gaim and totem transition for testing., Gustavo Franco, 2006/10/31

• Re: gaim and totem transition for testing., Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/10/31
  • Re: gaim and totem transition for testing., Steve Langasek, 2006/10/31

Please consider bumping cdbs' urgency, and let it migrate to testing, Frank Küster, 2006/10/30

• Re: Please consider bumping cdbs' urgency, and let it migrate to testing, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/10/30
  • Re: Please consider bumping cdbs' urgency, and let it migrate to testing, Frank Küster, 2006/10/30
    • Re: Please consider bumping cdbs' urgency, and let it migrate to testing, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/10/30
    • Re: Please consider bumping cdbs' urgency, and let it migrate to testing, Frank Küster, 2006/10/30

Re: question for ARM porters: incomplete arm v3 support in etch?, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/30

• Re: question for ARM porters: incomplete arm v3 support in etch?, Phil Blundell, 2006/10/30

Please let dhcp3 into testing, Andrew Pollock, 2006/10/29

• Re: Please let dhcp3 into testing, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/10/29

gcc-4.1 status in unstable, Matthias Klose, 2006/10/29

• Re: gcc-4.1 status in unstable, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/31

RC bugfixes uploaded with urgency=low, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2006/10/29

• Re: RC bugfixes uploaded with urgency=low, Julien Cristau, 2006/10/29

pnet and gettext, Santiago Vila, 2006/10/28

• Re: pnet and gettext, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/10/28
  • Re: pnet and gettext, Santiago Vila, 2006/10/29

Please allow libpng (with udeb) in testing, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 2006/10/28

• Re: Please allow libpng (with udeb) in testing, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/28
• Re: Please allow libpng (with udeb) in testing, Frans Pop, 2006/10/28

[D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Frans Pop, 2006/10/27

• Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/28
  • Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Frans Pop, 2006/10/29
    • Pushing console-data in testing (was: Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs), Christian Perrier, 2006/10/30
    • Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/30
    • Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Frans Pop, 2006/10/30
• Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Frans Pop, 2006/10/28
  • Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/10/28
    • Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/10/29
    • Re: [D-I] RC1 - final push of udebs, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/10/29

Building shadow on arm, Christian Perrier, 2006/10/27

• Re: Building shadow on arm, Lennart Sorensen, 2006/10/27
• Re: Building shadow on arm, Aurelien Jarno, 2006/10/28
  • Re: Building shadow on arm, Christian Perrier, 2006/10/28

Please approve adduser 3.99, Marc Haber, 2006/10/27

• Re: Please approve adduser 3.99, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/10/27
  • Re: Please approve adduser 3.99, Marc Haber, 2006/10/27

Please hint udev, Josselin Mouette, 2006/10/26

• Re: Please hint udev, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/27
  • Re: Please hint udev, Josselin Mouette, 2006/10/27
    • Re: Please hint udev, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/28

Re: Bug#344686: fixed in cyrus-sasl-2.1 2.1.22-0~pre01, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/26

• Package renaming (was: Bug#344686: fixed in cyrus-sasl-2.1 2.1.22-0~pre01), Andreas Metzler, 2006/10/26
• Re: Bug#344686: fixed in cyrus-sasl-2.1 2.1.22-0~pre01, Fabian Fagerholm, 2006/10/26

Usertags missing?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/10/25

• Re: Usertags missing?, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/25
  • Re: Usertags missing?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/10/26
    • Re: Usertags missing?, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/26
    • Re: Usertags missing?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/10/26
    • Re: Usertags missing?, Simon Josefsson, 2006/10/26
    • Re: Usertags missing?, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/26

Hint ncurses 5.5-5 in, Daniel Baumann, 2006/10/25

• Re: Hint ncurses 5.5-5 in, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/10/25

pcmcia-cs and #394018, Per Olofsson, 2006/10/24

• Re: pcmcia-cs and #394018, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/25
  • Re: pcmcia-cs and #394018, Per Olofsson, 2006/10/25
    • Re: pcmcia-cs and #394018, Frans Pop, 2006/10/26

Re: m68k release future, Andreas Barth, 2006/10/24

• Re: m68k release future, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/24
• Re: m68k release future, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/27
  • Re: m68k release future, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/27
  • Re: m68k release future, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/10/27
• Re: m68k release future, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/27
  • Re: m68k release future, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/10/27
  • Re: m68k release future, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/27
    • Re: m68k release future, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/10/28
    • Re: m68k release future, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/28
    • Re: m68k release future, Frans Pop, 2006/10/28
    • Re: m68k release future, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/10/28
    • Re: m68k release future, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/30
    • Re: m68k release future, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/30
    • Re: m68k release future, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/10/31

gcj/java status, Matthias Klose, 2006/10/23

• Re: gcj/java status, Andrew Haley, 2006/10/24

D-I - Hint requests for packages with udebs, Frans Pop, 2006/10/22

• Re: D-I - Hint requests for packages with udebs, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/10/23
  • Re: D-I - Hint requests for packages with udebs, Frans Pop, 2006/10/23
• Re: D-I - Hint requests for packages with udebs, Kenshi Muto, 2006/10/24
  • Re: D-I - Hint requests for packages with udebs, Frans Pop, 2006/10/26
    • Re: D-I - Hint requests for packages with udebs, Kenshi Muto, 2006/10/26
    • Re: D-I - Hint requests for packages with udebs, Frans Pop, 2006/10/26
    • Re: D-I - Hint requests for packages with udebs, Luk Claes, 2006/10/26

Request for binNMU for libcommoncpp2 transition, Luk Claes, 2006/10/22

• Re: Request for binNMU for libcommoncpp2 transition, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/23

Request for binNMU of medusa for subversion transition, Luk Claes, 2006/10/22

• Re: Request for binNMU of medusa for subversion transition, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/22

Security status of Etch, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2006/10/22

• Re: Security status of Etch, Daniel Kobras, 2006/10/22
  • Re: Security status of Etch, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2006/10/23

freeze excemption handling, Andreas Barth, 2006/10/22

• Re: freeze excemption handling, Frans Pop, 2006/10/22
  • Re: freeze excemption handling, Andreas Barth, 2006/10/23
    • Re: freeze excemption handling, Frans Pop, 2006/10/23

python 2.4.4 for etch, Matthias Klose, 2006/10/22

• Re: python 2.4.4 for etch, Andreas Barth, 2006/10/22

Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/21

• Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/21
  • Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007, Sven Luther, 2006/10/21
• Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007, Sven Luther, 2006/10/21
  • Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007, Marco d'Itri, 2006/10/22
    • Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007, Sven Luther, 2006/10/22
• Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/10/24

Request to remove ikvm from testing & etch, Dave Beckett, 2006/10/20

• Re: Request to remove ikvm from testing & etch, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/21
  • Re: Request to remove ikvm from testing & etch, Dave Beckett, 2006/10/22
    • Re: Request to remove ikvm from testing & etch, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/22

binNMUs of gaim-plugins, Joachim Breitner, 2006/10/19

• Re: binNMUs of gaim-plugins, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/20
  • Re: binNMUs of gaim-plugins, Ari Pollak, 2006/10/21
    • Re: binNMUs of gaim-plugins, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/22
    • Re: binNMUs of gaim-plugins, Ari Pollak, 2006/10/22
    • Re: binNMUs of gaim-plugins, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/23

Why was cjk-latex removed from testing?, Frank Küster, 2006/10/19

• Re: Why was cjk-latex removed from testing?, Andreas Barth, 2006/10/19
  • Re: Why was cjk-latex removed from testing?, Frank Küster, 2006/10/24
• Re: Why was cjk-latex removed from testing?, danai . sae-han, 2006/10/20

belpic 2.5.9-5, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/10/19

• Re: belpic 2.5.9-5, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/19
  • Re: belpic 2.5.9-5, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/10/19
    • Re: belpic 2.5.9-5, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/19

Why was bug #387783 downgraded from serious to important?, Markus Laire, 2006/10/19

• Re: Why was bug #387783 downgraded from serious to important?, Andreas Barth, 2006/10/19
  • Re: Bug#387783: Why was bug #387783 downgraded from serious to important?, Eduard Bloch, 2006/10/27

[D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer, Frans Pop, 2006/10/17

• Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/10/18
  • Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer, Frans Pop, 2006/10/18
    • Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/10/18
    • Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer, Loïc Minier, 2006/10/18
• Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer, Frans Pop, 2006/10/18
  • Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/10/18

[D-I] Migrating partman, Frans Pop, 2006/10/17

• Re: [D-I] Migrating partman, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/10/18

Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ?, Nathanael Nerode, 2006/10/17

• Message not available
  • Message not available
    • Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ?, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006/10/18
• Message not available
  • Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ?, Thomas Viehmann, 2006/10/18

Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission, Stephen Gran, 2006/10/17

• Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission, Mike Hommey, 2006/10/17
  • Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission, Mike Hommey, 2006/10/17
    • Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission, Andrew Vaughan, 2006/10/17
    • Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission, Mike Hommey, 2006/10/17
    • Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission, Andrew Vaughan, 2006/10/17
    • Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission, Mike Hommey, 2006/10/17

please hint ltsp 0.99debian5 into etch, Vagrant Cascadian, 2006/10/17

• Re: please hint ltsp 0.99debian5 into etch, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/17

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Bill Allombert, 2006/10/17

• Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thiemo Seufer, 2006/10/17
• Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Bill Allombert, 2006/10/17
• Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/17
  • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Martin Michlmayr, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Filipus Klutiero, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Filipus Klutiero, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Frans Pop, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Frans Pop, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Riccardo, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Riccardo, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Geert Uytterhoeven, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Goswin von Brederlow, 2006/10/25
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Loïc Minier, 2006/10/18
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Loïc Minier, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Frans Pop, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Roman Zippel, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Loïc Minier, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Alexander Wirt, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Frans Pop, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/22
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Mark Duckworth, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/19
  • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Bill Allombert, 2006/10/17
  • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Wouter Verhelst, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Andreas Barth, 2006/10/17
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/18
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/18
  • Message not available
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Aurelien Jarno, 2006/10/19
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Anthony Towns, 2006/10/20
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Bill Allombert, 2006/10/20
    • Message not available
    • Re: m68k is a release arch for etch, Bill Allombert, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k is a release arch for etch, Ingo Juergensmann, 2006/10/21
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Michael Schmitz, 2006/10/22
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Message not available
    • Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?, Manoj Srivastava, 2006/10/23

Please hint tetex-base into testing, Frank Küster, 2006/10/16

• Re: Please hint tetex-base into testing, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/17
  • Re: Please hint tetex-base into testing, Frank Küster, 2006/10/17

D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Frans Pop, 2006/10/16

• Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Frans Pop, 2006/10/16
  • Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Stephen Gran, 2006/10/16
    • Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Frans Pop, 2006/10/16
    • Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/17
    • Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Frans Pop, 2006/10/17
  • Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/17
• Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt, 2006/10/16
• Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1, Jeroen van Wolffelaar, 2006/10/17

Re: BinNMU request for scim-uim, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/16

• Re: BinNMU request for scim-uim, Ming Hua, 2006/10/16
  • Re: BinNMU request for scim-uim, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/16

Request for binNMU of kdesvn, Luk Claes, 2006/10/08

• Re: Request for binNMU of kdesvn, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/21

please trigger binary recompile of libglu1-mesa, martin f krafft, 2006/10/08

• Re: please trigger binary recompile of libglu1-mesa, Mike Hommey, 2006/10/08

Re: Bug#390000: libggi-target-aa: empty package on hppa, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 2006/10/08

• hppa libggi binNMU (was: Bug#390000: libggi-target-aa: empty package on hppa), Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, 2006/10/17

RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion., Sven Luther, 2006/10/06

• Re: RFC: Final version of kernel team's firmware GR proposal, coined to be consensual to all those of good faith involved in the current discussion., Andreas Barth, 2006/10/06

Re: status update: GNUstep library transition, Hubert Chan, 2006/10/05

• Re: status update: GNUstep library transition, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/21
  • Re: status update: GNUstep library transition, Hubert Chan, 2006/10/22

Request for binNMUs for the pth transition (2 packages), Luk Claes, 2006/10/05

• Re: Request for binNMUs for the pth transition (2 packages), Steve Langasek, 2006/10/06
  • Re: Request for binNMUs for the pth transition (2 packages), Luk Claes, 2006/10/06
  • Re: Request for binNMUs for the pth transition (2 packages), Julien Cristau, 2006/10/06
    • Re: Request for binNMUs for the pth transition (2 packages), Steve Langasek, 2006/10/08

Xen is affected by the trademark desease, Bastian Blank, 2006/10/03

• Re: Xen is affected by the trademark desease, Mike Hommey, 2006/10/03
• Re: Xen is affected by the trademark desease, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/04
  • Re: Xen is affected by the trademark desease, Mike Hommey, 2006/10/04
    • Re: Xen is affected by the trademark desease, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/05
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Xen is affected by the trademark desease, Bastian Blank, 2006/10/06
    • Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Xen is affected by the trademark desease, Ian Campbell, 2006/10/06

Re: cdbs update, Loïc Minier, 2006/10/03

• Re: cdbs update, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/10/03
  • Re: cdbs update, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/10/03
  • Re: [Build-common-hackers] Re: cdbs update, Peter Eisentraut, 2006/10/03

hypothetical bin-NMU versioning question, Kevin B. McCarty, 2006/10/02

• Re: hypothetical bin-NMU versioning question, Andreas Metzler, 2006/10/02
  • Re: hypothetical bin-NMU versioning question, Kevin B. McCarty, 2006/10/02

Please bin-NMU mn-fit on alpha, amd64, ia64, Kevin B. McCarty, 2006/10/02

• Re: Please bin-NMU mn-fit on alpha, amd64, ia64, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/18
• Re: Please bin-NMU mn-fit on alpha, amd64, ia64, Kevin B. McCarty, 2006/10/17

[opal@xxxxxxxxxx: Remove some architectures for vzctl], Ola Lundqvist, 2006/10/02

• Re: [opal@xxxxxxxxxx: Remove some architectures for vzctl], Steve Langasek, 2006/10/03
  • Re: [opal@xxxxxxxxxx: Remove some architectures for vzctl], Ola Lundqvist, 2006/10/03

intent to do a poppler transition, Ondřej Surý, 2006/10/02

• Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Pierre Habouzit, 2006/10/02
• Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Frank Küster, 2006/10/02
  • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Ondřej Surý, 2006/10/02
• Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Norbert Preining, 2006/10/02
  • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Ondřej Surý, 2006/10/02
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Frank Küster, 2006/10/02
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Ondrej Sury, 2006/10/02
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2006/10/02
  • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 2006/10/02
  • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Hubert Chan, 2006/10/02
• Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Frank Küster, 2006/10/02
• Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Hubert Chan, 2006/10/02
• Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Norbert Preining, 2006/10/03
  • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Ondřej Surý, 2006/10/03
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Frank Küster, 2006/10/03
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Ondřej Surý, 2006/10/05
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Frank Küster, 2006/10/05
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Ondřej Surý, 2006/10/05
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/05
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Frank Küster, 2006/10/05
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Hubert Chan, 2006/10/05
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Hubert Chan, 2006/10/06
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Hubert Chan, 2006/10/06
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/05
• Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Frank Küster, 2006/10/05
  • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Daniel Kobras, 2006/10/06
    • Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/06
• Re: intent to do a poppler transition, Frank Küster, 2006/10/05

Re: Hint openssl to testing., Kurt Roeckx, 2006/10/02

• Re: Hint openssl to testing., Andreas Barth, 2006/10/02
  • Re: Hint openssl to testing., Kurt Roeckx, 2006/10/07
    • Re: Hint openssl to testing., Steve Langasek, 2006/10/08

Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Michael Vogt, 2006/10/02

• Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Jens Seidel, 2006/10/02
  • Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/10/02
    • Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Jens Seidel, 2006/10/02
    • Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Martijn van Oosterhout, 2006/10/02
    • Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Thijs Kinkhorst, 2006/10/03
    • Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, 2006/10/02
    • Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Otavio Salvador, 2006/10/02
• Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/02

Who declares optional packages extra?, Richard B. Kreckel, 2006/10/02

• Re: Who declares optional packages extra?, Russ Allbery, 2006/10/02
• Re: Who declares optional packages extra?, Joerg Jaspert, 2006/10/02
• Re: Who declares optional packages extra?, Luk Claes, 2006/10/02
  • Re: Who declares optional packages extra?, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/02

Please hint tzdata to testing, Aurelien Jarno, 2006/10/01

• Re: Please hint tzdata to testing, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/02

After upgrade to etch, power off after shutdown does not work any more, Rainer Dorsch, 2006/10/01

• Re: After upgrade to etch, power off after shutdown does not work any more, Andreas Barth, 2006/10/01

BinNMU request for openser 1.1.0-3 on arm, Julien BLACHE, 2006/10/01

• Re: BinNMU request for openser 1.1.0-3 on arm, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/02
  • Re: BinNMU request for openser 1.1.0-3 on arm, Julien BLACHE, 2006/10/02
  • Re: BinNMU request for openser 1.1.0-3 on arm, Julien BLACHE, 2006/10/02

Xen 3.0.3 for Etch, Bastian Blank, 2006/10/01

• Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch, Sven Luther, 2006/10/01
• Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch, Jim Crilly, 2006/10/02
  • Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch, Otavio Salvador, 2006/10/02
    • Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch, Jim Crilly, 2006/10/03
    • Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch, Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006/10/03
    • Re: Xen 3.0.3 for Etch, Otavio Salvador, 2006/10/03

[Etch] Please allow docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 to propagate into Etch, Daniel Leidert, 2006/10/01

• Re: [Etch] Please allow docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 to propagate into Etch, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/01
  • Re: [Etch] Please allow docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 to propagate into Etch, Daniel Leidert, 2006/10/02

Please allow ltsp to propagate into etch, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2006/10/01

• Re: Please allow ltsp to propagate into etch, Steve Langasek, 2006/10/01