Per Bothner writes:
> Anthony Green wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 10:14 -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
> >>Shouldn't the Tomcats use gcj regardless of what alternatives
> >>have been configures - at least as long as it depends on a
> >>specific alternative?
> > It's not supposed to depend on any specific alternative - although the
> > current alternative needs to provide the required bits. AFAIK all 1.4.2
> > alternatives do. What alternative did you have selected?
> It was a JDK 1.5.x.
> I'm a bit surprised. If the tomcat package (say) installed pre-compiled
> classes it would seem like it assumes a specific version of java - and
> perhaps a specific version of gcj.
Why? I don't see why it should.