At Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:28:12 -0400,
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 12:30 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > At Thu, 01 Jun 2006 05:21:21 -0400,
> > "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 10:20 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:23:53PM -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> > > > > Indeed. And while we are about it: where do you propose to store keys
> > > > > that are used for group signatures?
> > > >
> > > > In some place that cannot be destroyed by any of the members of the
> > > > group, but
> > > > only by the group administrators. That is, in a special user account
> > > > created
> > > > specially for that group.
> > >
> > > Ah. So you propose that the computational "right of assembly" should be
> > > present only with the consent of the system administrator?
> > Can you pelase define what you mean by "computational 'right of
> > assembly'"? The term is entirely void of meaning to me.
> If the group keys should be stored in a specially created account, then
> the system administrator's permission is required in order to form a
> private group. This seems contrary to freedom.
I think you did not answer my question.
L4-hurd mailing list