| Subject: | Re: self-paging |
|---|---|
| From: | Pierre THIERRY |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:16:12 +0100 |
Scribit Jonathan S. Shapiro dies 07/12/2005 hora 12:06: > > What exactly do you mean with "constant per-frame storage"? That a > > shared page has only one mapping to disk? I was always assuming > > that. > Neither. I meant that you need to find a way to (a) record all > sponsors of a frame, but (b) accomplish this MxN relationship (M > sponsors, N frames) in O(N) storage. Wouldn't be O(M+N) acceptable? Isn't it just theoretically impossible to achieve it in O(N)? (naive question, maybe you were merely joking in suggesting O(N) for MxN relationship storage) Doubtfully, Nowhere man -- nowhere.man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list L4-hurd@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: self-paging, Pierre THIERRY |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | shared "system" libraries, Marcus Brinkmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro |
| Next by Thread: | Re: self-paging, Bas Wijnen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |