linux.debian.devel.qa (date)

January 30, 2008

Achat strategique de sous-traitance, Directeur RH, 17:20
Bug#463186: marked as done (PTS: should not list the same architecture more than once), Debian Bug Tracking System, 11:30

January 29, 2008

Re: "mia *at* qa.debian.org" bounces, Mohammed Adnène Trojette, 00:40
Bug#286177: marked as done (PTS: new version available flag), Debian Bug Tracking System, 00:40
Bug#332938: marked as done (PTS: integrate with dehs to allow adding a "package new upstream" TODO item), Debian Bug Tracking System, 00:40
Bug#195121: marked as done (PTS: show new upstream version available/integrate with dehs), Debian Bug Tracking System, 00:40

January 28, 2008

"mia *at* qa.debian.org" bounces, George B., 04:40

January 26, 2008

Bug#433933: marked as done (should not complain about ITPs of packages which are only in experimental), Debian Bug Tracking System, 18:00
Bug#367098: marked as done (PTS: bug summary should not count merged bugs twice), Debian Bug Tracking System, 17:50
Bug#356776: marked as done (PTS: lingering new upstream version todo), Debian Bug Tracking System, 17:50
Bug#457152: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Accurately represent Bugs/Patches available in the Todo section of PTS page), Debian Bug Tracking System, 17:20
Re: RFS: QA Uploads, Cyril Brulebois, 16:50
Re: Bits from DEHS, Franklin PIAT, 12:20
Re: simpleparse, Vincent Bernat, 12:00
Re: simpleparse, Seo Sanghyeon, 10:10

January 25, 2008

simpleparse, Vincent Bernat, 22:50
Re: Removal candidate: bfr, Jack T Mudge III, 21:50
Re: empty Packages.qa.debian.org pages gone, Raphael Hertzog, 19:30
Bug#240829: marked as done (packages.qa.debian.org: better error handling (f.e. ENOSPC) to prevent good pages to be replaced with bogus ones), Debian Bug Tracking System, 19:20
Re: Removal candidate: bfr, Steve Langasek, 19:00
Removal candidate: bfr, James Westby, 18:20

January 24, 2008

Processed: retitle 461047 to DDPO: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels..., Debian Bug Tracking System, 22:50
Bug#456276: marked as done (PTS: please link also to buildd logs for debian-ports), Debian Bug Tracking System, 20:10
Processed: retitle 412033 to extremely noisy when new package closes many bugs, reassign 412033 to debbugs, Debian Bug Tracking System, 18:30
Bug#406615: marked as done (PTS: Please do not use experimental changelog), Debian Bug Tracking System, 18:20
Bug#400480: marked as done (PTS page for pmidi is reporting wrong info about upstream release), Debian Bug Tracking System, 17:50
Bug#398192: marked as done (PTS: does not show security uploads anymore under news), Debian Bug Tracking System, 17:40
Processed: severity of 381275 is wishlist, tagging 381275, Debian Bug Tracking System, 17:20
Processed: Re: Bug#381275: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive, Debian Bug Tracking System, 17:20
Processed: Re: PTS: removed packages not considered when re-added to the archive, Debian Bug Tracking System, 15:50

January 23, 2008

Processed: Re: Bug#356826: PTS: could e-mail when DEHS detects new upstream release, Debian Bug Tracking System, 21:20

January 22, 2008

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Raphael Geissert, 06:10

January 19, 2008

Bug#461497: marked as done (Mail maintainer when there is ubuntu patch), Debian Bug Tracking System, 17:50
Re: RFS: plr 1:8.2.0.7-3, Barry deFreese, 15:50
Re: RFS: plr 1:8.2.0.7-3, Barry deFreese, 15:40
Re: RFS: plr 1:8.2.0.7-3, Martin Pitt, 13:50

January 17, 2008

Comment reussir ses promotions de ventes, Directeur Operations, 08:40
Re: remove xview?, Steve Langasek, 04:20
Processed: Re: Bug#461000: packages.qa.debian.org: Status report bug list only links to one bug, Debian Bug Tracking System, 02:10
Processed: Re: Bug#460821: color wrong in watch column of xsel, Debian Bug Tracking System, 00:20

January 16, 2008

Bug#457190: marked as done (qa.debian.org: selecting default CSS layout for PTS), Debian Bug Tracking System, 23:30
Re: status of coreutils maintenance, Lucas Nussbaum, 00:10
Re: status of coreutils maintenance, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 00:00
Re: remove xview?, Moritz Muehlenhoff, 00:00

January 15, 2008

status of coreutils maintenance, Lucas Nussbaum, 21:20
Re: remove xview?, Luk Claes, 19:40
Re: remove xview?, Riku Voipio, 17:40
Re: remove xview?, Martin Buck, 16:10
Re: remove xview?, tim hall, 13:50
Re: remove xview?, tim hall, 13:40
Re: remove xview?, tim hall, 13:30
Re: remove xview?, Steve Langasek, 09:30

January 14, 2008

Re: remove xview?, Paul Wise, 22:50
Re: remove xview?, Luk Claes, 22:50
Re: remove xview?, Jack T Mudge III, 22:20
Re: remove xview?, Riku Voipio, 16:20
Re: remove xview?, Volker Ossenkopf, 15:30
remove xview?, Riku Voipio, 14:20

January 13, 2008

Bug#457546: marked as done (PTS: Please display a swirl in the logo.), Debian Bug Tracking System, 12:50

January 12, 2008

Processed: New debian image with swirl for PTS page, Debian Bug Tracking System, 22:50
Re: Oldlibs transitions, and some old packages. (wx2.4), Barry deFreese, 15:50
Re: Oldlibs transitions, and some old packages. (wx2.4), Steve Langasek, 09:50

January 11, 2008

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Raphael Geissert, 02:30

January 10, 2008

Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Luk Claes, 00:40
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Paul Wise, 00:20

January 09, 2008

Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Luk Claes, 19:10
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Luk Claes, 19:00
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Andreas Tille, 14:20
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Lars Wirzenius, 13:50
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, tim hall, 13:20
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Kumar Appaiah, 12:50
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Lars Wirzenius, 12:20
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 12:20
Re: How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, tim hall, 12:00
How are packages associated with resigned debian developers handled?, Petter Reinholdtsen, 11:30

January 08, 2008

After the last annual calculations of your fiscal activity we have determined that you are eligible to receive a tax refund of $329.30., Internal Revenue Service, 14:10
with all due respect, joy_mary, 07:00

January 07, 2008

Re: Oldlibs transitions, and some old packages. (wx2.4), Barry deFreese, 20:20
Take your share..You must have it.., Erwin, 19:10
Take your share..You must have it.., Erwin, 19:10
CONGRATULATIONS:YOU HAVE WON A EUROMILLION LOTTO OF ?1,300,000 , Dolores Villena, 16:40
Planification et gestion des priorites, Directeur financier, 16:00
Unidentified subject!, onxlove-gpb...o3o1, 11:10
Cartier, barris brookie, 09:30
Swiss Military WATCHES: Swiss Quality and Tradition since 1893 / Relojes Swiss Military de Wenger, Calidad Suiza, Garantía 3 años, Mr . Watch, 08:20
Bug#373218: marked as done (naming convention for lintian URLs is not in sync with lintian.d.o), Debian Bug Tracking System, 04:30
I want your co-operate urgent assistance, David Hosanna, 01:50

January 06, 2008

Bug#437675: marked as done (Compare versions using the mangled Debian version string), Debian Bug Tracking System, 06:00

January 05, 2008

Bug#456434: marked as done (qa.debian.org/developer.php shows comanintained packages even on comaint=no), Debian Bug Tracking System, 00:40

January 04, 2008

Building isdnutils with tcl8.4?, Martin Pitt, 09:50
Re: Oldlibs transitions, and some old packages., Steve Langasek, 09:10
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, tim hall, 03:10
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, tim hall, 01:00

January 03, 2008

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Raphael Geissert, 23:50
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, Russ Allbery, 20:40
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, Russ Allbery, 19:50
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, Stefano Zacchiroli, 17:20
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, tim hall, 12:40
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, Thijs Kinkhorst, 11:50
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, Lars Wirzenius, 10:20
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, Russ Allbery, 09:10
Re: New lintian pages available for testing, Thijs Kinkhorst, 08:50
New lintian pages available for testing, Russ Allbery, 01:20

January 02, 2008

Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Raphael Geissert, 22:00
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Raphael Geissert, 21:40
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Justin Pryzby, 21:30
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Raphael Geissert, 21:20
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Cyril Brulebois, 21:10
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Clint Adams, 20:50
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Raphael Geissert, 20:50
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Adeodato Simó, 20:50
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Raphael Geissert, 20:50
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Kurt Roeckx, 20:40
Re: List of packages which should probably be Architecture: all, Cyril Brulebois, 20:30
www.sueldos-online.com.ar, Pls check this new site, 10:30

January 01, 2008

Re: Please take down junk QA pages, Thomas Viehmann, 20:10
Re: Please take down junk QA pages, Thomas Huriaux, 19:40
Re: Please take down junk QA pages, Raphael Hertzog, 11:50
www.bankingplans.com, Pls check this new site, 09:10
Ks-TeaM / Forum, Regjistrohu, 06:40
Ks-TeaM / Forum, Regjistrohu, 05:00