christian Perrier, 09:00
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Steve Langasek, 08:00
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 06:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Jesus Climent, 03:30
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Raphael Hertzog, 01:50
Re: Help in gcc-4.0.x transition issue, "Martin v. Löwis", 00:20

August 26, 2005

Re: vancouver revisited, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Adrian von Bidder, 22:20
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Thiemo Seufer, 22:10
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Kurt Roeckx, 22:00
Re: Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Stephane Chauveau, 21:50
Re: vancouver revisited, Adam Heath, 20:40
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Matt Taggart, 20:20
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ron Johnson, 16:30
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Bastian Blank, 16:20
[jharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: Debian/Ubuntu keyring maintainer issues], Marco Nenciarini, 14:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, W. Borgert, 14:40
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Raphael Hertzog, 14:30
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Raphaël Hertzog, 14:30
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 14:00
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 14:00
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 13:50
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, David Weinehall, 13:40
get-orig-source target in debian/rules, George Danchev, 13:10
Re: get-orig-source target in debian/rules, George Danchev, 13:10
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Florian Weimer, 13:00
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Bastian Blank, 12:50
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Raphaël Hertzog, 12:30
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Martin Schulze, 12:10
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Vincent Caron, 12:00
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Raphaël Hertzog, 11:50
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Florian Weimer, 11:30
Re: Documentation of alioth?, Florian Weimer, 11:30
Re: Bug#322282: ITP: swapspace -- Dynamic swap space manager, Jeroen Vermeulen, 10:40
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Thiemo Seufer, 10:30
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 10:10
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 10:10
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 10:00
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 09:30
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 09:20
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ron Johnson, 09:20
Help in gcc-4.0.x transition issue, Andreas Tille, 09:10
Work-needing packages report for Aug 26, 2005, wnpp, 09:00
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ron Johnson, 09:00
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 08:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 08:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 08:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 08:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 08:40
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 08:40
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 08:40
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 08:40
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 07:20
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Horms, 06:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Bernd Eckenfels, 06:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ron Johnson, 06:10
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 04:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 04:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Russ Allbery, 04:40
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Theodore Ts'o, 04:20
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 04:20
Re: vancouver revisited, Joey Hess, 03:50
Re: vancouver revisited, Joey Hess, 03:30
Re: Making .deb packages, Bryan Donlan, 02:20
Re: Making .deb packages, jdgamble, 01:30
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Stephane Chauveau, 01:20
Re: Making .deb packages, Michael Spang, 00:50
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Kurt Roeckx, 00:50
Re: Making .deb packages, The Fungi, 00:50
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Stephane Chauveau, 00:40
Making .deb packages, jdgamble, 00:30

August 25, 2005

Re: Using buildds only, Olaf van der Spek, 23:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Wouter Verhelst, 23:30
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Jesus Climent, 23:20
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, W. Borgert, 23:00
Re: Using buildds only, Wouter Verhelst, 22:50
Re: Xvidcap, mplayer and rte (was Re: Fun with the NEW queue), Joerg Jaspert, 21:00
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 20:40
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Bastian Blank, 20:30
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Kurt Roeckx, 20:20
Re: Using buildds only, Martin Pitt, 20:10
Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required, Thiemo Seufer, 20:00
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 19:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ben Armstrong, 19:00
Re: Using buildds only, Michael Spang, 18:50
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, sean finney, 18:20
Re: Gaim & TLS, Nathan Poznick, 18:10
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 18:10
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 18:10
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:50
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 17:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:40
Question about recurrence in libmimedir, Martin Felis, 17:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:40
Gaim & TLS, Maykel Moya, 17:40
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ben Armstrong, 17:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 17:40
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Ben Armstrong, 17:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:30
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:30
Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 17:30
Unlock your account, info@xxxxxxxxxx, 17:20
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, W. Borgert, 17:10
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 16:10
Re: making developer location from ldap public?, Oliver Elphick, 16:00
making developer location from ldap public?, Robert Lemmen, 15:50
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 14:40
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Thiemo Seufer, 14:20
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 12:30
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, David Weinehall, 12:20
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Lars Wirzenius, 12:20
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Frans Pop, 12:10
Re: Using buildds only, Olaf van der Spek, 12:10
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Olaf van der Spek, 12:00
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 12:00
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Andrew Porter, 11:00
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Jon Dowland, 11:00
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Horms, 11:00
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 11:00
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 10:50
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 10:50
Re: Xvidcap, mplayer and rte (was Re: Fun with the NEW queue), Petter Reinholdtsen, 10:20
Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Steve Langasek, 10:20
Xvidcap, mplayer and rte (was Re: Fun with the NEW queue), Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 10:10
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Steve Langasek, 09:50
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Steve Langasek, 09:50
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Andrew Porter, 09:50
Re: Fun with the NEW queue, Martin Wuertele, 09:50
Re: Fun with the NEW queue, Petter Reinholdtsen, 09:50
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 09:40
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Tollef Fog Heen, 09:40
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Matt Taggart, 09:10
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Horms, 06:30
Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Paul TBBle Hampson, 05:50
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Brian May, 05:30
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Nathanael Nerode, 04:40
Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:30
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:20
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:20
Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:00
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 02:50
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Bryan Donlan, 02:20
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Adeodato Simó, 02:10
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Al Viro, 02:00
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Steve Langasek, 02:00
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 01:20
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Steinar H. Gunderson, 01:10
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 01:10
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Blars Blarson, 01:00
Re: Bug#324861: ITP: pptpproxy -- a small app that forwards PPTP VPN connections through a Linux firewall, Thomas Viehmann, 00:50
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, martin f krafft, 00:50
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Frans Pop, 00:40
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 00:40
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, Grzegorz Bizon, 00:40
Re: Closing bugs in BTS, martin f krafft, 00:30
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Mauro Calderara, 00:10
Closing bugs in BTS, Grzegorz Bizon, 00:00

August 24, 2005

Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Mauro Calderara, 23:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Russ Allbery, 23:20
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, martin f krafft, 23:20
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, sean finney, 23:20
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Gabor Gombas, 22:20
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Gabor Gombas, 22:10
Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Shaun Jackman, 20:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, W. Borgert, 19:20
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Julien BLACHE, 19:00
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, sean finney, 18:50
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, sean finney, 18:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Humberto Massa Guimarães, 18:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Andrew Porter, 18:30
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, martin f krafft, 18:30
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Peter Palfrader, 18:10
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 18:00
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, "Martin v. Löwis", 17:50
Re: removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, martin f krafft, 17:40
Re: Bug#318590: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Domenico Andreoli, 17:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Miquel van Smoorenburg, 17:40
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Ondrej Sury, 17:30
removing /etc/hotplug.d/ support, Marco d'Itri, 17:30
Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?, Francesco P. Lovergine, 17:20
better init.d/* : who carres ?, Marc Chantreux, 17:00
Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 16:50
Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 16:50
Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 16:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 16:40
Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Marco d'Itri, 16:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 16:20
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 16:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 16:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 16:00
Re: curl 7.14.0-5: OpenSSL vs GnuTLS is still a problem, Domenico Andreoli, 16:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 15:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Michael Banck, 15:30
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Jon Dowland, 15:10
Re: vancouver revisited, Michael Banck, 15:10
Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 15:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Tollef Fog Heen, 14:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 14:40
CURSO INTERATIVO HP12C, carlos santos, 14:20
Re: vancouver revisited, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 14:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 14:00
Re: Using buildds only, Wouter Verhelst, 13:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Alastair McKinstry, 13:00
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Marc Haber, 13:00
Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Francesco P. Lovergine, 12:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 12:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 11:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 11:10
Re: vancouver revisited, Sven Luther, 11:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Tollef Fog Heen, 11:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, GOTO Masanori, 10:40
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, W. Borgert, 10:30
Can't we at least agree on Anti-Virus for our mail, Richard A Nelson, 10:10
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Christian Perrier, 10:00
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 09:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Anthony Towns, 09:30
Re: Using buildds only, Martin Pitt, 09:30
Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Tollef Fog Heen, 09:30
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Tollef Fog Heen, 09:00
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Tollef Fog Heen, 09:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 08:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Adeodato Simó, 02:50
Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Russ Allbery, 02:30
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Steve Langasek, 02:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Adeodato Simó, 02:20
Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Neil Schemenauer, 02:10
Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Shaun Jackman, 01:50
Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, martin f krafft, 01:50
Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Pierre Habouzit, 01:50
Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Otavio Salvador, 01:30
Re: Using buildds only, Wouter Verhelst, 01:20
Re: invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, martin f krafft, 01:20
invalid-arch-string-in-source-relation amd64, Shaun Jackman, 01:10

August 23, 2005

Re: More pbuilder use!, Roger Leigh, 23:20
Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, martin f krafft, 23:10
Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Andreas Barth, 23:10
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 23:10
Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Russ Allbery, 23:00
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Frans Pop, 23:00
Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Goswin von Brederlow, 23:00
Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:50
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Olaf van der Spek, 22:50
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:50
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 22:40
Re: how to fully replace another package, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 22:40
Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:40
Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:40
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 22:40
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:30
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 22:30
Re: More pbuilder use!, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:30
Re: More pbuilder use!, Roger Leigh, 22:20
Re: More pbuilder use!, Paul TBBle Hampson, 22:20
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:20
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:10
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:10
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:00
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:00
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 22:00
Re: Using buildds only, Tomas Fasth, 21:50
Re: Using buildds only, Goswin von Brederlow, 21:50
Re: More pbuilder use!, Bastian Blank, 21:00
Re: More pbuilder use!, Roger Leigh, 20:50
Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 20:50
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal), Emanuele Rocca, 20:40
Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Walter Landry, 20:40
Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 20:30
Re: how to fully replace another package, Steve Langasek, 20:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Adrian von Bidder, 20:20
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Adrian von Bidder, 20:10
Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 20:00
Re: How coldplug works, Isaac Clerencia, 19:50
Re: More pbuilder use!, Wouter Verhelst, 19:40
Re: More pbuilder use!, Wouter Verhelst, 19:30
Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 19:30
Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Russ Allbery, 19:30
Re: how to fully replace another package, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 19:20
Re: Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, martin f krafft, 19:20
Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 19:20
Re: vancouver revisited, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 19:20
Is dpkg --compare-versions canonical?, Russ Allbery, 19:10
Re: vancouver revisited, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 19:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 19:10
Re: More pbuilder use!, Humberto Massa Guimarães, 19:00
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 19:00
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 18:50
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 18:50
Re: More pbuilder use!, Roger Leigh, 18:30
Re: More pbuilder use!, Piotr Roszatycki, 18:30
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Joe Smith, 18:20
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Bastian Blank, 17:40
Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Oliver Korff, 17:30
Re: More pbuilder use!, Bastian Blank, 17:30
Re: More pbuilder use!, Bastian Blank, 17:10
Re: More pbuilder use!, Humberto Massa Guimarães, 17:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation withspecialemphasis in security, Gunnar Wolf, 17:10
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Hamish Moffatt, 16:40
Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Steinar H. Gunderson, 16:10
Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Laurent Fousse, 16:00
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Stephen Frost, 16:00
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 16:00
Re: Bug#324677: ITP: fruit -- Fruit is an UCI-only chess engine., Ondrej Sury, 15:50
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Stephen Frost, 15:20
Re: update of (several) config files, W. Borgert, 15:10
Re: Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, Pavel Orehov, 15:10
Re: update of (several) config files, martin f krafft, 15:10
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Thijs Kinkhorst, 15:00
Re: More pbuilder use!, John Hasler, 14:50
Re: vancouver revisited, Riku Voipio, 14:50
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Gerrit Pape, 14:30
update of (several) config files, Tomas Davidek, 14:30
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 14:30
Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 14:30
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 14:10
Re: Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Ondrej Sury, 14:00
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, W. Borgert, 13:50
Unnecessary "Conflicts" with imap-server packages, Edward, 13:40
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Mark Brown, 13:30
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Frans Pop, 13:10
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, W. Borgert, 12:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 12:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 12:30
Re: vancouver revisited, Steve Langasek, 12:30
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 12:30
Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 11:50
Re: How coldplug works, Marco d'Itri, 11:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Marc Haber, 11:40
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Marc Haber, 11:30
Re: WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, Frans Pop, 11:30
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 11:30
Re: Using buildds only, Martin Pitt, 11:10
Re: How coldplug works, Luca Capello, 11:00
WebSVN of svn.debian.org uses wrong encoding, W. Borgert, 10:30
Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 10:10
Re: How coldplug works, Isaac Clerencia, 10:10
Re: How coldplug works, Marco d'Itri, 10:10
Re: Using buildds only, Tomas Fasth, 09:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 09:40
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 09:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Olaf van der Spek, 09:40
Re: pvcreate on loopback file with lvm2, pavel.orehov@xxxxxxxxx, 09:40
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 09:40
Re: More pbuilder use!, Olaf van der Spek, 09:30
Re: How coldplug works, Isaac Clerencia, 09:10
Re: Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, Matt Zimmerman, 09:10
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Pierre Habouzit, 09:00
Re: Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, pavel.orehov@xxxxxxxxx, 09:00
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 09:00
未承諾広告※携帯向け広告のご案内です。, mobi_gate, 08:50
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 08:50
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Steve Langasek, 08:40
Re: More pbuilder use!, Roberto C. Sanchez, 07:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 07:20
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation withspecial emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 07:10
Re: How coldplug works, Joe Smith, 07:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 07:00
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 07:00
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Joe Smith, 07:00
Re: More pbuilder use!, Joe Smith, 06:50
Your account will be suspended!, PAYPAL, 06:00
More pbuilder use!, Nathanael Nerode, 04:10
Re: Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, Goswin von Brederlow, 04:00
Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 04:00
Re: pvcreate on loopback file with lvm2, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:50
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:40
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:40
Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 03:30
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Steve Langasek, 03:20
Re: vancouver revisited, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:10
Re: vancouver revisited, Goswin von Brederlow, 03:10
Re: vancouver revisited, Bernd Eckenfels, 02:10
Re: Using buildds only, Bernd Eckenfels, 02:00
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 01:50
Re: vancouver revisited, Steve Langasek, 01:50
Re: vancouver revisited, Joey Hess, 01:50
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 01:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Hamish Moffatt, 01:20
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Hamish Moffatt, 00:50
How coldplug works, Marco d'Itri, 00:50
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 00:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 00:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 00:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 00:30
Re: vancouver revisited, Joe Smith, 00:30

August 22, 2005

Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Sven Luther, 23:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Peter Samuelson, 23:50
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Peter Samuelson, 23:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 23:40
Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 23:20
Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 23:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 23:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Roger Leigh, 22:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Blars Blarson, 22:40
Re: Using buildds only, Roger Leigh, 22:20
Re: how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 21:50
Re: how to fully replace another package, Ben Armstrong, 21:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, W. Borgert, 20:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Adrian von Bidder, 20:10
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 20:10
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 20:00
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Adrian von Bidder, 20:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Adrian von Bidder, 19:50
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 19:30
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Adrian von Bidder, 19:10
Re: version numbering, martin f krafft, 18:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Riku Voipio, 18:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 18:40
Re: version numbering, David Nusinow, 18:30
Re: pvcreate on loopback file with lvm2, Simon Richter, 18:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, David Nusinow, 18:30
pvcreate on loopback file with lvm2, pavel.orehov@xxxxxxxxx, 18:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Gunnar Wolf, 18:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Gunnar Wolf, 17:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 17:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 17:20
Re: version numbering, Manoj Srivastava, 17:20
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway?, Manoj Srivastava, 17:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 17:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 17:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Martin Pitt, 17:00
Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Amaya, 17:00
Re: Using buildds only, W. Borgert, 16:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Mario Fux, 16:40
Re: Czech translation of po-debconf templates completed, Christian Perrier, 16:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Manoj Srivastava, 16:40
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Olaf van der Spek, 16:30
Re: Using buildds only, Olaf van der Spek, 16:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Hamish Moffatt, 16:20
Re: Using buildds only, Manoj Srivastava, 16:10
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 16:10
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 16:10
Snapshot/Rollback using LVM/EVMS, pavel.orehov@xxxxxxxxx, 16:00
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 16:00
Re: Bug#324296: ITP: ldapscripts -- Add and remove user and groups stored (using ldap), W. Borgert, 16:00
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Hamish Moffatt, 15:50
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Martin Pitt, 15:50
Re: Bug#324296: ITP: ldapscripts -- Add and remove user and groups stored (using ldap), Roberto C. Sanchez, 15:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Manoj Srivastava, 15:30
Re: "block" feature description, Christoph Berg, 14:50
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 14:40
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Matthew Palmer, 14:30
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 14:30
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, John Hasler, 14:30
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 14:30
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 14:20
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 14:20
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 14:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 14:10
"block" feature description, Stefano Zacchiroli, 14:10
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Thijs Kinkhorst, 14:10
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 14:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Barth, 14:00
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 13:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Sven Luther, 13:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Marc Haber, 13:20
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Marc Haber, 13:10
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 13:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Andreas Jochens, 13:00
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 13:00
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 13:00
Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 13:00
Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 12:50
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Jochens, 12:50
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 12:50
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 12:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 12:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 12:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 12:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Aurelien Jarno, 12:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Olaf van der Spek, 12:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Wouter Verhelst, 12:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Jonas Smedegaard, 12:30
Re: Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Barth, 12:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Jon Dowland, 11:50
Re: Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), Wouter Verhelst, 11:50
Re: vancouver revisited, W. Borgert, 11:40
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Jon Dowland, 11:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Pierre Habouzit, 11:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 11:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Wouter Verhelst, 11:40
Will the amd64 port be rejected because of the 98% rule?, Andreas Jochens, 11:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Andreas Barth, 11:20
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 11:10
Re: vancouver revisited, Steve Langasek, 11:00
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 11:00
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Ingo Juergensmann, 10:50
Using buildds only (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 10:50
Re: version numbering, Henning Makholm, 10:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Steve Langasek, 10:20
Re: vancouver revisited, Andreas Barth, 10:10
subscribe, Arash Bijanzadeh, 09:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Steve Langasek, 09:50
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 09:40
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 09:40
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 09:30
Processed: Re: Bug#256226: please don't fix /usr/doc symlink code..., Debian Bug Tracking System, 09:20
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Martin Langhoff, 09:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Sven Luther, 09:00
Re: Mindterm, Benjamin Seidenberg, 08:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation withspecial emphasis in security, Gunnar Wolf, 08:00
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Robert Collins, 07:10
Re: vancouver revisited, Peter Samuelson, 07:00
Re: Sponsoring procedures, Adam Heath, 06:30
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Peter Samuelson, 06:10
Re: Mindterm, Andrew Suffield, 05:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Matthew Palmer, 05:10
version numbering, Neil Roeth, 04:30
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Daniel Burrows, 04:10
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Marcelo E. Magallon, 03:50
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Marcelo E. Magallon, 03:30
Re: version numbering, Wouter Verhelst, 02:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Otavio Salvador, 02:20
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal), David Nusinow, 02:10
Re: vancouver revisited, Mark Brown, 01:50
Re: Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal), Mark Brown, 01:40
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Marco d'Itri, 01:40
Re: version numbering, Bob Proulx, 01:40
how to fully replace another package, Marco d'Itri, 01:40
Re: version numbering, martin f krafft, 01:40
Re: [PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), martin f krafft, 01:30
[PATCH] Simple parallellized boot sequence (and a plea for LSB complience), Petter Reinholdtsen, 01:20
Re: version numbering, Robert Collins, 01:00
Re: Be sure you pack your bags yourself, Henning Makholm, 00:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Jonas Smedegaard, 00:20
Re: vancouver revisited, Riku Voipio, 00:00
Team have veto rights, because they can just refuse the work anyway? (Was: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal), Petter Reinholdtsen, 00:00

August 21, 2005

Re: vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 23:50
Re: Be sure you pack your bags yourself (was: Results of the meeting...), Laszlo Boszormenyi, 23:40
Re: vancouver revisited, Andreas Barth, 23:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Laszlo Boszormenyi, 22:50
vancouver revisited, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 22:40
Sponsoring procedures, Henning Makholm, 22:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Manoj Srivastava, 22:10
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Richard Atterer, 21:50
Be sure you pack your bags yourself (was: Results of the meeting...), W. Borgert, 21:50
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 20:40
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, David Weinehall, 20:30
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Aurelien Jarno, 20:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Joe Wreschnig, 20:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Bas Zoetekouw, 20:20
Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal, Jonas Smedegaard, 19:50
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Ron Johnson, 19:50
Re: Bug#324296: ITP: ldapscripts -- Add and remove user and groups stored (using ldap), Pierre Habouzit, 16:40
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, martin f krafft, 14:00
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, David Weinehall, 13:40
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Matthew Palmer, 13:20
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Mark Brown, 12:30
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Tollef Fog Heen, 12:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Martin Langhoff, 12:10
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Tollef Fog Heen, 12:00
Re: Bug#323227: new list: debian-planet to distribute planet.debian.org postings; archive to enable searching, Tollef Fog Heen, 11:30
Re: pbuilder status update, Anibal Monsalve Salazar, 09:50
Re: pbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 07:50
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Paul TBBle Hampson, 06:50
Re: Mindterm, Benjamin Seidenberg, 06:40
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Matthew Palmer, 03:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Florian Weimer, 03:10
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Tristan Seligmann, 02:10
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Wouter van Heyst, 02:00
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Joe Smith, 01:50
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 00:40
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Christoph Hellwig, 00:40
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Christoph Hellwig, 00:20
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 00:20

August 20, 2005

Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 23:30
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 23:30
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 23:30
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, martin f krafft, 22:30
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Joe Smith, 22:20
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, Joe Smith, 22:10
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Roland Mas, 22:00
Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Thomas Viehmann, 22:00
Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Henning Makholm, 21:30
Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Jaldhar H. Vyas, 21:30
Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software, martin f krafft, 21:20
Re: arch, svn, cvs, martin f krafft, 21:20
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 21:10
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 21:00
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 20:50
Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez, 20:30
Re: Mindterm, Radu Spineanu, 19:40
Re: Mindterm, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 19:10
Mindterm, Henning Makholm, 18:40
Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 18:00
Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Henning Makholm, 16:20
Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance, Henning Makholm, 16:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Roland Mas, 16:00
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Peter Samuelson, 13:50
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Christoph Hellwig, 13:00
Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas, 10:10
Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, martin f krafft, 08:30
Re: pbuilder status update, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 05:50
Re: pbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 05:30
kernel build version dependency and NPTL support, GOTO Masanori, 03:10
Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, W. Borgert, 01:20
OT: Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Adam Heath, 00:50
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Adam Heath, 00:50
Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, martin f krafft, 00:10
Re: arch, svn, cvs, martin f krafft, 00:10
Re: arch, svn, cvs, martin f krafft, 00:00

August 19, 2005

Re: arch, svn, cvs, Joey Hess, 23:00
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Romain Francoise, 22:20
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Roland Mas, 22:10
Re: arch, svn, cvs, Florian Weimer, 21:50
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Jaakko Niemi, 21:20
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Steve Langasek, 21:20
Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, W. Borgert, 21:00
Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Roberto C. Sanchez, 21:00
Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez, 21:00
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Russ Allbery, 20:50
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Andreas Metzler, 20:50
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Stefan Hornburg, 20:40
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Norbert Tretkowski, 20:20
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Pierre Habouzit, 19:20
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Julien BLACHE, 19:10
Please remove me from "Call Wave" I have signed up for local Comcast broadband,, Lrllittell, 19:00
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Russ Allbery, 18:50
Re: order of builds on a buildd: icu (optional/libs), Kurt Roeckx, 18:10
Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, martin f krafft, 18:10
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas, 18:00
Re: Bug#323923: ITP: base -- Basic Analysis and Security Engine, Jon Dowland, 17:50
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Jon Dowland, 17:50
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Piotr Roszatycki, 17:40
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Michael Poole, 17:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Alec Berryman, 17:10
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas, 17:10
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for August 19, 2005, Piotr Roszatycki, 17:00
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 16:10
Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), martin f krafft, 15:00
Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Steinar H. Gunderson, 15:00
Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Daniel Stone, 14:50
Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), martin f krafft, 14:40
arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security), Marc Haber, 14:30
Re: Czech translation of po-debconf templates completed, Pascal Hakim, 13:20
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Pierre Habouzit, 13:20
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, martin f krafft, 13:20
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Steinar H. Gunderson, 13:10
Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security, Adeodato Simó, 12:50
Re: order of builds on a buildd: icu (optional/libs), Adeodato Simó, 12:40
Work-needing packages report for Aug 19, 2005, wnpp, 08:50

August 12, 2005

Re: package tracking system issues, Thijs Kinkhorst, 17:50
Re: runlevels remodeled, GOMBAS Gabor, 17:40
Re: runlevels remodeled, GOMBAS Gabor, 17:30
Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, GOMBAS Gabor, 17:20
package tracking system issues, Jay Berkenbilt, 17:20
Re: runlevels remodeled, John Hasler, 17:10
Re: runlevels remodeled, John Hasler, 17:10
Re: please fix your RC bugs, Steve Greenland, 17:00
Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, GOMBAS Gabor, 16:50
Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Goswin von Brederlow, 16:50
Re: runlevels remodeled, Petter Reinholdtsen, 16:30
Re: runlevels remodeled, W. Borgert, 16:20
Re: runlevels remodeled, Simon Richter, 16:20
Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 16:20
Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Andreas Barth, 16:20
Re: runlevels remodeled, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 16:20
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?, Andreas Barth, 16:10
Re: remove ruby1.6, akira yamada / やまだあきら, 16:10
runlevels remodeled, Timo Aaltonen, 15:30
Re: runlevels remodeled, Petter Reinholdtsen, 15:30
Re: Bug#53121: Gerador de sistemas - Convite, Adãoafli, 14:40
RFH: postfix-policyd using dbconfig-common and ucf, Ondrej Sury, 14:10
Re: remove ruby1.6, Nico Golde, 12:00
remove ruby1.6, akira yamada / やまだあきら, 11:50
Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Tim Dijkstra, 11:40
Re: bashisms in init scripts, Piotr Roszatycki, 11:20
Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Piotr Roszatycki, 10:50
Re: bashisms in init scripts, Frans Pop, 10:50
Re: bashisms in init scripts, Petter Reinholdtsen, 10:50
debian-devel,invite you to try our new free trade website., Postrade.com, 10:50
bashisms in init scripts, Piotr Roszatycki, 10:40
Re: RFH: libs11n (serialisation for C++), martin f krafft, 09:40
Re: RFH: libs11n (serialisation for C++), Isaac Clerencia, 09:30
RFH: libs11n (serialisation for C++), martin f krafft, 09:00
Work-needing packages report for Aug 12, 2005, wnpp, 08:50
Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome, Steve Langasek, 07:00
Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Adeodato Simó, 02:30
Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Steve Langasek, 02:20
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Henning Makholm, 02:10
Re: alioth down ?, Neil McGovern, 02:10
alioth down ?, Junichi Uekawa, 01:40

August 11, 2005

Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Olaf van der Spek, 23:20
Re: what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, Goswin von Brederlow, 23:10
Re: Bug#322282: ITP: swapspace -- Dynamic swap space manager, Goswin von Brederlow, 23:10
Re: please fix your RC bugs, Goswin von Brederlow, 23:00
Re: net-tools maintenance status, Olaf van der Spek, 22:30
Re: Packaging a PostScript resource, Alexander Schmehl, 22:10
Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome, Mike Hommey, 22:00
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Sebastian Kuzminsky, 22:00
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf, Thijs Kinkhorst, 22:00
Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome, Graham Wilson, 20:50
Re: net-tools maintenance status, Bernd Eckenfels, 20:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Philipp Kern, 20:20
libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome, Mike Hommey, 19:50
Re: Bug#322282: ITP: swapspace -- Dynamic swap space manager, Henning Makholm, 18:50
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Brian Nelson, 18:40
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, W. Borgert, 18:20
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Henning Makholm, 18:10
what happened to RunDinstallHourly proposal?, kamaraju kusumanchi, 18:10
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 17:30
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, W. Borgert, 17:30
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Joey Hess, 17:20
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Sebastian Kuzminsky, 17:20
Re: please fix your RC bugs, Steve Greenland, 15:50
Re: Partition, LVM, and RAID management utility, Goswin von Brederlow, 13:30
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 12:20
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Marco d'Itri, 12:10
user@xxxxxxxxxxx no longer exists, Wayne Christopher, 12:00
Re: libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Tim Dijkstra, 11:40
Re: please fix your RC bugs, Nathanael Nerode, 11:20
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Qingning Huo, 11:20
libnss-db and /usr/lib/* libraries, Piotr Roszatycki, 10:40
Re: Bug#322282: ITP: swapspace -- Dynamic swap space manager, Jeroen Vermeulen, 10:10
Re: net-tools maintenance status, Olaf van der Spek, 09:30
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Steve Langasek, 08:10
Re: shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Thiemo Seufer, 06:40
shouldn't I use update-alternatives for this?, Sebastian Kuzminsky, 06:10
Re: RFC: allow new upstream into stable when it's the only way to fix security issues., Andrew Pollock, 04:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Gustavo Noronha Silva, 04:40
Re: Partition, LVM, and RAID management utility, The Fungi, 04:30
Re: Partition, LVM, and RAID management utility, Karl Chen, 04:10
Re: Would anybody miss bibtool-dev?, Steve Langasek, 03:10
Partition, LVM, and RAID management utility, Shaun Jackman, 02:30
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Thomas Bushnell BSG, 01:20
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 01:10
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 00:40

August 10, 2005

dobra ponuda, Trajan Antic, 23:20
Would anybody miss bibtool-dev?, Henning Makholm, 23:00
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Gustavo Noronha Silva, 22:50
Re: please fix your RC bugs, Philip Brown, 20:40
Re: please fix your RC bugs, Philip Brown, 20:40
Re: Packaging a PostScript resource, Joe Smith, 19:20
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?, Andreas Metzler, 19:10
Re: Packaging a PostScript resource, Henning Makholm, 19:10
Re: Packaging a PostScript resource, Ben Armstrong, 18:10
Re: Packaging a PostScript resource, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 18:10
Re: Packaging a PostScript resource, Terry Burton, 17:40
Re: Packaging a PostScript resource, Alexander Schmehl, 17:10
Re: Packaging a PostScript resource, Terry Burton, 16:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Humberto Massa Guimarães, 16:20
Re: Bug#322151: ITP: tablix -- high school timetable generator, Radu Spineanu, 16:10
Re: Bug#322151: ITP: tablix -- high school timetable generator, Robert Lemmen, 15:20
ITA: Mac on Linux packages, Martin Loschwitz, 15:00
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Wouter Verhelst, 14:50
Re: Bug#322151: ITP: tablix -- high school timetable generator, John Goerzen, 14:20
zlib* in incoming since ftp-master move, Noèl Köthe, 13:50
Re: Bug#322282: ITP: swapspace -- Dynamic swap space manager, Henning Makholm, 13:30
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?, Colin Watson, 13:10
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?, Nigel Jones, 13:10
Packaging a PostScript resource, Terry Burton, 12:40
Unison, Klaus Ethgen, 12:10
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Adeodato Simó, 09:20
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Ondrej Sury, 09:10
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Ondrej Sury, 09:10
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?, Nigel Jones, 08:50
Bug#322282: ITP: swapspace -- Dynamic swap space manager, Anibal Monsalve Salazar, 08:40
Swap space manager, Jeroen Vermeulen, 07:20
Re: not starting daemons at boot: ln -s disabled, Andrew Pollock, 05:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Josh Metzler, 05:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Steve Langasek, 05:00
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), David Nusinow, 05:00
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), David Nusinow, 04:50
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 04:50
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 04:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 04:30
Re: controlling spam via mail interface?, Andrew Pollock, 04:00
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Josh Metzler, 03:10
Re: Bug#322151: ITP: tablix -- high school timetable generator, Hamish Moffatt, 03:00
Re: fakeroot: line 152: 7689 Segmentation fault, Steve Langasek, 02:30
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Arjan Oosting, 02:30
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Steve Langasek, 02:20
Re: curl reverts to openssl (but the story does not ends here), Steve Langasek, 02:10
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 01:50
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), David Nusinow, 01:50
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Steve Langasek, 01:30
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 01:20
Re: fakeroot: line 152: 7689 Segmentation fault, Max Vozeler, 01:10
Re: fakeroot: line 152: 7689 Segmentation fault, Henning Makholm, 01:10
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?, Colin Watson, 01:00
Re: Removing packages from testing (FAQ), Steve Langasek, 01:00
fakeroot: line 152: 7689 Segmentation fault, Tomas Fasth, 00:50
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 00:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Petter Reinholdtsen, 00:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Olaf van der Spek, 00:30
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), David Nusinow, 00:10

August 09, 2005

Re: curl reverts to openssl (but the story does not ends here), Daniel Stenberg, 23:50
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Kurt Roeckx, 22:50
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Eldon Koyle, 20:40
experimental bugs preventing testing transition?, Frank Küster, 20:40
problem in ftp master ?, Jose Carlos do Nascimento, 17:50
Re: problem in ftp master ?, Roberto C. Sanchez, 17:50
Re: Removing packages from testing (FAQ), Roberto C. Sanchez, 17:40
Re: Removing packages from testing (FAQ), Thaddeus H. Black, 17:20
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), David Nusinow, 16:30
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Russ Allbery, 16:20
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf, Radu Spineanu, 15:50
Re: python's gettext.gettext broken, use gettext.lgettext, Steve Kowalik, 14:00
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf, Steve Kowalik, 13:50
Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf, Emanuele Rocca, 13:40
Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098), Nigel Jones, 12:00
status of jackd? (bug #318098), Erik Steffl, 10:30