Which CD is a package on?, Jerome Warnier, 2005/07/29

• Re: Which CD is a package on?, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2005/07/30
  • Re: Which CD is a package on?, Steve McIntyre, 2005/07/30
• Re: Which CD is a package on?, Guilherme de S. Pastore, 2005/07/30
  • Re: Which CD is a package on?, Guilherme de S. Pastore, 2005/07/30
    • Re: Which CD is a package on?, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2005/07/30
  • Re: Which CD is a package on?, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2005/07/30

Public service announcement about Policy 10.4, Brian M. Carlson, 2005/07/29

• Re: Public service announcement about Policy 10.4, Thomas Hood, 2005/07/29
  • Re: Public service announcement about Policy 10.4, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/29
    • Re: Public service announcement about Policy 10.4, Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/30
    • Re: Public service announcement about Policy 10.4, Thiemo Seufer, 2005/07/30
• Re: Public service announcement about Policy 10.4, Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/30

RFC, problem with g++4, Jaakko Niemi, 2005/07/29

• Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Brian M. Carlson, 2005/07/29
  • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Thiemo Seufer, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/30
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/30
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Jaakko Niemi, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/29
    • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Jaakko Niemi, 2005/07/30
• Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Petri Latvala, 2005/07/29
  • Re: RFC, problem with g++4, Jaakko Niemi, 2005/07/29

Work-needing packages report for Jul 29, 2005, wnpp, 2005/07/29

• Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 29, 2005, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/29
  • Re: Work-needing packages report for Jul 29, 2005, Martin Michlmayr, 2005/07/29

meanin of sid tag, Mathias Weyland, 2005/07/29

• Re: meanin of sid tag, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/29

bugs2ldap gateway down - wnpp, bts.turmzimmer.net broken, Andreas Barth, 2005/07/28

• Re: bugs2ldap gateway down - wnpp, bts.turmzimmer.net broken, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2005/07/28
  • DDPO: excuses broken? (Was: Re: bugs2ldap gateway down - wnpp, bts.turmzimmer.net broken), Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2005/07/28

Problemes with the debian archives or apt?, Klaus Ethgen, 2005/07/28

• Re: Problemes with the debian archives or apt?, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2005/07/28
  • Re: Problemes with the debian archives or apt?, Marc Haber, 2005/07/28
    • Re: Problemes with the debian archives or apt?, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/28
    • Re: Problemes with the debian archives or apt?, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/28
• Re: Problemes with the debian archives or apt?, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/28

Festival TTS for Italian, Matthias Urlichs, 2005/07/27

• Re: Festival TTS for Italian, Adeodato Simó, 2005/07/27

Re: Debian Weekly News - July 26th, 2005, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/27

• Re: Debian Weekly News - July 26th, 2005, Nigel Jones, 2005/07/28

Re: Bug#320067: ITP: vamps -- Vamps evaporates DVD compliant MPEG2 program streams by selectively copying audio and subpicture tracks and by re-quantizing the embedded elementary video stream., Jon Dowland, 2005/07/27

• Re: Bug#320067: ITP: vamps -- Vamps evaporates DVD compliant MPEG2 program streams by selectively copying audio and subpicture tracks and by re-quantizing the embedded elementary video stream., Jon Dowland, 2005/07/27
• Re: Bug#320067: ITP: vamps -- Vamps evaporates DVD compliant MPEG2 program streams by selectively copying audio and subpicture tracks and by re-quantizing the embedded elementary video stream., Eric Cooper, 2005/07/27
  • Re: Bug#320067: ITP: vamps -- Vamps evaporates DVD compliant MPEG2 program streams by selectively copying audio and subpicture tracks and by re-quantizing the embedded elementary video stream., Ron Johnson, 2005/07/28

Re: Can I simulate a weak conflict?, Thomas Viehmann, 2005/07/27

• Re: Can I simulate a weak conflict?, Thomas Viehmann, 2005/07/27

Packages descriptions review, Clément Stenac, 2005/07/26

• Re: Packages descriptions review, Anthony DeRobertis, 2005/07/27
  • Re: Packages descriptions review, Clément Stenac, 2005/07/27
• Message not available
  • Re: Packages descriptions review, Clément Stenac, 2005/07/29
    • Re: Packages descriptions review, Michael Bramer, 2005/07/29
    • Re: Packages descriptions review, Clément Stenac, 2005/07/29
    • Re: Packages descriptions review, Michael Bramer, 2005/07/30
    • Re: Packages descriptions review, Clément Stenac, 2005/07/30
    • Re: Packages descriptions review, Michael Bramer, 2005/07/30

Xorg packages, Mark Sutton, 2005/07/26

• Re: Xorg packages, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/26
• Re: Xorg packages, John Lightsey, 2005/07/26

problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham, 2005/07/26

• Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham, 2005/07/27
• Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Alexander Wirt, 2005/07/27
  • Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham, 2005/07/27
    • Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Kevin B. McCarty, 2005/07/27
    • Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Alexander Wirt, 2005/07/27
    • Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Andrew Vaughan, 2005/07/27
    • Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Alexander Wirt, 2005/07/27
    • Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Andreas Metzler, 2005/07/27
    • Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham, 2005/07/27
• Re: problem installing libmotif-dev on debian sarge stable, Daniel Burrows, 2005/07/28

"at" package unmaintained??, Mathis Dirksen-Thedens, 2005/07/26

• Re: "at" package unmaintained??, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/26
• Re: "at" package unmaintained??, Kevin Mark, 2005/07/26

Testing requirements stalled, Shaun Jackman, 2005/07/26

• Re: Testing requirements stalled, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/26
  • Re: Testing requirements stalled, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Testing requirements stalled, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Testing requirements stalled, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Testing requirements stalled, Andreas Barth, 2005/07/26

Help needed: People willing to help co-maintain debian accessibility packages, Mario Lang, 2005/07/25

• Re: Help needed: People willing to help co-maintain debian accessibility packages, Frans Pop, 2005/07/25
  • Re: Help needed: People willing to help co-maintain debian accessibility packages, Mario Lang, 2005/07/25
• Re: Help needed: People willing to help co-maintain debian accessibility packages, Joey Hess, 2005/07/25
  • Re: Help needed: People willing to help co-maintain debian accessibility packages, Mario Lang, 2005/07/25
• Re: Help needed: People willing to help co-maintain debian accessibility packages, Rene Engelhard, 2005/07/25

http://torrents.debian.org -- idea, Mick Weiss, 2005/07/25

• Re: http://torrents.debian.org -- idea, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/25
• Re: http://torrents.debian.org -- idea, Jon Dowland, 2005/07/25
• Re: http://torrents.debian.org -- idea, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/25
  • Re: http://torrents.debian.org -- idea, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/25

does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Miernik, 2005/07/24

• Re: does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/25
  • Re: does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/25
  • Re: does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Miernik, 2005/07/25
    • Re: does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/25
    • Re: does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Miernik, 2005/07/25
    • Re: does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Miros/law Baran, 2005/07/25
    • Re: does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/25
    • Re: does gs needs to depend on gsfonts, or could it use ttf fonts maybe?, Miles Bader, 2005/07/25

does libwmf0.2-7 have to depend on gsfonts ?, Miernik, 2005/07/24

• Re: does libwmf0.2-7 have to depend on gsfonts ?, Josh Metzler, 2005/07/24

Please participate in popularity-contest, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/24

• Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Michelle Konzack, 2005/07/24
  • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/24
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Michelle Konzack, 2005/07/24
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Andreas Fester, 2005/07/24
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Bernd Eckenfels, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Kevin B. McCarty, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Ron Johnson, 2005/07/25
    • Message not available
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Ron Johnson, 2005/07/28
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Helmut Wollmersdorfer, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Margarita Manterola, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Pascal Hakim, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Adeodato Simó, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Pascal Hakim, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Marc Haber, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Graham Wilson, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Helmut Wollmersdorfer, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Helmut Wollmersdorfer, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Philip Ross, 2005/07/28
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Steve Greenland, 2005/07/26
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/07/29
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Joey Hess, 2005/07/25
• Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Erik Schanze, 2005/07/24
  • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Michelle Konzack, 2005/07/24
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/27
    • Re: Please participate in popularity-contest, Michelle Konzack, 2005/07/28

libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3, Dan From, 2005/07/23

• Re: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/23

(no subject), Shorty550, 2005/07/23

• Re: (no subject), Ryan Schultz, 2005/07/23
  • Re: (no subject), Steve Langasek, 2005/07/23
    • Re: (no subject), Mowgli, 2005/07/23
  • Re: (no subject), Daniel Burrows, 2005/07/23
    • Re: (no subject), Ryan Schultz, 2005/07/23
    • Re: (no subject), Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/24
    • Re: (no subject), Wesley J. Landaker, 2005/07/24
  • Re: (no subject), Anthony DeRobertis, 2005/07/25

libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading), Jens Peter Secher, 2005/07/23

• Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading), Brian M. Carlson, 2005/07/23
• Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading), Bastian Blank, 2005/07/23
• Re: libcrypto++, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/24
• Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading), Nathanael Nerode, 2005/07/24
  • Re: libcrypto++, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/24
    • Re: libcrypto++, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/24

Keyboard lockup after X startup; possible cause, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 2005/07/23

• Re: Keyboard lockup after X startup; possible cause, Finn-Arne Johansen, 2005/07/23
• Re: Keyboard lockup after X startup; possible cause, Benjamin Mesing, 2005/07/23
• Re: Keyboard lockup after X startup; possible cause, Enrico Zini, 2005/07/24

LinuxWorld in San Francisco, Michael Meskes, 2005/07/22

• Re: LinuxWorld in San Francisco, Don Armstrong, 2005/07/23
  • Re: LinuxWorld in San Francisco, Michael Meskes, 2005/07/23

doomsday not DFSG (was Re: ITP: doomsday - greatly improved engine to play doom, doom2, heretic and hexen), Jon Dowland, 2005/07/22

• Re: doomsday not DFSG (was Re: ITP: doomsday - greatly improved engine to play doom, doom2, heretic and hexen), Jamie Jones, 2005/07/22
  • Re: doomsday not DFSG (was Re: ITP: doomsday - greatly improved engine to play doom, doom2, heretic and hexen), Jon Dowland, 2005/07/22
    • Re: doomsday not DFSG (was Re: ITP: doomsday - greatly improved engine to play doom, doom2, heretic and hexen), Jon Dowland, 2005/07/22
    • Re: doomsday not DFSG (was Re: ITP: doomsday - greatly improved engine to play doom, doom2, heretic and hexen), Jamie Jones, 2005/07/23
    • Re: doomsday not DFSG (was Re: ITP: doomsday - greatly improved engine to play doom, doom2, heretic and hexen), Jon Dowland, 2005/07/23
    • Re: doomsday not DFSG, Jamie Jones, 2005/07/24
    • Re: doomsday not DFSG (was Re: ITP: doomsday - greatly improved engine to play doom, doom2, heretic and hexen), Alexander Fieroch, 2005/07/28

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/22

• Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Don Armstrong, 2005/07/23
  • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Jochen Voss, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Colin Watson, 2005/07/24
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Andreas Metzler, 2005/07/24
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Colin Watson, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Don Armstrong, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/23
  • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Pascal Hakim, 2005/07/26
  • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Michelle Konzack, 2005/07/23
  • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Pascal Hakim, 2005/07/26
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/26
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Joey Hess, 2005/07/26
• Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/22
• Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Nigel Jones, 2005/07/22
  • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/22
• Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Kurt Roeckx, 2005/07/23
  • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/23
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Pascal Hakim, 2005/07/25
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Nikita V. Youshchenko, 2005/07/25
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Pascal Hakim, 2005/07/26
    • Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions, Mark Brown, 2005/07/26

"Button voting" can't be implemented anyway, Filipus Klutiero, 2005/07/22

• Re: "Button voting" can't be implemented anyway, Don Armstrong, 2005/07/22
• Re: "Button voting" can't be implemented anyway, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/07/24

Re: Bug#319334: ITP: ng-spice -- Mixed-level/mixed-signal electronic circuit simulator, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2005/07/21

• Re: Bug#319334: ITP: ng-spice -- Mixed-level/mixed-signal electronic circuit simulator, Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/21
• Re: Bug#319334: ITP: ng-spice -- Mixed-level/mixed-signal electronic circuit simulator, John Hasler, 2005/07/21

Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/21

• Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, David Weinehall, 2005/07/21
• Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, John Hasler, 2005/07/21
• Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2005/07/21
  • Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, John Hasler, 2005/07/21
  • Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/21
• Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/07/21
  • Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/22
    • Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Tore Anderson, 2005/07/22
    • Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/22
    • Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Helmut Wollmersdorfer, 2005/07/22
    • Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/22
• Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Kevin Mark, 2005/07/22
• Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2005/07/22
• Re: Mass-filing bugs based on piuparts?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2005/07/22

Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Josh Metzler, 2005/07/21

• Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/21
  • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a, 2005/07/22
• Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Adeodato Simó, 2005/07/21
  • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Colin Watson, 2005/07/21
  • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Nigel Jones, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Colin Watson, 2005/07/21
• Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Margarita Manterola, 2005/07/21
• Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Colin Watson, 2005/07/21
• Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2005/07/21
  • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Pierre Habouzit, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Pascal Hakim, 2005/07/22
  • Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Yaroslav Halchenko, 2005/07/21
• Re: Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a, 2005/07/22
• Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Brian May, 2005/07/22
• Re: Reopening bug closed due to SPAM, Anthony DeRobertis, 2005/07/23

GPG Key sign, mina fahmy, 2005/07/20

• Re: GPG Key sign, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/21

apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?, Graham Williams, 2005/07/20

• Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?, Matthew Palmer, 2005/07/22
  • Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?, Graham Williams, 2005/07/22
    • Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/22
    • Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?, Graham Williams, 2005/07/24
    • Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/25
    • Re: apt 0.6 downloads from second archive?, Graham Williams, 2005/07/27

GPG Key Signing, Allyn, MarkX A, 2005/07/20

• Re: GPG Key Signing, David Weinehall, 2005/07/20
  • Re: GPG Key Signing, Keith Packard, 2005/07/21
• Re: GPG Key Signing, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/21

Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, W. Borgert, 2005/07/20

• Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Nico Golde, 2005/07/20
  • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2005/07/20
  • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Ben Armstrong, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Enrico Zini, 2005/07/21
• Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Daniel Burrows, 2005/07/20
• Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Andreas Tille, 2005/07/20
  • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Thaddeus H. Black, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/23
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Andreas Tille, 2005/07/23
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/23
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Jon Dowland, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, John Hasler, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Andreas Tille, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Ben Armstrong, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/23
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2005/07/23
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Ben Armstrong, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/23
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Ben Armstrong, 2005/07/23
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/23
• Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Steve Greenland, 2005/07/20
  • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Clément Stenac, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Steve Greenland, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Jochen Voss, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Jochen Voss, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Bernd Eckenfels, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Clément Stenac, 2005/07/21
  • Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?, Andrew Suffield, 2005/07/21

popcon (was Re: about voting for bugs), Jon Dowland, 2005/07/20

• Re: popcon (was Re: about voting for bugs), Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/20
  • Re: popcon (was Re: about voting for bugs), Jon Dowland, 2005/07/20

Re: about voting for bugs, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/20

• Re: about voting for bugs, zorglub, 2005/07/20
• Re: about voting for bugs, Andreas Fester, 2005/07/20
  • Re: about voting for bugs, Joey Hess, 2005/07/20
• Re: about voting for bugs, Jon Dowland, 2005/07/20
• Re: about voting for bugs, Andreas Tille, 2005/07/20
  • Re: about voting for bugs, Jon Dowland, 2005/07/20
  • Re: about voting for bugs, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/20
    • Re: about voting for bugs, Andreas Tille, 2005/07/20
    • Re: about voting for bugs, Paul Brossier, 2005/07/20
    • Re: about voting for bugs, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2005/07/20
    • Re: about voting for bugs, Benjamin Mesing, 2005/07/20
  • Re: about voting for bugs, Mark Brown, 2005/07/20
    • Re: about voting for bugs, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/20
• Re: about voting for bugs, Paul Brossier, 2005/07/20
• Re: about voting for bugs, Adeodato Simó, 2005/07/20
  • Re: about voting for bugs, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/20
  • Message not available
    • Re: Bug#38116: about voting for bugs, Adeodato Simó, 2005/07/22
    • Re: Bug#38116: about voting for bugs, Pascal Hakim, 2005/07/22

aspell upgrade woes, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/07/20

• Re: aspell upgrade woes, Brian Nelson, 2005/07/20
  • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Brian Nelson, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Brian Nelson, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Ron Johnson, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Brian Nelson, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/21
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/21
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Brian Nelson, 2005/07/21
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/21
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, David Nusinow, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Hendrik Sattler, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/21
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Marcelo E. Magallon, 2005/07/26
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Marcelo E. Magallon, 2005/07/26
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/07/20
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/21
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Petri Latvala, 2005/07/21
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/21
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Denis Barbier, 2005/07/22
    • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/22
• Re: Re: aspell upgrade woes, Nathanael Nerode, 2005/07/20
  • Re: Re: aspell upgrade woes, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/20
• Re: aspell upgrade woes, "Martin v. Löwis", 2005/07/22
  • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/22
  • Re: aspell upgrade woes, Brian Nelson, 2005/07/22

broken g++ transition packages, Mike Furr, 2005/07/19

• Re: broken g++ transition packages, Rene Engelhard, 2005/07/19
• Re: broken g++ transition packages, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/07/24
  • Re: broken g++ transition packages, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/24
    • Re: broken g++ transition packages, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/07/25
  • Re: broken g++ transition packages, Aurelien Jarno, 2005/07/24

debian mentors & ubuntu, Nico Golde, 2005/07/19

• Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Martin Pitt, 2005/07/19
  • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Willi Mann, 2005/07/19
  • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Nigel Jones, 2005/07/19
  • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Nico Golde, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, martin f krafft, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Nico Golde, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Norbert Tretkowski, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, John Hasler, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, David Nusinow, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, martin f krafft, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, David Nusinow, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Matthew Palmer, 2005/07/20
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Christoph Haas, 2005/07/20
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Jon Dowland, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Miles Bader, 2005/07/20
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, David Nusinow, 2005/07/20
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Miles Bader, 2005/07/20
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Shot - Piotr Szotkowski, 2005/07/20
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Jon Dowland, 2005/07/20
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Wouter Verhelst, 2005/07/24
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Julien BLACHE, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, martin f krafft, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Nico Golde, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Matt Zimmerman, 2005/07/20
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Martin Pitt, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Paul TBBle Hampson, 2005/07/21
• Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Nico Golde, 2005/07/19
  • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/19
    • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Matthew Palmer, 2005/07/20
• OT: debian mentors & ubuntu, Ben Armstrong, 2005/07/19
  • Re: OT: debian mentors & ubuntu, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/20
• Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Matthew Palmer, 2005/07/20
  • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Nico Golde, 2005/07/20
• Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Christoph Haas, 2005/07/20
  • Re: debian mentors & ubuntu, Nico Golde, 2005/07/20

Yet another g++ transition page, Mike Furr, 2005/07/18

• Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Daniel Burrows, 2005/07/18
  • Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Mike Furr, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Daniel Burrows, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Mike Furr, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Jochen Voss, 2005/07/19
• Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Jochen Voss, 2005/07/18
• Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/19
  • Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Mike Furr, 2005/07/21
    • Re: Yet another g++ transition page, Jochen Voss, 2005/07/22

dpkg: should it remove in reverse depends order?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/18

• Re: dpkg: should it remove in reverse depends order?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/18
  • Re: dpkg: should it remove in reverse depends order?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/18
    • Re: dpkg: should it remove in reverse depends order?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/19
    • Re: dpkg: should it remove in reverse depends order?, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/19

Re: BTS version tracking, Rob Sims, 2005/07/18

• Re: BTS version tracking, Colin Watson, 2005/07/18
  • Re: BTS version tracking, Andreas Barth, 2005/07/18
    • Re: BTS version tracking, Colin Watson, 2005/07/19
• Re: BTS version tracking, Matthew Palmer, 2005/07/20
  • Re: BTS version tracking, Pierre Habouzit, 2005/07/20
• Re: BTS version tracking, Brian May, 2005/07/20
• Re: BTS version tracking, Brian Nelson, 2005/07/20
  • Re: BTS version tracking, Colin Watson, 2005/07/20
    • Re: BTS version tracking, Colin Watson, 2005/07/24

snownews maintainership, Nico Golde, 2005/07/18

• Re: snownews maintainership, Clint Adams, 2005/07/18
  • Re: snownews maintainership, Nico Golde, 2005/07/18
• Re: snownews maintainership, Christoph Berg, 2005/07/18
  • Re: snownews maintainership, Nico Golde, 2005/07/18
    • Re: snownews maintainership, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/18
    • Re: snownews maintainership, Nico Golde, 2005/07/18

NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/18

• Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/18
• Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Matthias Klose, 2005/07/18
• Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2005/07/18
• Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Isaac Clerencia, 2005/07/18
  • Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Isaac Clerencia, 2005/07/18
    • Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Isaac Clerencia, 2005/07/18
    • Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Isaac Clerencia, 2005/07/19
• Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/19
• Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Thomas Viehmann, 2005/07/19
  • Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/19
• Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Adeodato Simó, 2005/07/24
• Re: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading, Marcelo E. Magallon, 2005/07/26

debconf5 - videos of the talks and BOFs available, Holger Levsen, 2005/07/17

• Re: debconf5 - videos of the talks and BOFs available, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2005/07/18
• Re: debconf5 - videos of the talks and BOFs available, Christian Fromme, 2005/07/18

Removal of transitional dummy packages, Mohammed Adnène Trojette, 2005/07/17

• Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Adeodato Simó, 2005/07/17
  • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Mohammed Adnène Trojette, 2005/07/17
• Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/17
  • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Joerg Jaspert, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Christian Perrier, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Thomas Hood, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Don Armstrong, 2005/07/19
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/19
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/22
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/22
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/23
    • Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/07/21

lsb-base, Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/17

• Re: lsb-base, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/17
  • Re: lsb-base, Thomas Hood, 2005/07/17
    • Re: lsb-base, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2005/07/17
  • Re: lsb-base, Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/17
• Re: lsb-base, Bernhard R. Link, 2005/07/18
  • Re: lsb-base, Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/18
    • Re: lsb-base, Andreas Barth, 2005/07/18
    • Re: lsb-base, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen, 2005/07/19
    • Re: lsb-base, Andreas Barth, 2005/07/19
    • Re: lsb-base, Thomas Hood, 2005/07/19
    • Re: lsb-base, Bernhard R. Link, 2005/07/19
    • Re: lsb-base, Jon Dowland, 2005/07/19
• Re: lsb-base, Thomas Hood, 2005/07/22
  • Re: lsb-base, Pierre Habouzit, 2005/07/22
  • Re: lsb-base, Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/22

linuxsampler/libgig: intent to hijack, Paul Brossier, 2005/07/17

• Re: linuxsampler/libgig: intent to hijack, Matt Flax, 2005/07/17
  • Re: linuxsampler/libgig: intent to hijack, Paul Brossier, 2005/07/18

libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed, Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/07/17

• Re: libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed, Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/17
  • Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), sean finney, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), sean finney, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), sean finney, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Olaf van der Spek, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Bernhard R. Link, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Domenico Andreoli, 2005/07/19
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), sean finney, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Marco d'Itri, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/07/22
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Domenico Andreoli, 2005/07/25
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Aaron M. Ucko, 2005/07/25
    • MIT krb5 vs. Heimdal for curl's GSSAPI support (Re: Who needs libcurl3?), Domenico Andreoli, 2005/07/26
    • Re: MIT krb5 vs. Heimdal for curl's GSSAPI support (Re: Who needs libcurl3?), Aaron M. Ucko, 2005/07/27
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Brian May, 2005/07/27
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Don Armstrong, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Damian Pietras, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), Steve Langasek, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/19
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/19
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/19
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Ondrej Sury, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3? (was libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed), sean finney, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, Elimar Riesebieter, 2005/07/18
    • Re: Who needs libcurl3?, sean finney, 2005/07/18
  • Re: libcurl3-dev: A development package linked again gnutls needed, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/18

Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Joachim Breitner, 2005/07/17

• Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Javier Candeira, 2005/07/17
  • Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Eduard Bloch, 2005/07/18
• Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Josselin Mouette, 2005/07/20
  • Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Matt Zimmerman, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Josselin Mouette, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Matt Zimmerman, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Josselin Mouette, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Matt Zimmerman, 2005/07/20
    • Re: Reformatted Ubuntu Patches Repository, Lars Wirzenius, 2005/07/20

Alioth upgrade, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/17

• Re: Alioth upgrade, Raphael Hertzog, 2005/07/17

is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Karl Chen, 2005/07/17

• Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/17
  • Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2005/07/17
    • Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/17
  • Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/07/18
    • Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/18
    • Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Hamish Moffatt, 2005/07/18
• Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Matthew Woodcraft, 2005/07/17
  • Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Karl Chen, 2005/07/18
• Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?, Adrian von Bidder, 2005/07/21

Re: Dependency problems with Xorg, Harald Dunkel, 2005/07/16

• Re: Dependency problems with Xorg, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/16
  • Re: Dependency problems with Xorg, Harald Dunkel, 2005/07/16
    • Re: Dependency problems with Xorg, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/17
    • Message not available
    • Re: Dependency problems with Xorg, Daniel Stone, 2005/07/17

[RFC] Auto-Accept libs with just changed SONAME?, Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/16

• Re: [RFC] Auto-Accept libs with just changed SONAME?, Joerg Jaspert, 2005/07/16
  • Re: [RFC] Auto-Accept libs with just changed SONAME?, Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/16
    • Re: [RFC] Auto-Accept libs with just changed SONAME?, Frank Lichtenheld, 2005/07/16
  • Re: [RFC] Auto-Accept libs with just changed SONAME?, Gustavo Noronha Silva, 2005/07/20

Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Ralf Treinen, 2005/07/16

• Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Stephen Gran, 2005/07/16
  • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, David Pashley, 2005/07/16
    • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, René van Bevern, 2005/07/16
    • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Matthias Klose, 2005/07/17
• Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/17
  • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/17
• Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Matthias Klose, 2005/07/17
• Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Marcelo E. Magallon, 2005/07/16
  • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, Marcelo E. Magallon, 2005/07/17
    • Re: Procedure reminders on updating a lib package for a C++ ABI change, David Nusinow, 2005/07/17

unsubscribe, Matthew D. Melbert, 2005/07/15

• unsubscribe, siva m, 2005/07/16
• unsubscribe, CoolFox, 2005/07/20
• unsubscribe, CoolFox, 2005/07/25

Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues, Daniel Schepler, 2005/07/15

• Re: Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues, Aurelien Jarno, 2005/07/15
  • Re: Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues, Daniel Schepler, 2005/07/15
• Re: Gradual mass bug filing for C++ transition / gcc-4.0 issues, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/16

unreproducable bugs, Nico Golde, 2005/07/15

• Re: unreproducable bugs, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/15
  • Re: unreproducable bugs, Nico Golde, 2005/07/15
• Re: unreproducable bugs, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/15
  • Re: unreproducable bugs, kamaraju kusumanchi, 2005/07/15
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Matthew Palmer, 2005/07/18
  • Re: unreproducable bugs, Nico Golde, 2005/07/15
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, sean finney, 2005/07/15
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Nico Golde, 2005/07/15
  • Re: unreproducable bugs, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/15
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Rich Walker, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Rich Walker, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Rich Walker, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/16
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/07/17
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/07/17
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/17
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/07/17
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/17
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/07/18
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/07/18
    • Re: unreproducable bugs, Jon Dowland, 2005/07/18
  • Re: unreproducable bugs, Steve Greenland, 2005/07/16

aspell dictionary packages fail to build, Matt Kraai, 2005/07/15

• Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/15
  • Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build, Matt Kraai, 2005/07/17
    • Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/17
• Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build, Agustin Martin, 2005/07/15
• Re: aspell dictionary packages fail to build, Brian Nelson, 2005/07/17

skills of developers, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo, 2005/07/15

• Re: skills of developers, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/15
• Re: skills of developers, Laszlo Boszormenyi, 2005/07/15
  • Re: skills of developers, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/07/15
    • Re: skills of developers, Eduard Bloch, 2005/07/15
    • Re: skills of developers, Benjamin Mesing, 2005/07/16
• Re: skills of developers, Peter Samuelson, 2005/07/16
  • Re: skills of developers, Torsten Landschoff, 2005/07/16
    • Re: skills of developers, Manoj Srivastava, 2005/07/18

pbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/14

• Re: pbuilder status update, Brian May, 2005/07/15
  • Re: pbuilder status update, Henning Glawe, 2005/07/15
  • Re: pbuilder status update, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/15

shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/14

• Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Andreas Metzler, 2005/07/14
  • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/14
    • Build-Depends: libfoo-dev more susceptible to breaking (Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal), Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/15
    • Re: Build-Depends: libfoo-dev more susceptible to breaking (Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal), Stephen Frost, 2005/07/15
    • Re: Build-Depends: libfoo-dev more susceptible to breaking (Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal), Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/15
    • Re: Build-Depends: libfoo-dev more susceptible to breaking (Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal), Steve Langasek, 2005/07/15
  • SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Josh Metzler, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Greenland, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/07/29
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Greenland, 2005/07/30
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Brian May, 2005/07/30
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/29
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/29
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Russ Allbery, 2005/07/29
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/07/29
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Jay Berkenbilt, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/07/29
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Jay Berkenbilt, 2005/07/29
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, GOMBAS Gabor, 2005/07/29
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Jay Berkenbilt, 2005/07/28
    • Re: SUMMARY: Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/30
• Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/14
  • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/14
• Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/14
  • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Will Newton, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Eduard Bloch, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Michael K. Edwards, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/14
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Goswin von Brederlow, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Daniel Kobras, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Ondrej Sury, 2005/07/15
• Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, martin f krafft, 2005/07/15
  • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2005/07/15
    • Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/15
    • API/ABI in -dev package name?, Junichi Uekawa, 2005/07/15
    • Re: API/ABI in -dev package name?, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/15
    • Re: API/ABI in -dev package name?, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/15
    • Re: API/ABI in -dev package name?, Philipp Kern, 2005/07/15
    • Re: API/ABI in -dev package name?, Stephen Frost, 2005/07/15
• Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal, Kurt Roeckx, 2005/07/16

congratulations to the X team!!, Sean Perry, 2005/07/14

• Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Benjamin Mesing, 2005/07/14
  • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Steinar H. Gunderson, 2005/07/14
  • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Francesco P. Lovergine, 2005/07/14
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/14
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/14
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Roger Leigh, 2005/07/14
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Francesco Paolo Lovergine, 2005/07/16
  • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Miles Bader, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe, 2005/07/30
  • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Klaus Ethgen, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Klaus Ethgen, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Klaus Ethgen, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Henning Glawe, 2005/07/16
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Steve Langasek, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Andreas Metzler, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Florian Weimer, 2005/07/15
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/15
• Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Jaakko Niemi, 2005/07/14
  • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/14
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Jaakko Niemi, 2005/07/23
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/23
• Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Gustavo Franco, 2005/07/14
  • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Daniel Stone, 2005/07/14
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Gustavo Franco, 2005/07/14
    • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Daniel Stone, 2005/07/15
  • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/14
• Re: congratulations to the X team!!, David Nusinow, 2005/07/14
• Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Greg Folkert, 2005/07/14
  • Re: congratulations to the X team!!, Brendan, 2005/07/15

#311724 (was: Re: gaim-irchelper_0.11-1_i386.changes REJECTED), Martin-Eric Racine, 2005/07/14

• Re: #311724, Joerg Jaspert, 2005/07/14
  • Re: #311724, Martin-Eric Racine, 2005/07/14
    • Re: #311724, BJoerg Jaspert, 2005/07/14
    • Re: #311724, Marc Haber, 2005/07/14

Mass bug filing for packages that FTBFS because of changes to texi2html, Matt Kraai, 2005/07/14

• Re: Mass bug filing for packages that FTBFS because of changes to texi2html, Santiago Vila, 2005/07/14
• Re: Mass bug filing for packages that FTBFS because of changes to texi2html, Andreas Barth, 2005/07/14

AT&T Korn Shell, Andrew Porter, 2005/07/13

• Re: AT&T Korn Shell, Andrew Porter, 2005/07/13

Lintian test case author needed (zlib linking), Florian Weimer, 2005/07/13

• Re: Lintian test case author needed (zlib linking), Florian Weimer, 2005/07/13

interacting with the press, Anand Kumria, 2005/07/13

• Re: interacting with the press, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/07/13
• Re: interacting with the press, Steve Greenland, 2005/07/13
  • Unidentified subject!, Anand Kumria, 2005/07/14
• Re: interacting with the press, Nigel Jones, 2005/07/13
  • Re: interacting with the press, Rudi Effe, 2005/07/13
  • Re: interacting with the press, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/07/14
    • Re: interacting with the press, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2005/07/14
• Re: interacting with the press, Florian Weimer