On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 20:52 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:20 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>I have written up a draft spec for the format of the binary metadata
>>to back up the repository api which I posted earlier. I hope to have
>>some initial code implementing both of these soon.
>>Comments highly appreciated,
> OK, I probably missed something but, exactly how are language bindings
>supposed to get the actual API function pointers? All I can see is
>function name. Should we use dlsym() (or glib equivalent abstraction)?
c_name: The symbol which can be used to obtain the function pointer with
> Once we get the function pointer, are we supposed to use libffi to
>call the function with the actual parameters?
Hmm. That is a problem. Perhaps we could provide a way to easily
generate marshallers for functions in the introspection data on the
client end. It's a little unclear to me how this would integrate into
I guess languages like Java/C# will already be using libffi or
equivalent and so this won't be an issue.
gtk-devel-list mailing list