Re: RFS: goal-dash NMU's

[Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@xxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

James Vega wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:50:52PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>> Why do you use +nmu1 for two of them (and not for manpages-tr)? I though
>> that +nmu notation was not settled yet.
> 
> It's used by dch for native NMUs as per discussion on -devel a couple
> months ago.  The DEP that's currently under discussion is suggesting to
> use it for both native and non-native NMUs.
> 

Until then I keep using 'dot'n for non-native NMUs :)

Regards,
- -- 
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIaW8SYy49rUbZzloRAqcOAKCc8AoV++xHHSB/HhxW/d1zP0uwgQCfYV8j
xZ2b3OaeeRTrAuCpPcGvPvo=
=UUpk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx