| Subject: | Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch |
|---|---|
| From: | Holger Levsen <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:50:22 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | linux.debian.devel.qa |
Hi,
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 21:54, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
[...]
> * is orphaned (...); and because
[...]
> And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being shipped
> in lenny? Is that right?
Yes. It's orphaned. If you really care about the package, please adopt it.
Thanks.
> IMHO there are many other packages that are better candidates for not being
> shipped in lenny than the above mentioned example.
Debian is a distribution which is organised in a way that there are packages
and package maintainers. *Pause*
Sometimes the latter give up, so these packages are orphaned, Orphaned
packages which are not picked up by new maintainers IMHO shouldn't be part of
a Debian release.
regards,
Holger
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: The Ultimate Debian Database, Raphael Geissert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The Ultimate Debian Database, Christian von Essen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch, Frank Lichtenheld |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch, Raphael Geissert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |